`
`Application
`No.
`16/127,046
`
`Examiner
`MAN GT| N
`LIAN
`
`Yes
`
`Applicant(s)
`Marshall et al.
`
`AIA (First Inventor
`to File) Status
`
`All participants (applicant, applicants representative, PTO personnel):
`
`1. MANGTIN LIAN (Primary Examiner); Telephonic
`
`2. Stephen Mao (Attorney); Telephonic
`
`Date of Interview: 28 June 2019
`
`Claims Discussed:
`
`1
`
`Prior Art Discussed: Kagami and Yuas
`
`Amendment proposed: please see attached.
`
`Brief Description of the main topic(s) of discussion: Applicant argues that element 31 of Kagami is not
`equivalent to the claimed inductor coil. The examiner states that whether or not element 31 of Kagami is equivalent
`to the claimed inductor coil, the power receiving unit 3 comprises coils 31 and 32, at least one of which would be
`equivalent to the claimed inductor coil. The examiner submits that Yuasa also discloses inductor coil 250 wound
`around core 260. No agreement is reached.
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`ltem(s) under 35 U.S.C. 103:
`No agreement is reached.
`
`Attachment(s): Proposed Amendments, Proposed Arguments,
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site