REMARKS
`
`Claims 1—20 were pending in this application, and claims 1, 15, and 20 were the
`
`independent claims. The specification is amended to update a priority claim. Claims 15 and 20
`
`are amended for clarity. The amendments are supported by the original specification, and no
`
`new matter is added.
`
`OBJECTIONS TO THE SPECIFICATION
`
`The specification is amended to update the priority claim, thus rendering the objections to
`
`the specification moot.
`
`Response to Double Patent Rejection
`
`Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as unpatentable
`
`over claims 1-20 of US. Patent No. 10,091,259, claims 1-11 of US. Patent No. 9,826,004, and
`
`claims 1-17 ofU.S. Patent No. 9,596,276, and claims 1-17 of US. Patent No. 9,413,708.
`
`Accordingly, a terminal disclaimer is included herewith, and the withdrawal of this rejection is
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`

`

`CONCLUSION
`
`Based on the foregoing, the application is in condition for allowance of all claims, and a
`
`Notice of Allowance is respectfully requested. If the examiner believes for any reason direct
`
`contact would help advance the prosecution of this case to allowance, the examiner is
`
`encouraged to telephone the undersigned at the number given below.
`
`If extensions of time are necessary to prevent abandonment of this application, then such
`
`extension of time are hereby petitioned under 37 CFR 1.136(a), and any fees required therefore
`
`are hereby authorized to be charged to our Deposit Account 19-2555.
`
`Dated:
`
`November 15, 2019
`
`/Saad Hassan/
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Saad K. Hassan, Reg. No. 70,223
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`801 California Street
`
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Phone: (650) 335-7182
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket