Natural Foods through marine Krill Meal
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`
`:} Submit Query weweeed
`Lannie!
`
`BUYER'S GUIDE
`
`RESOURCES
`
`TECHNICAL CENTER
`
`COMMODITIES
`
`FEED FINDER
`
`NEWSROOM
`
`PUBLICATIONS
`
`HOME
`0
`
`
`
`Natural Foods through marine Krill Meal - Reports &
`Articles
`
`Job Board
`(/resources/job-
`center/)
`Checkout the latest industry job openings in our
`Job Board (/resources/job-center/).
`
`RAS Aquaculture Production
`Manager - France(/resources/job-
`center-listing/8163/RAS-
`Aquaculture-Production-Manager--
`France/)
`
`Business Development Manager —
`Oman (/resources/job-center-
`listing/8125/Business-
`Development-Manager--Oman/)
`
`Key Account Manager - Thailand
`(/resources/job-center-
`listing/8118/Key-Account-Manager--
`Thailand/)
`
`Conferences
`%
`& AQUAFEER
`
`
`Ss
`
`xt
`
`evenerecccrerecrerececrenened
`
`g %
`
`
`
`yee
`
`Whe
`.eeteeces.=
`(http:/Avww.feedconferences.com)
`Brought to you by the industry's knowledge
`communicator, Aquafeed.com, our conferences
`will arm delegates with the latest processing
`information to meet head on the challenges
`facing this sector.
`
`Natural Foods through marine Krill Meal
`by Dimitri Sclabos and Raul Toro (mailto:)
`09/09/2003
`
`: Natural Foods through marineKrill Meal
`
`: By Mr. Dimitri Sclabos and Mr. Raul Toro
`
`Clean Human-Grade products based on clean feed ingredients
`
`The feed ingredient for the future: South Antarctic Krill Meal
`§ [Euphausia superba, Dana]
`
`Krill meal is a specialty feed ingredient, which has been producedby the industry for more than 15
`years from whole roundkrill, yetit is still in the growth phase of the productlife cycle curve. (Dimitri
`Sclabos, www.Aquafeed.com June 2003.) Although there are more than 80 different krill species
`around the globe, resource abundance and high value dried krill meals have been mainly produced
`from South Antarctic Krill [Euphausia superba, Dana].
`
`South Antarctic Krill has unique nutritional and quality attributes, which makesit the feed ingredient
`of the future. No matter that it has been in the market for sometime already, only in the past few
`years a serious effort has been madeto position this product within the high value aquaculture
`feeds marketniche. This trend is possible due to feed formulators acceptance of krill meal’s
`uniquenessthrough its good protein content, its strong palatability effect, natural beta-carotene
`content[in the form of astaxanthine], its excellent lipids & minerals profile and its chitin & chitosan
`constituent.
`
`Nevertheless, it is krill meals’ negligible amount of dioxins, PCB’s and heavy metals, the main
`feature that makesit an irreplaceable feed ingredient.
`
`Krill meal is an excellent nutritional source of protein in an average of 60% [58-65% dry basis] of
`the highest biological value. Krill meal’s typical average amino acid profile is as follows; Alanine
`5.8% [percent of protein] - Arginine 6.7% - Aspartic Acid 9.5% - Cisteine 1.2% - Glutamic Acid
`12.6% - Glycine 4.8% - Histidine 2.5% - Isoleucine 5.0% - Leucine 7.8% - Lysine 8.2% - Methionine
`4.0% - Phenylalanine 5.2% - Proline 4.0% - Serine 4.5% - Threonine 4.7% - Tyrosine 4.5% - Valine
`5.3% - Taurine 2.9%. (Tepual S.A. & Mr. Raul Toro, independent report 1994)
`
`Regardingkrill meal’s palatability attribute, it has low molecular weight soluble compounds such as
`nucleotides, amino acidsin the form of proline and glycine, glucosamine, and high levels of trimethyl
`amine oxide, TMAO (190 MgN/100 g sample). All these compounds act together as an effective
`attractant and flavoring agent. (Allahpichay and Shimizu 1984; Storbakken, 1988; Shimizu, et al.
`1990; Ogle and Beaugz, 1991). Krill meal has been successfully used in low palatability aqua-diets
`such as feeds containing vegetable proteins and/or antibiotics. Additionally, krill meal high TMAO
`content has an extra osmoregulatory contribution, useful to reduce salmon’s physiological stress
`whentheyare transferred from fresh to seawater. (Finne, G., 1992)
`
`http://www.aquafeed.com/read-article.php?id=439
`
`7/19/2018
`
`

`

`Natural Foods through marine Krill Meal
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`South Antarctic krill meal’s natural pigment content [in the form of Astaxanthin] is a very well known
`attribute.
`It has an average content of 180ppm [132-250ppm] dry basis, depending mainly on
`processing plus resource and fishing grounds conditions. This feature is used to increase flesh
`pigmentation on salmon, trout, yellow tail, shrimp and other farmed species. (Sforebakken 1988;
`Storebakken et al. 1987; Torrissen et al, 1989). Krill meals used this way, the resulting end product
`contains the same type and coloring agent as naturally fed wild caught salmon. This characteristic
`has proved a strong selling argument
`for feed manufacturers focused on natural or organic
`conscious buyers.
`
`Indeed, studies suggest that astaxanthin play a fundamental role in the protection against active
`oxygen speciesin fish and other organisms (Shimidzu etal., 1996).
`
`Beta-carotene astaxanthin found in krill meal has an important role in the regulation of fish’ immune
`system, besides its role as a pigmentation agent, enhancing disease resistance and boosting
`survival rates.
`It is also known as an essential fish growth regulator. (Christiansen et al., 1994; J.
`Torrissen, 1984)
`
`Krill meal steroidal component located in krill’s cephalotorax region has proved a powerful and
`efficient promoting agent in the use of the protein found in feed diets.
`It therefore acts as a good
`growth promoting agent,
`increasing weight gain and feed conversion rates (Allahpichay and
`Shimizu, 1985)
`
`Krill meal chitin content found on raw krill’s caparison has an average content of 2-4% of chitin.
`This way, krill meal is being studied as an immune system stimulant for some fish species. (Siwicki
`et al, 1994).
`
`Regarding minerals’ and their use on several biological functions, South Antarctic krill meal is a
`good source of bio-available minerals; Copper 101ppm (dried meal), Selenium 12ppm, Zinc 72ppm,
`Calcium 1.7% (dried meal), Phosphorous 1.3%. (Tepual S.A. & Mr. Raul Toro, independent reports
`1994). Copper’s high content plays an important
`role in
`fin and skin integrity, while high
`concentration of selenium plays a relevant part on cellular antioxidant systems (Barrows, F and
`Lellis, W, 1997)
`
`Krill meal has an additional relevant feature, whichis its fat content uniqueness, in an average of
`15% (8 — 18%), depending mainly on the fishing season and processing particulars. Within the
`traditional krill meal-processing layout, around 70% of raw krill original fat content remains bonded
`to krill meal’s protein. This fat contains a high Omega-3 fatty acid concentration, where EPA & DHA
`are foundin the vicinity of 23% or even higher (as part ofthe lipids). This fat has also a high content
`of phospholipids (40-50% oflipids). Accordingly,fish fed with diets containing krill meals increase
`their natural Omega 3 and natural astaxanthin content allowing this fish to enter the highly lucrative
`natural food market niche.
`
`In a study on the effect of dietary lipid level on muscle composition in Atlantic salmon, it was found
`that muscle fatty acid composition reflected dietary fatty acid profiles, containing similar percentages
`of total saturated, monoenic and n-3 fatty acids in fish from all dietary treatment groups (Hemre &
`Sandnes, 1999).
`
`Krill meal is added in aquaculture feed diets in a range of 1 to 8% (Dimitri Sclabos unpublished
`report 2001). Feeds containingkrill meal are either used only at pre-harvest period or throughout
`the whole rearing & growth phase, depending on diet’s main purpose(flesh pigmentation or
`attractant for example). Markets for these feeds include shrimp, trout and salmon feed
`manufacturers.
`
`The bestkrill meals are a result of raw material processed on board factory trawlers within the first 5
`hours after the krill has been caught. This allows the highest freshness expressed as a very low
`TVN value in the range of 5 — 20 (mgN/100g).
`(Mr. Raul Toro, independent report 1999-2003,
`unpublished data)
`
`Probablykrill meal’s future will not be purely link to nutritional aspects, but also on food safety
`issues. Krill meal raw material comes from South Antarctic waters with a very low contentof risky
`
`contaminants such as Dioxins, PCB’s and heavy metals.
`
`Krill Meal shows a remarkably low content of undesirable substances such as heavy metals and
`dioxins, closely related to the unpolluted waters whereit is captured and processed (Dimitri Sclabos
`& Raul Toro Aquafeed report June 2003; Dimitri Sclabos & Raul Toro Intrafish & Fis.com report
`dune 2003). South Antarctic krill fishing grounds hasits own natural barriers such as sea current
`activity, circumpolar atmospheric winds and a limited human intervention. Industrial contamination is
`at a minimum level- if any. Heavy metals found in this area come primarily from volcanic activity,
`the main estimated pollutant source for Antarctic marine species (Knox, 1970; Beckman, 1992).
`
`http://www.aquafeed.com/read-article.php?id=439
`
`7/19/2018
`
`

`

`Natural Foods through marine Krill Meal
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`Rathersoonerthan later, EU’s Commission on Undesirable Substanceswill place such low import
`allowance levels on Dioxins, Furans and PCB’s likes, that many of the actual feed ingredients will
`not makeit as a safe ingredient. Other markets surely will follow this trend. This will not be the
`caseforkrill meals. Additionally, as krill meal adds invaluable natural pigments, white tablecloth
`restaurants will be in a much better position to serve natural-like food to environment-concerned
`customers.
`
`Arsenic (As) comes from volcanic sources and it is a natural element found in water, soil and air. In
`marine species it mainly comes onits organic [80-99%] non-toxic form. Arsenic inorganic form is
`found in an amount of less than 0,01 ppm As/Kg wet weight while fish have 1-10ppm of As/kg wet
`weight. The EU regulation states 10ppm total Arsenic content for feeding stuffs from fish or other
`marine animals. In whole krill, Arsenic level reaches 3 ppm As/Kg (Deheyn, D. et al, 2000).
`
`Cadmium (Cd) and Lead (Pb) comefrom volcanic activity and human contamination through
`wastewater, fertilizers and air pollution. Lead comes from industrial contaminants (batteries, solder,
`and alloys). Both metals have a low accumulation rate in fish’s flesh. (Norwegian Agricultural
`Inspection Service, Amended proposal, December 2000). Data for brown and white fishmeals and
`krill meals show that Cadmium and Leadlevels fall within EU’s Directive 2002/32/EC.
`
`Cadmium and Leadlevels
`Antarctic Krill Meal and Fish Meal
`
`
`
`Antarctic krill meal {Norwegian fish meal|Feed Material
`
`Mean(ppm) n=4
`
`Mean(ppm) n=15
`
`EU Regulation
`
`Upper Limit
`
`
`
`(*) Regular brown & white fishmeals have a Lead average contentof 3,72ppm (IFFO
`1976)
`
`Mercury (Hg) is widely distributed in nature, found in water, soil, and air and in several organisms. In
`marine species, organic mercury (methyl mercury) is considered a toxic compound, thoroughly
`concentrated throughout the food chain.
`Inorganic less-toxic mercury is accumulated at lower
`concentrations. Methyl mercury found in fish feeds is accumulatedin fish’s flesh andit is slowly
`eliminated. Tuna, halibut, sharks, and other predatory species accumulate higher mercury
`concentrations (0.5 — 1 ppm wet weight). The opposite is valid for species found at the beginning of
`the food chain, such as Antarctic krill that fed from plankton. It accumulates mercury at less than 0.1
`ppm (wet weight).
`
`Mercury in Antarctic krill Meal
`
`Krill Meal
`Mean(ppm)
`
`Complete Fish Feeds
`Mean(ppm
`(ppm)
`
`n=54
`
`{EU upperlevelfor feed
`material
`i
`Mean(ppm)
`
`EU limit for
`complete feeds
`Pp
`
`Mean(ppm)
`
`(*) Regular brown & white fishmeals have a Mercury average content of 0,15ppm (IFFO 1976)
`
`Krill meal mercury levels easily falls within EU regulations and are a suitable and safe feed
`ingredient.
`
`Regarding Krill meal Fluorine content (F), the latest European Directive [Directive 2002/32/EC] of
`the Parliament and of the Council dated May 7" 2002 on Undesirable Substancesin animal feed, it
`set a maximum Fluorine content in feeding stuffs of animal origin of 500ppm [dry basis], which
`included red meals in general andkrill meals in particular. Fortunately the said commission
`amendedsuchlevel to higher fluorine content. If this directive would have gone through, it could
`have stopped all European red meals imports since South Antarctic krill meal has an average F
`content of 1750ppm [dry basis]. This data (Dimitri Sclabos & Raul Toro unpublished data 1995-
`2003) relates to krill meal’s raw material.
`
`While whole krill has average moisture content is 79% (trip May-June 2002), Fluorine equivalent
`dry basis content reaches 1,495ppm. In frozen de-shelled krill tail meat for example, with an
`average moisture content of 76% and 21ppm F, its equivalent F content reaches 88ppm (dry basis).
`
`http://www.aquafeed.com/read-article.php?id=439
`
`7/19/2018
`
`

`

`Natural Foods through marine Krill Meal
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`On 12% moisture and 60% protein content krill meal, lipids reaches 14% while F content jumps to
`2,036ppm. This pattern is similar to whatit is shown on other crustacean meals such as North
`European Prawn meals, South East Asian shrimp shell meals and South American shrimp &
`langoustine meals.
`
`Fortunately, thanks to personal work (Dimitri Sclabos & Raul Toro Aquafeed July 2003, Intrafish
`July 2003) and European EFAPIT & IFFO, the EU Commission on Undesirable Substances decided
`to amend the 500ppm limit andrise it to a 2000ppm level. (Still to be confirmed by the commission)
`Dioxins
`
`Dioxins are a group of 210 polychlorinated substances spontaneously created from industrial
`contamination and wastewater - mainly from cellulose plants. From these, 17 are considered toxic
`and these are targeted in lab analysis.
`
`Dioxins are a serious toxic material and active at very low dosage; they accumulate in fatty tissue
`and are not easily eliminated, either in marine species or humans. The EU directive is set at a
`maximum level for fishmeals of 1.25 ng-WHO-TEQ/kg product.
`Dioxin content in South Antarctic Krill Meals
`
`Expressed as ng-WHO-TEQ/kg
`
`Orkney Island
`Jan.26-Feb.28 ‘02
`
`! Orkney Island
`{Mar.15-Apr.18 ‘02
`
`South Georgia’s
`{Jun.22-Jul.31°02.
`
`EU maxlevel for
`fish
`meal
`| O'S
`
`Fat 12,9%
`
`0,2657 (*)
`
`Fat 13,0%
`
`0
`
`3259 (*)
`
`Fat 13,9%
`
`(*) Average value
`
`0
`
`2054 (*)
`
`Since Antarctic krill meals are well within EU establishedlimits, it gives the fish feed manufacturer a
`greater safety margin, particularly if some of the other fish meals and oil feed ingredients used are
`closerto the limit.
`
`References
`
`Allahpichay, |. and Shimizu, C. (1985). Separation of growth promoting factors from non-muscle krill
`meal of Euphausia superba. Bull. Japanese Soc. Sci. Fish. 51, 945-951.
`
`Berkman, P.A. (1992). The Antarctic Marine Ecosystem and humankind. Reviews in Aquatic
`Sciences 6, 295-333.
`
`Christiansen, R. .Lie, O. J. Torrissen (1994). Effect of astaxanthin and Vitamin A on growth and
`survival during first feeding of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L Aquaculture and Fisheries
`Management 1994, 25, 903-914.
`
`|. (2000). Characterization of metals contamination
`Deheyn D., Gendrau P. , Baldwin R.J. , Latz M.
`in the marine ecosystem of Deception Island, Antarctica. In Marine Biology Research Division,
`Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Ca, USA.
`
`Canadian FoodInspection Agency (2002). Summary Report of Contaminant Results in Fish Feeds,
`Fish Meal and FishOil.
`
`Finne, G. (1992). Non-protein nitrogen compoundsin fish and shellfish. Advances in Sea Food
`Biochemistry. 393. Hemre & Sandnes (1999)Sa/mo salar. Aquaculture Nutrition (1), 9-16
`
`Knox, G.A. (1970). Antarctic Marine Ecosystem. Antarctic Ecology Academic Press, London, pp 69
`- 96.
`
`Lellis, W. and Barrows, F. (1997). Aquaculture 156 : 229-240.
`
`Norwegian Agricultural Inspection Service (2001). Amended proposal for a Directive on undesirable
`substances and products in animal nutrition. COM (2000) 861 final.
`
`Ogle and Beaugz (1991). Food preferente of P. Vannamei. Gulf Research Reports 8 : 291-294.
`
`Shimidzu N., Goto M., Miki W. (1996). Carotenoids as singlet oxygen quenchers in marine
`organisms. Fish. Sci.; 62:134-137
`
`http://www.aquafeed.com/read-article.php?id=439
`
`7/19/2018
`
`

`

`Natural Foods through marine Krill Meal
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`Shimizu, C., Ibrahim, A., Toroko, T. and Shirakawa, Y. (1990). Feeding stimulation in sea bream,
`Pagrus major, fed diets supplemented with Antarctic krill meals. Aquaculture 89, 43-53. Siwiki, A.,
`Anderson, P., Rumsey, G. (1994). Dietary intake of immunostimulant by rainbow trout effects non-
`specific immunity and protection against furunculosis. Veterinary immunology and
`immunopathology. 41: 125-139.
`
`Storebakken, T. (1988). krill as a potential feed source for salmonids. Aquaculture. 70, 193-205.
`
`Storebakken T. Foss P. Schiedt K. Austreng E. Liaaen-Jensen S. Manz U. (1987). Carotenoidsin
`Diets for Salmonids IV Pigmentation of Atlantic Salmon with Astaxantin, Astaxantin Dipalmitate and
`Canthaxantin, Aquaculture 65: 279-292
`
`Torrissen O. J. Pigmentation of salmonids: effect of carotenoids in eggs and start-feeding diet on
`survival and growth rate. Aquaculture 1984; 43: 185-193
`
`Torrissen O. J. Pigmentation of salmonids: interactions of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin on
`pigment deposition in rainbow trout. Aquaculture 1989; 79: 363-374
`
`For more information contact the authors at: dimitri@sclabos.com
`(mailto:dimitri@sclabos.com) or visit: www .sclabos.com (http:/Awww.sclabos.com/)
`
`Follow Us
`Weare social. Connect with us on:
`
`(/about-us/who-we-are/#contact-us)
`(https ://www.facebook.com/Aquafeeddotcom)
`(http:/Awww.linkedin.com/groups/AQUAFEED-4008134)
`
`Sign Up For Our Publications
`Select a newsletter/magazine and submit your e-mail to subscribe.
`
`) Aquafeed Newsletter
`©) Aquafeed Magazine
`£3 Hatcheryfeed Publications
`Email Address
`
`
`
`Copyright @1998-2018 AquaFeed.com. All rights Reserved. Read our Copyright & Privacy (/disclaimer/?iframe=true&width=60% &height=80%).
`Website by MVZ Tech Services (http:/Awww.mvztechservices.com)
`Site Maintained by Ravenbox Multimedia (http:/Awww.ravenbox.com)
`
`http://www.aquafeed.com/read-article.php?id=439
`
`7/19/2018
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket