`(19) World Intellectual Property
`Organization
`International Bureau
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`
`g
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`WO 2013/156627 A1
`24 October 2013 (24.10.2013) WIPOI PCT
`
`
`(51)
`
`International Patent Classification:
`CIZQ 1/70 (2006.01)
`
`(21)
`
`International Application Number:
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`(22)
`
`International Filing Date:
`
`(25)
`
`Filing Language:
`
`(26)
`
`Publication Language:
`
`19 April 2013 (19.04.2013)
`
`English
`
`English
`
`(30)
`
`(71)
`
`(72)
`
`(74)
`
`(81)
`
`Priority Data:
`123054629
`
`20 April 2012 (20.04.2012)
`
`EP
`
`Applicant: INSTITUT PASTEUR [FR/FR]; 25-28, rue
`du Docteur Roux, F-75015 Paris (FR).
`
`Inventors: ELOIT, Mare; 91 rue du Cherche-Midi, F-
`75006 Paris (FR). CHEVAL. Justine; 91 rue de la sante',
`F-75013 Paris (FR). HEBERT, Charles; 22 rue Desaix
`Escalier B, F-78800 Houilles (FR). LECUIT, Marc; 7 rue
`Boissonade, F-75014 Paris (FR).
`
`Agent: REGIMBEAU; 20, rue de Chazelles, F-75847 Pat-
`is Cedex 17 (FR).
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BVV, BY,
`
`BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM,
`DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT,
`HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP,
`KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD,
`ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI,
`NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU,
`RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, Sv, SY, TH, TJ,
`TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA,
`ZM, ZW.
`
`(84)
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ,
`UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ,
`TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK,
`EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV,
`MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM,
`TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GVV,
`ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`Declarations under Rule 4.17:
`
`ofinventorsnip (Rule 4.1 7(iv))
`Published:
`
`with international search report (Art. 21(3))
`
`with sequence listing part ofdescription (Rule 5.2(a))
`
`(54) Title: ANELLOVIRUS GENOME QUANTIFICATION AS A BIOMARKER OF IMMUNE SUPPRESSION
`
`(57) Abstract: The present invention relates to the use of the measure of anelloviral load for the detelmination of immunosuppres -
`sion. More precisely, the present invention provides a method for characterizing the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed
`Status of a subject, comprising the steps of determining the anelloviral load from a biological Sample of the said subject, and deterrn —
`ining from the said comparison the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status, The determination of the immunosup-
`pressed status of the subj eet can then be used to design or adapt a therapeutic treatment.
`
`
`
`W02013/156627A11||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||\|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`ANELLOVIRUS GENOME QUANTIFICATION
`
`AS A BIOMARKER OF IMMUNE SUPPRESSION
`
`The present invention relates to the use of the measure of anelloviral load for the
`
`determination of immunosuppression. More specifically,
`
`the invention relates to a
`
`method for the diagnosis of immunosuppression in a subject based on anellovirus
`
`viral load .
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`The immune system defends an organism against aggressions such as pathogen
`
`infection, cellular transformation, and physical or chemical damage. When the
`
`immune system is less active than normal, immunodeficiency or immunosuppression
`
`occurs, resulting in life-threatening infections or cancer.
`
`Immunosuppression is a
`
`condition in which the immune system's ability to fight diseases,
`
`for example
`
`infectious diseases or cancer, is compromised or entirely absent. Immunosuppression
`
`takes various forms, and may affect either the innate or the adaptive immune
`
`system, or both, depending of the source of the deficiency.
`
`It usually results in
`
`recurring or life-threatening infections.
`
`Immunosuppression can either be the result of diseases, or be produced by
`
`pharmaceuticals or an infection, resulting in an increased susceptibility to secondary
`
`infections by pathogens such as bacteria and viruses.
`
`Many diseases
`
`are
`
`thus
`
`characterized by
`
`the development of progressive
`
`immunosuppression in the patient. The presence of an impaired immune response in
`
`patients with malignancies (e.g.
`
`leukemia,
`
`lymphoma, multiple myeloma) is well
`
`documented. Progressive immunosuppression has also been observed in certain
`
`chronic infection such as AIDS, sepsis, leprosy, cytomegalovirus infections, malaria,
`
`lupus, and the like. Immunodeficiency is also a potential adverse effect of many
`
`therapeutic treatments (radiotherapy or chemotherapy for example).
`
`In such a
`
`situation of non-deliberate immunosuppression, patients are usually treated with
`
`immunostimulants (e.g. cytokines),
`
`in order to boost the patient’s immune system.
`
`However,
`
`immunostimulants lack specificity,
`
`in that
`
`they activate the immune
`
`system in general. If not administered cautiously, they may trigger an overactivation
`
`of the immune system, resulting in poor tolerance
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`2
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`Alternatively, immunosuppression may result from deliberate intent to weaken the
`
`immune system. In general, deliberately induced immunosuppression is performed by
`
`administration of immunosuppressive drugs,
`
`in order to prevent
`
`the body from
`
`rejecting an organ transplant or
`
`for
`
`the treatment of auto-immune diseases.
`
`Immunosuppressive treatments, however, when inappropriate or inadequate, may
`
`lead to an over-immunosuppression state where the patient is extremely vulnerable
`
`to infections.
`
`Indeed, opportunistic infections and malignancies remain a significant
`
`cause of death after
`
`transplantation and are obvious consequences of over-
`
`immunosuppression.
`
`Because of the great diversity of causes, and because each of those causes may
`
`affect
`
`the immune
`
`system in
`
`a different
`
`aspect, different
`
`diagnosis
`
`for
`
`immunosuppression have been developed. Some nonspecific and pathogen-specific
`
`measures of cell-mediated immune function are available (Fishman et al. N Engl J
`
`Med. 2007, Fishman et al. Liver Transpl. 2011). Cell mediated immune function
`
`assays include lymphocyte subset analysis, particularly CD4+ T cell numbering or
`
`measure of the CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, neutrophil function assay, NK activation
`
`assay,
`
`lymphocyte proliferation assay (Hutchinson et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant
`
`2003).
`
`Those assays however are not sufficiently sensitive to detect slight changes in the
`
`immune system. Additionally, each of those assays focus on assaying the integrity of
`
`a specific pathway or mechanism of the immune system. None of them is based on
`
`assaying the end result, which is the capability of the immune system to respond to
`
`or control infections.
`
`Currently there is a no universal method for the diagnosis of immunosuppression that
`
`could be used universally, that is, for any suspected cause of immunosuppression.
`
`There is thus a ongoing need for a rapid, reliable and non-invasive test assessing
`
`precisely the immune status of a patient. Especially, a diagnosis method that would
`
`allow for evaluation of the capacity of the immune system to respond to infections
`
`could be used to fine-tune immunosuppressive treatments to the proper needs of the
`
`1O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`patients, and avoid over-immunosuppression.
`
`The inventors have found that the anelloviral load is a reliable marker of immune
`
`status and can thus be used for the diagnosis of immunosuppression.
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`Anelloviruses
`
`(ANV) are viruses that
`
`infect more than 90% individuals. Mixed
`
`infections with several strains and ANV species are frequent, and most subjects host
`
`at least one of them, but no pathological consequence has been attributed to ANV
`
`infection.
`
`In particular, no clear correlation between the anelloviral load and the
`
`immune state of the subject has been identified in the prior art. Patients on
`
`immunosuppressive treatment generally showed an increase in the load of specific
`
`viral strains (e.g. TLMV and TN). However, the inter-individual variations were such
`
`that the only relevant information could be obtained from examining the changes in
`
`the viral load of each individual. In particular, no conclusion could be drawn from the
`
`comparison of groups of patients , treated or not treated. Thus the methods of the
`
`prior art did not enable the determination of the immunosuppressive status of a
`
`subject and the design of a specific treatment thereof (Moen et al., J Med Virol,
`
`70(1): 177-182, 2003; Moen et al., AIDS, 16(12): 1679-1682, 2002; Christensen et al.,
`
`J Infect Dis, 181: 1796—1799, 2000; Shibayama et al., AIDS, 15: 563—570, 2001;
`
`Touinssi et al., J Clin Virol, 21: 135—141, 2001).
`
`In contrast, the present inventors have surprisingly found that the anelloviral load
`
`can be used as a marker for immunosuppression. Whereas previous studies were
`
`based on PCR, and thus were highly dependent upon primers design, resulting in
`
`missing variants of this highly variable virus (Moen et al., J Virol Methods,104(1): 59-
`
`67, 2002),
`
`the present
`
`inventors used High Throughput Sequencing (HTS). This
`
`technique led to the identification of a broad and unbiased range of ANV sequences,
`
`enabling the present
`
`inventors to demonstrate the existence of a correlation
`
`between the anelloviral
`
`load and immunosuppression with a high degree of
`
`confidence.
`
`In particular, the inventors have found that immunosuppressed subjects
`
`have a higher anelloviral load by comparison with healthy subjects.
`
`1O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`The measure of the global load of the viruses from the family of anelloviruses can
`
`thus be used as a marker of the immune state of the subject. More precisely,
`
`according to the invention, a high anelloviral load in a subject indicates that the said
`
`30
`
`subject is immunosuppressed.
`
`Thus,
`
`in a first aspect,
`
`the invention relates to a method for characterizing the
`
`immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of a subject, comprising the
`
`steps of :
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`a) determining the anelloviral load from a biological sample of the said subject,
`
`and
`
`b) assessing from the determination of step a)
`
`the immunosuppressed or non-
`
`immunosuppressed status.
`
`The term “immunosuppression” (or “immunodepression” or “immunodeficiency”), as
`
`used herein, refers to the reduction or suppression of the immune system function,
`
`i.e. immunosuppression generally denotes a state when a subject’s specific and/or
`
`non-specific immune system function is
`
`reduced or absent. The whole immune
`
`response may be depressed, or a particular population of immunologically active
`
`lymphocytes may be selectively affected.
`
`In some cases,
`
`the effect may be
`
`preferentially on T cells rather than B cells.
`
`If B cells are affected, it may be on a
`
`specific subclass of antibody-producing cells. Antigen-specific immunosuppression
`
`may be the result of deletion or suppression of a particular clone of antigen-specific
`
`cells, or the result of enhanced regulation of the immune response by antigen-
`
`specific suppressor cells.
`
`It can also be the result of increased production of
`
`antiidiotypic antibody.
`
`Immunosuppression may result from certain diseases such as AIDS or lymphoma or
`
`from certain drugs such as some of those used to treat cancer. Immunosuppression
`
`may also be deliberately induced with drugs, as in preparation for bone marrow or
`
`other organ transplantation to prevent
`
`the rejection of
`
`the transplant. Thus
`
`immunosuppression according to the invention may be from any origin such as, for
`
`example, but not limited to, immunosuppressive treatment, immunosuppressive side
`
`effects of drugs or therapy including radiotherapy,
`
`inherited immunosuppressive
`
`genetic traits or diseases, acquired immunosuppressive diseases such as Ale, cancers
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`such as leukemia or lymphoma.
`
`By “immunosuppressed status” it is herein referred to a condition where the immune
`
`system function of a subject is reduced or absent. Thus, according to the invention
`
`the terms “immunosuppressed”, “immunodepressed” or “immunocompromised” are
`
`all deemed to carry the same meaning.
`
`In
`
`a particular embodiment,
`
`the
`
`30
`
`“immunosuppressed status” of the subject means the ability of the subject to control
`
`viral infection, that is to say, the ability of the subject to prevent viral amplification
`
`from said viral infection.
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`It is difficult to precisely asses the immunosuppressed status of a subject with the
`
`methods of the prior art. This may lead to situations where too high a dose of an
`
`immunosuppressive treatment is given to a patient in need thereof. It is also possible
`
`that a dose not high enough of an immunostimulating treatment is administered to a
`
`patient, because the immunosuppressed status of the said patient was not correctly
`
`determined. The consequences for the patient’s health are potentially serious in
`
`either situation. For example, immunosuppressive treatments, when inappropriate or
`
`inadequate, may lead to an over-immunosuppression state, which leaves the patient
`
`highly susceptible to infections. On the other hand, it is important to be capable of
`
`identifying reliably chronically immunosuppressed patients, so as to provide them
`
`with the most adequate treatment.
`
`The method
`
`of
`
`the
`
`invention
`
`allows
`
`the
`
`precise determination
`
`of
`
`the
`
`immunosuppressed status of the subject, enabling a specific treatment to be tailored
`
`to the needs of the patient. The prior determination of the immunosuppressed status
`
`of the patient with the method of the invention thus lead to a treatment safer than
`
`the treatments designed on the basis of the methods of the prior art.
`
`Thus
`
`the present
`
`invention
`
`also
`
`relates
`
`to
`
`a method
`
`for
`
`designing
`
`an
`
`immunomodulation treatment for a subject, said method comprising:
`
`a) determining from a biological sample of a subject the anelloviral load, and
`
`b) assessing from the determination of step a)
`
`the immunosuppressed or non-
`
`immunosuppressed status, and
`
`c) designing the immunomodulation treatment according to said immunosuppressed
`
`or non-immunosuppressed status assessed in step b)
`
`The invention is also drawn to a method of treatment of a condition associated with
`
`immunodeficiency. As used herein; “conditions associated with immunodeficiency” or
`
`“immunodeficiency disorders” refer to a diverse group of conditions characterized
`
`primarily by an increased susceptibility to various opportunistic infections with
`
`consequent severe acute, recurrent or chronic disease.
`
`In a first embodiment,
`
`this
`
`increased susceptibility to infection results from immunosuppression due to one or
`
`more defects in the immune system.
`
`Immunosuppression in this case is non-
`
`deliberate.
`
`Immunodeficiency
`
`disorders
`
`encompass,
`
`without
`
`limitation,
`
`"immunodeficiency syndromes" wherein all features are the result of the immune
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`defect, and "syndromes with immunodeficiency", wherein some, even prominent
`
`features cannot be explained by the immune defect. By means of example and not
`
`limitation,
`
`diseases
`
`and
`
`conditions
`
`associated with
`
`immunodeficiency
`
`or
`
`immunosuppression comprise: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
`
`infection and
`
`acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), hypogammaglobulinemia, hematologic
`
`cancers such as leukaemia and lymphoma,
`
`, lymphocytopenia (lymphopenia) of any
`
`origin, lupus erythematosus, cachexia, opioids abuse, mastocytosis, rheumatic fever,
`
`trypanosomiasis, alcohol abuse.
`
`The group of immunodeficiency disorders also encompasses diseases and conditions
`
`associated with immunosuppression arising from an artificial, usually controlled
`
`diminution or prevention of a subject's immune response.
`
`Immunosuppression in
`
`subjects is thus deliberately induced.
`
`It may be caused by immunosuppressive
`
`treatment, or it may occur as a side effect of a therapy of other indications (e.g.,
`
`side effect of cancer chemotherapy). These latter conditions include such conditions
`
`as total bone marrow ablation, bone marrow transplantation, organ transplantation,
`
`treatment with immunosuppressive drugs such as inter alia tacrolimus, cyclosporine,
`
`methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, interferons, and immunoglobulins such
`
`anti-CD20 and anti-CD3; and treatments with: chemotherapy agents, corticosteroids,
`
`anti-TNF drugs, radiation.
`
`Thus the present
`
`invention also relates to a method for treating a condition
`
`associated with immunodeficiency in a subject, said method comprising:
`
`a)
`
`determining the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the said
`
`subject according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b)
`
`adapting an immunomodulation treatment to the said subject.
`
`The present invention thus provides an immunomodulation treatment for use in
`
`treating a condition associated with immunodeficiency in a subject, wherein the use
`
`comprises the steps of:
`
`a)
`
`the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the said subject is
`
`determined according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b)
`
`the said immunomodulation treatment is adapted to the said subject.
`
`1O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`In other words, the invention relates to the use of an immunomodulation treatment
`
`in the preparation of a medicament
`
`for
`
`treating a condition associated with
`
`immunodeficiency in a subject, wherein:
`
`a) the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the said subject is
`
`determined according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b) the said immunomodulation treatment is adapted to the said subject.
`
`By “immunomodulation treatment”, it is herein referred to any treatment intended
`
`to induce, enhance, inhibit or suppress an immune function. According to a preferred
`
`embodiment, an immunomodulation treatment is an immunosuppressive treatment.
`
`According to another preferred embodiment, an immunomodulation treatment is an
`
`immunostimulating treatment.
`
`By “immunosuppressive treatment” it is herein referred to any treatment intended to
`
`inhibit or suppress an immune function of a subject that would be adverse to a
`
`desired clinical outcome.
`
`Immunosuppressive treatments include for example
`
`treatments that are intended to induce immune function deficiency in a subject in
`
`order to treat the said subject with a transplant of cells or of an organ. They also
`
`include for example treatments that induce immune function deficiency as a side
`
`effect, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Immunosuppressive treatments usually
`
`include e.g. glucocorticoids, antiproliferative and antimetabolic drugs (rapamycin,
`
`everolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid), calcineurin inhibitors
`
`(cyclosporine, FK506, voclosporin), S1P-R agonists
`
`(FI'Y720), malononitrilamides
`
`(FK778),
`
`and
`
`antibodies
`
`(e.g.
