`
`Europaisches Patentamt
`
`European Patent Office
`Office européen des brevets
`
`® Publication number:
`
`0 369 603
`Al
`
`2)
`
`EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION
`
`@) Application number: 89310572.6
`
`@)
`
`int. cis: AGIF 2/44
`
`@) Dateoffiling: 16.10.89
`
`
`
` @) Applicant: CEDAR SURGICAL,INC.
`Thetitle of the invention has been amended
`(Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, A-iil,
`7.3).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`@) Priority: 17.10.88 US 259031
`
`8) Date of publication of application:
`23.05.90 Bulletin 90/21
`
`Designated Contracting States:
`DE FR GB NL SE
`
`15265 Minnetonka Boulevard
`Minnetonka Minnesota 55345(US)
`
`
`
`@) inventor: Ray, Charles D.
`19550 Cedarhurst
`Deephaven Minnesota 55391(US)
`Inventor: Dickhudt, Eugene A.
`801 Continental Drive
`New Brighton Minnesota 55112(US)
`
`Representative: Darby, David Thomasetal
`Abel & Imray Northumberland House 303-306
`High Holborn
`London WC1V 7LH(GB)
`
`®) Fusion cage for bone joints.
`
`@) A fusion basket (10) having an external, substan-
`tially continuous helical V-thread (12) by which it can
`be screwed into a bore afterfirst forming in the bore
`mating female threads that bite into the cancellous
`regions.. Mating of
`the threads ensures that
`the
`fusion basket remains securely in place without com-
`pressing or splitting the recipient bone. Eventually,
`the ingrowth of bone through perforations (13) in the
`valley (14) of the thread forms a permanentintercon-
`nection between the two bony structures. When
`used to create bone ingrowth between adjacent ver-
`tebrae, the V-thread fusion basket
`is implanted in
`
`qs on opposite sides of the disc space.
`14
`
`13 “ /2 EP0369603
`
`Xerox Copy Centre
`
`
`
`1
`
`EP 0 369 603 Al
`
`2
`
`FUSION CAGE
`
`The invention concerns method and apparatus
`for fusing two adjacent bony siructures such as a
`bone joint, especially adjacent vertebrae of
`the
`spine.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Subsequent to injury, disease or other degen-
`erative disorder,
`the disc, a ligamentous cushion
`between vertebrae, may undergo a painful deterio-
`ration. The disc shrinks and flattens out, and the
`distance between the vertebral bodies begins to
`collapse. Subsequently,
`there may be a progres-
`sive degensration leading to mechanical instability,
`where painful
`translocations occur between adja-
`cent vertebrae. The movement-induced pain may
`be so disabling that in many such cases, the seg-
`mental motion must be eliminated. Thus, rigid fu-
`sions may be the only present means to stop the
`translocations and relieve the pain.
`It is generally held that successful fusions de-
`mand a contiguous growth of bone to create a solid
`mass that will unite the movable elements into one
`unit. Otherwise, the fusion cannot achieve the tasks
`of pain reduction, maintenance of
`intervertebral
`height, and immobility of the segment. When fusion
`boneis first placed, it is soft and movable, having
`no cohesive strength. Therefore a variety of appli-
`ances have been developed that atiempt to hold
`the segments quite still under conditions of normal
`spinal activity and daily stress. Bone graft material
`is placed between the segments, the outer or cor-
`tical surfaces of which have been removed or
`deeply scarified so as to promote the ingrowth of
`the graft into these recipient sites. Thus positioned,
`the bone graft slowly unites the segments. Such an
`appliance is not meant to permanently secure im-
`mobility of
`the segments. Bone ingrowth is
`re-
`quired for this.
`Dependency upon such an appliance as the
`sole stabilizer is ultimately unsuccessful due to the
`development of a mechanical gap or transition be-
`tween the bone and the appliance, leading to struc-
`tural failure of the bone and adjacent connective
`tissue. Such failure is seen in fractures, erosion,
`and absorption of bone with potential further col-
`lapse. The pain may also become progresively
`disabling.
`fusions
`Approximately 150,000 lumbar spinal
`were performed in the USA during 1987, as re-
`ported by the American Hospital Association. There
`are many methods for intervertebral fusion. The
`most successful have achieved a success rate of
`
`about 90% in random cases. However, several of
`these techniques, especially those requiring com-
`plex appliances, are difficult
`to master and are
`hazardous to nerve and vessel structures normally
`lying close to the involved bones.
`From a biomechanical point of view, the most
`important location of a spinal fusion is at the me-
`chanical center of rotation between the vertebrae.
`This point is centered within the disc space. There-
`fore, an interbody fusion is the most rigid and thus
`the most sought after method among surgeons.
`Current methods of interbody fusions are, however,
`the most hazardousof all spinal fusion methods.
`Both anterior
`(transabdominal) and posterior
`surgical approaches are used for interbody fusions.
`Typically, a plug, dowel, or segment of bone is
`driven tightly into a cavity carved inside the inter-
`body,
`intradiscal space. Since there must be a
`bone-to-bone bridge created during the fusion pro-
`cess, connective tissue and discal tissue must be
`removed. Therefore, deep cuts within the bone
`must penetrate into the softer, cancellous region to
`promote bone growth across the space.
`intervertebral fusions using circular bone grafts
`have been reported in the orthopedic and neurosur-
`gical literature for some years. B. R. Wiltberger in a
`paper published in Clinical Orthopedics, Vol. 35,
`pp. 69-79, 1964, reviewed various methodsof inter-
`vertebral body fusion using posterior bone dowels
`driven firmly into a suitably smaiier hole between
`the adjacent vertebrae. Upon doing so the dowel
`can split or crack or collapse. The stretched bone
`might also split and it can be compressed by the
`dowel to the point that it will not grow normally due
`to collapse of formerly open pores or vascular
`channels.
`If
`this occurs, there may be a late ab-
`sorption of surrounding bone and the dowel might
`loosen, with a renewed danger of expulsion. See
`also a two-page brochure from Neurological Sur-
`gery Associates
`of Cincinnati,
`Inc.
`entitled
`"Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Made Simple”
`which shows, after the bone dowel placement, the
`"(a)pplication of 5 mm dacron suture around spi-
`nous processes."
`.
`U.S. Patent 4,501,269 (Bagby) describes a sur-
`gical procedure for stabilizing the cervical spine of
`a horse and says that the procedure “is applicable
`to any human or animal joint formed by opposed
`contiguous bony surfaces which are covered and
`separated by intervening cartilage and are sur-
`rounded by ligaments which resist expansion of the
`joint. Specific examples of such joints are a spinal
`joint between adjacent vertebrae or the ankle joint.
`The process was developed to immediately sia-
`bilize the joint and to further promote ultimate
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`38
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`
`
`3
`
`EP 0 369 603 Al
`
`4
`
`bone-to-bone fusion...The implanted structure is in
`the form of a perforated cylincrical bone basket
`which can be filled with bone fragments produced
`during the preparaticn of
`the joint. These bone
`fragments provide autogenous tissue to promote
`bone growth through the basket, as well as around
`it.
`
`"The process involves theinitial steps of surgi-
`cally accessing the joint and removing intervening
`cartilage located between the contiguous bony sur-
`faces. A transverse cylindrical opening is
`then
`bored across the contiguous bony surfaces. Imme-
`diate stabilization is achieved by driving into the
`cylindrical opening a hollow basket having a rigid
`perforated cylindrical wall whose outside diameter
`is slightly greater than the inside diameter of the
`cylindrical opening. The implanting of the basket
`spreads the bony surfaces apart in opposition to
`the resistance to expansion of the joint provided by
`the surrounding ligaments." (Gol. 2, lines 26-55).
`Vich, J. Neurosurg Vol. 63, pp. 750-753 (1983)
`describes a means for cervical spine fusion, using
`an anterior approach, by surgically implanting a
`cylindrical bone graft. "Screw threads are placed in
`the graft with a small, previously sterilized die. The
`grooves of ihe thread can be made as deep as
`required. The vertebral cervical bodies are pre-
`pared according to Cloward's technique. After a
`cylindrical bed has been drilled in the appropriate
`intervertebral bodies,
`the graft
`is
`screwed into
`place with instruments especialy developed forthis
`purpose.” (P. 750). The Fig. 2 legend points out
`that a threaded graft dowel has a larger contact
`surface than a plain dowel and a greater resistance
`to pressure and sliding.
`An additional desirable effect of an interver-
`tebral fusion is the restoration or maintenance of a
`normai
`intervertebral spacing. Spreading devices
`are generally required in order to restore all or a
`part of the normal intradiscal height, in the process
`of placing the fusion material or applicance. When
`the procedure is performed using the commonly
`employed posterior approach, a variety of spread-
`ers may be placed between various posterior bony
`elements normally attached to he vertebrae, such
`as, dorsal spinous processes or
`laminas. Using
`such spreaders, a forward tilt or wedging of the
`discal space occurs, with the posterior aspect of
`the space becoming more open than the anterior.
`When a bone graft of any shape is driven into a
`cavity that is wedged more open posteriorly be-
`tween two opposing movable vertebrae, there is a
`strong propensity for the graft
`to be retropulsed
`during the postoperative recovery period as a re-
`sult of to and fro movement between the opposing
`vertebrae. Thus,
`to aid in the prevention of graft
`expulsion,
`it would be desirable to have the cavity
`either maintain parallelism or be slightly narrower
`
`at its most posterior portion. Ventrai to this cavity,
`the stout ligamentous disc anulus remains and pre-
`vents veniral migration of the graft
`into the retro-
`peritoneal space. Further, there is value in restoring
`the original spinal
`lordotic curve, as the fusion
`grows; this requires that the cavity and the inter-
`body fusion element be placed to promote a nor-
`mal
`spinal anatomical position,
`that
`is, without
`wedging of the space in either direction.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention provides a fusion basket or cage
`which,
`like the fusion basket of Bagby,
`is a perio-
`rate rigid cylinder that can be surgically inserted
`into a bore that has been formed in two adjacent
`bony structures such as two vertebrae. The fusion
`cage is then packed with bone chips or other bone-
`inducing substance,
`thus inviting ingrowth of
`live
`bone. The fusion cage of the invention differs from
`the fusion basket of Bagby by an external, subsian-
`tially continuous helical V-thread by which it can be
`screwed into the bore, after first forming mating
`female threads in the bore. Mating of the threads
`ensures that the fusion basket remains securely in
`place, there being much less danger of splitting or
`compression atrophy of the recipient bone. Even-
`tally, the ingrowth of bone through perforations in
`the valley of the thread forms a permanent inter-
`connection between the two bony structures.
`By V-thread is meant
`that the crown of the
`thread is sharp, although its valley preferably is
`blunt or rounded to permit the mating peaks of the
`female threads to have adequate strength. When
`the angle of the V-thread at its crown is about 60°,
`a preferred range of radii for thefillet in the valley
`is from 0.35 to 0.75 mm. The angle at the crown of
`the V-thread should be no more than 90° , because
`a sharper thread would increase the exposedinter-
`face surface of bone relative to the implant, thus
`increasing the opportunity for
`ingrowth. However,
`the angle at
`the crown should be at
`least 45°,
`because the pitch would be undesirably smail if the
`angle were smaller. An unduly smail pitch would
`entail weak female bone threads and create a dan-
`ger of cross threading.
`The perforations should be as large as possible
`as long as the fusion basket has adequate struc-
`tura! strength. When the surface of the fusion bas-
`ket is projected onto the inner face of a cylinder,
`the projected perforations should comprise from
`30% to 60% of the projected area, preferably about
`50%.
`Individual apertures should be at
`least one
`mm both axially and transversely to permit good
`ingrowth of fresh bone, whereas the fusion basket
`might be unduly weakened if the apertures were
`
`70
`
`16
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`36
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`56
`
`
`
`5
`
`EP 0 369 603 Al
`
`6
`
`substaniially more than 2 mm axially and 3 mm
`transversely when the angle of the V-thread at its
`crownis about 60°.
`The novel fusion basket preferablyis fitted with
`end caps, a first of which may be in place before
`the fusion basket
`is screwed into the recipient
`bone, and thus should have a maximum diameter
`no greater than the minor diameter of the V-thread
`of the fusion basket. The first end cap retains the
`bone-inducing sustance whenit is packed into the
`fusion basket. The open end of the fusion basket
`may then be closed with a second end cap to hold
`the bone chips securely in place. The end caps
`may be imperforate but preferably have substan-
`tially the same perforation as does the fusion bas-
`ket to permit bone or other tissue ingrowth through
`the end caps. However, end caps may not be
`necessaryor, if used, they can be made of biodeg-
`radable material, even when the fusion basket
`is
`not.
`
`Currently the novel V-thread fusion basket pref-
`erably is made of implantable-grade stainless steel.
`Titanium and ceramics are also useful, as are
`super-strength polymers or composites of poly-
`mers and high-strength filaments such as super-
`high-density polyethylene, glass, or graphite. Non-
`metallic composites have the preferred ability to
`pass x rays or magnetic beams without distortion,
`thus enhancing the preparation of scan images as
`compared to metallic fusion baskets. The fusion
`basket can be biodegradable, because it no longer
`is needed after the bone ingrowth has matured.
`When the fusion basket is not biodegradable, it can
`remain in place permanently after the ingrowth has
`taken place,
`in contrast
`to the need to remove
`many types of metallic supports or appliances that
`have heretofore been used to promote rigid fu-
`sions.
`Useful bone-inducing substances include bone
`chips and bone substitutes or synthetic material,
`with or without bone activating matter, such as
`hydroxyapatite, bone morphologic protein, bone
`growth factor, or cartilage activation factor. Instead
`of being mixed with the bone-inducing substance,
`bone-activating matter can be coated onto the nov-
`el fusion basket, e.g., after being microencapsulat-
`ed in a wax. Whenthe fusion basket is made of an
`arganic material, bone activating matter can be
`combined with the organic material before it
`is
`formed into the fusion basket.
`For implantation between vertebrae of a per-
`son's lower back,
`two sizes of the novel fusion
`basket should suffice, one having a V-thread major
`diameter of 16 mm and the other a major diameter
`of 12 mm. Because the anterior-posterior dimen-
`sion of a typical lower lumbar vertebra is about 30
`mm,
`the length of
`the fusion basket preferably
`does not exceed 25 mm butis at least 20 mm in
`
`length to give sufficient contact as well as a good
`platform when implanted in pairs.
`The crown of the V-thread of the novel fusion
`basket preferable is continuous, both for strength
`and for ease of
`insertion into the threaded bore.
`Preferably the V-thread has from 3 to 8 turns per
`cm. A smaller turn ratio may result in an undesir-
`ably large thread depth, penetrating too deeply into
`the cancellous bone. A larger turn ratio may unduly
`restrict the size of the performations.
`The novel V-thread fusion basket can be im-
`planted for fusing adjacent bony structures by the
`following method: (a) forming ain said bony struc-
`tures a bore with a female thread that penetrates
`into their cancellous regions,
`(b) forming a rigid,
`perforate, cylindrical basket to have an external,
`substantially continuous helical V-thread that can
`mate with said female thread,
`(c) screwing the
`basket into said threaded bore, and (d) packing the
`basket with bone-inducing substance. When the
`bore to be formed in step (a) is to extend between
`adjacent vertebrae, there should be prior to step (a)
`the added step of spreading the vertebrae apart,
`preferably in a manner that maintains their paraliel-
`ism,
`the fusion basket
`is
`implanted in pairs on
`opposite sides of the disc space.
`a
`have
`should
`The
`novel
`fusion basket
`modulus of elasticity approximating that of the re-
`cipient bone,
`thus permitting it
`to flex along its
`length, consequently minimizing stresses at
`the
`bony interface between the graft and recipient
`bone. Although a fusion basket of substantially
`lower modulus of elasticity would provide the same
`desirable result,
`it might not have adequate struc-
`tural strength.
`The bore into which the V-thread fusion basket
`is to be inserted preferably is tapped by hand,
`using a slow motion to ensure against burning the
`bone. This freshens the bone margins of the bore
`so that if any bone had been burned by drilling to
`form the bore,
`it is now cut away slowly by hand.
`The tapping process is quite safe, in that the sur-
`geon can feel the progress of the technique.
`The V-thread
`fusion
`basket preferably is
`screwed by hand into the threaded bore, again
`permitting the surgeon to feel
`if the resistance is
`too great and that rethreading of the bore might be
`required.
`In contrast, a bone dowel
`typically is
`driven into a bore using a hammer, and in order to
`guard against an overly tight fit, the surgeonlistens
`to the sound of
`the striking hammer and also
`monitors the degree of resistance.
`When using the noval fusion basket to creat
`bone ingrowth between adjacent vertebrae, the fu-
`sion basket should be implanted in pairs on op-
`posite sides of the disc space. Each is held in
`place by its V-thread, biting into female threads
`that penetrate into the cancellous bone of the inter-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`
`
`7
`
`EP 0 369 603 Al
`
`8
`
`posed vertebral bodies. Gravity, muscle pull, and
`elastic recoil of the spread (or stretched) outer disc
`anulus together exert force against each of
`the
`fusion baskets. Thus the fusion baskets are held in
`place by compression forces between the adjacent
`vertebrae.
`
`To prevent distraction froces from possibly dis-
`lodging the fusion baskets, e.g., when the patient
`forward flexes, thus separating the posterior mar-
`gins of
`the adjacent vertebrae,
`the dorsal pro-
`cesses may be tied or wrapped together. By an-
`other technique, screws placed through the appro-
`priate facet jackets limit both flexion and extension
`motions.
`interbody spreader in the form of a
`A novel
`scissors jack has been developed to maintain a
`desirable parallel attitude between the adjacent ver-
`tebrae while the bore is drilled and then tapped by
`a novel
`instrument. Another instrument
`that has
`been developed for use in the implantation of the
`novel
`fusion basket
`is a tapping instrument
`for
`forming helical threads in a bore in recipient bone.
`This noval tapping instrument comprises
`a hollow cylindrical shaft having a handle at one
`end and an external thread which is formed at the
`
`70
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Fig. 2 is an isometric view illustrating the
`formation of a body that can be cut
`to form a
`series of second V-thread fusion baskets of the
`invention;
`Fig. 3 is an isometric view of a tap (partly
`cut away to reveal details of construction) for for-
`ming female thread in bores into which a V-thread
`fusion basket is to be inserted; and
`Fig. 4 is an isometric view of a wrench for
`screwing a V-thread fusion basket into a threaded
`bore.
`The fusion basket 10 of Fig. 1 was formed from
`a solid steel cylinder by drilling eight
`small,
`equally-spaced holes 11 in the axial direction, each
`hole being centered on a circle concentric with the
`axis of the cylinder. Then a large hole was drilled
`centered on the axis and having a radius substan-
`tially identical to that of the aforementioned circle.
`A V-thread 12 was then machined in the external
`surface of the cylinder, thus opening through that
`surface a perforation 13 extending through the
`rounded valley 14 of the V-thread at each crossing
`of the valley and one of the small holes 11. A
`screw thread 15 was then machined in the internal
`
`surface of the fusion basket to threadably receive
`an end cap 16 that has apertures 18 similar to
`those of a salt shaker. Snap-on end caps would
`also be useful.
`
`other end with at least one scallop that exposes a
`cutting edge, and
`a pilot rod that slidably fits into said bore, projects
`beyond said other end of the hollow shaft, and is
`formed with a central recess that communicates
`with the scallop in the hollow shaft and provides a
`reservoir for detritus remvoed by said cutting edge,
`thus permitting the detritus to be carried away by
`removing the pilot rod from the the hollow shaft.
`The portion of the pilot rod that projects be-
`yond said other end of the hollow shaft preferably
`is threaded to carry detritus upwardly to the reser-
`voir.
`
`tapping instrument to
`When using the novel
`form female threads for an interbody fusion, the
`hollow shaft should have an odd numberof scal-
`lops and cutting edges, preferably three because
`an odd number provides more equal removal of
`recipient bone on both sides of the bore than would
`an even number.
`tapping instrument and a novel
`The novel
`wrenchare illustrated in the drawing that also illus-
`trates two V-thread fusion baskets of the invention.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`65
`
`In making a fusion basket by the technique
`described in the preceding paragraph,
`the small
`holes 11 could be enlarged io intersect each other,
`thus making it unnecessary to drill a central hole.
`Enlarged smail holes would result in larger pertora-
`tions 13.
`Referring to Fig. 2, a series of fusion baskets
`can be made from a plurality of rods 22 of rectan-
`gular cross-section that can be continuously ex-
`truded and fed into each of eight keyways 23 in the
`surface of a mandrel 24. Simultaneously, a rod 26
`of
`triangular cross-section is extruded, wrapped
`helically around the rectangular rods 22, and sol-
`dered or welded to each of the rectangular rods 22
`at every crossing io provide an external V-thread.
`Upon emerging from the keyways,
`the resulting
`body is cut into individual fusion baskets each of
`which has a perforation 28 between adjacent turns
`of the V-thread-forming rod 26 whereverit bridges
`a gap between adjacent rectangular rods 22.
`A fusion basket identical to that of Fig. 2 can
`be made from a hollow cylinder by machining an
`external V-thread and broaching a plurality of rec-
`tangular internal keyways.
`1 and 2
`Each of the fusion baskets of Figs.
`could be made from a model by the Icst-wax
`In the drawing, all figures of which are sche-
`process.
`matic,
`The tapping isntrument 30 of Fig. 3 has a
`Fig. 1 is an exploded isometric view ofafirst
`
`V-thread fusion basket of the invention and twa
`hollow cylindrical shaft 31 with a T-handle 32 at
`one end and an external thread 33 at the other end.
`perforated end caps;
`
`
`
`9
`
`EP 0 369 603 Al
`
`10
`
`Slidably received within the hollow shaft is a pilot
`rod 34, one end 35 of which protrudes beyond the
`hollow shaft 31 and slidably fits into a bore that has
`been drilled into the recipient bone. At the other
`end of the pilot rod is a knurled cap 35A. Projec-
`ting from the threaded end of the hollow shaift 31
`are cutting teeth 36 that enlarge the bore to the
`minor diameter of the external
`thread 33 of the
`hollow shaft 31. The threaded end of the hollow
`shaft also is formed with three symmetrical scal-
`lops 37 (one shown) to expose a cutting edge 38 at
`the leading edge of the external thread 33, which
`cutting edge forms female bone threads in the bore
`upon rotation of the hollow shaft.
`Detritus created by tapping instrument 30 is
`deposited through the scallops 37 into a reservoir
`provided by a central recess 39 in the pilot rod 34.
`The end 35 of the pilot rod which extends from the
`recess 39 into the bore has external threads which,
`when the threaded pilot
`rod 34 is turned, carry
`detritus upwardly to be deposited through the scal-
`lops into the reservoir.
`Upon rotating the hollow shaft 31 to form fe-
`male bone threads in the bore,
`the surgeon can
`feel
`increased back pressure when the reservoir
`becomesfull and should grasp the knurled cap 35A
`to remove and clean out
`the pilot
`rod.
`lf
`the
`gummy nature of the detritus were to prevent the
`pilot rod from being easily pulled out of the hollow
`shaft, the knurled cap 35A could be removed to
`permit the hollow shaft 31 to be unscrewed from
`the threaded bore,
`leaving the pilot rod in place.
`The pilot rod then serves. as a guide if the bore
`has not yet been completely tapped and it
`is
`necessary to reinsert the hollow shaft to complete
`the tapping.
`The wrench 40 of Fig. 4 has a cylindrical shaft
`41 with a T-handle 42 at one end and an octagonal
`protuberance 44 at the other end. The corners of
`the protuberance 44 fit into recesses in the fusion
`basket to permit the fusion basket to be rotated by
`rotating the wrench. A spring-loaded ball 46 fric-
`tlonally holds the protuberance in place when it is
`inserted into the fusion basket.
`
`implanting the Fusion Basket
`
`fusion basket
`the novel
`In order to implant
`between adjacent vertebrae, soft, collagenous disc
`material
`is first
`removed from the intervertebral
`space. A small window is created in the overlying
`laminas of each side, namely, standard faminotom-
`ies. The neural tissues, dural sac and nerves, are
`retracted medially. The
`intervertebral
`space is
`cleaned of disc material
`in a standard surgical
`fashion.
`if the disc space has narrowed as a result
`
`of degeneration, a scissors-jack type vertebral
`spreader or a hydraulically inflated bladder is in-
`serted on one (the first) side inside the disc space
`and opened until the space approximates the nor-
`mal. This may be confirmed bya lateral x ray. The
`height of the disc space is measured on the x ray
`so that the proper sizes of drills,
`tap, and fusion
`basket may be chosen.
`The opposite (second) side of the same disc
`space is then addressed. The nerve tissues on the
`first side are relaxed and then retracted medialward
`on the second side. A pilot drili (e.g., 5 mm or 8
`mm diameter depending upon discal space height)
`cuts a small channel
`in the face of each of the
`vertebrae, penetrating the interdiscal space to a
`depth of about mm (the normal disc space is about
`30 mm deep and 50 mm wide). A drill stop may be
`applied to the drill to prevent overboring the hole. A
`solid rod pilot
`is then inserted into the pilot hole
`and a pilot cutter (7 mm or 10 mm)is passed over
`it and brought downward to enlarge the pilot chan-
`nels to slidably receive the pilot
`rod 35 of
`the
`tapping instrument 30 of Fig. 3. The cutting thread
`33 (12 mm or 16 mm major diameter) cuts female
`bone threads through the opposing vertebral end
`plates and into both cancellous regions that will
`invite the ingrowth of new bone.
`A V-thread fusion basket of the invention, with
`one end capin place, is snapped onto the wrench
`40 of Fig. 4 by which it is screwed by hand into the
`threaded intradiscal bore to its full depth. After
`removing the wrench,
`the basket
`is packed with
`pone chips or other bone-inducing substance, and
`the second end cap is applied to hold the bone
`chips securely in place.
`After removing the vertebral spreader, the dura
`and nerves on the second side are relaxed and
`attention is once again directed to the first side
`which is drilled and tapped to receive a second
`fusion basket by the same procedure.
`Over a period of several weeks, the bone from
`the vertebral bodies will grow through the perfora-
`tions in the fusion baskets and unite with the bone-
`inducing substance inside them, creating a solid
`fusion.
`it is believed that the novel fusion baskets will
`primarily be implanted by a posterior approach to
`the spine, although an anterior approach may be
`utilized, especially when applied to the cervical
`spine.
`
`Example 1
`
`The fusion basket of Fig. 1 has been machined
`from a cylinder of surgically implantable stainiess
`steel to have the following dimensions:
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`
`
`if
`
`EP 0 369 603 Ai
`
`12
`
`16 mm
`
`diameterof starting cylinder
`length of cylinder
`25 mm
`3mm
`diameter of each small hole 11
`diameter of circle on which holes 11 are centered
`11.5 mm
`diameter of central hole
`
`11mm
`
`2.5 mm/éturn
`pitch of V-thread 12
`angle at crown of thread 12
`60"
`0.4 mm
`fillet radius in valley of thread 12
`1.6 mm
`axial width of perforations 13
`circumferential breadth of perfs. 13
`2.8mm
`when projected onto interior of a cylinder, % of
`area perforated 25%
`in appear-
`identical
`A V-thread fusion basket
`ance to one produced as in Fig. 2 can be made
`from a hollow cylindrical tube. After machining an
`external thread, a plurality of rectangular keyways
`are broached in the inner surface to form perfora-
`tions through the valley of the thread. A continuous
`technique for making a novel fusion basket starts
`with a continuous helical spring made from a trian-
`gular rod such as the rod 26 usedin Fig. 2, then
`welding or soldering the inner-facing surface of the
`spring to a plurality of cylindrical wires, each ex-
`tending parallel to the axis of the spring.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Claims
`
`major diameter of which is from 12 to 16 mm.
`9. A fusion cage as defined in claim 1, made of
`implantable-grade stainless steel.
`10. A fusion cage as defined in claim 1, made
`of biodegradable material.
`11. A fusion cage as defined in claim 1, made
`of x-ray-transparent maierial.
`12. A fusion cage that is a hollow rigid cylinder
`that is suitable for insertion during surgery into a
`bore that has been formed in adjacent bony struc-
`tures and can contain bone inducing substances,
`thus inviting ingrowth of live bone, the fusion cage
`having an external, substantially continuous screw
`thread by which it can be screwed into mating
`female threads formed in the bore, and, having
`openingsin the valley between turns of the thread.
`13. A fusion cage as claimed in claim 12
`having any one or more of the features as defined
`in claims 2 to 11.
`
`14. A fusion cage as claimed in claim 12 or 13,
`wherein the screw thread is a V-thread.
`15. A fusion cage as claimed in any one of the
`preceding claims for use in fusing adjacent bony
`structures.
`
`16. A tapping instrument comprising a hollow
`cylindrical shaft having a handie at one end and an
`external
`thread which is formed at the other end
`with at
`least one scallop that exposes a cutting
`edge, and a pilot rod that slidably fits into said
`bore, projects beyond said other end of the hollow
`shaft, and is formed with a central recess that
`communicates with the scallop in the hollow shaft
`and provides a reservoir for detritus removed by
`said cutting edge, thus permitting the detritus to be
`carried away by removing the pilot rod from the
`holiow shaft.
`
`1. A fusion cage which is a hoilow perforate
`rigid cylinder that can be surgically inserted into a
`bore that has been formed in two adjacent bony
`structures and filled and packed with bone chips,
`thus inviting ingrowth of
`live bone, wherein the
`improvement comprises: the fusion cage (a) has an
`extenal, substantially continuous helical V-thread
`by which it can be screwed into mating female
`threads formed in the bore and (b) is perforated in
`the valley between adjacent turns of the thread.
`2. A fusion cage as defined in claim 1 wherein
`the V-thread is continuous and the angle at the
`crown of the V-thread is no more than 90°, but not
`less than 45°.
`3. A fusion cage as defined in claim 2 wherein
`the angle at
`the crown of the V-thread is about
`60 .
`4. A fusion cage as defined in claim 2 wherein
`the V-thread has from 3 to 8 turns per cm.
`5. A fusion cage as defined in claim 2 wherein
`50
`the valley of the V-thread hasafillet, the radius of
`which is from 0.35 to 0.75 mm.
`6. A fusion cage as defined in claim 1 wherein,
`when the surface of the fusion cage is projected
`onto the inner face of a cylinder, the perforations
`comprise from 30% to 60% of the projected area.
`7. A fusion cage as defined in claim 1, which is
`fitted with removable perforated end caps.
`8. A fusion cage as defined in claim 1, the
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`
`
`EP 0 369 603 Al
`
`
`
`»ay
`PERS
`.
`
`
`fay3
`
`DS»
`
`
`aaNNaeFe
`==i——|AexfeeeOar
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Ut
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`O) omePatent
`EUROPEANSFARCHREPORT
`ApplicationNumber
`)
`Ice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO BE RELEVANT
`Citation of documentwithmnecation. where appropriate,
`D,Y |US-A-4 501 269
`(BAGBY)
`* Complete document *
`
`EP
`
`89 31 0572
`
`A61F
`
`2/44
`
`(VICH)
`|DE-A-3 505 567
`* Claims; figures *
`
`Vor<i + technological background acagenunwsseerssceseresnersnesneersesstmrtnesenseesasnnscneseeseseenarenaseanseresscoaseonsses
`
`T : theory or principle underlying the invention
`CATEGORY OF CITED DOCUMENTS
`E:earlier patent document, but published on, or
`+ particularly relevant if taken alone
`after the fil
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site