Reply to Office Action of June 7, 2021
`
`-9-
`
`Remarks
`
`Kenneth NORTH
`Application No. 16/944,650
`
`Reconsideration of this Application is respectfully requested.
`
`Uponentry of the foregoing amendment, claims 1-20 are pending in the application, with
`
`claims 1, 10, and 19 being the independent claims. Claims 1, 10, 11, and 19 are sought to be
`
`amended. Claims 4, 5, 13, and 14 are sought to be canceled without prejudice to or disclaimer of the
`
`subject matter therein. These changesare believed to introduce no new matter, and their entry is
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`Based on the above amendmentandthe following remarks, Applicant respectfully requests
`
`that the Examiner reconsiderall outstanding objections and rejections and that they be withdrawn.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claims 5 and 14 are objected to as containing allowable subject matter. Office Action, 2.
`
`Applicant has amended claims 1 and 19 to incorporate the allowable limitations of claims 4 and 5
`
`and claim 10 to incorporate the allowable limitations of claims 13 and 14. Accordingly, withdrawal
`
`of the objection is respectfully solicited.
`
`Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b)
`
`Claims 11 and 12 rejected allegedly being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and
`
`distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventoror a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the
`
`applicant regards as the invention. Applicant traverses.
`
`Claim 11 is rejected for reciting “during the installation of the distributed content.” Office
`
`Action, 4. The Office Action alleges that “there is no recitation of any installation step” in claim 10.
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3450.0570002
`
`

`

`Reply to Office Action of June 7, 2021
`
`- 10-
`
`Kenneth NORTH
`Application No. 16/944,650
`
`Without acquiescing to the merits of the rejection, Applicant amendsclaim 11 to recite “an
`
`installation.” Withdrawal of the § 112(b) rejection is respectfully solicited.
`
`Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`Claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9-13, 15, 16, and 18 are rejected as allegedly being unpatentable over
`
`Cammarata, (US 20140337752 A1) (hereinafter Cammarata) and in view ofSirpalet al., (US
`
`20120084675 A1) (hereinafter Sirpal). Claims 8 and 17 are rejected as allegedly being unpatentable
`
`over Cammarata in view ofSirpal as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of Meyer
`
`et al., (US 20140365561 A1) (hereinafter Meyer). Claims 19 and 20 are rejected as allegedly being
`
`unpatentable over Cammarata, and in view of Agnettaet al., (US 20140337791 A1) (hereinafter
`
`Agnetta). Applicant traverses.
`
`Asnoted above, the Office Action objects to dependent claims 5 and 14 asreciting
`
`allowable subject matter. Without acquiescing to the merits of the § 103 rejections, Applicant
`
`amends independent claims 1, 10, and 19 to incorporate the language of the allowable limitations of
`
`claims 5 and 14. Accordingly, withdrawal of the § 103 rejection is respectfully solicited.
`
`Conclusion
`
`All of the stated grounds of objection and rejection have been properly traversed,
`
`accommodated, or rendered moot. Applicant therefore respectfully requests that the Examiner
`
`reconsiderall presently outstanding objections and rejections and that they be withdrawn. Applicant
`
`believes that a full and complete reply has been made to the outstanding Office Action and, as such,
`
`the present application is in condition for allowance. If the Examinerbelieves, for any reason, that
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3450.0570002
`
`

`

`Reply to Office Action of June 7, 2021
`
`-l1-
`
`Kenneth NORTH
`Application No. 16/944,650
`
`personal communication will expedite prosecution of this application, the Examineris invited to
`
`telephone the undersigned at the number provided.
`
`Promptand favorable consideration of this Amendment and Reply is respectfully requested.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Dohm Chankong/
`
`Dohm Chankong
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 70,524
`
`Date:__September 7, 2021
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`16964897.1
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3450.0570002
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket