`
`-2-
`
`Remarks
`
`BRUNNERet al.
`Application No. 29/795,780
`
`Based on the following remarks, Applicant respectfully requests that the Office reconsider
`
`the outstanding rejection and that it be withdrawn.
`
`Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112
`
`The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 as allegedly being indefinite and nonenabling.
`
`Office Action at 3. Applicant respectfully requests that the rejection be withdrawn because the
`
`rejection is based on canceled figures. The Appendix to the Office Action and the Office Action
`
`Summary indicate that the rejection is based on original Figures 1-7, filed on June 21, 2021.
`
`However, Applicant replaced original Figures 1-7 with replacement Figures 1—7 in the Preliminary
`
`Amendmentfiled on July 6, 2021. Accordingly, Applicant asks that the rejection under § 112 be
`
`withdrawn andthat the application be examined accounting for the July 6, 2021 amendment.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The stated ground of rejection has been properly traversed, accommodated, or rendered
`
`moot. Applicant therefore respectfully requests that the Office reconsider the outstanding rejection
`
`and that it be withdrawn. Applicant believes that a full and complete reply has been madeto the
`
`outstanding Office Action and, as such, the present application is in condition for allowance. If the
`
`Office believes, for any reason, that personal communication will expedite prosecution of this
`
`application, the Office is invited to telephone the undersigned at the numberprovided.
`
`Promptand favorable consideration of this Reply is respectfully requested.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Rebekah Holtz, #71,185/
`
`Rebekah K. Holtz
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 71,185
`
`17207164.1
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3581.0150007
`
`Date: 2021-08-24
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
We are unable to display this document.
HTTP Error 400: Found
