`
`Application No.
`17/391,056
`Examiner
`MEKONEN T
`BEKELE
`
`Applicant(s)
`BOK, Seung Lyong
`AIA (First Inventor
`to File) Status
`Yes
`
`
`
`Telephonic
`MEKONENT BEKELE
`
`Kyle W. Kellar Reg( No. 71,165) [Attorney|CC—C“‘CisS
`
`Date of Interview: 14 June 2024
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`35 U.S.C. 112
`
`The applicant representative and Examiner discuss the 112b rejection. Based on our discussion
`Applicant representative will consider to amend the claim.
`
`Other
`
`The applicant representative and Examiner discuss about the requestof the after final amendment under
`AFCP 2.0 . We agree that the request is proper. After further search consideration Examiner found a
`potential prior art that read the addedlimitation See PTO 892
`
`/MEKONENT BEKELE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
`
`37 CFR§ 1.2 Businessto be transactedin writing
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substanceof the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview wasinitiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner hasindicated that a written summarywill be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Pleasefurther see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: lt is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substanceof interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substanceof any interview of record. A complete
`and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the itemslisted in MPEP 713.04 for complete
`and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argumentor issue discussed, a general
`indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or outcome of the
`interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issuesraised.
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/413b (Rev. Oct. 2019)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20240616
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
