`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/272,612
`
`05/25/2021
`
`Sang Ok JEONG
`
`PL5924482
`
`1005
`
`NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC, dba NKL Law
`3251 Blenheim Blvd.
`SUITE 500
`FAIRFAX, VA 22030
`
`KANE, KATHARINE GRACZ
`
`3732
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`12/22/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`docket01 @nkllaw.com
`docket02 @nkllaw.com
`skim @nkllaw.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/272,612
`JEONG etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF)StatusExaminer
`KATHARINE KANE
`3732
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 12/5/2023.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)[¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`19-33 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)__ is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 19-33 is/are rejected.
`(] Claim(s)__ is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)(J accepted or b)( objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)7) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) [[] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20231216
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`underthe first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`2.
`
`Applicant’s amendmentfiled on 12/5/2023 has been received; Claims 19-33 are
`
`pending.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basisfor all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effectivefiling date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`4.
`
`The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness
`
`under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized asfollows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`
`2. Ascertaining the differences betweenthe prior art and the claims at issue.
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinentart.
`
`4. Considering objective evidence presentin the application indicating
`
`obviousness or nonobviousness.
`
`5.
`
`Claims 19-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Compte (USPN 3,006,084) in view of Ludemann (US 2013/0133229).
`
`Regarding Claim 19, Compte discloses shoes (Figures 1-5) comprising: a
`
`first body portion (1%, see annotated Figure 1 below) in which a portion of a front
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 3
`
`foot portion of a weareris positioned (Figure 1); a second body portion (2", see
`
`annotated Figure 1 below) connectedto thefirst body portion (Figure 1) and in
`
`which the other remaining portion of the front foot portion, a middle foot portion,
`
`and a rear foot portion of the wearer are positioned (Figure 1); at least one
`
`protrusion (15) protruding from an inner surface and extending in a direction in
`
`which the second body portion extends (Figure 1), wherein a protruding
`
`thickness of each protrusion of the at least one protrusion decreases from an
`
`upperportion toward the first body portion (decreases, see annotated Figure 1A
`
`below). Compte doesnotspecifically disclose a cover seamlessly connected to
`
`the second body portion and protruding in an outward direction from both edge
`
`portions. Ludemann discloses a cover (Para. 22) seamlessly connected to a
`
`second body portion and protruding in an outward direction from both edge
`
`portions (Figure 4). It would have been obvious to one ofordinary skill in the art
`
`to include a cover and thus a shoe made oflayers, as taught by Ludemann, in
`
`order to provide a lightweight and insulative shoe.
`
`Regarding Claim 20, Compte discloses whenthe at least one protrusion
`
`comprises a plurality of protrusions spaced apart from each other across the
`
`inner surface of the cover (Figures 1-5).
`
`Regarding Claim 21, Compte discloses a discharge passage (passage,
`
`see annotated Figures 2 & 3 below) located between two adjacent protrusions to
`
`discharge sweator odor inside the shoes (Col. 2, lines 6-25).
`
`Regarding Claim 22, Compte does not specifically disclose a width of the
`
`discharge passage is 0.5 cm to 3.cm.
`
`It, however, would have been obvious to
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 4
`
`one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was madeto
`
`experimentwith different ranges of width for the passagesin order to achieve an
`
`optimal configuration for ventilating purposes, since discovering the optimum or
`
`workable rangesof the width involvesonly routine skill in the art.
`
`Regarding Claim 23, Compte discloses protrusion heights of different
`
`protrusions located at the same level are the same or different (Figures 1-3).
`
`Regarding Claim 24, Compte discloses whenthe protrusion heights of the
`
`different protrusions located at the same level are different from each other, the
`
`protrusion height increases from the edge portion of the cover toward the center
`
`(Figures 1-3).
`
`Regarding Claim 25, Compte discloses extending lengths of two adjacent
`
`protrusions are the same or different (Figures 1-3).
`
`
`
`
`‘
`
`SA.
`
`SE SEEte SS
`» OSSSSS
`ee
`SE
`; ARE =
`we
`$S
`REET
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`6.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`A personshall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use,
`on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effectivefiling date of the claimed
`invention.
`
`7.
`
`Claims 19 & 26-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being
`
`anticipated by Vattes (USPN 8,146,266).
`
`Regarding Claim 19, Vattes discloses shoes (Figures 1-2) comprising: a
`
`first body portion (18, see annotated Figure 1A below) in which a portion of a
`
`front foot portion of a weareris positioned (Figure 1A); a second bodyportion
`
`(2"¢, see annotated Figure 1A below) connectedto the first body portion and in
`
`which the other remaining portion of the front foot portion, a middle foot portion,
`
`and a rearfoot portion of the wearer can be positioned (Figure 1A); a cover(Col.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 6
`
`15, lines 1-29 & Col. 16, line 47- Col. 17, line 16) seamlessly connected to the
`
`second body portion and protruding in an outward direction from both edge
`
`portions (Figure 4G); at least one protrusion (38a & b, Figure 2c) protruding from
`
`an inner surface of the cover (Col. 15, lines 1-29 & Col. 16, line 47- Col. 17, line
`
`16) and extending in a direction in which the second bodyportion extends
`
`(Figures 1 & 2), wherein a protruding thickness of each protrusion of the at least
`
`one protrusion decreases from an upper portion toward the first body portion
`
`(decreases, see annotated Figure 2D below & Figures 2A-E).
`
`Regarding Claim 26, Vattes discloses a shape support portion (26) located
`
`between an edge portion of the cover and an edge portion of the second body
`
`portion adjacent to the edgeportion of the cover (Figures 1A & B) and having a
`
`thickness greater than those of the cover and the second bodyportion (Figures
`
`1B & 2F).
`
`Regarding Claim 27, Vattes discloses the shape support portion includes:
`
`a main body (26) located between the edge portion of the second bodyportion
`
`and the edgeportion of the cover adjacent to each other and facing each other
`
`(Figures 1A & B); and a support protrusion (Figures 2F-G) protruding from an
`
`inner surface of the main body (Figure 1-2).
`
`Regarding Claim 28, Vattes discloses a width of the main bodyis different
`
`depending on a position (Figures 2F-G).
`
`Regarding Claim 29, Vattes discloses the width of the main body
`
`increasesin a direction from an upper end of the main body toward a crutch
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 7
`
`portion in which talus of the wearer's foot is located and in a direction from a
`
`lower end of the main bodyto the crutch portion of the wearer (Figures 1-2).
`
`Regarding Claim 30, Vattes discloses a thickness of the support
`
`protrusion increases from an edge portion connected to the second body portion
`
`toward the cover(Figure 2G).
`
`Regarding Claim 31, Vattes discloses the shape support portion further
`
`includes an extension portion (extension, see annotated Figure 2F below)
`
`extending in a direction intersecting the support protrusion from a lower end of
`
`the support protrusion (Figures 1 & 2F).
`
`Regarding Claim 32, Vattes discloses a height of an outer surface of the
`
`extension portion is higher than a height of outer surfaces of the adjacentfirst
`
`and second body portions (Figures 1-2).
`
`Regarding Claim 33, Vattes discloses an arrest protrusion (18) located on
`
`a rear outer surface of the second bodyportion.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 8
`
`ceo
`
`ihat7peeaa
`SerertdSo,aewma
`
`oy
`
`mae
`
`eeeeen_‘73tnc
`Pad.
`"s
`
`teetadeeIMAEimgBeer,
`
`-"
`cirberernre
`
`ValFeorgenttyboom,tb1Deiotedrraof
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pringecendenececesedsLPLLLLEIEIEIEDirmerrnnrrnrrner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 9
`
`eo
`LES
`
`
` =
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`8.
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amended claims have beenfully
`
`considered but are mootin view of the new groundsof rejection as discussed supra.
`
`Conclusion
`
`9.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the eventafirst reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTHshortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 10
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however,will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`10.=Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to KATHARINE KANE whosetelephone number is
`
`(571)272-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-6pm EST.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Avwww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, KHOA HUYNH canbe reached on 571-272-4888. The fax phone numberfor
`
`the organization wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Centeris
`
`available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,
`
`visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-
`
`center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For
`
`additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197
`
`(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO CustomerService
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/272,612
`Art Unit: 3732
`
`Page 11
`
`/KATHARINE G KANE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site