www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`29/823,119
`
`01/14/2022
`
`Robert D. BRUNNER
`
`3581.0150008(P25245USC6)
`
`1130
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 NEW YORK AVENUE,N.W.
`WASHINGTON,DC 20005
`
`GREENE, PAULA ALLEN
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2912
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`03/18/2022
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`Apple-eOA @sternekessler.com
`e-office @ sternekessler.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) Single Claim is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)____is/are objected to.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)(2 The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)M The drawing(s) filed on 1/14/2022 is/are: a)f¥) accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)1) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`Other: Annotated Drawing
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20220314
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`29/823,119
`BRUNNER etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`PAULA Allen GREENE
`2912
`No
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)C) Responsive to communication(s) filed on
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)C) This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)0) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\() Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 29/823,119
`Art Unit: 2912
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AlAfirst to invent
`
`provisions.
`
`This Application incorporates by reference U.S. Design Patent Applications
`
`29/795780filed June 21, 2021, 29/706360filed September 19, 2019, 29/642633
`
`filed March 30,2018, 29/574209 August 12, 2016, 29/504827 filed October 9,
`
`2014, 29/464539 filed August 18, 2013, 29/426082 filed June 29, 2012, and,
`
`29/410585filed January 9, 2012. All the material from the U.S. Design Patent
`
`Applications that is essential to the claimed design is included in this application.
`
`It is understood that any material in the U.S. Design Patent Applications thatis
`
`not present in this application forms no part of the claimed design.
`
`The necessity for good drawings in a design patent application cannot be
`
`overemphasized. As the drawing constitutes the whole disclosure of the design, it
`
`is of utmost importance that it be so well executed both as to clarity of showing
`
`and completeness, that nothing regarding the design sought to be patented is left
`
`to conjecture. An insufficient drawing may befatal to validity (35 U.S.C. 112(a) or
`
`pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph). Moreover, an insufficient drawing may
`
`have a negative effect with respect to the effectivefiling date of a continuing
`
`application.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 29/823,119
`Art Unit: 2912
`
`Page 3
`
`The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) or pre-AlA 35 U.S.C.
`
`112, first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not described in such
`
`full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to
`
`make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the
`
`subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or, for applications subject
`
`to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant) regards as the invention.
`
`The claim is indefinite and nonenabling as the claimed design is subject to
`
`more than one interpretation since a clear understanding of the claimed designis
`
`not understood from the drawing views. Are the interior circular members of the
`
`headsetear cupsflat in Figures 1 and 7? If the interior circular membersof the
`
`headset ear cupsareflat in Figs. 1 and 7, flat surface shading is required.
`
`If the
`
`interior circular members of the headset ear cups are notflat, the perimeter and
`
`interior of the interior circular members of the headsetear cupsin Figs. 1 and 7
`
`must be reduced to broken lines and a corresponding statement added to the
`
`specification. Also, the claimed design lacks contour surface shading to delineate
`
`plane, concave, convex, raised and or depressed surfaces and to disclose open
`
`and closed areas. The lack of surface shading renders the claimed design
`
`nonenabling. Contour surface shading is required to better describe the character
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 29/823,119
`Art Unit: 2912
`
`Page 4
`
`of the claimed design MPEP 1503.01 subsection Il. Note the enclosed annotated
`
`drawing. Correction is required.
`
`The claimed design is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) for the reason
`
`given.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from
`
`the examiner should be directed to PAULA Allen GREENE whose telephone
`
`number is (571)272-2623. The examiner can normally be reached on M,Tu,Th,F
`
`from 6:00 to 4:00.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the
`
`examiner’s supervisor, Sandra Snapp, can be reached at telephone number 571-
`
`272-8364. The fax phone number for the organization wherethis application or
`
`proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from
`
`the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR
`
`only. For more information about the PAIR system, see
`
`http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions about access
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 29/823,119
`Art Unit: 2912
`
`Page 5
`
`to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-
`
`217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`Examiner interviewsare available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule
`
`an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview
`
`Request (AIR) at fs
`
`/PAULA Allen GREENE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2912
`
`