`
`antithymocyte
`
`globulin)
`
`including monoclonal
`
`antibodies (e.g. muromonab-CD3, daclizumab, basiliximab, rituximab, alemtuzumab,
`
`infliximab, adalimumab, efalizumab).
`
`An “immunostimulating treatment”, according to the present invention, is any type
`
`of treatment intended to induce or enhance immune function. Immunostimulating
`
`treatments include treatments that stimulate specific immune response, treatments
`
`that stimulate non-specific immune response and treatments that stimulate both
`
`specific and non-specific immune responses. Such immunostimulating treatments are
`
`usually given to treat conditions associated with non-deliberate immunosuppression.
`
`Immunostimulating treatments that stimulate the immune response have been
`
`described in the literature,
`
`ranging from small synthetic molecules (poly |:C,
`
`1O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`levamisole,
`
`inosine pranobex) to living microorganisms (Corynebacterium parvum),
`
`and including complex mixtures of bacterial components with mineral oils (Freund's
`
`adjuvant) or inorganic salts (aluminum and magnesium hydroxide/phosphate) and,
`
`more
`
`recently,
`
`recombinant proteins modulating immunity
`
`(e.g.
`
`cytokines,
`
`antibodies against cellular receptors). According to the present invention anti-viral
`
`treatments are also considered immunostimulating treatments. Anti-viral treatments
`
`include for example oseltamivir (Tamiflu), zanamivir (Relenza),
`
`interferon, which
`
`inhibit viral synthesis in infected cells, particularly alpha-interferon, used in the
`
`treatment of hepatitis B and C.
`
`Thus,
`
`in one embodiment of the method of the invention,
`
`the immunomodulation
`
`treatment
`
`is an immunosuppressive treatment.
`
`In another embodiment of
`
`the
`
`method of the invention, the immunomodulation treatment is an immunostimulating
`
`treatment.
`
`The said adaptation of the immunomodulation treatment may be either a reduction
`
`or suppression of the said immunomodulation treatment or the continuation of the
`
`said immunomodulation treatment at the same or an increased dose. The skilled
`
`person will appreciate that the treatment will be continued if the desired effect on
`
`the subject’s immune system is not achieved. For example, when the treatment is
`
`administered for stimulating the immune system function in order to compensate for
`
`a deficit
`
`thereof,
`
`the
`
`treatment
`
`is
`
`continued
`
`if
`
`the patient
`
`shows
`
`an
`
`immunosuppressed phenotype. Likewise, an immunosuppressive treatment will be
`
`continued if the subject displays a non-immunosuppressed status. On the other hand,
`
`the treatment will be reduced or suppressed if the desired effect on the subject’s
`
`immune system has been attained. This is the case for example when the treatment
`
`seeks to obtain immunosuppression in order to perform e.g. organ transplantation,
`
`while the subject shows an i mmunosuppression status.
`
`In a preferred embodiment,
`
`the condition associated with immunodeficiency is
`
`transplant rejection.
`
`Thus,
`
`the invention relates to a method for treating or preventing transplant
`
`rejection in a transplanted subject, said method comprising:
`
`a) determining the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the said
`
`transplanted subject according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`1O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`9
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`b) adapting an immunosuppressive treatment to the said transplanted subject.
`
`The present invention thus provides an immunosuppressive treatment for use in
`
`treating or preventing transplant rejection in a transplanted subject, wherein the
`
`said use comprises the steps of:
`
`a) determining the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the said
`
`transplanted subject according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b) adapting the said immunosuppressive treatment to the said transplanted subject.
`
`In other words, the invention relates to the use of an immunosuppressive treatment
`
`in the preparation of a medicament for treating or preventing transplant rejection in
`
`10
`
`a transplanted subject, wherein:
`
`a) the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the transplanted said
`
`subject is determined according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b) the said immunosuppressive treatment
`
`is adapted to the said transplanted
`
`subject.
`
`In another preferred embodiment, the condition associated with immunodeficiency is
`
`an infection.
`
`Thus this embodiment relates to a method of treating an infection in an infected
`
`subject, said method comprising:
`
`a) determining the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the said
`
`infected subject according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b) adapting an immunostimulating treatment to the said infected subject.
`
`The present invention thus provides an immunostimulating treatment for use in
`
`treating an infection in an infected subject, wherein the use comprises the steps of :
`
`a) determining the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the said
`
`transplanted subject according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b) adapting the said immunostimulating treatment to the said subject.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`10
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`In other words, the invention relates to the use of an immunostimulating treatment
`
`in the preparation of a medicament for treating an infection in an infected subject,
`
`wherein :
`
`a) the immunosuppressed or non-immunosuppressed status of the transplanted said
`
`subject is determined according to the methods of the invention, and
`
`b) the said immunostimulating treatment is adapted to the said transplanted subject.
`
`An anellovirus according to the invention is a non-enveloped virus, with a small
`
`circular single-stranded DNA genome which is replicated through double-stranded
`
`intermediates, and which may contain up to 4 open reading frames: ORF1, ORF2,
`
`ORF3 and ORF4. Open reading frames (ORF)
`
`1
`
`(long) and 2 (short) are partially
`
`overlapping. ORF3 and 0RF4 are smaller. Anelloviruses are subgrouped into torque
`
`teno virus ('l'l'V), torque teno mini virus ('l'l'MV), and torque teno midi virus ("l—I'MDV),
`
`with known hosts including humans, non-human primates and domestic animals
`
`(Biagini et al., J Gen Virol, 88: 2696—2701, 2007; Hino & Miyata, Rev Med Virol, 17:
`
`45—57, 2007; Leary et al., J Gen Virol, 80: 2115—2120., 1999).
`
`By “anellovirus”, it is herein referred to any virus belonging to the Anelloviridae
`
`family of viruses, including, but not limited to, the Torque Teno viruses ("l—I'Vs), the
`
`Torque Teno midiviruses ('I'I'MDVs), and the Torque Teno miniviruses, also formerly
`
`known as the Torque Teno-like miniviruses (Tl'MVs). The prototype strain of Torque
`
`Teno Virus ('lTV-1a) has a genome size of 3853 nucleotides. The prototype strain of
`
`Torque Teno Minivirus, formerly known as 'l'l'V-like minivirus ('l'l'MV-NLC030), has a
`
`genome size of 2915 nucleotides. Finally,
`
`the Torque Teno Midivirus has been
`
`described, with a genome of 3242 nucleotides for the prototype strain ('lTMDV-MD1-
`
`073). Anelloviruses are highly variable in sequence. For example, nucleotide
`
`sequences of full-length genomes of TN can vary by 40 %, and those of 'I'I'MDV by 33
`
`%.
`
`The “viral load” according to the invention is the number of nucleic acid sequences
`
`of a virus present in a biological sample. The viral load reflects the severity of a viral
`
`infection. Preferably,
`
`the viral
`
`load refers to the proportion of a nucleic acid
`
`sequences in a biological sample which belong to the said virus. More preferably, the
`
`viral load represents the number of copies of the said virus in a biological sample.
`
`1O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`11
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`The viral load can for example be determined by estimating the amount of the virus
`
`in a biological sample from a subject.
`
`As used herein, the term “subject” refers to a vertebrate, preferably a mammal, and
`
`most preferably a human.
`
`By “biological sample”,
`
`it is herein referred to any sample that is taken from a
`
`subject, which includes but is not limited to, for example, blood, serum, plasma,
`
`sputum, urine, stool, skin, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, gastric secretions, semen,
`
`seminal fluid, tears, spinal tissue or fluid, cerebral fluid, trigeminal ganglion sample,
`
`a sacral ganglion sample, adipose tissue,
`
`lymphoid tissue, placental tissue, upper
`
`reproductive tract tissue, gastrointestinal tract tissue, male genital tissue and fetal
`
`central nervous system tissue. Preferably, the biological sample is blood or is derived
`
`from blood, such as plasma or serum.
`
`According to the invention, the anelloviral load in a subject means the viral load of
`
`any virus of the Anelloviridae family hosted by said subject. Thus determining the
`
`anelloviral
`
`load in a subject according to the invention comprises estimating the
`
`number of sequences of any virus of the Anelloviridae family in a biological sample
`
`from the said subject. In particular, there is no selection, according to the invention,
`
`of specific anellovirus species to be measured in the said biological sample.
`
`Preferably, determining the anelloviral load comprises determining the amount of
`
`active and/or
`
`inactive viral copies.
`
`It comprises determining the amount of
`
`circulating, integrated or latent viral copies. More preferably, the anelloviral load
`
`corresponds to circulating copies of anellovirus.
`
`The levels of anellovirus may be determined by measuring levels of anellovirus DNA,
`
`anellovirus RNA, or anellovirus proteins. The method according to the invention may
`
`thus comprise another preliminary step, between the taking of the sample from the
`
`patient and step a) as defined above, corresponding to the transformation of the
`
`biological sample into a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) sample, or into an mRNA (or
`
`corresponding cDNA) sample, or into a protein sample, which is then ready to use for
`
`in vitro detection of anellovirus in step a). The said dsDNA may correspond either to
`
`the whole anellovirus genome or only to a portion of it. Once a ready-to-use dsDNA,
`
`mRNA (or corresponding cDNA) or protein sample is available, the detection of the
`
`anellovirus may be performed, depending on the type of transformation and the
`
`available ready-to-use sample, either at
`
`the genomic DNA (i.e. based on the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`12
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`presence of at least one sequence consisting of at least a part of the anellovirus
`
`genome), mRNA (i.e. based on the mRNA content of the sample) or at the protein
`
`level (i.e. based on the protein content of the sample).
`
`Preferably,
`
`the levels of anellovirus are determined by measuring levels of
`
`anellovirus DNA.
`
`Methods for detecting a nucleic acid in a biological sample include inter alia
`
`hybridization with a labelled probe, amplification,
`
`including PCR amplification,
`
`sequencing, and all other methods known to the person of skills in the art. The
`
`amount of nucleic acid transcripts can be measured by any technology known by the
`
`skilled person. In particular, the measure may be carried out directly on an extracted
`
`messenger RNA (mRNA) sample, or on retrotranscribed complementary DNA (cDNA)
`
`prepared from extracted mRNA by technologies well-known in the art. From the
`
`mRNA or cDNA sample, the amount of nucleic acid transcripts may be measured using
`
`any technology known by a person skilled in the art, including nucleic microarrays,
`
`quantitative PCR, and hybridization with a labelled probe.
`
`In a first embodiment of the invention, the levels of anellovirus DNA are measured by
`
`sequencing. As used herein, the term "sequencing" is used in a broad sense and refers
`
`to any technique known by the skilled person including but not limited to Sanger
`
`dideoxy
`
`termination
`
`sequencing, whole-genome
`
`sequencing,
`
`sequencing
`
`by
`
`hybridization, pyrosequencing, capillary electrophoresis, cycle sequencing, single-
`
`base extension sequencing, solid- phase sequencing, high-throughput sequencing,
`
`massively parallel
`
`signature sequencing (MPSS),
`
`sequencing by reversible dye
`
`terminator, paired-end sequencing, near-term sequencing, exonuclease sequencing,
`
`sequencing
`
`by
`
`ligation,
`
`short-read
`
`sequencing,
`
`single-molecule
`
`sequencing,
`
`sequencing-by-synthesis,
`
`real-time
`
`sequencing,
`
`reverse-terminator
`
`sequencing,
`
`nanopore sequencing, 454 sequencing, Solexa Genome Analyzer sequencing, SOLiD(R)
`
`sequencing, MS-PET sequencing, mass spectrometry, and combinations thereof.
`
`Optionally, DNA is fragmented randomly, generally by physical methods,, prior to
`
`sequencing. The anellovirus DNA may be sequenced by any technique known in the
`
`art,
`
`including sequencing by ligation, pyrosequencing, sequencing—by-synthesis or
`
`single-molecule sequencing. Sequencing also includes PCR-based techniques, such as
`
`for example quantitative PCR or emulsion PCR.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2013/156627
`
`13
`
`PCT/EP2013/058231
`
`Sequencing is performed on the entire DNA contained in the biological sample, or on
`
`portions of the DNA contained in the biological sample. It will be immediately clear
`
`to the skilled person that the said sample contains at least a mixture of anellovirus
`
`DNA and of DNA from the host subject. Moreover, the anellovirus DNA is likely to
`
`represent only a minor fraction of the total DNA present in the sample.
`
`A first approach that addresses these challenges is
`
`to sequence and quantify
`
`sequences which are known to be specific of the anellovirus genome. Indeed, the
`
`inventors have identified two consensus sequences, represented by SEQ ID No. 4 and
`
`SEQ ID No. 5, based on the comparison between all the anelloviral sequences. Thes