`Reply to Ex Parte Quayle Action of April 30, 2020
`
`SCHWARZ et al.
`Application No. 16/218,735
`
`Remarks
`
`Reconsideration of this Application is respectfully requested. Based on the above
`
`amendment and following remarks, Applicant respectfully requests that the Office reconsider the
`
`outstanding objection and that it be withdrawn.
`
`Objection to the Specification
`
`The Office has objected to the specification because paragraphs [0001]-[0006] are not
`
`consistent with the Application Data Sheet filed March 30, 2020. Applicant has amended
`
`paragraphs [0001 ]-[0006] to reflect the priority data that is present in the current Application Data
`
`Sheet (which was filed March 30, 2020, and recognized bythe Office in the Official Filing Receipt
`
`dated April 17, 2020), while appropriately preserving all incorporations by reference present in the
`
`Specification as-filed. Appheant respectfully requests that the objection to the specification be
`
`withdrawn.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Prompt and favorable consideration of this Response to Ex parte Quavie Action is
`
`respecttully requested. Based on the above remarks, Applicant requests that the Office reconsider
`
`the presently outstanding objection and that it be withdrawn. Applicant believes that a full and
`
`complete reply has been madeto the outstanding x parte Quayle Action and, as such, the
`
`application is in condition for allowance. Ifthe Office believes, for any reason, that personal
`
`communication will expedite prosecution of this application, the Office is invited to telephone the
`
`undersigned at the number provided.
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 4387.004000X%
`
`
`
`~S~
`Reply to Ex Parte Quayle Action of April 30, 2020
`
`SCHWARZ et al.
`Application No. 16/218,735
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN &FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`Richard D. Coller 10
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 60,390
`
`Date: May 1, 2020
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`14951373 i.docx
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 4387.004000X%
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
