`
`Application No.
`
`16/239,173
`
`Examiner
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`Herrick etal.
`
`Art Unit
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`
`KHANH Q DINH
`
`2458
`
`Yes
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant’s representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) KHANH Q. DINH.
`
`(2) Frederick Tsang (Reg. No.68,680).
`
`Date of Interview: 24 September 2019.
`
`Type:
`
`(J) Video Conference
`Telephonic
`C) Personal [copy given to: C1) applicant O) applicant's representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: ( Yes
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`No.
`
`Others
`(3103
`(1102
`(1112
`(1101
`Issues Discussed
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 1-20.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: US 10,200,486.
`
`Substance of Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics may include: identification or clarification of a reference
`or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied referencesetc...)
`
`Applicant agree to file a Terminal Disclaimer to overcome a possible Double Patenting rejection.
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2458 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substanceofinterview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substanceof any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of the
`substanceof an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the general
`thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a generalindication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or
`outcome ofthe interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issuesraised.
`
`[ Attachment
`
`/KHANH Q DINH/
`
`PTOL-413B (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20190930
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
