`
` <
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKETNO.
`
`CONFIRMATIONNO.
`
`17/549,624
`
`12/13/2021
`
`Jung Hun NOH
`
`P8161USC1
`
`7938
`
`H.C. PARK & ASSOCIATES, PLC
`1894 PRESTON WHITE DRIVE
`RESTON, VA 20191
`
`GANMAVO, KUASSI A
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2692
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`02/01/2024
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`PATENT @PARK-LAW.COM
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Applicant-InitiatedInterview Summary “KUASSI A GANMAVO
`
`Application No.
`17/549,624
`Examiner
`KUASSIA
`GANMAVO
`
`Applicant(s)
`NOH etal.
`AIA (First Inventor
`to File) Status
`Yes
`
`Telephonic
`JAE HOON KIM [Attorney|CC—C“‘CisS
`
`
`
`Date of Interview: 25 January 2024
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`35 U.S.C. 103
`
`The examiner arguesthat part of coupling layer 75-1 do not overlap the generator 27. The part of 75-1
`not overlapping the generatoris interpreted as intermediate layer and layer 27-2’ is interpreted asfirst
`layer. Therefore the applicant's argument are not persuasive.
`
`Attachment
`
`/KUASSI A GANMAVO/
`Examiner, Art Unit 2692
`
`/CAROLYN R EDWARDS/
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2692
`
`37 CFR§ 1.2 Businessto be transactedin writing
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substanceof the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview wasinitiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner hasindicated that a written summarywill be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Pleasefurther see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substance of the
`interview. (See MPEP section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is given a
`non-extendable period of the longer of one monthor thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this
`interview summary form, whichever is later, to file a statement of the substanceofthe interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substanceof any interview of record. A complete
`and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the itemslisted in MPEP 713.04 for complete
`and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argumentor issue discussed, a general
`indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or outcome of the
`interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issuesraised.
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/413b (Rev. Oct. 2019)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20240126
`
`