(19) dg
`
`Europadisches Patentamt
`
`European Patent Office
`
`Office européen des brevets
`
`(11)
`
`EP 0 880 938 A1
`
`(12)
`
`EUROPEANPATENT APPLICATION
`
`(43) Date of publication:
`02.12.1998 Bulletin 1998/49
`
`(51) Intcl.*: A61B 17/02, A61F 2/46
`
`(21) Application number: 98109238.0
`
`(22) Dateoffiling: 20.05.1998
`
`(84) Designated Contracting States:
`AT BE CH CY DE DK ESFI FR GB GRIEITLILU
`MC NL PT SE
`
`Designated Extension States:
`AL LT LV MK RO SI
`
`(30) Priority: 30.05.1997 US 48045 P
`
`(71) Applicant: United States Surgical Corporation
`Norwalk, Connecticut 06856 (US)
`
`
`
`(54)
`
`‘Instrumentation for implant insertion
`
`A Surgical retractor instrument includes at least
`(57)
`two elongate membersdisposed in side by side relation.
`Each elongate member has proximal and distal end por-
`tions and defines a longitudinal passagewayfor recep-
`tion of surgical instrumentation. The distal end portion
`of each elongated member is configured for insertion at
`least partially within a space defined between adjacent
`
`(72) Inventors:
`¢ Castro, Salvatore
`Seymour, CT 06483 (US)
`¢ McDonnell, Christopher
`Newtown, CT 06470 (US)
`
`(74) Representative: Marsh, Roy Davidetal
`Hoffmann Eitle,
`Patent- und Rechtsanwéalte,
`Arabellastrasse 4
`
`81925 Munchen (DE)
`
`tissue portions, preferably, adjacent vertebrae. The dis-
`tal end portion includes at least two retractor arms ex-
`tending in a general longitudinal direction. Each retrac-
`tor arm hasfirst and second supporting surfaces for en-
`gaging opposed adjacenttissue portions, and defines a
`dimension between the first and second supporting sur-
`taces sufficient to distract the opposed tissue portions
`uponinsertion thereof.
`
`FIG. 8B
`
`
`
`
`
`EP0880938A1
`
`Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR)
`
`(Cont. next page)
`
`

`

`EP 0 880 938 Al
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`EP 0 880 938 A1
`
`2
`
`Description
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`1. Technical Field
`
`The present disclosure generally relates to a meth-
`od and associated instrumentation for implant insertion
`and, in particular, to a method and instrumentation for
`insertion of a pair of spinal implants to facilitate fusion
`of adjacent vertebral bodies.
`
`2. Background of the Related Art
`
`A large number of orthopedic procedures involve
`the insertion of either natural or prosthetic implants into
`bone or associated tissues. These procedures include,
`for example, ligament repair, joint repair or replacement,
`non-union fractures, facial reconstruction, spinal stabi-
`lization and spinal fusion. In a typical procedure, anin-
`sert, dowel or screw is inserted into a prepared bore
`formedin the bone or tissuesto facilitate repair and heal-
`ing. See, for example, U.S. Patent Nos.: 5,470,334 to
`Rosset al.; 5,454,811 to Huebner; 5,480,403 to Lee et
`al.; 5,358,511 to Gatturna et al.; and 4,877,020 to Vich.
`Some implants are particularly configured with cav-
`ities and boresto facilitate bony ingrowth and enhance
`anchoring of the implant at the insertion site. See, for
`example, U.S. Patent Nos.: 4,328,593 to Sutter et al.;
`4,936,851 to Fox etal.; and 4,878,915 to Brantigan. Oth-
`er specialized implants include fusion cages having in-
`ternal cavities to receive bone growth stimulation mate-
`rials such as bone chips and fragments. See, for exam-
`ple, U.S. Patent Nos.: 4,501,269 to Bagby; 4,961,740 to
`Ray et al.; 5,015,247 to Michelson; and 5,489,307 to
`Kuslich et al. These types of implants are particularly
`well suited for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures
`necessitated by injury, disease or some degenerative
`disorder of the spinal disc. Subsequently, there may be
`progressive degeneration leading to mechanical insta-
`bility between adjacent vertebrae necessitating direct
`fusion of the vertebrae while maintaining a pre-defined
`intervertebral space. This fusion may be accomplished
`by the insertion of one or more of the specialized im-
`plants as discussed above and also discussed U.S. Pat-
`ent No. 5,026,373, the contents of which are incorporat-
`ed herein by reference.
`Both anterior (transabdominal) and posterior surgi-
`cal approaches are used for interbody fusions of the
`lumbar spine. Fusions in the cervical area of the spine
`are primarily performed using posterior and anterior ap-
`proaches as well. Typically, an implant such as a plug,
`dowel, prosthesis or cage is inserted into a preformed
`cavity inside the interbody, interdiscal space. Since it is
`desirable in these procedures to promote a "bone to
`bone"bridge, connective tissue and at least a portion of
`the distal tissue is removed. Preferably, relatively deep
`cuts are made in the adjacent bonesin order to pene-
`
`10
`
`1S
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`trate into the softer, more vascularized cancellous re-
`gion to facilitate bone growth acrossthe implant.
`One of the morecritical tasks performedin the in-
`sertion of a surgical fusion implant, particularly,
`in in-
`tervertebral spinal fusion, is the formation of the implant
`receiving cavity or bore within the adjacent vertebrae.
`More particularly, the drilled bore must be equally cen-
`tered within the intervertebral space and preferably par-
`allel to the vertebral end plates to ensure removal of
`equal portions of bone from the adjacent vertebrae
`throughoutthe length of the cut and subsequent appro-
`priate seating of the implant relative to the vertebral bod-
`ies.
`
`Surgical instruments for facilitating spinal fusion im-
`plant insertion are known. For example, U.S. Patent No.
`5,484,437 to Michelson discloses a method and appa-
`ratus incorporating an outer and an inner sleeve ar-
`rangement. The outer sleeve has teeth at one end which
`are driven directly into the posterior surface of the adja-
`cent vertebrae. The inner sleeveis positioned within the
`outer sleeve and serves to guide instruments such asa
`drill used to form the implant receiving bore. U.S. Patent
`Nos.: 5,487,307 to Kuslich et al.; 5,015,247 to Michel-
`son; and 4,878,915 to Brantigan disclose similar ar-
`rangements. Other arrangements include the use of
`guide rods which areplacedin pilot holes formed in the
`vertebral bodies. The guide rods guide a bore forming
`hollow drill into the intervertebral space.
`Although current instrumentation and methods as-
`sociated therewith for enhancing the placement of spi-
`nal fusion implants have been generally effective for
`their intended purposes, there exists certain limitations
`with the design of this instrumentation which detract
`from their usefulness. For example, the arrangement
`disclosed in the Michelson '437 patent and similar ar-
`rangements do not provide for automatic alignment of
`the outer sleeve to ensure that the bore formed by a drill
`introduced into the outer sleeve is in optimal alignment
`for a tapping procedure(if required) and reception of the
`spinal implant. Rather, such orientation is dependentdi-
`rectly upon the skill of the surgeon. Moreover, the outer
`sleeve, which is mountedonly atits extreme distal end
`tothe posterior surface of the adjacent vertebrae, is sub-
`ject to disorientation or dislodgment during insertion
`and/or removal of the drill and/or tapping instrument.
`Similarly, the use of guide rods increases the number of
`steps required to implant the fusion cage and is also
`subject to possible misalignment.
`In many surgical implant techniques, two implants
`are inserted within the intervertebral space in side-by-
`side or lateral relation to fully support the adjacent ver-
`tebrae across the span of the intervertebral space.
`In
`accordance with these techniques, a first lateral side of
`the intervertebral space is prepared, e.g., by removing
`excess disc material and drillingAapping a bore to re-
`ceive the implant followed by insertion of the implant.
`Thereafter, the second lateral side is prepared for im-
`plant insertion in the same manner. During the initial
`
`

`

`3
`
`EP 0 880 938 A1
`
`4
`
`preparation of the first lateral side of the intervertebral
`space, however, the adjacent vertebrae are subjected
`to displacement in both the lateral and longitudinal di-
`rection. This may cause additional movementof the ver-
`tebral portion disposed on the other (second) lateral side
`of the intervertebral space.
`U.S. Patent No. 5,489,307 to Kuslich discloses a
`surgical method for implanting two spinal implants into
`a disc space utilizing a distraction spacer which is in-
`serted initially within one side of the intervertebral
`space. The rigid distraction spacer is intended to act
`against the vertebral end plates of the adjacent verte-
`brae to urge the vertebrae apart while the second side
`of the intervertebral space is prepared, by drilling/ap-
`ping, to receive an implant. Once the implantis inserted,
`the distraction spacer is removed and the side left un-
`occupied by removal of the spacer is prepared to receive
`the second implant.
`The present disclosure is directed to a method and
`associated instrumentation to facilitate the introduction
`
`of at least two fusion implants, which maintains the de-
`sired disc height across the span of the intervertebral
`space and thereby ensures opiimal alignment of each
`drilled bore for reception of the fusion implant.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`In one preferred embodiment, a surgical retractor
`instrument
`is disclosed. The retractor instrument
`in-
`
`cludes at least two elongated members connected to
`each other in side by side relation. Each elongated
`member has proximal and distal end portions and de-
`ines a longitudinal passagewayfor reception of surgical
`instrumentation. The distal end portion of each elongat-
`ed member is configured for insertion at least partially
`within a space defined between adjacent tissue por-
`ions. Preferably, the distal end portion of each elongat-
`ed member includesat least one retractor arm extend-
`
`
`
`longitudinal direction. Each retractor
`ing in a general
`arm hasfirst and second supporting surfaces for engag-
`ing opposed adjacent tissue portions, and defines a di-
`mension between the first and second supporting sur-
`aces sufficient to distract the opposed tissue portions
`upon insertion thereof. The first and second supporting
`surfaces of each retractor arm may be substantially pla-
`nar. The retractor arms may be dimensioned between
`he first and second supporting surfacesto distract ad-
`jacent vertebrae.
`In an alternate embodiment
`two
`
`spaced apart retractor arms extend from the distal end
`portion of each elongated member.
`In another preferred embodiment, a surgical retrac-
`tor for use in distracting adjacent vertebrae includesfirst
`and second elongate sleeve members connected to
`each other in side by side relation. Each sleeve member
`has a proximal end and a distal end and defines a lon-
`gitudinal passagewaytherebetween. Atleast two retrac-
`tor arms extend longitudinally from the distal end of the
`retractor. Each retractor arm definesa first vertebra sup-
`
`porting surface and a second vertebra supporting sur-
`face portion. The first and second vertebra supporting
`surfaces of each retractor arm are spaced thereon ata
`predetermineddistraction distance.
`In an alternate embodiment, a spacer member is
`disposed between the first and second sleeve members
`to space the sleeve members at a predetermined dis-
`tance.
`
`A method for performing a surgical procedure with
`the surgical retractor is also disclosed. The method in-
`cludes the stepsof providing a surgical retractor includ-
`ing at least two elongate members connected to each
`other along longitudinal portions thereof and having
`proximal and distal end portions with an opening there-
`through to receive instrumentation, the distal end por-
`tion of each elongate member configured for insertion
`at least partially into an intervertebral space between
`adjacent opposed vertebrae, inserting the distal end of
`the two elongate membersof the retractor to distract lat-
`eral sides of the intervertebral space and performing the
`surgical procedure adjacent the distracted vertebrae.
`The distal end portion of at the retractor may include two
`spaced apart retractor arms having first and second
`supporting surfaces and wherein the step of distracting
`includes inserting the retractor arms within the interver-
`tebral space wherebythe first and second supporting
`surfaces of each retractor arm respectively engage the
`adjacent opposed vertebrae. Surgical instrumentation
`may be inserted within the opening of one of the elon-
`gate members to perform the surgical procedure. In a
`preferred embodiment, a fusion implant
`is
`inserted
`through the opening of the one elongate member and
`between the distracted vertebrae to effect fusion there-
`of.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`10
`
`1S
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Preferred embodiments of the disclosure are de-
`
`40
`
`scribed hereinbelow with reference to the drawings
`wherein:
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`illustrates a double surgical retractor con-
`1
`FIG.
`structed in accordance with the principles of the
`present disclosure and utilized in distracting adja-
`cent bony structures, particularly adjacent verte-
`brae, and having first and second retractor sleeves;
`FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the double retractor of
`FIG. 1;
`FIG. 3 is a side plan view of the double retractor,
`FIG. 4 is across-sectional view of the double retrac-
`
`tor taken along the lines 4-4 of FIG. 3;
`FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a surgical kit for per-
`forming a spinal fusion procedureillustrating, from
`bottom to top, the double retractor of FIG. 1, an im-
`plant insertion apparatus, a surgical tap instrument,
`a drill instrument and a T-shaped handle;
`FIG. 6 is a view illustrating a portion of the vertebral
`column;
`
`

`

`5
`
`EP 0 880 938 A1
`
`6
`
`FIG. 7 is a side viewillustrating insertion of the dou-
`ble retractor of FIG. 1 within an intervertebral space
`defined between adjacent vertebrae;
`FIG. 8A is a view of the intervertebral space taken
`along the lines 8A-8A of FIG. 6 illustrating insertion
`of the drill instrument through a first retractor sleeve
`of the double retractor to drill a bore adjacenta first
`lateral side of the adjacent vertebrae;
`FIG. 8B is a view similar to the view of FIG.
`
`8Ail-
`
`lustrating insertion of the drill instrument within the
`second retractor sleeve to drill a bore adjacent a
`second lateral side of the adjacent vertebrae;
`FIG. 8C is a view taken along the lines 8C-8C of
`FIG. 8B further illustrating advancementof the drill
`instrument within the intervertebral space defined
`between adjacent vertebrae;
`FIG.
`9A is a view similar to the view of FIG.
`
`BA il-
`
`lustrating insertion of the tap instrument within the
`first retractor sleeve for tapping the bore formedin
`the first lateral side of the adjacent vertebrae by the
`drill instrument;
`FIG. 9B is a view similar to the view of FIG. 9A il-
`
`lustrating insertion of the tap instrument within the
`second retractor sleevefor tapping the bore formed
`in the second lateral side of the adjacent vertebrae
`by the drill instrument;
`FIG. 10 is a view similar to the view of FIG. 8Aillus-
`
`trating insertion of the implant insertion instrument
`with mounted fusion implant within the retractor to
`mountthe implant within the tapped bore;
`FIG. 11 is a view taken along the lines 11-11 of FIG.
`10 further illustrating insertion of the implant inser-
`tion instrument within the intervertebral space de-
`fined between adjacentvertebrae;
`FIG. 12 is a cross-sectional view illustrating the in-
`sertion of two implants within the intervertebral
`space;
`FIG. 13 is a perspective view of an alternate em-
`bodiment of the double surgical retractor of FIG.
`1
`having a spacing member interposed between the
`retractor sleevesto laterally displace the two retrac-
`tor sleeves;
`FIG. 141s a top plan view of the couble retractor of
`FIG. 13;
`FIG. 15 is a view of the double retractor of FIG. 13
`
`taken along the lines 15-15 of FIG. 14;
`FIG. 16 is a top plan view of another alternate em-
`bodiment of the double surgical retractor having a
`curved engagementsurface;
`FIG. 17 is a perspective view of yet another alter-
`nate embodiment of the double surgical retractor
`having two retractor arms; and
`FIG. 18 is a top plan view of the double surgical re-
`tractor of FIG. 17.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`
`EMBODIMENT(S)
`
`The preferred embodiments of the method and in-
`strumentation disclosed herein are discussed in terms
`
`of orthopedic spinal fusion procedures and instrumen-
`tation. It is also envisioned, however, that the disclosure
`is applicable to a wide variety of procedures including,
`but, not limited to ligament repair, joint repair or replace-
`ment, non-unionfractures, facial reconstruction and spi-
`nal stabilization.
`In addition,
`it
`is believed that the
`present method and instrumentation finds application in
`both open and minimally invasive proceduresincluding
`endoscopic and arthroscopic procedures wherein ac-
`cess to the surgical site is achieved through a cannula
`or small incision.
`
`The following discussion will include a description
`of each instrumentutilized in performing a spinal fusion
`methodfollowed by a description of the preferred meth-
`od for spinal fusion utilizing the instrumentation in ac-
`cordance with the present disclosure.
`In the discussion which follows, the term "proximal",
`as is traditional, will refer to the portion of the structure
`which is closest to the operator, while the term "distal"
`will refer to the portion which is furthest from the oper-
`ator.
`
`Referring now to the drawings in which like refer-
`ence numerals identify similar or identical elements
`throughout the several views, FIG. 1
`illustrates in per-
`spective view a preferred embodimentof the double sur-
`gical retractor of the present disclosure. Double retrac-
`tor 10 is particularly contemplated for distracting adja-
`cent bony structures, é.g., adjacent vertebral bodies, to
`facilitate the insertion and application of a pair of im-
`plants. However,
`it is envisioned that double retractor
`10 may also be utilized to distract other structures as
`well including joints, ligaments, etc... Other applications
`for retractor 10 are also contemplated.
`Referring now to FIGS. 1-2, double retractor 10 in-
`cludesfirst and second retractor sleeves 12a, 12b con-
`nected to each other along adjacentperipheral portions
`as shown. Retractor sleeves 12a, 126 may be formed
`of any suitable rigid material including stainless steel,
`titanium, aluminum ora suitable polymeric material and
`formed by injection molded techniques. Retractor
`sleeves 12a, 12b may be two separate componenis
`connected to each other by conventional meansinclud-
`ing adhesives, welding or the like or may be a single
`monolithic unit.
`
`Each retractor sleeve 12a, 12b is similar in config-
`uration to the retractor sleeve disclosed in U.S. patent
`Application Serial No. 08/615,379, filed March 14, 1996,
`the contents of which are incorporated herein by refer-
`ence. Each sleeve 12a, 12b may be a variety of sizes
`such as 12mm, 14mm, 16 mm and 18 mm in diameter.
`The retractor size utilized will generally correspond to
`the size of the fusion implant to be applied. As shown,
`each retractor sleeve 12a, 12b has a longitudinal pas-
`
`10
`
`1S
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`

`7
`
`EP 0 880 938 A1
`
`8
`
`depth of penetration of drill shaft 52 and drill bit 56 into
`the adjacent vertebrae. Drill shaft 52 includes a hexag-
`onal-shaped head 62 atits proximal end to mount T-han-
`dle 250.
`
`Tap instrument 100is also disclosed in the '379 ap-
`plication. Tap instrument 100 is utilized for forming an
`internal thread within the drilled bore formed bythe drill
`instrument 50. Tap instrument 100 includes elongated
`member 102 having hex head 104 atits proximal end to
`engage T-shaped handle 250. Tap instrument 100 fur-
`ther includes distal tapping threaded portion 106. Distal
`tapping portion 106 includes a plurality of conveyance
`channels (one is shown) 108 extending longitudinally
`through the cutting thread. Each conveyance channel
`108 has a directional componentparallel to the longitu-
`dinal axis and a directional component transverse to the
`longitudinal axis. Each conveyance channel 108 en-
`compasses approximately an arc of about 1/3 the outer
`circumference of the tapping portion 106. Conveyance
`channels 108 are each dimensioned to receive bone
`
`10
`
`1S
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`collar 16. Each opening 14 preferably extends radially
`or about between 15%-40% the circumference or pe-
`rimeter of sleeve 12a, 12b and longitudinally preferably
`or about 25%the length of sleeve 12a, 12b. Openings
`14 are contemplated to permit the introduction of surgi-
`cal instrumentation if necessary to assist in carrying out
`he fusion procedure.
`Each sleeve 12a, 12b further includesfirst and sec-
`ond diametrically opposed retractor arms 18. Retractor
`arms 18 extend distally from collar 16 in a general lon-
`gitudinal direction and are spaced from each other. Each
`arm 18 has an arcuate outer surface(i.e., defining a ra-
`material deburred by the cutting edges during the tap-
`dius of curvature substantially equivalent to the radius
`ping procedure and to continually transmit the bone ma-
`of curvature of the remaining portion of the sleeve).
`terial proximally through the channel to avoid undesired
`Each retractor arm 18 hasfirst and second supporting
`material build up at the tapping site. In this manner, tap
`surfaces 18a, 18b in general parallel relation to each
`instrument 100 may be used to completely tap the inter-
`other and preferably to the longitudinal axes "a" of each
`nal thread within the bore without interruption of the tap-
`sleeve 12a, 12b. The supporting surfaces 18a, 18b are
`ping procedure.
`preferably substantially planar. The height "h" of each
`Implant insertion instrument 150 is configured for
`arm 18 (i.e., the distance between supporting surfaces
`mounting and inserting fusion implant 200 within the in-
`18a, 18b) corresponds to the height of the space be-
`tervertebral space.
`Insertion instrument 150 includes
`tween adjacentbony structures to be distracted. For ex-
`elongated shaft 152 having hex-head mounting section
`ample, in spinal fusion application, the height "h" of each
`154 at its proximal end and cylindrical collar 156 atits
`arm 18 preferably ranges from about 0.28 to about 0.35
`distal end. Cylindrical collar 156 is dimensioned to be
`inches. Each arm 18 further includes tapered end por-
`received within the cavity of fusion implant 200. A spring
`tions 20 defining a generally V-shaped configuration.
`ball detent mechanism 158is disposed within cylindrical
`End portions 20 facilitate insertion of retractor arms 18
`collar 156 to releasably engage implant 200. Detent
`within the surgical site, ¢.g., within the intervertebral
`space.
`mechanism 158 is preferably spring-biased outwardly
`to engage corresponding structure defined within fusion
`As depicted in FIG. 5, retractor 10 mayfurther in-
`implant 200 such as a recess or aperture formed in an
`clude impactor head 22 whichis correspondingly dimen-
`interior wall thereof. Any type of detent mechanism 158
`sioned to fit over the proximal endsof retractor sleeves
`12a, 12b. Impactor head 22 is dimensionedto slide onto
`suitable for this intended purpose maybe utilized. Collar
`
`retractor 10 and formafrictionfit therebetween. Impac- 156 may further include a pair of longitudinal grooves
`tor head 22 may further include an inner shelf which en-
`160 which engage corresponding structure of implant
`gagesthe proximal end faces of retractor sleeves 12a,
`200 (e.g., inner longitudinal rails) to rotatably fix the im-
`12b. In the alternative, impactor head 22 may be closed
`plant on the collar, i.e., to prevent rotational movement
`at its proximal end.
`of the implant 200 on the collar. Other insertion instru-
`Referring still to FIG. 5, the various instruments uti-
`ments and arrangements are also envisioned.
`lized in performing adouble spinal fusion procedure with
`Implant 200 is uniquely designed for use in spinal
`the retractor 10 of the present disclosure areillustrated.
`fusion procedures. This implant 200 is generally dis-
`These instruments include surgical drill 50, tap instru-
`closedin U.S. Patent No. 5,026,373 to Ray, the contents
`ment 100, implant insertion instrument 150, fusion im-
`of which have been previously incorporated herein by
`plant 200 and T-shaped handle 250 which is used to ac-
`reference, and is commonly referred to as a "fusion
`tuate each of the instruments.
`cage". Implant or fusion cage 200 includesa cylindrical
`cage body 202 having an internal cavity or hole for ac-
`commodating bone-growth inducing substances. One
`end of cage body 202 is closed and defines a rounded
`or bull-nosed configuration to facilitate insertion of the
`fusion cagerelative to one or more bonystructures. The
`
`sageway extending from the proximal to the distal end
`portion to receive surgical instrumentation therethrough
`o carry out the fusion procedure.
`With reference nowto FIGS. 1-4, each sleeve 12a,
`12b mayoptionally include first and second longitudinal-
`ly extending openings 14 formed in its outer wall. Open-
`ings 14 are diametrically arranged with relation to each
`other and terminateat their distal ends in circumferential
`
`
`
`Surgical drill 50 is disclosed in the previously incor-
`porated '379 application. Drill 50 includes drill shaft 52,
`extension shaft 54 and drill bit 56 mounted atthe distal
`end of the drill shaft 52. Extension shaft 54 hasfirst and
`
`second collars 58, 60 which cooperate to control the
`
`

`

`g
`
`EP 0 880 938 A1
`
`10
`
`other end defines an opening which communicates with
`the internal cavity. The outer surface of the cage body
`202 includes a single continuous thread (preferably V-
`shaped) having a plurality of raised turns with valleys
`defined between adjacent turns.
`A plurality of perforations are disposed within the
`thread and extend through the outer surface of the cage
`body 202 to provide direct communication between the
`outer surface and internal cavity. The perforations per-
`mit immediate contact between the bone growth induc-
`ing substances within the inner cavity and the bone
`structure when the cage body 202is mated to the bone
`structure, e.g., adjacent vertebrae. An end cap (not
`shown) may be mountable to the open end of cage body
`202 to enclose the bone-growith inducing substances
`within the interior cavity.
`T-shaped handle 250 includes mounting portion
`252 defining hexagonal-shaped recess 254 which re-
`ceives the corresponding structureofdrill instrument 50,
`tap instrument 100 and implant
`insertion instrument
`150.
`
`Operation of the Instrumentation
`
`The use of the instrumentation in conjunction with
`the insertion of a pair of fusion implants 200 into an in-
`tervertebral space defined between adjacent vertebrae
`will be described. The subsequent description will be
`particularly focused on an anterior procedure for spinal
`surgery although a posterior approach is envisioned as
`well.
`
`With reference to FIG. 6, which depicts a portion of
`the vertebral column, a targeted intervertebral space "i"
`defined between adjacent vertebrae "V;, Vo"
`is ac-
`cessed utilizing appropriate retractors, e.g., laminal re-
`tractors, dural extractors.
`As depicted in FIG. 7, impactor head 22 is placed
`on the proximal end of retractor sleeves 12a, 12b. Re-
`tractor 10 is manipulated to align retractor arms 18 with-
`in the desired intervertebral space "i" defined between
`adjacent vertebrae "V,, V.". Preferably, retractor 10 is
`arranged such that retractor sleeve 12a is adjacent a
`first lateral side "S," of the intervertebral space "i" and
`retractor sleeve 12b is adjacent a second lateral side
`"So" of the intervertebral space "i". Thereafter, retractor
`arms 18 are advancedinto the intervertebral space "i"
`wherebyfirst and second supporting surfaces 18a, 18b
`of each retractor arm 18 respectively engage the op-
`posed vertebral bodies "V,, V2". Retractor arms 18 are
`preferably dimensionedto slightly distract the adjacent
`vertebrae "V,, Vo". However, alternatively,
`it
`is envi-
`sioned that retractor arms 18 may be configured to
`cause no distracting movementof the vertebrae "V,,
`Vo". Once inserted, retractor arms 16 effectively stabi-
`lize the adjacent vertebrae "V,, Vo" across the span of
`the intervertebral space "i". Preferably, during insertion,
`retractor 10 is drivendistally, by e.g., impacting impactor
`head 22 with a standard mallet "m" as depicted in FIG.
`
`7, which thereby drives retractor arms 18 within the ad-
`jacent vertebrae "V,, Vo". Tapered end portions 20 of
`retractor arms 18 facilitate advancementwithin the in-
`
`tervertebral space "i".
`Referring now to FIG. 8A, with retractor arms 18 of
`retractor sleeves 12a, 12b in their appropriate positions
`within the intervertebral space "i", attention is directed
`to drilling a bore in the first lateral side "S," of the in-
`tervertebral space "i". The cutting depth of drill instru-
`ment 50 is adjusted as desired(i.e., to correspond to the
`length of the fusion implant) by adjusting collars 58, 60.
`With the T-handle 250 mountedto drill instrument 50,
`the instrumentis introducedinto the axial bore of retrac-
`tor sleeves 12a and advanced to contact the anterior
`
`surface of the vertebral bodies, "V,, V2". Drill 50 is ad-
`vanced into the intervertebral space "i" adjacentthe first
`lateral side "S," by rotating T-handle 250 such thatdrill
`bit 56 shears the soft tissue and cuts the bone of the
`
`adjacent vertebrae "V,, Vo" thereby forming a bore
`which extends into the adjacent vertebrae "V,, Vo". Drill
`50 is then removed from retractor sleeve 12a. The drill-
`
`in-
`ing procedure is then repeated by insertion of drill
`strument 50 within the second retractor sleeve 12b to
`
`form a bore within the adjacent vertebra "V,, Vj" proxi-
`mate the secondlateral side "S," as depicted in FIGS.
`8B-8C.
`
`Referring now to FIG. 9A, tap instrument 100 is se-
`lected and attached to the T-handle 250. Tap instrument
`100 is inserted into first retractor sleeve 12a and posi-
`tioned adjacent the drilled bore formed in the adjacent
`vertebrae "V,, Vp" by the surgical drill 50. With retractor
`sleeve 12a as a direct guide, T-handle 250 is rotated in
`the direction of the directional arrow of FIG. 9A while
`
`simultaneously applying sufficient downward pressure
`on the T-handle to advance the tap instrument 100 and
`promote even purchase into the endplates. Upon ad-
`vancementof the tap instrument 100, the deburred bone
`chips collect within conveyance channel 108 of tapping
`head 106, and are conveyed proximally during rotational
`movementof the tapping head 106 away from the tap-
`ping site. Tap instrument 100 is advanced into the bone
`until the desired depth has been achieved, which occurs
`when the distal end of tapping head 108 "bottoms out"
`on the bone. When tap instrument 100 reachesthe ap-
`propriate depth, the tap instrument 100 is rotated via T-
`handle 250 in an opposite direction to back the instru-
`mentout of the bore. The tapping procedureis then re-
`peated byinsertion of tap instrument 100 within the sec-
`ond retractor sleeve 12b to form a bore within the adja-
`cent vertebrae "V,, Vo" proximate the second lateral
`side as depicted in FIG. 9B. It is to be appreciated that
`in procedures where a self-tapping implantis utilized the
`tapping of the bores with tap instrument 100 is not nec-
`essary.
`With reference now to FIG. 10, attention is focused
`on the insertion of fusion implant 200. FIG. 10 shows a
`first fusion implant 10 already applied within the bore
`proximate the first lateral side "S," of the intervertebral
`
`10
`
`1S
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`

`11
`
`EP 0 880 938 A1
`
`12
`
`space i. To apply the fusion implant, cage body 202 of
`the fusion implant 200 is mounted onto insertion instru-
`ment 150 by positioning the cage body 202 onto mount-
`ing collar 156 of the instrument to permit spring ball de-
`tent mechanism 158 to releasably engage correspond-
`ing structure of the implant body 202. This assembly is
`attached to T-handle 250. Insertion instrument 150 with
`
`mounted cage body 202is inserted into retractor sleeve
`12b of retractor 10 and the cage body 202 is positioned
`within the tapped bore by rotating insertion instrument
`150 in the direction depicted in FIG. 10. Cage body 202
`is advanced until it is completely seated with the bore
`as shown in FIG. 11. Insertion instrument 600 is then
`removed from retractor 100.
`
`At this point in the procedure, bone growth inducing
`substances may be harvested from, e.g., the iliac crest,
`and packedinto the cage body 202 of implant 200 until
`the cage body 202 is completely filled with bone growth
`inducing substances. An end cap may then be mounted
`to the cage body 202. Retractor 10 is then removed. It
`is also contemplated that the implant could be at least
`partially packed with bone growth inducing substances
`prior to insertion.
`FIG. 12 illustrates the two lateral fusion implants
`200 inserted within the intervertebral space in accord-
`ance with the afore-described procedure.
`Thus, retractor 10 of the present disclosure main-
`tains a desired spacing between the adjacent vertebra
`"V,, Vo" across the lateral span of

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket