Appl. No. 17/855,845
`Amdt. dated May 23, 2024
`Response to Office Action of February 23, 2024
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 107033-1446687
`
`REMARKS/ARGUMENTS
`
`Status of the Claims
`
`Upon entry of the present amendment, claims 1 and 4-15 will be pendingin this
`
`application. Claims 1 and 13 have been amended, claims 2-3 have been canceled, and no new
`
`claims have been added. No new matter is added. Based on the following remarks, Applicant
`
`respectfully requests reconsideration and allowance of the pending claims.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC§ 102 § 103
`
`Claims 1-2 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as allegedly being anticipated
`
`by CHENetal. (US 20210257353), (hereinafter, CHEN);
`
`Claims 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as allegedly being unpatentable over
`
`CHENetal. (US 20210257353), (hereinafter, CHEN) in view of Xu (US 11721974),
`
`(hereinafter, Xu);
`
`To expedite allowance of this application, Applicant has amended claims 1 and 13, and
`
`cancelled claims 2-3 without prejudice or disclaimer. Specifically, claim 1 is amendedto include
`
`all elements of original allowable claims 2-3. Applicant has amended claim 13 with the features
`
`of original allowable claims 2-3. No new matter is added.
`
`Uponentry of these amendments, claims 1, 4-15 are pending and under examination.
`
`Applicant respectfully requests reconsideration of this application and timely allowanceofthe
`
`pending claims for at least the following reasons.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`The Allowable Subject Matter , Rejection of Claims 1-2, 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1)
`
`and Rejection of Claims 14-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`The rejection of claim 2 is rendered moot due to cancellation of this claim.
`
`Applicant thanks the Examiner for indicating that claims 3-12 would be allowable if
`
`rewritten in independent form includingall of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening
`
`claims. Claim 1 is amendedto includeall elements of original claims 2-3, and thus amendedclaim
`
`1 is allowable.
`
`Applicant respectfully traverses Examiner’s rejection of claim 13. However, to expedite
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/855,845
`Amdt. dated May 23, 2024
`Response to Office Action of February 23, 2024
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 107033-1446687
`
`prosecution, Applicant has amended claim 13 with the features of original claims 2-3. Thus,
`
`amended claim 13 is allowable for at least the same reasons as amended claim 1.
`
`The dependentclaims are also allowable at least due to their dependencies from one of
`
`the allowable independent claims.
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/855,845
`Amdt. dated May 23, 2024
`Response to Office Action of February 23, 2024
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 107033-1446687
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In view of the foregoing, Applicant believesall claims now pendingin this application
`
`are in condition for allowance. The issuance of a formal Notice of Allowanceat an early date is
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`Except for the issue fees payable under 37 C.F.R. § 1.18, the Director is authorized to
`
`charge any additional fees during pendencyofthis application, including any required extension
`
`of time fees, or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account Number 20-1430. This paragraphis
`
`intended to be a constructive petition for extension of time in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §
`
`1.136(a)(3).
`
`If the Examinerbelieves a telephone conference would expedite prosecution ofthis
`
`application, please contact the undersignedat (858) 350 3861 or fshen@ktslaw.com.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Fei Shen/
`Fei Shen
`Registration No. 68,520
`
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`
`LK
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket