FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
`Do NoT ENTER
`
`Application No.:
`Title:
`Filing Date:
`Examiner:
`Attorney Docket No.:
`
`17/553,590
`Multilayer Polymer Sheets
`December16, 2021
`Vivian Chen
`22773-826.309
`
`Examiner Interview Agenda — November 15", 2023, 4PM EST
`
`Applicant thanks Examiner Chenfor her availability at the above indicated time. The
`
`interview will be attended by representatives for Applicant, Richard Shin (Reg. No. 79,825;
`
`rshin@wsegr.com) and Yahn Lin (Franklin) Chu (Reg. No. 75,946; fchu@geminlaw.com).
`
`PROPOSED TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION:
`
`L
`
`Pending Claims
`
`(Previously Presented) A method of making a multilayer dental aligner for repositioning
`2.
`a patient's teeth fromafirst arrangement toward a second arrangement, the method comprising:
`providing a multilayer sheet comprising:
`a first layer;
`a second layer; and
`a third layer; and
`wherein the first layer consists of a first polymer having:
`a flexural modulus greater than 150,000 psi; and
`an elongation at break of greater than 70%;
`wherein the second layer consists of a second polymerdifferent than the first polymer,
`wherein the second polymeris a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer having:
`a hardness from 60A to 85D; and
`an elongation at break of greater than 200%;
`providing a mold;
`thermoforming the multilayer sheet over the mold to form a plurality of tooth-receiving
`cavities configured to receive and reposition the patient's teeth from the first arrangement toward
`the second arrangement; and
`trimming excess material from the thermoformed multilayer sheet to form the dental
`
`aligner.
`
`I.
`
`Pending Rejections under 35 U.S.C.§ 103
`
`e
`
`Claims 2-6, 10-30, 33-35 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as allegedly
`
`unpatentable over Wen (WO 2006/0996558), Bedard et al. (US 6,077,075), Desimone
`
`et al. (US 2006/0078841), Phan et al. (US 6,454,565), Kalili (US 2011/0020761),
`
`TEXIN 990R, Shore A Hardness Scale, and Wrosz (US 2005/0082703)
`
`e Desimone (US 2006/0078841) — the Office Action cites to J] 0023, 0027, 0030, 0044
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket