`
`REMARKS
`
`I
`
`Summaryof the Office Action
`
`The Examinerrejected claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C. §102 as allegedly being anticipated
`
`by McDonoughet al. U.S. Patent No. 6,120,262 (hereinafter “McDonough’’).
`
`I.
`
`Summary of Applicant’s Reply
`
`Applicant has amended claims 1 and7.
`
`Applicant has added new claims 12-15.
`
`Applicant has traversed the rejections of claims 1-11.
`
`Ill.
`
`Applicant’s Reply to the Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`
`The Examinerrejected claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as allegedly being anticipated
`
`by McDonough. Office action, pg. 2.
`
`A.
`
`An AC outputin an electrical box
`
`The Examinerstated that McDonoughdiscloses a fan device controller that includes an
`
`AC outputin an electrical box ([McDonough] col. 8, In. 33-34). Office action at 2.
`
`Applicant disagrees.
`
`McDonoughFIG. 2 shows that McDonough AC powersource 104 (See, e.g.,
`
`McDonough,col. 8, 1n.33) is outside McDonough wall box 118. McDonough powerconverter
`
`181, which is described by McDonoughcol. 8, In. 33-34, and shown in McDonoughFIG.7
`
`receives AC power from McDonough power source 104 and convertsit to first and second DC
`
`output terminals Vad and Vss. See, e.g., McDonough,col. 8, In. 41-43. The McDonoughfirst
`
`and second DC output terminals are DC output terminals, not AC output terminals. McDonough
`
`wall box 118, therefore, does not include an AC outputin an electrical box. McDonough does
`
`not disclose an AC outputin an electrical box.
`
`Applicant submits that McDonoughdoesnotteach the claimed an AC outputin an
`
`electrical box, and for at least this reason does not anticipate either the previous or amended
`
`version of claim 1.
`
`
`
`A disconnect switch in the electrical boxfor disconnecting the AC outputfrom
`B.
`the AC voltage input
`
`The Examinerstated that McDonoughdiscloses a fan device controller that includes a
`
`disconnect switch in the electrical boxfor disconnecting the AC outputfrom the AC voltage
`
`input ([McDonough]col. 5, In. 3-7; col., 6 In. 56-59; col. 10, In. 14-16). Office action at 3.
`
`Applicant disagrees.
`
`Asset forth above, McDonough wall box 118 does not have an AC output. McDonough
`
`wall box 118, therefore, does not have an AC output that can be disconnected by a switch from
`
`an AC voltage input. Therefore, McDonoughdoesnotdisclose a disconnect switch in the
`
`electrical boxfor disconnecting an AC outputfrom an AC voltage input.
`
`Applicant submits, therefore, that McDonoughdoes notteach the claimed disconnect
`
`switch, and for at least this reason does notanticipate claim 1.
`
`Also, applicant points out that while McDonough ON/OFFswitch 220 (e.g, FIG. 8; col.
`
`9, In. 18) is part of interface 182 (e.g, col. 8, In. 62-63), whichis part of fixed controller 106 (e.g,
`
`FIG. 6), switch 220, like all of the McDonoughfixed controller switches, communicates by RF
`
`to the McDonoughfan. See, e.g., McDonough FIG.8 (showing fixed controller buttons 211-
`
`221, all of which feed information to control 230 and encoder 184 for transmission by transmitter
`
`186 to the McDonoughfan). None of the McDonoughswitchesis a switch that disconnects the
`
`fan from an AC voltage output in the box.
`
`The foregoingis true forall of the McDonoughfeatures that the Examinerrelied upon,
`
`including the "four position DIP switch [244]" that the Examinerstated is in the McDonough
`
`"fixed (electrical box) controller." Office action at 3. DIP switch 244is part of the RF
`
`communication between a McDonoughcontroller and the McDonoughfan. See, e.g.,
`
`McDonough,FIG.9; col. 10, In. 12-24). And, in any event, McDonough DIP switch 244is
`
`located at the fan in control unit 123. See, e.g., McDonough,col. 9, In. 66-67.
`
`For these reasons, too, McDonough doesnot teach the claimed disconnect switch, and
`
`does not anticipate claim 1.
`
`Forat least the foregoing reasons, applicant respectfully submits that independent
`
`claim 1, and the claims that depend therefrom, including new claims 12-15, are patentable over
`
`
`
`McDonough. Applicant respectfully requests that the rejections of claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 102 be withdrawn.
`
`Absence ofa reply to a specific rejection, issue or comment does not signify applicant’s
`
`agreement. Absence of an argumentdoes not signify waiver of the argument. Further,
`
`amendmentof any claim is not a concession of unpatentability of the claim prior to the
`
`amendment.
`
`IV.
`
`Amendments
`
`Applicant has amended claim 1 to recite an AC voltage outputthatis:
`
`in the electrical box; and
`
`configured to be in electrical communication with a fan.
`
`Applicant has amended claim 1 to recite an RF signal transmitter configured to be paired
`
`with the fan.
`
`Applicant has made a conforming amendmentof claim 7.
`
`Applicantasserts that the amendmentsare notrelated to patentability.
`
`V.
`
`New Claims
`
`Applicant has added new claims 12-15, which are directed to inventive subject matter.
`
`VI.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant respectfully awaits a prompt and favorable response to this Reply. The
`
`
`
`Director is hereby authorized to charge any additional fees that may be due in connection with
`
`this paper, or to refund any overpayments, to Deposit Account No. 50-4650.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Edward M. Arons/
`Edward M. Arons
`Reg. No. 44,511
`Attorney for Applicant
`WEISS & ARONS LLP
`Customer No. 72,822
`63 South Main Street
`Spring Valley, New York 10977
`Tel.: (845) 362-6100
`
`Date: January 27, 2022
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site