`(19) World Intellectual Property
`Organization
`International Bureau
`
`AMCAMAA AOAAAA
`
`Z
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`30 October 2014 (30.10.2014)
`
`WIPOIPCT
`
`GD)
`
`International Patent Classification:
`CI2N 15/69 (2006.01)
`
`(21)
`
`International Application Number:
`
`(74)
`
`(81)
`
`PCT/EP2014/058459
`
`(22)
`
`International Filing Date:
`
`(25)
`
`(26)
`
`(30)
`
`(7)
`
`(72)
`
`Filing Language:
`
`Publication Language:
`
`25 April 2014 (25.04.2014)
`
`English
`
`English
`
`Priority Data:
`1307528.8
`
`26 April 2013 (26.04.2013)
`
`GB
`
`Applicant: KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN
`[BL/BE}; K.U. Leuven R&D, Waaistraat 6 - box 5105, B-
`3000 Leuven (BE).
`
`(84)
`
`Inventors: DALLMEIER, Kai; c/o Labo Virology and
`Chemotherapy, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok i
`- bus 1030, B-
`3000 Leuven (BE). NEYTS, Johan; c/o Dept. Microbio-
`logy and Immunology, Minderbroedersstraat 10 blok x -
`bus 1030, B-3000 Leuven (BE).
`
`(54) Title: BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOMES
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`WO 2014/174078 Al
`
`IPLODGE BVBA; Technologielaan 9, B-3001
`Agent:
`Heverlee (BE).
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY,
`BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM,
`DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FL GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT,
`HN,HR, HU,ID,IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR,
`KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME,
`MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI NO, NZ,
`OM,PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA,
`SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM,
`TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM,
`ZW.
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ,
`UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU,TJ,
`TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK,
`EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU,IE,IS, IT, LT, LU, LV,
`MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SL SK, SM,
`TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, Cl, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW,
`KM,ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`[Continued on next page]
`
`>
`
`Size distribution of pACNR series
`
`(57) Abstract: The inventionrelates to the use of a bacterialartificial chro-
`mosome (BAC)for the preparation of a vaccine, wherem the BAC com-
`prises: - an inducible bacterial ori sequence for amplification of the BAC to
`more than 10 copies per bacterial cell, and - a viral expression cassette com-
`prising a cDNA of an allenuated RNA virus genome and comprising cis-
`regulatory elements for transcription of said viral cDNAin mammalian cells
`and for processing of the transcribed RNA into infectious viral RNA.
`
`2
`
`4
`
`5
`
`&
`
`
`
`Feecuency(Numibayofchenest
`
` Radifardtary
`
` alll.
`
`46
`
`OF
`
`40 th az 43 14 45
`B
`8
`7
`fadisjarbleery sstits}
`
`'C
`
`Size distribution of the pShuttle dones + arabinose
`
`Figure 10
`
`
`
`wo2014/174078A1|IIMIMNIINUINAYRITIANMITTATANTTCATUA
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078 A1IIfMUIMOTIITIT ATTAINTTRTA
`
`Declarations under Rule 4.17: —_before the expiration of the time limit for amending the
`
`
`—__of inventorship (Rule 4.17(iv)) claims and to be republished in the event of receipt of
`.
`amendments (Rule 48.2(h))
`Published:
`
`
`
`— ith ‘tofdescriptionlisti (Rule 5.2(
`— with international search report (Art. 21(3))
`with
`sequence listingpart of description (Rule
`5.2(a))
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/0358459
`
`BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOMES
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to a plasmid vector system suitable for manipulating,
`
`maintaining and propagating infectious cDNA of RNA virus genomes as well as to
`
`the use of such vector systems.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Previously, copy DNA (cDNA) of several flaviviruses and other RNA viruses has been
`
`cloned in different low copy bacterial vectors to overcome their intrinsic toxicity
`
`(due to the large size and cryptic expression of the viral sequences) (Bredenbeek ef
`
`al. (2003) J. Gen. Virol. 84, 1261-1268; Durbin, et a/. (2006) Hum Vaccin. 2, 255-
`
`260; Fan and Bird (2008) J. Virol. Methods. 149, 309-315; Li et a/, (2011) PLoS
`
`One 6,
`
`€18197;
`
`Pu ef a/. (2011) J. Virol. 85, 2927-2941; Rice et al. (1989) New
`
`Biol. 1, 285-296) Almazan et al.
`
`(2008) Methods Mo/ Biol. 454, 275-91). The
`
`cloned cDNAs have been used as templates for production of infectious recombinant
`
`viruses, either by /n vitro synthesis and transfection of
`
`the RNA genomes
`
`(Bredenbeek et a/., 2003, cited above), or by incorporating the viral cDNA in an
`
`expression
`
`cassette, which
`
`comprise
`
`a
`
`promoter
`
`such
`
`as
`
`the CMV-IE
`
`(Cytomegalovirus Immediate Early) promoter allowing the transcription of the viral
`
`RNA from transfected plasmid DNAs (Enjuanes et a/. (2001) J. Biotechnol. 88, 183-
`
`204; Hall ef a/. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100, 10460-10464). Such viral
`
`expression cassettes directing the expression of attenuated foot-and-mouth disease
`
`(Ward ef a/. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 7442-7447) and Kunjin viruses (Hall et a/. (2003)
`
`Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100, 10460-10464) have been used as experimental DNA
`
`vaccines. Although the low copy number vector systems comprising a viral
`
`expression cassette can be maintained in the bacterial host cell in a stable manner,
`
`they have the important disadvantage that
`
`they only allow the purification of
`
`infective viral
`
`cDNA in amounts that are merely sufficient
`
`for
`
`small
`
`scale
`
`experimental use. Therefore, their use as a routine source of infective viral cDNA is
`
`impossible, for instance in the production of a life cDNA vaccine.
`
`The production of viral DNA vaccines requires a substantial amplification of cloning
`
`vectors to obtain sufficient DNA, but these amplification methods are subject to
`
`severe constraints.
`
`In order to avoid mutations, vectors comprising viral DNA are
`
`propagated under conditions which prevent mutagenic events (recombination,
`
`mutations,
`
`improving mismatch
`
`repair,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`like). Bacterial Artificial
`
`Chromosomes(BAC) are known for their stability and can contain inserts up to 500
`
`kb or more.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`However the size of such a vector with foreign DNAis a serious burden for bacteria,
`
`and its replication requires a substantial metabolic effort. Furthermore, exhaustion
`
`of nucleotides can lead to increased mutations. Finally, unwanted expression of
`
`foreign DNA (so-called cryptic expression) may occur, which can lead to toxic
`
`recombinant proteins. The production of toxic proteins by cryptic transcripts is
`
`inherent to flavivirus DNA and can only be solved by lowering the copy number of
`
`plasmids.
`
`Indeed,
`
`the higher
`
`the copy number of a vector,
`
`the higher
`
`the
`
`concentration
`
`of
`
`toxic
`
`proteins. As
`
`a
`
`consequence,
`
`bacterial
`
`hosts may
`
`counterselect for mutants wherein these proteins are not expressed.
`
`10
`
`Pu et a/. (2011) J. Virol. 85, 2927-2941, describes in detail various attempts to
`
`solve the intrinsic toxicity of flavivirus cDNA in bacteria. These include the in vivo
`
`ligation of plasmids comprising parts of the viral genome, specific hosts, mutants to
`
`avoid cryptic expression and also low copy number plasmids.
`
`The use of BACs which occur as a single copy in a bacterium provides thus a
`
`15
`
`solution for these problems.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`The low copy number is not a drawback for those applications wherein BAC DNA is
`
`subsequently subcloned or amplified to increase the concentration and wherein the
`
`introduction of some mutations by these techniques is not critical for the envisaged
`
`experiments. However,
`
`such amplification methods cannot be applied in the
`
`manufacture of DNA vaccines, making BACs a non-preferred vehicle for large scale
`
`plasmid preparations for DNA vaccines. Very large scale cultures are required to
`
`obtain substantial amounts of BAC.
`
`The use of inducible BAC vectors is known from Wild et a/. (2002) Genome Res. 12,
`
`1434-1444 whereby the copy number of the BAC increases from 1 copy per cell to
`
`up to 100 copies per cell, or even more. Although this system provides a method to
`
`increase the yield of BAC DNA,
`
`there is a legitimate concern that the strongly
`
`increased activity of
`
`the replication system upon induction will
`
`increase the
`
`mutation frequency. The manufacture of DNA vaccines thus requires a system
`
`wherein a high copy number of a vector is obtained, but wherein replication of the
`
`30
`
`vectors occurs without intolerable introduction of mutations.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`35
`
`The present invention resolves the problem of the amplification of viral cDNA for
`
`the preparation of a vaccine in the vector systems of the prior art by providing a
`
`vector that can be stably maintained in the host cell at low copy number, but can
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`be significantly amplified by modifying the culture conditions of its host, without
`
`unwanted mutagenesis events.
`
`It is a further object of the present invention to
`
`provide such vector that can be shuttled from and to both a yeast and bacterial
`
`host, thus providing a very versatile system amenable to manipulate the vector in
`
`both a yeast and bacterial genetic system.
`
`The present invention demonstrates, against what was expected, that the inducible
`
`increase in copy number of a BAC vector provides DNA which has a surprisingly low
`
`mutation rate. Even more surprisingly, the few mutations that occur are mostly
`
`frameshift mutations or
`
`stop codons,
`
`leading to truncated versions upon
`
`expression. Point mutations, which are either without effect or which lead to
`
`modified amino acids, are underrepresented.
`
`This unexpected effect
`
`leads to the advantageous effect that high amounts of
`
`vector are obtained and that the limited amount of errors that does occur leads to a
`
`non-functional viral genome, rather than to a mutated viral genome of which the
`
`virulence can be increased comparedto originally cloned construct.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`The present
`
`invention provides a bacterial artificial chromosome comprising an
`
`inducible bacterial ori sequence, which allows to induce the amplification of said
`
`bacterial artificial chromosome to a high copy number, for instance by modifying
`
`20
`
`the culture conditions of the bacterial host. Bacterial artificial chromosomes as used
`
`herein further comprise a viral expression cassette comprising a cDNA of a RNA
`
`virus genome flanked by cis-regulatory elements, which upon introduction of said
`
`bacterial artificial chromosome in a mammalian cell promote the transcription of
`
`said viral cDNA and allow for the processing of the transcribed RNA into infectious
`
`viral RNA. Viral
`
`cDNA contained in the viral expression cassette can either
`
`correspond to that of a wild-type RNA virus genome or be a chimeric viral cDNA
`
`construct, wherein heterologous DNA sequences have been inserted and/or native
`
`viral sequences have been deleted, truncated, or mutated. Typically heterologous
`
`DNA sequences encode one or more peptides/proteins, which are heterologously
`
`expressed by the recombinant virus, following the introduction in a mammalian cell
`
`of a bacterial artificial chromosome according to the present invention that contains
`
`a viral expression cassette comprising such chimeric viral cDNA. The bacterial
`
`artificial chromosome can further comprise a yeast autonomously replicating
`
`sequence for shuttling to and maintaining said bacterial artificial chromosome in
`
`yeast. The possibility to shuttle to and maintain the bacterial artificial chromosome
`
`according to the present invention in a yeast cell provides the advantage that it is
`
`amenable for genetic manipulation in both the yeast and bacterial genetic systems.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`4
`
`As such the present
`
`invention provides a
`
`single vector system suitable for
`
`manipulating, maintaining and propagating infectious cDNA of RNA virus genomes.
`
`In absence of a stimulus of the inducible ori, the bacterial artificial chromosomes
`
`according to the present invention can be used for archiving and stable cloning of
`
`infectious viral CDNA in a bacterial host, while in presence of such stimulus said
`
`cDNAcan readily be amplified and subsequently isolated to be used. The bacterial
`
`artificial chromosomes according to the present invention are particularly useful in
`
`the development, stable maintenance and production of viral cDNA to be used as a
`
`life vaccine against RNA viral pathogens. Alternatively, said bacterial artificial
`
`chromosomes are used for
`
`the maintenance and propagation of native or
`
`recombinant viruses from cDNA,for instance for research purposes.
`
`In the present invention, BACs with an inducible bacterial ori are used for the
`
`preparation of a vaccine of a viral expression cassette comprising cDNA of an RNA
`
`virus and cis regulatory elements for the transcription of viral CDNA in mammalian
`
`cells and processing of the transcribed RNA into infectious viral RNA.
`
`Surprisingly, the generation of multiple copies of the BAC comprising the viral DNA
`
`did not lead to the disadvantages that are known to occur with high copy number
`
`systems.
`
`Generally,
`
`toxic proteins are produced in bacterial systems, due to the cryptic
`
`expression of viral sequences. Indeed, the generation of flavivirus infectious clones
`
`has been traditionally hindered by the toxicity of their full-length cDNAs in bacteria.
`
`Various approaches have been employed to overcome this problem, including the
`
`use of very-low-copy-number plasmids and bacterial
`
`artificial chromosomes
`
`(discussed in Edmonds (2013) J. Virol. 87, 2367-2372). This is a phenomenon
`
`which relates to the insert which is cloned into the BAC, and hampers bacterial
`
`growth and metabolism. Bacteria with mutants wherein cryptic expression does not
`
`take place have a growth advantage and will overgrow the original population. In
`
`the prior art
`
`this is
`
`reflected by the size of bacterial colonies. Non-mutated
`
`constructs produce toxic proteins and typically small colonies are obtained. Mutated
`
`constructs produce less or no toxic proteins which results in the occurrence of
`
`larger colonies.
`
`Based upon this prior art knowledge it was expected that the induction of plasmid
`
`replication would thus result in an increase of toxic transcripts and a concomitant
`
`increase in mutants wherein cryptic expression does not take place.
`
`Surprisingly the inducible replication system appears to be insensitive to the
`
`toxicity of cryptic proteins. Indeed, compared to the prior art high copy number
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`systems,
`
`the bacterial colonies are somewhat
`
`larger, which indicates that
`
`the
`
`bacterial host is less sensitive to eventual toxic proteins. More importantly, very
`
`large colonies, representing mutated plasmids are not encountered.
`
`The finding that
`
`the inducible system is
`
`insensitive towards toxic proteins is
`
`unexpected. There were no indications in the prior art which indicated that this
`
`system would not be sensitive to toxic proteins (or perhaps that toxic proteins are
`
`not produced).
`
`A further disadvantage of the inducible system is inherent to the generation of
`
`10
`
`multiple copies of the BAC. Indeed the authors of the inducible system explain that
`
`the most important feature of BAC clones is their stability resulting from their very
`
`low copy number. Wild et a/. (2002) cited above shows that the copy number can
`
`be lowered even further by the addition of glucose. This single copy state improves
`
`stability of maintenance of BAC libraries
`
`by
`
`reducing the opportunity for
`
`15
`
`intracellular recombination between clones. This demonstrates that the inducible
`
`system as published by Wild et a/. does not
`
`lower the changes of unwanted
`
`recombination events which occur as soon as multiple copies of a BAC are present
`
`in a host cell.
`
`It
`
`is understood by the skilled person that
`
`induction and the
`
`subsequent high copy number will reintroduce recombination events. Consequently,
`
`20
`
`the skilled person would refrain of using such systems for DNA preparations that
`
`are intended to be used for vaccination purposes.
`
`In the present invention BACs have been amplified in the inducible ori system and
`
`the amplified BAC has been tested for recombination events. Contrary to what
`
`25
`
`would be expected, recombination events are rare.
`
`Furthermore, apart from testing for recombination events, the amplifies BACs have
`
`been tested as well for the presence of other mutations. The mutation frequency
`
`which was encountered was very low, and moreover, the fraction of missense is
`
`surprisingly lower
`
`than theoretically expected. Mutations,
`
`if occurring
`
`are
`
`predominantly nonsense or frameshift mutations leading to non-functional viral
`RNA.
`
`The present invention allows a significant upscale of DNA vaccine production. For
`
`example, the main manufacturers of the life-attenuated Yellow Fever vaccine are at
`
`present unable to meet the existing demands. With the technology of the present
`
`invention, it will be possible to produce DNA vaccinesat significant lower costs and
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`higher quantities than the current life-attenuated vaccine, thereby fulfilling a long
`
`felt need.
`
`Also for other viral diseases such as JEV, WNV, measles, rubella and HIV vaccines
`
`there is a need for a vaccine preparation platform which can provide sufficient
`
`amounts of DNA.
`
`A first aspect of the invention relates to uses of a bacterial artificial chromosome
`
`(BAC) for the preparation of a vaccine, wherein the BAC comprises:
`
`- an inducible bacterial ori sequence for amplification of said BAC to more than 10
`
`copies per bacterial cell, and
`
`- a viral expression cassette comprising a cDNA of an attenuated RNA virus genome
`
`and comprising cis-regulatory elements for transcription of said viral cDNA in
`
`mammalian cells and for processing of the transcribed RNA into infectious RNA
`
`virus,
`
`Embodiments of cDNAs of an attenuated RNA virus genome are a chimeric viral
`
`cDNA construct of an RNA virus genome, wherein a heterologous DNA sequence has
`
`been inserted or wherein a native viral sequence has been deleted, truncated, or
`
`10
`
`15
`
`mutated.
`
`Embodiments of the viral expression cassette comprise
`
`-
`
`-
`
`20
`
`a CDNAofa positive-strand RNA virus genome,
`
`a RNA polymerase driven promoter preceding the 5’ end of said cDNA for
`
`initiating the transcription of said cDNA, and
`
`-
`
`an element for RNA self-cleaving following the 3’ end of said cDNA for
`
`cleaving the RNA transcript of said viral cDNA at a set position.
`
`Embodiments
`
`of positive-strand
`
`RNA virus
`
`are
`
`flaviviruses,
`
`hepaciviruses,
`
`25
`
`pestiviruses,
`
`togaviruses,
`
`picornaviruses,
`
`coronaviruses,
`
`hepeviruses,
`
`and
`
`caliciviruses.
`
`In a typical embodiment
`
`the viral expression cassette comprises a cDNA of a
`
`yellow fever virus, for example a cDNA ofthe life-attenuated YFV-17D yellow fever
`
`30
`
`virus vaccine.
`
`In other embodiments the viral expression cassette comprises a cDNA of a virus
`
`belonging to the group of negative-strand RNA viruses, double-strand RNA viruses
`
`or ambisense RNA viruses.
`
`In specific embodiments the bacterial artificial chromosome further comprises a
`
`35
`
`yeast autonomously replicating sequence for shuttling to and maintaining said
`
`bacterial artificial chromosome in yeast.
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`An example of a yeast ori sequence is
`
`the 2u plasmid origin or the ARS1
`
`(autonomously replicating sequence 1) or
`
`functionally homologous derivatives
`
`thereof.
`
`In certain embodiments the RNA polymerase driven promoter is an RNA polymerase
`
`II promoter, such as Cytomegalovirus Immediate Early (CMV-IE) promoter, the
`
`Simian virus 40 promoter or functionally homologous derivatives thereof.
`
`In other embodiments the RNA polymerase driven promoter is an RNA polymerase I
`
`or IIT promoter.
`
`Examples of an element for RNA self-cleaving is the cDNA of the genomic ribozyme
`
`of hepatitis delta virus or functionally homologous RNA elements.
`
`In a particular embodiment the viral expression cassette comprises a cDNA of the
`
`life-attenuated YFV-17D vaccine, wherein one or more of the cDNA sequences
`
`coding for the virion surface proteins are either deleted, truncated, or mutated so
`
`that such functional virion surface protein of YFV-17D is not expressed and wherein
`
`a cDNA sequences coding for a heterologous protein is inserted in the YFV-17D
`
`cDNA. An example of such heterologous protein is a virion surface protein of a
`
`flavivirus.
`
`Embodiments of a viral expression cassette comprises a cDNA ofthe life-attenuated
`
`YFV-17D vaccine, wherein one or more unrelated CDNA sequences are inserted to
`
`be expressed as one or more heterologous protein within the viral polyprotein.
`
`In other embodiments the viral expression cassette comprises a viral CDNA wherein
`
`foreign cDNA sequences are inserted to be heterologously expressed by the said
`
`recombinant viruses.
`
`A further aspect relates to methods of preparing a vaccine against RNA viruses
`
`comprising the steps of: a) providing a bacterial host transfected with a BAC as
`
`described
`
`in
`
`the
`
`first
`
`aspect
`
`and
`
`in
`
`the various
`
`embodiments
`
`thereof
`
`b) amplifying the BAC by adding a compound which activates said inducible ori
`
`c) isolating the amplified BAC,
`
`d) formulating the BAC into a vaccine.
`
`A further aspect relates to a BAC as described in the first aspect and in the various
`
`embodiments thereof for use as a vaccine.
`
`Another aspect of the present invention relates toa BAC as described in the first
`
`aspect and in the various embodiments thereof for use in the prevention of a RNA
`
`virus infection.
`
`A further aspect relates to uses of a BAC as described in the first aspect and in the
`
`various embodiments thereof as a life DNA vaccine.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`Another aspect relates to uses of a BAC as described in the first aspect and in the
`
`various embodiments thereof for the propagation of native or recombinant viruses
`
`from said cDNA.
`
`A further aspect relates bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) as a BAC as described
`
`in the first aspect and in the various embodiments thereof for the preparation of a
`
`vaccine.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPITON OF THE INVENTION
`
`Legendsto the figures
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Figure 1. Generation of the pShuttleBAC series of RNA virus expression
`
`plasmids. (A) Sketch showing the construction of the pShuttleBAC/Pme as starting
`
`vector construct.
`
`(B) Sketch showing the construction of the pShuttleBAC/Pme
`
`derived flaviviral expression vectors by insertion of the viral cDNAs by homologous
`
`recombination between the SV40 promoter (SV40p) and HDV ribozyme (HDrz).
`
`Figure 2. Enhanced plasmid stability of pShuttleBAC constructs in E.coli.
`
`Generic plasmid maps showing the principle layout of prior art flaviviral cDNA
`
`plasmids (A) and the new pShuttleBAC series of vectors (B, DNA-YFVax). Upon
`
`transformation in E. co/i a single colony of each (A) and (B) was grown overnight at
`
`37 °C and plated on selective media. Generally constructs of type A grow into much
`
`smaller colony sizes as those of type B (Figure 2C and D, respectively). Moreover,
`
`type A constructs give rise to progeny of a wide range of colony sizes (histogram
`
`for normalized colony diameters, right panel of figure 2C)
`
`indicative for selection
`
`and segregation of mutant plasmid clones that occasionally render the cDNAs less
`
`toxic to £. coli. Clonal analysis identified multiple possible underlying mutations,
`
`including transposon insertion in the viral E/NS1 region. By contrast, plasmid clones
`
`comprising type B constructs of the pShuttleBAC series do not segregate and show
`
`a more homogenous colony size even after repeated passage in E. coli indicating
`
`high genetic stability.
`
`Figure
`
`3A. Detection of
`
`replicative intermediates of YFV-17D RNA
`
`replication after
`
`transfection of Vero-B cells with pShuttle/YF17D
`
`(wildtype,
`
`WT)
`
`and
`
`its
`
`replication
`
`deficient
`
`derivative
`
`
`
`
`
`pShuttle/YF17DAGDD (AGDD) by Northern§blot. Antisense oriented
`
`antigenomes, (-)-RNA (A upper panel, 11 kb) and sense orientated viral genomes,
`
`(+)-RNA (A lower panel, 11kb), could be detected 5 days after transfection only in
`
`35
`
`WTtransfected cells. Ongoing replication in the presence of actinomycin D (ACD),
`
`an inhibitor of DNA directed RNA synthesis, confirms that after initial
`
`launching of
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`YFV-17D genome transcription from pShuttle/YF17D, viral
`
`replication continues
`
`autonomously in a plasmid independent manner.
`
`Figure 3B. Detection of proper YFV-17D RNA transcript processing by 5’-
`
`and 3’-RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends). pShuttle/YF17D launches
`
`transcription of nascent YFV-17D RNAs (bold cases in figure 3B) that start and end
`
`with proper 5‘ and 3’ ends (upper and lower panel, respectively) as confirmed by
`
`rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE).
`
`Figure 4A-C. Similar CPE induced by YFV-17D of different origin. YFV-17D
`
`viruses derived from /n vitro transcribed and capped RNA using pACNR-FLYF17DII
`
`as a template (A) or harvested after plasmid DNA transfection of pShuttle/YF17D
`
`(B) produce an identical virus induced cytopathic effect (CPE) on BHK-21 cells 5
`
`days postinfection (d p.i.); C, uninfected cells for comparison.
`
`Figure 4D-E. Similar plaque phenotype of YFV-17D of different origin. YFV-
`
`17D viruses derived from in vitro transcribed and capped RNA using pACNR-
`
`FLYF17DII as a template (D) or harvested after plasmid DNA transfection of
`pShuttle/YF17D (E) produce a comparable number (5 days p.i. 3x 10° plaque
`forming units (pfu) mL vs 2 x 10° pfu mL") and identical morphology of plaques
`
`(diameter 6,4 + 0,7 mM vs 6,1 + 1,1 mM; n = 8, p-value = 0,6 by t-test) on BHK-
`
`21 cells.
`
`Figure
`
`5.
`
`Detection
`
`of
`
`infectious
`
`recombinant
`
`DENV2
`
`by
`
`immunofluocrescence assay (IFA). Recombinant DENV2 NGC produced by BHK-
`
`21 cells transfected with pShuttle/DV2 shows dose dependent infection of Vero-B
`
`cells, visualizes as viral foci by immunofluorescence staining for the viral E protein 5
`
`days p.i. (A, undiluted supernatant, B, 100-fold diluted supernatant, C, uninfected
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`cell control).
`
`Figure 6. Survival of AG129 mice infected with Stamaril (open squares) or
`
`transfected with pShuttle/YF17D (crosses). About 10 to 12 days after i.p.
`
`challenge,
`
`interferon type I and II receptor deficient (AG129) mice start losing
`
`weight and develop a uniform set of symptoms, namely ruffling of the fur, tremor
`
`and flaccid hind limb paralysis. Control animals transfected with the replication
`
`deficient NSSAGDD plasmid variant (AGDD, open circles) show no pathogenesis.
`
`However, they stay susceptible to a second Stamaril ® challenge (filled triangle) 20
`
`days after initial
`
`transfection and then die within a comparable timeframe and
`
`showing similar symptoms. Plasmid DNAs were transfected i.p. using calcium
`
`carbonate microflowers in 33%propylene glycol as carrier.
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`10
`
`Figure 7. Morbidity (A) and detection of YFV-17D RNA (B) from infected
`
`AGi129 mice.
`
`(A)
`
`If
`
`infected either with Stamaril ® or
`
`transfected with
`
`pShuttle/YF17D (pYF17D), AG129 mice loose about 20 % of body weight before
`
`they have to be euthanized after an average of 12 to 13 days (MDD, mean day to
`
`death). By contrast, pShuttle/YF17DAGDD (AGDD})
`
`transfected mice gain weight,
`
`before they are challenged with Stamaril ® (AGDD + 2° Stamaril) and die from
`
`YFV-17D infection within about two weeks.
`
`(B) Comparable amounts of YFV-17D
`
`RNA can be detected by means of qRT-PCR in brain samples of AG129 mice from
`
`(A) collected at death.
`
`Figure 8. Map of pShuttle/YF17D (synthetic construct #1). Legend: SV40p:
`
`Simian virus 40 promoter/origin, YFV-17D: yellow fever virus vaccine strain 17D
`
`cDNA, HDVrz: hepatitis delta virus ribozyme cDNA; 2u: S. cerevisiae 2-micron
`
`origin; TRP1: TRPi gene conferring prototrophic growth towards tryptophan;
`
`parABC: partitioning genes of F-plasmid; repE: repE gene of F-plasmid; oriS: origin
`
`of F-plasmid; oriV: origin of plasmid RK2; CmR: chloramphenicol resistance gene.
`
`Figure 9. E. coli colony growth after tranformation with different YFV-17D
`
`cDNA vectors. (A) —. coli EPI-300T colonies after transformation with pACNR-
`
`FLYFi7DII and growth for 16 h at 37° C. A colony size distribution with two
`
`subpopulations with major
`
`size differences
`
`can be observed, microcolonies
`
`(diameter smaller than 0.2 mm) and macrocolonies (diameter around 0.4 mm).
`
`Microcolonies
`
`represent
`
`the majority.
`
`(B+C) &.
`
`co/f EPI-300T colonies after
`
`transformation with pShuttle/YFV17D. Plating on plates without inducer (B), or with
`
`0.01% L-arabinose (C) for induction of of high copy replication mediated by the
`
`inducible high-copy origin. Large black circles are zirkonia beads of 2.5 mm
`
`diameter embedded into the agar to serve as calibrators.
`
`Inset
`
`figures are
`
`schematic line drawings representing the colony outlines observed in each setting.
`
`Figure 10. Size distribution of £. coli colonies after transformation with
`
`different YFV-17D cDNA vectors.
`
`(A)
`
`&£.
`
`co/i EPI-300T colonies
`
`after
`
`transformation with pACNR-FLYF17DII.
`
`(B+C) &.
`
`co/i EPI-300T colonies after
`
`transformation with pShuttle/YFV17D. Plating on plates without inducer (B), or with
`
`0.01% L-arabinose (C)
`
`for induction of high copy replication mediated by the
`
`inducible high-copyorigin.
`
`Figure ita. Map of pShuttle/ChimeriVax-JE. pShuttle/ChimeriVax-JE contains
`
`following the SV40 promotor/origin nt 1-481 and 2452-10862 of YFV-17D,
`
`in which
`
`477-2477 of neuroattenuated JEV vaccine strain JE SA14-14-2 are inserted. The
`
`second last two last amino acids of the JEV E-ORF are mutated from a histidin to a
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`11
`
`glycin codon to generate a KasI site,
`
`the NS2A and NS4B-ORFs contain two
`
`adaptive G4055a and G7349a mutations found in Imojev® changing a methionine
`
`to valine in the YFV-17D NS2A and a lysine to glutamine in the NS4B ORFs,
`
`respectively. Additional silent mutations generate restriction markers at positions
`
`406 (XhoI), 4009 (BstEII), and 7315 (NhelI).
`
`Figure 11b. Map of pShuttle/ChimeriVax-WN. pShuttle/ChimeriVax-WN contains
`
`following the SV40 promotor/origin nt 1-481 and 2452-10862 of YFV-17D,
`
`in which
`
`477-2477 of a neuroattenuated derivative of WNV strain NY-99 are inserted. The
`
`second last two last amino acids of the WN E-ORF are mutated from a histidin to a
`
`glycin codon to generate a KasI site,
`
`the NS2A and NS4B-ORFs contain two
`
`adaptive G4055a and G7349a mutations found in Imojev® changing a methionine
`
`to valine in the YFV-17D NS2A and a lysine to glutamine in the NS4B ORFs,
`
`respectively. Additional silent mutations generate restriction markers at positions
`
`406 (XhoI), 4009 (BstEII), and 7315 (NheI).
`
`Figure 12. Map of pShuttle/EV71. pShuttle/EV71 contains the cDNA of EV71 strain
`
`BrCr-TR (Genbank AB204852.1) inserted between the SV40 promotor/origin at its
`
`5’ terminus, and a 30 nt long polyA repeat plus the hepatitis delta virus ribozyme at
`
`its 3’ end.
`
`Figure 13 depicts sequences with SEQ ID NO 1-7
`
`Definitions
`
`The term "bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)" refers to a plasmid DNA
`
`construct used to clone DNA sequencesin bacterial cells, such as F. coli. Typically
`
`DNA sequences ranging from 30,000 to about 300,000 base pairs can be inserted
`
`into a BAC. The BAC, with the inserted DNA, can be taken up by bacterial cells. As
`
`the bacterial cells grow and divide, the BAC DNA is stably maintained within the
`
`bacterial cells at a very low copy number per bacterial cell, preferably not
`
`exceeding 3 copies per cell, such as at a single copy per cell. The replication of a
`
`BAC is
`
`initiated at an origin of
`
`replication (ori) sequence,
`
`typically the oriS
`
`sequence. This replication is stringently regulated by gene products, generally the
`
`repE and/or repF, encoded by the BAC. The BAC further encodes for proteins, such
`
`as parA, B and C, directing the partitioning of the BAC copies to the daughter cells
`
`during division. Typically, BAC vectors further comprise selectable markers, such as
`
`antibiotic resistance or reporter enzyme markers, such as lacZ allowing for blue
`
`white selection. An example of a generally used BAC is the pBeloBacil (Shizuya et
`
`al. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 8794-8797.) The sequence of this vector
`
`was reported at GenBank Accession Number U51113. pBeloBaci1 is a circular
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`WO 2014/174078
`
`PCT/EP2014/058439
`
`12
`
`plasmid that includes oriS, the repE gene that produces a protein that initiates and
`
`regulates the replication at oriS, and partition genes par A, B, and C. For selection
`
`pBeloBac11 includes a chlo

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site