UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`16/294,499
`
`03/06/2019
`
`Jeonghun KIM
`
`29275-43102/US
`
`3311
`
`759°
`1383“-
`LG D1sp1ay/FENWICK
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`
`11/22/2019
`
`SHRESTHA' SAGAR
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2835
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`11/22/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`FWLGDisplayPatents @ fenwiek.eom
`ptoe @ fenwiek.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`017/09 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/294,499
`Examiner
`SAGAR SH RESTHA
`
`Applicant(s)
`KIM et al.
`Art Unit
`2835
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 08/26/2019.
`CI A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a). This action is FINAL.
`
`2b) D This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4):] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expade Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s)
`
`flis/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above Claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`
`
`[:1 Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) 1—10,12 and 15—16 is/are rejected.
`
`Claim(s) 11 and 13—14is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`C] Claim(s
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`httpfiwww.”smogovmatentsflnit_events[pph[index.'§p or send an inquiry to PPeredhack@gsptg.ggv.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10):] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 03/06/2019 is/are: a). accepted or b)D objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)C] Some**
`
`c)[j None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2E] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3C] Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) C] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) E] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20191115
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Priority
`
`Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119
`
`(a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 15/404155, filed on
`
`01/11/2017.
`
`Amendment filed on 08/26/2019 has been considered.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`Claim Objections
`
`Claims 1, 15 and 16 are objected to because of the following informalities:
`
`Claim 1 recites “plurality of driver” in lines 4 and 10. “plurality of driver” should be
`
`replaced by “plurality of drivers”.
`
`Claim 15 recites “...segments coming” in line 2. “...segments coming” should be
`
`replaced by “...segments comes”.
`
`Claim 16 recites “through hole” and “connecting member” in lines 1-2. “through
`
`hole” and “connecting member” should be replaced by “through holes” and “connecting
`
`members” respectively.
`
`Appropriate correction is required.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 3
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 1, 5, 6 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim
`
`et al. (US 2016/0231843; “Kim” hereinafter) in view of Miyaguchi (US 20110007042;
`
`“Miyaguchi” hereinafter) and Kim et al. (US 2016/0239050; “Kim’050” hereinafter).
`
`Regarding claim 1, Kim (Figs. 1-4A) discloses a rollable display (“a rollable
`
`display device”, Par. [0062], fig. 1) comprising: a flexible display panel (DM; Kim states,
`
`“a flexible display module DM”, Par. [0063]) having a display area (front surface of
`
`display module DM has display area, fig. 2D-3A) and a non-display area (“The black
`
`matrix BM is located at a rear surface of the base member 100-BS to define a non-
`
`display area”, Par. [008]) including: a reinforcing structure (SB; Kim states, “a plurality of
`
`support blocks SB”, Par. [0063]) on a rear side of the flexible display panel (SB is
`
`attached to the rear side of the flexible display module DM, figs. 1, 4A) and a plurality of
`
`segments (SB comprises of plurality of segments SB1, SB2, SBS...SBm, fig. 4A); a
`
`panel roller (BL-10; Kim states, “a roller RL-10”, par. [0098, fig. 4A) having a
`
`circumference surface onto which the display panel is rolled (fig. 4A-4B); wherein the
`
`segments of the reinforcing structure are arranged along with the direction parallel to
`
`the rolling direction of the display panel (plurality of segments SB1, SB2, SBS...SBm, of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 4
`
`the reinforcing structure SB are arranged along with the direction parallel to the rolling
`
`direction of the display panel DM, figs.2A- 4A).
`
`Kim does not explicitly disclose a display panel including a scan driver
`
`configured to supply a scan signal to the display panel; and a plurality of data driver
`
`configured to supply a data signal to the display panel; and a control board in the panel
`
`roller; and an auxiliary sheet attached to one end of the display panel, wherein the scan
`
`driver is disposed on at least one side of the display area of the display panel and the
`
`plurality of data driver are disposed along with a direction perpendicular to a rolling
`
`direction of the display panel.
`
`Miyaguchi (figs. 1-11) teaches a display device comprising: a display panel (101;
`
`Miyaguchi states, “the display device, which includes ...an element substrate 101”, Par.
`
`[0045]; “a display device including a flexible panel”, Par. [0010]) including a scan driver
`
`(108; Miyaguchi states, “a scan line driver circuit 108”, Par. [0046]) configured to supply
`
`a scan signal to the display panel (“a driver circuit 108 that controls display of the
`
`display portion 103 with scan lines (also referred to as a scan line driver circuit 108)”,
`
`Par. [0046]); and a plurality of data driver (106; Miyaguchi states, “a signal line driver
`
`circuit 106”, Par. [0046]) configured to supply a data signal to the display panel (“a
`
`driver circuit 106 that controls display of the display portion 103 with signal lines (also
`
`referred to as a signal line driver circuit 106)”, Par. [0046]); and an auxiliary sheet (301)
`
`attached to one end of the display panel (flexible printed circuit is attached to the upper
`
`end of the display 101, figs. 3A-4C), wherein the scan driver (108) is disposed on at
`
`least one side of the display area of the display panel (fig. 1B, 2) and the plurality of
`
`data driver (106) are disposed along with a direction perpendicular to a longitudinal
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 5
`
`direction of the display panel (106 is disposed along a horizontal direction of the display
`
`device, fig. 2).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the display device of Kim to incorporate a
`
`scan driver and a data driver, and a flexible printed circuit wiring (i.e. interpreted as the
`
`auxiliary sheet) to attached to the end of the display as taught by Miyaguchi because
`
`Miyaguchi states, “a driver circuit 108 that controls display of the display portion 103
`
`with scan lines (also referred to as a scan line driver circuit 108), and a driver circuit 106
`
`that controls display of the display portion 103 with signal lines (also referred to as a
`
`signal line driver circuit 106” (Par. [0046]). The modification would provide signal to the
`
`display panel and controls the display and further the auxiliary sheet or the FPC wiring
`
`electrically connects the display to the circuit board (Par. [0061]).
`
`Kim’050 (figs. 2 and 5) teaches a control board (112, Kim’050 states, “circuit
`
`board 112”, Par. [0039]) in the roller (111; Kim’050 states, “rolling member 111”, Par.
`
`[0039]; “The circuit board 112 is formed so as to be accommodated in the rolling
`
`member 111 and can have one end exposed from the rolling member 111.” Par.
`
`[0039D.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the roller of Kim to incorporate a control
`
`board in the roller as taught by Kim’050 because Kim’050 states, “The circuit board 112
`
`can supply an image signal or power to the flexible display panel 130t” (Par. [0039]),
`
`and further states, “the rolling member comprises a circuit board configured to driver the
`
`flexible display panel, Par. [0020]; and further by installing the control board or driver
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 6
`
`circuit in the roller would minimizes the size of the casing used for housing the roller and
`
`the rolled display panel, as it would otherwise need extra space for installing the control
`
`board or driver circuit in the casing.
`
`Regarding claim 5, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O (relied on Miyaguchi
`
`(figs 1-11) teaches the scan drivers (108) are disposed on both the left and right sides
`
`of the display area of the display panel (fig. 18).
`
`Regarding claim 6, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 teaches the scan
`
`driver (108; Miyaguchi, figs 1A-5A) is disposed along with the rolling direction of the
`
`display panel (108 is disposed along the two sides of the display 101, figs 1A-5A).
`
`Regarding claim 8, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O teaches each of the
`
`segments has a shape of a bar (881, 882, 883... are bar-shaped, Kim, figs. 2A-2B).
`
`Regarding claim 15, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O (relied on Kim, figs 1-
`
`4A) teaches wherein a surface of an edge of at least a subset of the segments coming
`
`into contact with the display panel when the display panel is rolled onto the panel roller
`
`(at least a subset of segments 881, 882, SBB...SBm, of the reinforcing structure SB
`
`coming into contact with the display panel DM when the display panel is rolled onto the
`
`panel roller RL, fig. 28).
`
`Claims 2, 3, 9, 10 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O as applied to claim 1, and in further view of Van
`
`Rens (US 2006/0107566; “Van” hereinafter).
`
`Regarding claim 2, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O discloses the rollable
`
`display of claim 1.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 7
`
`Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 does not explicitly disclose the segments
`
`comprise at least one through hole.
`
`Van (figs. 1-5) teaches a rollable display (“the mobile telephone 1 comprising the
`
`display device in which the display 3 is rolled up”, Par. [0028]) comprises of a plurality of
`
`segments (16; Van states, “Supporting, foldable or hingeable arms 16”, Par. [0029], fig.
`
`3) comprises through holes (“In the arm 16, which is hollow, runs a cable 30”, Par.
`
`[0033D.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the plurality of segments of the rollable
`
`display module of Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 to incorporate a plurality
`
`through holes in the plurality of segments of a reinforcing as taught by Van in order to
`
`manage the connecting member and further form a secure electrical connections
`
`between the boards.
`
`Regarding claim 3, Kim in view of Miyaguchi, Kim’050 and Van (relied on Van,
`
`figs. 1-5) teaches the rollable display further comprising a connecting member (30;
`
`“cable 30”, Par. [0033]) that electrically connects printed circuit board to transmit signals
`
`for displaying images on the display panel (the cable 30 is connected between the point
`
`of suspensions 33 and 34, fig. 3; and “The point of suspension for the cable is
`
`preferably located on a printed circuit board”, Par. [0011]), the connecting member
`
`slidably inserted into the through holes (“In the arm 16, which is hollow, runs a cable
`
`30”, Par. [0033]).
`
`Regarding claim 9, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 discloses the rollable
`
`display of claim 1.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 8
`
`Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 does not explicitly disclose adjacent
`
`segments are connected through hinge.
`
`Van (figs. 1-5) teaches a rollable display comprising a plurality of segments (161 -
`
`164) and adjacent segments are connected through hinge (171 -173).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the plurality of segments of the rollable
`
`display module of Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O to have the adjacent segments
`
`connected by a hinge as taught by Van because it provides folding means to the
`
`plurality of the segments which helps in rolling the display panel.
`
`Regarding claim 10, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O discloses the rollable
`
`display of claim 1.
`
`Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O does not explicitly disclose adjacent
`
`segments are spaced apart by a set distance.
`
`Van (figs. 1-5) teaches a rollable display comprising a plurality of segments (161 -
`
`164) and adjacent segments are spaced apart by a set distance (fig. 3).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the plurality of segments of the rollable
`
`display module of Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O to have the adjacent segments
`
`spaced apart by a set distance as taught by Van because it provides space for folding
`
`the plurality of the segments.
`
`Regarding claim 16, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’O5O discloses wherein a
`
`number of the through hole corresponds to a number of connecting member (only one
`
`connecting member 30 passes through the hole of each of the segment 16, fig. 3).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 9
`
`Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of
`
`Miyaguchi and Kim’050 as applied to claim 1, and in further view of Park et al. (US
`
`2016/0086563; “Park” hereinafter)
`
`Regarding claim 4, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 discloses the rollable
`
`display of claim 1.
`
`Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 does not explicitly disclose the scan driver
`
`is formed in a gate in panel (GIP) structure in the non-display area of the display panel.
`
`Park (fig. 1) teaches a scan driver (20) is formed in a gate in panel (GIP)
`
`structure in the non-display area of the display panel (“The scan driver 20 may be in the
`
`non-display area of the display panel 10 and, for example, may be provided in an
`
`Amorphous Silicon TFT gate driver scheme or a Gate Driver ln Panel (GIP) scheme”,
`
`Par. [0034]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the rollable display of Kim in view of
`
`Miyaguchi and Kim’050 to has the scan driver formed in a GIP structure in the non-
`
`display area as taught by Park so as to realize a small volume, weight reduction and low
`
`manufacturing cost.
`
`Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of
`
`Miyaguchi and Kim’050 as applied to claim 1, and in further view of Hamer et al.
`
`(US
`
`20090295422; “Hamer” hereinafter).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 10
`
`Regarding claim 7, Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 discloses the rollable
`
`display of claim 1.
`
`Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 does not explicitly disclose the display
`
`area comprises subpixels, wherein the subpixels include a switching transistor, a drive
`
`transistor, a capacitor, a compensation circuit and an organic light emitting diode
`
`(OLED).
`
`Hamer (fig. 1) teaches a display area comprises subpixels (100), wherein the
`
`subpixels include a switching transistor (180), a drive transistor (170), a capacitor (190),
`
`a compensation circuit (compensation, drive circuit 105) and an organic light emitting
`
`diode (OLED) (fig. 1, Par. [0025]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the display area of Kim in view of
`
`Miyaguchi and Kim’050 to have the display area comprises subpixels, wherein the
`
`subpixels include a switching transistor, a drive transistor, a capacitor, a compensation
`
`circuit and an organic light emitting diode as taught by Hamer because Hamer states,
`
`the modification, “compensate for aging and efficiency changes in OLED emitters in the
`
`presence of transistor aging” (Par. [0013]).
`
`Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of
`
`Miyaguchi, Kim’050 and Van as applied to claim 3, and in further view of Minoo et al.
`
`(US 2012/0008294; “Minoo” hereinafter).
`
`Regarding claim 12, Kim in view of Miyaguchi, Kim’050 and Van discloses the
`
`rollable display of claim 3.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 11
`
`Kim in view of Miyaguchi and Kim’050 does not explicitly the rollable display
`
`further comprising an adhesive member that fixes part of the connecting member to at
`
`least one side of the control board.
`
`Minoo teaches an adhesive member that fixes part of the connecting member to
`
`at least one side of the control board (“Adhesive portions of printed circuit board layers,
`
`may be used to help hold wires 52 in place on printed circuit board 12”, Par. [0060]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`filling date of the claimed invention to modify the rollable display module of Kim in view
`
`of Zhang, Van and Yang to incorporate an adhesive member that fixes part of the
`
`connecting member to at least one side of the control board as suggested by Minoo,
`
`because Minoo states, “Adhesive portions of printed circuit board layers,
`
`may be
`
`used to help hold wires 52 in place on printed circuit board 12” (Par. [0060]) Le.
`
`Adhesive member help to hold the connecting member with control board and prevent
`
`disconnection of the connecting member.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claims 11, 13 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base
`
`claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the
`
`limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 12
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant’s arguments filed on 08/26/2019 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive.
`
`In the remarks:
`
`I.
`
`Applicants on page 6 argues that- “None of these cited references
`
`disclose, teach or suggest anything about providing an auxiliary sheet attached
`
`to one end of the display panel"
`
`> In response to argument— Examiner respectfully disagrees with
`
`applicant’s argument. Miyaguchi teaches an auxiliary sheet (301) attached
`
`to one end of the display panel (flexible printed circuit wiring 301 is attached
`
`to the upper end of the display 101, figs. 3A-4C) as mentioned in the
`
`rejection above.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure are listed in the form 892.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 13
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to SAGAR SHRESTHA whose telephone number is
`
`(571 )270-1 236. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00 am-5:30 pm, Monday-
`
`Friday.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Jinhee Lee can be reached on (571)272-1977. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/294,499
`Art Unit: 2835
`
`Page 14
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272—1 000.
`
`/S.S/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 2835
`
`/DAN|EL P WICKLUND/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
`
`