UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`16/013,944
`
`06/21/2018
`
`Sunghwan KIM
`
`P7826USOO
`
`6052
`
`H.C. PARK & ASSOCIATES, PLC
`1894 PRESTON WHITE DRIVE
`RESTON, VA 20191
`
`CH0WDHURY~ AFROZA Y
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2628
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`02/07/2020
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`PATENT @ PARK-LAW. COM
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`0/7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/013,944
`Examiner
`AFROZA Y CHOWDHURY
`
`Applicant(s)
`KIM etal.
`Art Unit
`2628
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 11/28/2019.
`CI A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a). This action is FINAL.
`
`2b) D This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4):] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expade Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s)
`
`1,4—7 and 9—20 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`
`
`Claim(ss) 1 ,4—7 and 9—15 is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(ss) 1_6—20 is/are rejected.
`
`1:] Claim(ss_) is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`S)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`C] Claim(s
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`httpfiwww.”smogovmatentsflnit_events[pph[index.'§p or send an inquiry to PPeredhack@gsptg.ggv.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10):] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`is/are: a)[:| accepted or b)D objected to by the Examiner.
`11):] The drawing(s) filed on
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12):] Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)I:I All
`
`b)C] Some**
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.1:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`SD Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) C] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) E] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20200117
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/013,944
`Art Unit: 2628
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`2.
`
`Applicant’s amendment filed on November 28, 2019 has been entered. Claims
`
`1, 4-7, and 9-20 are currently pending. Applicant’s amended claims are addressed
`
`herein below.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`3,
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`4.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/013,944
`Art Unit: 2628
`
`Page 3
`
`5.
`
`Claims 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim
`
`(03 20140132534) in view of Yu et al. (us 20170052635).
`
`As to claim 16, Kim discloses a display device comprising:
`
`a base film ([0047]: lower substrate);
`
`a circuit layer disposed on the base film ([0049]),
`
`the circuit layer ([0049]) comprising a gate driving unit (Fig. 2, [0071]: display
`
`driver IC 200 includes a gate driver), a sense driving unit (Fig. 2(310): transferor (TX),
`
`[0093]), and a plurality of gate lines ([0049]), the gate driving unit comprises a plurality
`
`of gate stages, the sense driving unit comprises a plurality of sense stages ([0093] —
`
`[0094]), and the plurality of pate lines are connected to the plurality ei pete stapes.
`
`respeetlvely ([0071], [0093] — [0094]);
`
`a light-emitting element layer disposed on the circuit layer ([0050]: LEDs);
`
`a thin-film encapsulation layer ([0049]: TFTs); and
`
`a sensing unit (Fig. 2(300): touch IC) disposed on the thin-film encapsulation
`
`layer, the sensing unit comprising a plurality of driving electrodes (Fig. 2(110): TX1-TXm)
`
`configured to receive a sense driving signal from the sense driving unit, and a plurality
`
`of sensing electrodes (Fig. 2(120): FiXt-Fan, [0054]).
`
`Kim does not explicitly teach a thin-film encapsulation layer covering the light-
`
`emitting element layer, and wherein each et the plurality el gate stages aud the plurality
`
`el sense stages are eeullgured te have a dependerlt eeltrieetieii relatlertsltlp tu operate
`
`in respense te a signal output lrem a previous stage.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/013,944
`Art Unit: 2628
`
`Page 4
`
`However, it is an obvious design choice for Kim’s display device to have a thin-
`
`film encapsulation layer covering the light-emitting element layer (LEDs) since LEDs are
`
`used in a backlight unit in order to enhance an efficiency of light (see Kim: [0050]: LED
`
`backlight).
`
`Kim does not specifically teach each et the pturatity et gate stages and the
`
`ptutattty st sense stages are configured ts have a dependent cenneetéen tetattenshtp to
`
`operate in response to a stgnat output from a previous stage.
`
`Yu teaches each pt the ptttratity of gate stages and the pieratéty of sense stages
`
`are eentigured te have a dependent epnneetien retatienship te operate is respense te a
`
`stgttat eutput them a ptevteus stage (Fig. 5, (00%)).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the
`
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kim’s display device by adapting
`
`Yu’s idea of using output from previous stage in order to improve driving condition and
`
`reduce noise.
`
`As to claim 17, Kim (as modified by Yu) teach the display device of claim 16,
`
`wherein a first sense stage among the plurality of sense stages receives a signal output
`
`from an nth gate stage (where n is a positive integer) among the plurality of gate stages
`
`(Yu: Fig. 5).
`
`As to claim 18, Kim (as modified by Yu) teach the display device of claim 16,
`
`wherein the circuit layer further comprises at least one dummy stage connected
`
`between an nth gate stage (where n is a positive integer) among the plurality of gate
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/013,944
`Art Unit: 2628
`
`Page 5
`
`stages and a first sense stage among the plurality of sense stages, wherein the first
`
`sense stage among the plurality of sense stages receives a signal output from the
`
`dummy stage (Kim: Fig. 2, [0055] — [0056]).
`
`As to claim 19, Kim (as modified by Yu) teach the display device of claim 16,
`
`wherein the plurality of gate stages receive a first clock signal and a second clock signal
`
`(Kim: [0090]: “ The sync signal generator 220 may be used as a
`
`controller of the display driver TC 900, and may generate and
`
`output
`
`the above—described sync signals according to control by
`
`the controller of the display driver TC 900”; first sync signal and second
`
`sync signal are interpreted as a first clock signal and second clock signal), and the plurality of
`
`sense stages receive a third clock signal ([0086]: first sync signal) and a fourth clock
`
`signal (Kim: [0087]: second sync signal).
`
`As to claim 20, Kim (as modified by Yu) teach teaches the display device of claim
`
`19, wherein it is an obvious design choice to have the plurality of sense stages further
`
`receive a fifth clock signal generated by gating the first clock signal and the second
`
`clock signal (Yu: Fig. 16B).
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claims 1, 4-7, and 9-15 are allowed.
`
`The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance:
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/013,944
`Art Unit: 2628
`
`Page 6
`
`This communication warrants no examiner’s reason for allowance, as the prosecution
`
`and applicant’s reply make evident reasons for allowance [see applicant’s persuasive
`
`arguments/remarks filed on 11/28/2019 regarding claims 1, 4-7, and 9-15],
`
`satisfying the record “record as a whole” as required by rule 37 CFR 1.104(e). In this
`
`case, the substance of applicant’s remarks and the amendments herein made to the
`
`claims clarifying the claimed invention indicate the reasons claims are patentable over
`
`the prior art of record. Reason for allowance is in all probability evident from the record.
`
`Thus, no examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance is necessary (see M.P.E.P.
`
`1302.14).
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`8.
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 16-20 have been considered but
`
`are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in
`
`the current rejection.
`
`Conclusion
`
`9.
`
`THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time
`
`policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/013,944
`Art Unit: 2628
`
`Page 7
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to AFROZA Y CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is
`
`(571)270-1543. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9am-5pm.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Nitin Patel can be reached on (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/013,944
`Art Unit: 2628
`
`Page 8
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272-1 000.
`
`/AFROZA CHOWDHURY/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket