Case 225-
`
`“
`ov-O0
`
`269-AB-RAOQ Document36 Filed O8/16/23 Page loti
`
`AO 126 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Mail Stop $
`
`P.O, Box 1480
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1458
`
`REPORTON THE
`FELING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`fled in
`
`§§ 290 and/or 15 US.0. § JEG vou are hereby advisedthat a court action has been
`
`fn Comphance with 3S TER. C.
`the US. Dhstnct Court
`for the Central District of California
`on the folowing
`
`
`
`il Trademarks or
`
`[| Patents.
`
`0269-AB-Fi;
`
`PLAINTIFI
`
`BTL industries, inc.
`
`| DEFENDANT
`Munera Esthetics, inc.
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`BATE OF PATENT
`tk TRADEMARK
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`PATENT
`OLDER OF
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`Pat. No. 10,478,634
`
`V1ANB/2018
`
`BTL Industries, inc.
`
`2 Pat. No. 16,709,894
`
`7/14/2020
`
`BTL industries, Inc.
`
`Pat. No. 11,266,852
`
`
`3/8/2022
`
`
`B/212017
`
`BTL industries, inc.
`
`
`BTL industries, Inc.
`
`3/24/2020
`
`BTL industries, inc.
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s}/ trademark(s)} have been incinded:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`i} Amendment
`VTE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`(wf Other Pleading
`[i Cross Bill
`[i Answer
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARE
`
`( (] the patent action involves 35 US at the Central District of California
`
` DATE
`
`TM No. 3,572,804
`
`10/2/2078
`
`BTL industries, inc.
`
`2 TM No. 5,915,636
`
`T2/19/2018
`
`BTL Industries, Inc.
`
`TM No. 6,069,279
`
`O/212020
`
`BTL industries, Inc.
`
`4 TR No. 6,206,098
`
`41/24/2020
`
`BTL industries, inc.
`
`3 TR No. 5,688,919
`
`3/5/2073
`
`BTL indusines, inc.
`
`{n the abc
`ove---ettitied case, the folowingdecision has been rendered
`
`or judgement issued:
`
`DECTSIONAUBGEMENT
`
`CONSENT JUDGMENT
`
`Kary Gray
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`Lori Muracka
`
`5/16/2023
`
`Copy i—Unpon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 3-—Upontermination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2-—-Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director
`Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket