`Reply to Office Action of August 17, 2023
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 22773-826.309
`
`AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings of claims in the
`
`application:
`
`Listing of Claims:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Currently Amended) A method of making a multilayer dental aligner for repositioning a
`
`patient’s teeth from a first arrangement toward a second arrangement, the method comprising:
`
`providing a multilayer sheet comprising:
`
`a first soft polymerlayer;
`
`a first hard polymerlayer:
`
`a second soft polymerlayer; and
`
`a second hard polymerlayer; and
`
`a third hard polymerlayer:
`
`wherein each of the first hard polymer layer, the second hard polymer layer, and
`
`the third hard polymerlayer consists of a co-polyesterfirstpehymer having:
`
`a flexural modulus greater than 150,000 psi; [[and]]
`
`a tensile strength yield of 4000 psi to 6500 psi;
`
`an elongation at yield of greater than 4%; and
`
`an elongation at break of greater than 70%;
`
`wherein each of the first soft polymer layer and the second soft polymer layer
`
`
`
`a hardness from 60A to 85D; and
`
`an elongation at break of greater than 200%;
`
`wherein each of the first soft polymer layer and the second soft polymer layer
`
`have a thickness of about 25 um to about 100 um: and
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`
`
`Appl. No.: 17/553,590
`Reply to Office Action of August 17, 2023
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 22773-826.309
`
`wherein the multilayer sheet has a thickness of about 600 um to about 1000 um:
`
`wherein the first hard polymer layer is disposed between the first soft polymer
`
`layer and the second soft polymerlayer:
`
`providing a mold;
`
`thermoforming the multilayer sheet over the mold to form a plurality of tooth-receiving
`
`cavities configured to receive and reposition the patient’s teeth from the first arrangement toward
`
`the second arrangement; and
`
`trimming excess material from the thermoformed multilayer sheet to form the dental
`
`aligner.
`
`3-5.
`
`(Canceled)
`
`6.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 2 ¢latm3, wherein the co-polyester first
`
`polymer has a tensile modulus of greater than 150,000 psi.
`
`7-9.
`
`(Canceled)
`
`10.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 2, wherein the elastomer thermeplastic
`
`poburethane-elastomer has an ultimate tensile strength of greater than 5000psi.
`
`11.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 2, wherein the co-polyester first-pebymer has
`
`an elastic modulus greater than the elastomer thermeplastic_pebyurethane-clastomer.
`
`12.
`
`(Canceled)
`
`
`
`asame-ordifferent thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer astheseeondteyer.
`
`14-18. (Canceled)
`
`19.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 2 elat+m+8, wherein the thirdtayer the first
`
`soft polymerlayer is co-extruded with or laminated to the first hard polymerlayer.
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`
`
`Appl. No.: 17/553,590
`Reply to Office Action of August 17, 2023
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 22773-826.309
`
`20-28. (Canceled)
`
`
`
`29. (Currently Amended) The method of claim 2 elaima—6, wherein the co-polyesterefthe
`
`firstlayer has a light transmission between 400 nm and 800 nm ofgreater than about 75%.
`
`30.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 2 ¢laim—46, wherein the elastomer
`
`
`
`thermoplastic_pelypurethane-elastomerofthe-secondtayerhas a compression set of greater than
`
`40% after 24 hours at 70° C,
`
`31-33. (Canceled)
`
`34.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 2 ¢laim—t, wherein the first-pelymer co-
`
`polyester has a light transmission between 400 nm and 800 nm of greater than about 75%, and
`
`wherein the thermeplastie_pelyurethane—elastemer elastomer has a light transmission between
`
`400 nm and 800 nm ofgreater than about 75%.
`
`35.
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 2 elatta—+6, wherein thermeplastte
`
`pobyurethaneelastomer the elastomer has a light transmission between 400 nm and 800 nm of
`
`greater than about 75%.
`
`36.
`
`(New) The method of claim 2, wherein the first hard polymer layer, the second hard
`
`polymerlayer, and the third hard polymer layer have a thickness of about 400 um to about 1100
`
`um.
`
`37.
`
`(New) The method of claim 2, wherein the first hard polymer layer, the second hard
`
`polymerlayer, and the third hard polymer layer have a thickness of about 500 um to about 900
`
`um.
`
`38.
`
`(New) The method of claim 2, wherein the first hard polymer layer, the second hard
`
`polymerlayer, and the third hard polymer layer have a thickness of about 550 um to about 750
`
`um.
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`
`
`Appl. No.: 17/553,590
`Reply to Office Action of August 17, 2023
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 22773-826.309
`
`39.
`
`(New) The method of claim 2, wherein one ofthe first soft polymer layer and the second
`
`soft polymer layer are configured to contact the patient’s teeth to reposition the patient’s teeth
`
`from the first arrangement toward the second arrangement.
`
`AO.
`
`(New) The method of claim 2, wherein the first soft polymer layer and the second soft
`
`polymerlayer serve as exterior layers of the multilayer dental aligner.
`
`41.
`
`(New) The methodof claim 2, wherein the elastomeris a co-polyester elastomer.
`
`42.
`
`(New) The method of claim 2, wherein the elastomer is a thermoplastic co-polyester
`
`elastomer.
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site