Appl. No.: 16/043,065
`Reply to Final Office Action of October 30, 2020
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 22773-826.303
`
`Amendments to the Specification:
`
`Please replace paragraph [0025] of the Specification with the following amended
`
`paragraph:
`
`[0025] Figure 2 shows a multilayer structure according to the present invention. As shown, a
`
`multilayer sheet 20 can include a three layer structure: a hard polymer layer 24 and two soft
`
`polymerlayers 22, 26. The hard polymerlayer can be disposed betweena first soft polymer layer
`
`and a second soft polymer layer.
`
`In some embodiments, the hard polymer layer can be thicker
`
`than either of the soft polymer layers. The soft polymer layers can have the sameor different
`
`thicknesses. For example, the hard polymer layer can range-frem-athickness-ofhave a thickness
`
`in a range from about 400 um to about 1100 um, about 450 um to about 1000 um, about 500 um
`
`to about 900 um, orabout 550 um to about 750 um. Thesoft polymerlayers can have a thickness
`
`inarange from athickress-of about 25 um to about 100 um, about 30 um to about 90 um, or about
`
`35 um to about 80 um. Multilayer sheets used for making appliances having a hard polymerlayer
`
`disposed between two soft polymerlayers can range from a thickness of about 500 um to about
`
`1200 um, about 550 um to about 1100 um, or about 600 um to about 1000 um.
`
`In some
`
`embodiments, the thicknesses of the various layers can be tailored for a particular stage of
`
`treatmentfor the patient.
`
`Support for amendments to Paragraph [0025] can be found in parent application US
`
`13/470,681 (now U.S. Patent No. 9,655,691) in the application as originally filed at least at
`
`paragraph [0024].
`
`Please replace paragraph [0036] of the Specification with the following amended
`
`paragraph:
`
`[0036] Figures 5-8 provide example test results that compare various physical properties of the
`
`multilayer sheet appliances of the present invention with other already existing aligner materials
`
`(Material 1). Samples of varied thicknesses were tested. For example, multilayer sheets were
`
`tested having a hard polymer layer with thicknesses ranging from about 580 um to about 715 um
`
`thick.
`
`In some examples, the hard layer was a co-polyester hard polymerlayer. The soft layers
`
`tested ranged between about 50 um to about 100 um. In some examples, the hard polymerlayer
`
`Page 2 of 17
`
`

`

`Appl. No.: 16/043,065
`Reply to Final Office Action of October 30, 2020
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 22773-826.303
`
`was disposed between thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer soft polymer layers. As shown in
`
`Figures 5 and 6, one example of the multilayer sheet material (Material 2) showed improvedstress
`
`relaxation properties as compared to another already existing material (Material 1) at room
`
`
`
`temperature andata37 °C/90-100% relative humidity condition. In addition, Figure 7 shows
`
`improved long-term unloading characteristics of the multilayer sheet Material 2 versus the already
`
`existing Material 1_in a 37 °C/90-100% relative humidity condition. The multilayer sheet showed
`
`less deflection under force loads. Figure 8 also shows improved long-term movementdata for the
`
`multilayer sheet Material 2 versus Material 1_in a 37 °C/90-100% relative humidity condition.
`
`Support for amendments to Paragraph [0036] can be found in parent application US
`
`13/470,681 (now U.S. Patent No. 9,655,691) in the application as originally filed at least at
`
`paragraph [0035].
`
`Accordingly, no new matter has been added by way of these amendments to the
`
`specification.
`
`Page 3 of 17
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket