PATENT APPLICATION FEE DETERMINATION RECORD
`Substitute for Form PTO-875
`
`Application or Docket Number
`18/194,075
`
`APPLICATIONAS FILED - PART|
`(Column 1)
`(Column 2)
`NUMBER FILED
`NUMBER EXTRA
`
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`(i),
`
`BASIC 6)
`(37 CFR 1.16(a
`SEARCH a(37 CER 1.16(k),
`EXAMINATIONFEE
`TOTALCLANS
`(37CFR1.16(h
`INDEPENDENT CLAIMS
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(0
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(i)
`
`minus 20 =
`
`minus3+
`
`10
`
`OTHER THAN
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`RATE($)
`
`FEE($)
`
`N/A
`
`Z|<>|>
`
`FEE($)
`
`TOTAL
`ADD'L FEE
`is less than the entry in column 2, write "0" in column 3.
`* If the entry in column 1
`* If the "Highest Number Previously Paid For" IN THIS SPACE is less than 20, enter "20".
`* If the "Highest Number Previously Paid For" IN THIS SPACEis less than 3, enter "3".
`be "Highest Numbe
`evio
`Paid
`For"
`(Tota
`lor
`ndependent)is
`the highest
`found in
`the appropriate box i
`
`If the specification and drawings exceed 100
`APPLICATION SIZE_|sheets of paper, the application size fee due is
`FEE
`$310 ($155 for small entity) for each additional
`(37 CFR 1.16(s))
`50 sheetsor fraction thereof. See 35 U.S.C.
`41(a)(1)(G) and 37 CFR 1.16(s).
`
`MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM PRESENT(37 CFR 1.16(j))
`
`* If the difference in column 1 is less than zero, enter "0" in column 2.
`
`APPLICATION AS AMENDED - PARTII
`
`(Column 2)
`(Golumn 1)
`HIGHEST
`CLAIMS
`NUMBER
`REMAINING
`PREVIOUSLY
`AFTER
`PAID FOR
`AMENDMENT
`Total Minus|**
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(i))
`
`(Golumn 3)
`
`SMALL ENTITY
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`OTHER THAN
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`AMENDMENTA
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(h))
`Application Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s
`
`FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENTCLAIM (37 CFR 1.16(j))
`
`(Column 1)
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`AFTER
`AMENDMENT
`
`(Golumn 3)
`
`(Golumn 2)
`HIGHEST
`NUMBER
`PREVIOUSLY
`PAID FOR
`
`Minus
`
`soleaton 8Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s
`FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENTCLAIM (37 CFR 1.16(j))
`
`AMENDMENTB
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`ADDITIONAL
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.