`(19) World Intellectual Property
`Organization
`International Bureau
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`
`g
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`WO 2014/068075 A1
`WIPOI PCT
`3 May 2014 (08.05.2014)
`
`
`(51)
`
`International Patent Classification:
`CIZQ 1/68 (2006.01)
`
`(21)
`
`International Application Number:
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`(22)
`
`International Filing Date:
`
`(25)
`
`Filing Language:
`
`(26)
`
`Publication Language:
`
`31 October 2013 (31.10.2013)
`
`English
`
`English
`
`(30)
`
`(71)
`
`(72)
`
`Priority Data:
`121908446
`
`31 October 2012 (31.10.2012)
`
`EP
`
`Applicant: GENESUPPORT SA [CH/CH]; Route de Ber-
`tigny 36, CH-1700 Fribourg (CH).
`
`Inventors: ESTERAS, Nlagne; 19, avenue Bois-de-la-
`Chapelle, CII-1213 Onex (CII). DELUEN SAGNE. Cé-
`cile; 50, ehemin du Dessy, F-01630 Sergy (FR). VIN-
`CENT, Nadine;
`1, rue du Pre Leavard, F-01200 In-
`jouX-Genissiat
`(FR). CONRAD, Bernard;
`Jardins du
`Salesianum 11, CH-1700 Fribourg (CH).
`
`(74)
`
`Agents: ERNEST GUTMANN - YVES PLASSERAUD
`SAS et al.; 88, Bd des Belges, F-69452 LYON Cedex 06
`(FR).
`
`(81)
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind ofnational protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`A0, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY,
`BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM,
`DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, Fl, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT,
`HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR,
`KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME,
`MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ,
`OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA,
`SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM,
`TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM,
`ZW.
`
`(84)
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RWY, SD, SL, SZ, TZ,
`UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ,
`TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK,
`EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV,
`MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM,
`TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GVV,
`KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`Published:
`
`with international search report (Art. 21(3))
`
`(54) Title: NON-INVASIVE METHOD FOR DETECTING A FETAL CHROMOSOMAL ANEUPLOIDY
`
`(57) Abstract: The invention relates to a method for obtaining a set of reference samples and/or a set of reference parameters for the
`diagnosis of fetal ancuploidy front a maternal biological sample, containing cell-free DNA, said method comprising: - extracting
`cell-free DNA from a set of biological samples obtained from euploid pregnant women carrying a euploid fetus; - after the extraction
`step, analyzing the size distribution of the DNA molecules Within each sample and selecting a set of samples based on the size distri -
`bution of the DNA molecules Within said samples; - performing a massively parallel sequencing of DNA of each size-selected
`sample; — mapping the obtained sequences to the human genome for each sample; — calculating a set of reference parameters, wherein
`each reference parameter is indicative of the number of unique exact sequences mapped to a chromosome or chromosomal region of
`interest for each sample; — obtaining a set ofreferenee samples and/or a set of reference parameters.
`
`
`
`W02014/068075A1i||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`Non-invasive method for detecting a fetal chromosomal aneuploidy
`
`The present invention relates to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy using
`
`cell-free DNA, particularly size-selected cell-free DNA. More particularly,
`
`the invention
`
`relates to methods of diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy characterized by the use of a set of
`
`external
`
`reference samples providing highly improved sensitivity and specificity. The
`
`invention also relates to methods for obtaining the reference samples and kits comprising
`
`the reference samples and / or a set of reference parameters for use in diagnosis of fetal
`
`aneuploidy.
`
`The detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies is an important procedure in prenatal
`
`diagnosis. Several major diseases are caused by chromosomal aneuploidies, such as
`
`Down syndrome (also referred to as trisomy 21), trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and it is of utmost
`
`importance to predict as soon as possible whether a fetus will be affected by one of these
`
`anomalies. Moreover,
`
`the risk that a fetus will be afflicted by an aneuploidy generally
`
`increases with the mother’s age. Therefore, the increase in the average age of pregnant
`
`women in most developed countries further raises the need for powerful and safe
`
`diagnostic methods for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies.
`
`The detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies is commonly performed through invasive
`
`procedures such as chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis or cord blood sampling.
`
`These methods have in common that they rely on the collection of a fetal biological
`
`material (amniotic fluid, chorionic villi, cord blood) in order to obtain fetal cells, necessary
`
`for a karyotype analysis. These methods have been routinely practised for a long time.
`
`However, due to their invasiveness, they are not free of risk for the fetus and for the
`
`mother. The most frequent risk is the chance of miscarriage, close to 1% in the case of
`
`amniocentesis. Other risks are associated with these invasive procedures, such as risks of
`
`infection, transmission of a disease from the mother to the fetus (for example AIDS or
`
`hepatitis B), amniotic fluid leakage, or premature birth.
`
`Non-invasive methods based on ultrasound scanning or on the detection of maternal
`
`serum biochemical markers have also been developed, but these methods are mainly
`
`restricted to the detection of epiphenomena, and have a limited clinical usefulness for
`
`detecting the core pathologies of chromosomal abnormalities.
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`The discovery of cell—free fetal nucleic acids in maternal plasma in 1997 opened up new
`
`possibilities. The first strategies using these nucleic acids for assessing the fetal
`
`chromosomal dosage were based on the analysis of the allelic ratio of SNPs in target
`
`nucleic acids (placental mRNA and DNA molecules bearing a placental-specific DNA
`
`methylation signature) based on the assessment of the fetal chromosomal dosage by
`
`allelic ratio analysis of SNPs. Another strategy was developed more recently using digital
`
`PCR (Lo et al., 2007). The technique consists in measuring the total amount of a specific
`
`locus on a potentially aneuploid chromosome (for example chromosome 21) in maternal
`
`plasma and comparing this amount to that on a reference chromosome.
`
`In 2008, Chiu et al successfully implemented massively parallel sequencing in a method
`
`for diagnosing fetal
`
`trisomy 21 in maternal plasma (Chiu et al., 2008). Their method
`
`consists in performing a massively parallel sequencing on DNA extracted from the plasma
`
`samples. The sequences obtained from the MPGS step are then aligned to a reference
`
`sequence of the human genome, and the number of sequences which have been uniquely
`
`mapped to a location on the human genome, without mismatch,
`
`is counted for each
`
`chromosome, and compared to the total number of sequences obtained during the MPGS.
`
`This ratio provides an indication of
`
`the “chromosomal
`
`representation” of
`
`the DNA
`
`molecules found in a maternal plasma sample. The overrepresentation of chromosome 21
`
`in a given sample, by comparison to a set of reference samples already known as eu ploid,
`
`is indicative of a fetal trisomy 21.
`
`Approximately at the same time, Fan et al successfully developed another method for the
`
`diagnosis of fetal trisomy 21, using shotgun sequencing of cell-free plasma (Fan et al.,
`
`2008). After massively sequencing the cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma
`
`samples, Fan et al. mapped each sequence to the human genome. Each chromosome of
`
`the human genome was then divided into 50 kb bins, and, for each bin the number of
`
`sequence tags uniquely mapped to the human genome with at most one mismatch was
`
`counted. Fan et al. then calculated the median value of this count of sequence tag over
`
`each chromosome. Finally, Fan et al. compared the chromosome 21 sequence tag density
`
`of plasma issued from mothers carrying a fetus afflicted by trisomy 21 to that of plasma
`
`issued from mothers carrying euploid fetuses, and they noticed that
`
`the trisomy 21
`
`sequence tag density was higher than that of euploid samples, with a 99% confidence
`level.
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`These techniques both rely on the detection of the overrepresentation of a given
`
`chromosome in comparison to euploid reference samples. They have provided a useful
`
`“proof-of—concept” and have paved the way for an efficient use of next-generation
`
`sequencing technology in the diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy. However, the implementation
`
`of the method in a routine clinical context requires a higher level of sensitivity and
`
`specificity than that currently described in the prior art.
`
`The sensitivity of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis to detect fetal aneuploidy with whole
`
`genome next generation sequencing (WG-NGS) depends on the fetal DNA fraction in the
`
`maternal plasma, and on the sequencing depth. While the fetal DNA fraction depends on a
`
`series of
`
`largely inherent biological variables,
`
`the technical variables
`
`subject
`
`to
`
`experimental modification include i), the efficiency of the DNA extraction procedure, ii), the
`
`accuracy and throughput of NGS, namely the fraction of sequence tags with unique exact
`
`matches that can be aligned to the sequenced genome (termed “unique exact sequences
`
`without mismatches" or “UES”) and the total number of molecules sequenced iii),
`
`the
`
`nature of the bioinformatic algorithms, and iv), the control group of samples from pregnant
`
`women with normal fetal caryotypes that provides the reference set. The latter is of utmost
`
`importance, since individual molecules counting for each single chromosome is normalized
`
`with the median sequence tag density of all autosomes (Fan et al 2008).
`
`The present invention implements a DNA extraction method not previously used for non-
`
`invasive prenatal diagnosis and having a fivefold greater yield than standard methods,
`
`together with a rigorously quality-controlled NGS work-flow with overall 25-30% more
`
`UESs than the published references, and average total count of UESs of more than
`
`15-106, which is three times higher than the current standard. The final readout of the test
`
`fits the requirements of a robust clinical test, is. a 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for
`
`the major fetal aneuploidies. This procedure for instance discriminates trisomy 21 or Down
`
`syndrome from normal male and female caryotypes with 51.1-10'5 prior probability of
`
`generating false results by chance. Since the benchmark is 52.7-10'3,
`
`it represents an
`
`improvement of
`
`two orders of magnitude. This invention provides a combination of
`
`methods that allow the constitution of a high quality reference set of sequences, which is
`
`the key step towards defining the performance of the NGS procedure.
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`A first aspect of the present invention thus relates to a method for obtaining a set of
`
`reference samples and/or a set of reference parameters for
`
`the diagnosis of fetal
`
`aneuploidy from a maternal biological sample, preferably a blood sample, comprising:
`
`a step of extracting cell-free DNA from a set of biological samples, preferably blood
`
`samples, obtained from euploid pregnant women carrying a euploid fetus;
`
`a step of performing a massively parallel sequencing of DNA of each sample;
`
`a step of mapping the obtained sequences to the human genome for each sample;
`
`optionally calculating a set of
`
`reference parameters, wherein each reference
`
`parameter is
`
`indicative of the number of unique exact sequences mapped to a
`
`chromosome or chromosomal region of interest for each sample;
`
`obtaining a set of reference samples and/or a set of reference parameters;
`
`wherein the method comprises at least one of the following additional steps/features:
`
`the extraction of cell-free DNA from each biological sample comprises:
`
`0 mixing said biological sample with a composition comprising chloroform and
`
`phenoh
`
`o
`
`0
`
`0
`
`extracting the aqueous phase from said mixture;
`
`precipitating DNA from said aqueous phase;
`
`optionally collecting precipitated DNA.
`
`After the extraction step, analyzing the size distribution of the DNA molecules within
`
`each sample and selecting a set of samples based on the size distribution of the DNA
`
`molecules within said samples;
`
`After the extraction step or after the selection step based on the size distribution of the
`
`DNA molecules, pre-sequencing DNA of each sample, mapping the obtained
`
`sequences to the human genome, and selecting a set of samples based on the
`
`amount of unique exact sequences mapped to the human genome;
`
`After the step of mapping the sequences obtained from massively parallel sequencing,
`
`selecting a set of samples based on the number of unique exact sequences mapped to
`
`the human genome.
`
`The method can comprise any one of these additional steps or features, any combination
`
`of two or three of these additional steps or features or the four additional steps and
`featu res.
`
`Preferably, the method of the invention includes a step of size selection of the cell-free
`
`DNA, particularly immediately after the extraction step and prior to massive parallel
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`sequencing. According to this embodiment, the invention relates to a method for obtaining
`
`a set of reference samples and/or a set of reference parameters for the diagnosis of fetal
`
`aneuploidy from a maternal biological sample, containing cell-free DNA, said method
`
`comprising:
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`extracting cell-free DNA from a set of biological samples obtained from euploid
`
`pregnant women carrying a euploid fetus;
`
`after the extraction step, analyzing the size distribution of the DNA molecules within
`
`each sample and selecting a set of samples based on the size distribution of the DNA
`
`molecules within said samples;
`
`performing a massively parallel sequencing of DNA of each size-selected sample;
`
`- mapping the obtained sequences to the human genome for each sample;
`
`—
`
`-
`
`calculating a set of reference parameters, wherein each reference parameter is
`
`indicative of the number of unique exact sequences mapped to a chromosome or
`
`chromosomal region of interest for each sample;
`
`obtaining a set of reference samples and/or a set of reference parameters.
`
`A preferred example of such a method for obtaining a set of reference samples, including a
`
`size-selection step, comprises :
`
`a) extracting cell-free DNA from a set of biological samples obtained from euploid pregnant
`
`women carrying a euploid fetus, and optionally also obtained from euploid pregnant
`
`women carrying an aneuploid fetus;
`
`b) subjecting the samples of extracted cell—free DNA to a step of size selection, particularly
`
`to remove cell-free DNA molecules having a size greater than 200 bp;
`
`0) processing the size-selected extracted DNA samples obtained in step (b) for the
`
`preparation of a sequencing library, for example by end repair of the DNA molecules and
`
`ligation of sequencing adaptors, optionally followed by amplification of the adaptor-ligated
`
`fragments;
`
`d) performing a massively parallel sequencing of DNA of each size—selected sample
`
`obtained in (c);
`
`e) mapping the sequences obtained in step (d) to the human genome for each sample;
`
`f) calculating a set of reference parameters, wherein each reference parameter is
`
`indicative of the number of unique exact sequences mapped to a chromosome or
`
`chromosomal region of interest for each sample;
`
`9) obtaining a set of reference samples and/or a set of reference parameters.
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`It
`
`is particularly preferred that,
`
`in obtaining the reference set of samples,
`
`the set of
`
`biological samples from which cell-free DNA is extracted further includes samples obtained
`
`from euploid pregnant women carrying an aneuploid fetus,
`
`In this way, the reference set
`
`provides reference values for both euploid and aneuploid samples.
`
`In an alternative embodiment, the method for obtaining a set of reference samples for the
`
`diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy from a maternal biological sample containing cell-free DNA,
`
`comprises steps of pre-sequencing and mapping on a size-selected sub-set of samples
`
`prior to massive parallel sequencing. According to this alternative embodiment the method
`
`comprises:
`
`(i)
`
`extracting cell-free DNA from a set of biological samples, preferably blood
`
`samples, obtained from a set of euploid pregnant women carrying a euploid
`
`fetus;
`
`(ii)
`
`(iii)
`
`(iv)
`
`(v)
`
`(vi)
`
`analyzing the size distribution of the DNA molecules within each sample;
`
`selecting a first set of samples based on the size distribution of the DNA
`
`molecules within said samples;
`
`pre-sequencing DNA of each sample from said first set of samples;
`
`mapping the sequences obtained in step (iv) to the human genome;
`
`selecting a second set of samples based on the amount of unique exact
`
`sequences mapped to the human genome in step (V);
`
`(vii)
`
`massively parallel sequencing DNA of each sample from said second set of
`
`samples;
`
`(viii)
`
`mapping the sequences obtained in step (vii) to the human genome;
`
`(ix)
`
`selecting a set of reference samples based on the number of unique exact
`
`sequences mapped to the human genome in step (viii).
`
`In a specific embodiment, step (iii) comprises selecting samples in which at least 90 wt%,
`
`preferably more than 95wt% of the DNA molecules have a size from 156 bp to 176 bp.
`
`In another embodiment, step(iii) comprises selecting samples with at least 0.88 ng/ul DNA
`
`molecules with a size from 156 bp to 176 bp.
`
`In another embodiment, step (iv) comprises sequencing from 1000 to 100000 sequences
`
`within each sample.
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`In another embodiment, step (vi) comprises selecting samples having at least 70 % of
`
`unique exact sequences with respect to the total number of sequences obtained in step
`
`(iv).
`
`In another embodiment, step (vii) comprises sequencing at least 25 million sequences for
`
`each sample. In another embodiment, step (vii) comprises obtaining at least 25 million filter
`
`passing reads for each sample.
`
`In another embodiment, step (ix) comprises selecting samples having more than 15
`
`millions unique exact sequence reads.
`
`The present invention also relates to a method for diagnosing fetal aneuploidy from a
`
`maternal biological test sample, preferably a blood sample, comprising:
`
`(a) extracting cell-free DNA from a maternal biological test sample obtained from a
`
`pregnant woman;
`
`(b) massively parallel sequencing cell-free DNA extracted from said test sample;
`
`(c) mapping the sequences obtained in step (b) to the human genome;
`
`(d) calculating a test parameter indicative of the number of unique exact sequences
`
`mapped to a chromosome or chromosomal region of interest;
`
`(e) calculating a set of reference parameters, wherein each reference parameter is
`
`indicative of the number of unique exact sequences mapped to a chromosome or
`
`chromosomal region of interest for a sample of a set of reference samples, such
`
`as a set of euploid reference samples, for example as obtained according to the
`
`present invention;
`
`(f) Comparing said test parameter calculated in step (d) with said set of reference
`
`parameters calculated at step (e);
`
`(9) based on the comparison, diagnosing a fetal aneuploidy.
`
`A preferred method of diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy comprises the above method in which,
`
`after the extraction step, a step of size selection based on the size of the DNA molecules
`
`within said sample is carried out. The step of size selection substantially eliminates DNA
`
`molecules having a size greater than 200 bp from the test sample. This step is preferably
`
`conducted prior to the preparation of a sequencing library. This method of diagnosis is
`
`particularly preferred in conjunction with the use of reference samples which have also
`
`undergone a step of cell-free DNA size selection as described above. Indeed, according to
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`the invention,
`
`it is preferred that the test sample be subject to the same methodology as
`
`the reference samples.
`
`According to this preferred embodiment, the method for diagnosing fetal aneuploidy from a
`
`maternal biological test sample, preferably a blood sample, comprises:
`
`(a)
`
`extracting cell—free DNA from a maternal biological test sample such as blood
`
`obtained from a pregnant woman;
`
`(b)
`
`performing a step of size selection on the extracted cell-free DNA, such that DNA
`
`molecules having a size greater than 200 bp are substantially eliminated from the
`
`sample ;
`
`processing the size-selected extracted cell-free DNA for the preparation of a
`
`sequencing library, for example by end repair of the DNA molecules and ligation of
`
`sequencing adaptors, optionally followed by amplification of the adaptor-ligated
`
`fragments;
`
`(d)
`
`massively parallel sequencing the cell-free DNA obtained in step (c);
`
`(e)
`
`mapping the sequences obtained in step (d) to the human genome;
`
`(f)
`
`calculating a test parameter indicative of the number of unique exact sequences
`
`mapped to a chromosome or chromosomal region of interest;
`
`(9)
`
`calculating a set of reference parameters, wherein each reference parameter is
`
`indicative of the number of unique exact sequences mapped to a chromosome or
`
`chromosomal region of interest for a sample of a set of reference samples, such
`
`as a set of euploid reference samples, obtained according to the size—selection
`
`method of the present invention;
`
`(h)
`
`Comparing said test parameter calculated in step (f) with said set of reference
`
`parameters calculated at step (9);
`
`(i)
`
`based on the comparison, diagnosing a fetal aneuploidy.
`
`Preferably,
`
`the extraction of cell—free DNA from the maternal biological
`
`test sample
`
`comprises:
`
`mixing said biological sample with a composition comprising chloroform and
`
`phenol;
`
`extracting the aqueous phase from said mixture;
`
`precipitating DNA from said aqueous phase;
`
`optionally collecting precipitated DNA.
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`In a specific embodiment, said test parameter is the unique sequence tag density of the
`
`chromosome or chromosomal region of interest normalized to the median unique exact
`
`sequence tag density of all autosomes.
`
`In another embodiment, said test parameter is the percentage of unique exact sequences
`
`mapped to said chromosome or chromosomal region, with respect to the total number of
`
`unique exact sequences mapped to all chromosomes, or to the total number of unique
`
`exact sequences mapped to all autosomes.
`
`In another embodiment, the comparison in step (f) is made through calculation of the z-
`
`score of said test parameter with respect to the set of reference parameters.
`
`In another embodiment, the test parameter is the absolute exact sequence count for the
`
`chromosome or chromosomal region of interest or the average exact sequence count for
`
`the chromosome or chromosomal region of interest.
`
`In a further embodiment the comparison in step (f) is made through calculation of the
`
`probability that the unique exact sequence count for the chromosome or chromosomal
`
`region of
`
`interest, or
`
`the average exact sequence count
`
`for
`
`the chromosome or
`
`chromosomal region of interest, belongs to the normal distribution of the unique exact
`
`sequence counts for the chromosome of interest of the reference set.
`
`In another embodiment, the chromosome of interest is chromosome 21, chromosome 18,
`
`chromosome 16, chromosome 11 or chromosome 13.
`
`In another embodiment, the chromosome of interest is chromosome 21, and the z-score of
`
`a trisomy 21 sample is at least 4.4 while the absolute value of the z—score of a sample
`
`euploid for chromosome 21 is less than 4.4.
`
`The present invention also relates to a method for extracting cell-free DNA from a maternal
`
`biological sample containing fetal and maternal cell-free DNA, comprising:
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`mixing said biological sample with a composition comprising chloroform and
`
`phenoh
`
`extracting the aqueous phase from said mixture;
`
`precipitating DNA from said aqueous phase;
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`—
`
`optionally collecting precipitated DNA.
`
`The present invention also relates to the use of chloroform and phenol, preferably of a
`
`composition comprising chloroform and phenol for extracting cell-free DNA from a maternal
`
`biological sample containing fetal and maternal cell-free DNA.
`
`In a specific aspect, said use is in a method for obtaining a set of reference samples for the
`
`diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy from a maternal biological sample.
`
`In another aspect, said use is in a method for diagnosing fetal aneu ploidy from a maternal
`
`biological test sample
`
`The present invention also relates to a set of reference samples obtainable according to
`
`the method of the present invention.
`
`The present invention also relates to a computer program product for implementing one or
`
`more steps of the method for obtaining a set of reference samples for the diagnosis of fetal
`
`aneuploidy from a maternal biological sample.
`
`The present invention also relates to a computer program product for implementing one or
`
`more steps of the method for diagnosing fetal aneuploidy from a maternal biological test
`
`sample, for example one or more of step (d) to (g).
`
`The present invention also relates to a kit comprising one or more of:
`
`-
`
`-
`
`—
`
`-
`
`-
`
`one or more compositions and/or a kit for extracting cell-free DNA, for example
`
`including a composition comprising phenol and chloroform;
`
`a set of reference samples obtainable according to the method of the present
`
`invention;
`
`a set of reference parameters obtainable according to the method according to the
`
`present invention, optionally included in a physical support, such as a computer
`
`readable media;
`
`a computer program product for implementing one or more steps of the method for
`
`obtaining a set of reference samples for the diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy from a
`
`maternal biological sample;
`
`a computer program product for implementing one or more steps of the method for
`
`diagnosing fetal aneuploidy from a maternal biological test sample.
`
`10
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`According to a preferred embodiment,
`
`the kit
`
`for
`
`the diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy
`
`comprises :
`
`-
`
`a set of reference samples obtainable according to the method of the invention, for
`
`example a set of samples having undergone size selection to enrich the sample for
`
`cell—free DNA having a size of s 200bp, and eliminating DNA molecules greater
`
`than 200 bp, and comprising not only samples from euploid pregnant women
`
`carrying a euploid fetus but also samples from euploid pregnant women carrying
`
`an aneuploid fetus
`
`-
`
`and / or a set of reference parameters wherein each reference parameter is
`
`indicative of the number of unique exact sequences mapped to a chromosome or
`
`chromosomal
`
`region of
`
`interest for a sample of a reference set obtainable
`
`according to the method of the invention, optionally included in a physical support,
`
`Such a kit may further comprise at least one of :
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`one or more compositions and/or a kit for extracting cell-free DNA,
`
`including a
`
`composition comprising phenol and chloroform;
`
`a computer program product for implementing one or more steps of the method for
`
`obtaining a set of reference samples for the diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy from a
`
`maternal biological sample;
`
`a computer program product for implementing one or more steps of the method for
`
`diagnosing fetal aneuploidy from a maternal biological test sample.
`
`Brief Description of the drawings
`
`Figure 1:
`
`size distribution of 3 maternal plasma samples as obtained by capillary
`
`electrophoresis. The DNA molecules in these samples are ligated to a 132 bp sequencing
`
`adaptor/barcode.
`
`Figure 2: total number of filter passing sequence reads obtained by NGS sequencing for
`
`91 samples (eu ploid and aneuploid). The axis legend in ordinate reads “Cnt +1e6”, namely
`
`the sequence count in million.
`
`Figure 3: number of unique exact sequences for the same samples shown in Fig. 2. The
`
`axis legend in ordinate reads “Cnt +1 e6”, namely the sequence count in million.
`
`Figure 4: percentage of total unique sequence reads mapped to chromosome 21 with
`
`1/100,000 confidence interval (z-score=4.4) with respect to known healthy individuals
`
`11
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`(reference samples selected according to the method of the present
`
`invention). The
`
`horizontal middle dotted line corresponds to the mean percentage of the reference sample.
`
`The horizontal full lines above and below the dotted line correspond to the discrimination
`
`threshold (mean i 4.4* SD). The trisomy 21 samples are positively discriminated.
`
`Figure 5: percentage of total unique sequence reads mapped to chromosome 18 with
`
`1/100,000 confidence interval
`
`(z—score=4.4) with respect to known healthy individuals
`
`(reference samples selected according to the method of the present
`
`invention). The
`
`horizontal middle dotted line corresponds to the mean percentage of the reference sample.
`
`The horizontal full lines above and below the dotted line correspond to the discrimination
`
`threshold (mean i 4.4* SD). The trisomy 18 samples are posititively discriminated.
`
`Figure 6: Scores of chromosome 1 using a second scoring algorithm. The discrimination
`
`thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with respect to known
`
`healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method of the present
`
`invention).
`
`Figure 7: Scores of chromosome 19 score using a second scoring algorithm. The
`
`discrimination thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with
`
`respect to known healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method
`
`of the present invention).
`
`Figure 8: Scores of chromosome 13 score using a second scoring algorithm. The
`
`discrimination thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with
`
`respect to known healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method
`
`of the present invention). The trisomy 13 sample is positively discriminated.
`
`Figure 9: Scores of chromosome 18 using a second scoring algorithm. The discrimination
`
`thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with respect to known
`
`healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method of the present
`
`invention). The trisomy 18 samples are positively discriminated.
`
`Figure 10: Scores of chromosome 21
`
`using a second scoring algorithm. The
`
`discrimination thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with
`
`respect to known healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method
`
`of the present invention). The trisomy 21 samples are positively discriminated.
`
`Figure 11: Scores of chromosome 22 using a second scoring algorithm. The
`
`discrimination thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with
`
`respect to known healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method
`
`of the present invention). The trisomy 22 sample is positively discriminated.
`
`12
`
`
`
`WO 2014/068075
`
`PCT/EP2013/072848
`
`Figure 12: Scores of chromosome 4 using a second scoring algorithm. The discrimination
`
`thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with respect to known
`
`healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method of the present
`
`invention). The 4p microdeletion (Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome) sample is negatively
`discriminated.
`
`Figure 13: Scores of chromosome 5 using a second scoring algorithm. The discrimination
`
`thresholds correspond to a 1/100,000,000,000 confidence interval with respect to known
`
`healthy individuals (reference samples selected according to the method of the present
`
`invention). The 5p microdeletion/duplication (cri du chat syndrome) sample is positively
`discriminated.
`
`Figure 14: Sequence tag densities over chromosome 4 of a 4p microdeletion syndrome
`
`sample. A negative deviation from the mean density of the reference samples is apparent
`
`at the location of the 4p deletion.
`
`Figure 15: Sequence tag densities over chromosome 5 of a 5p microdeletion/duplication
`
`syndrome sample. Positive and negative deviations from the mean density of the reference
`
`samples are apparent at the location of the 5p microdeletion and duplication, respectively.
`
`The data shown on Figures 2 to 13 were all obtained with the same set of 91 samples, and
`
`are

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site