www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`15/998,868
`
`08/17/2018
`
`Alexander Oksche
`
`1861.2700007/JMC/MSB
`
`7842
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 NEW YORK AVENUE NW
`WASHINGTON,DC 20005
`
`RICCI, CRAIG D
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`1611
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`10/18/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`e-office @ sternekessler.com
`
`jcovert @ sternekessler.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`15/998 868
`Oksche etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`CRAIG D RICCI
`1611
`No
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 2 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)[¥] Responsive to communication(s)filed on 8/17/2018.
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`2a)(] This action is FINAL.
`2b) C) This action is non-final.
`3)() An election was made bythe applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the meritsis
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparfe Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-14 is/are pending in the application.
`5)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s)__ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C] Claim(s} _is/are allowed.
`() Claim(s)__ is/are rejected.
`Lj] Claim(s)___is/are objected to.
`Claim(s) 1-14 are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10)() The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on __is/are: a). accepted or b)(_) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)() Acknowledgmentis made ofa claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)1) None of the:
`b)( Some**
`a)Q All
`1.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) [[] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(7) Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20191014
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/998,868
`Art Unit: 1611
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Election of Species
`
`1.
`
`This application contains claims directed to the following patentably distinct species:
`
`Elect a single film dosage form for trans-mucosal administration by defining EACH
`
`of the following with specificity:
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`Elect a single non-gelatin polymeric film-forming material (HPMC, HPC, etc);
`
`Elect any additional components (e.g., NONE, the pH modifier citric acid, sodium
`
`dihydrogen,
`
`the flavor orange flavor, etc);
`
`2.
`
`The species are independent or distinct because claims to the different species recite the
`
`mutually exclusive characteristics of such species.
`
`In addition,
`
`these species are not obvious
`
`variants of eachother based on the current record. Furthermore, there is anexamination and search
`
`burden for these patentably distinct species due to their mutually exclusive characteristics. For
`
`example, the species require a different field of search (e.g., searching different classes/subclasses
`
`or electronic resources, or employing different search queries). Accordingly, Applicant
`
`is
`
`required under 35 U.S.C. 121 to (i) elect asingle disclosed species for prosecution on the merits
`
`to which the claims shall be restricted if no generic claim is finally held to be allowable even
`
`though the requirement may be traversed (37 CFR 1.143); and (ii) identify the claims readable
`
`on the elected species, including any claims subsequently added. An argument that a claim is
`
`allowable or that all claims are generic is considered non-responsive unless accompanied by an
`
`election. Currently, claims 1 and 8-10 are generic.
`
`3.
`
`The election of the species may be made with or without traverse. To preserve a right to
`
`petition,
`
`the election must be made with traverse. If the reply does not distinctly and specifically
`
`point out supposed errors in the election of species requirement, the election shall be treated as an
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/998,868
`Art Unit: 1611
`
`Page 3
`
`election without
`
`traverse. Traversal must be presented at the time of election in order to be
`
`considered timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right
`
`to
`
`petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are added after the election, applicant must indicate which
`
`of these claims are readable on the elected species.
`
`4,
`
`Should applicant
`
`traverse on the ground that the species are not patentably distinct,
`
`applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the species to
`
`be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the
`
`examiner finds one of the species unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may
`
`be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other species.
`
`5.
`
`Upon the allowance of a generic claim, applicant will be entitled to consideration of claims
`
`to additional species which depend from or otherwise require all the limitations of an allowable
`
`generic claim as provided by 37 CFR 1.141.
`
`6.
`
`The election of the species may be made with or without traverse. To preserve a right to
`
`petition,
`
`the election must be made with traverse. If the reply does not distinctly and specifically
`
`point out supposed errors in the election of species requirement, the election shall be treated as an
`
`election without
`
`traverse. Traversal must be presented at the time of election in order to be
`
`considered timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right
`
`to
`
`petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are added after the election, applicant must indicate which
`
`of these claims are readable on the elected species.
`
`7.
`
`Should applicant
`
`traverse on the ground that the species are not patentably distinct,
`
`applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the species to
`
`be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/998,868
`Art Unit: 1611
`
`Page 4
`
`examiner finds one of the species unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may
`
`be used in arejection under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other species.
`
`8.
`
`Upon the allowance of a generic claim, applicant will be entitled to consideration of claims
`
`to additional species which depend from or otherwise require all the limitations of an allowable
`
`generic claim as provided by 37 CFR 1.141.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to CRAIG RICCI whose telephone number is (571) 270-5864. The examiner
`
`can normally be reached Mondaythrough Thursday, and every other Friday, 7:30 am — 5:30 pm.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`Bethany Barham can be reached on (571) 272-6175. The fax phone number for the organization
`
`where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system,
`
`see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system,
`
`contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`If you would like
`
`assistance from a USPTO CustomerService Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/CRAIG D RICCI/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1611
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket