`
`REMARKS
`
`I
`
`Summaryof the Office Action
`
`The Examinerrejected claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C. §102 as allegedly being anticipated
`
`by McDonoughet al. U.S. Patent No. 6,120,262 (hereinafter “McDonough’’).
`
`I.
`
`Summary of Applicant’s Reply
`
`Applicant has amended claims 1 and7.
`
`Applicant has added new claims 12-15.
`
`Applicant has traversed the rejections of claims 1-11.
`
`Ill.
`
`Applicant’s Reply to the Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`
`The Examinerrejected claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as allegedly being anticipated
`
`by McDonough. Office action, pg. 2.
`
`A.
`
`An AC outputin an electrical box
`
`The Examinerstated that McDonoughdiscloses a fan device controller that includes an
`
`AC outputin an electrical box ([McDonough] col. 8, In. 33-34). Office action at 2.
`
`Applicant disagrees.
`
`McDonoughFIG. 2 shows that McDonough AC powersource 104 (See, e.g.,
`
`McDonough,col. 8, 1n.33) is outside McDonough wall box 118. McDonough powerconverter
`
`181, which is described by McDonoughcol. 8, In. 33-34, and shown in McDonoughFIG.7
`
`receives AC power from McDonough power source 104 and convertsit to first and second DC
`
`output terminals Vad and Vss. See, e.g., McDonough,col. 8, In. 41-43. The McDonoughfirst
`
`and second DC output terminals are DC output terminals, not AC output terminals. McDonough
`
`wall box 118, therefore, does not include an AC outputin an electrical box. McDonough does
`
`not disclose an AC outputin an electrical box.
`
`Applicant submits that McDonoughdoesnotteach the claimed an AC outputin an
`
`electrical box, and for at least this reason does not anticipate either the previous or amended
`
`version of claim 1.
`
`
`
`A disconnect switch in the electrical boxfor disconnecting the AC outputfrom
`B.
`the AC voltage input
`
`The Examinerstated that McDonoughdiscloses a fan device controller that includes a
`
`disconnect switch in the electrical boxfor disconnecting the AC outputfrom the AC voltage
`
`input ([McDonough]col. 5, In. 3-7; col., 6 In. 56-59; col. 10, In. 14-16). Office action at 3.
`
`Applicant disagrees.
`
`Asset forth above, McDonough wall box 118 does not have an AC output. McDonough
`
`wall box 118, therefore, does not have an AC output that can be disconnected by a switch from
`
`an AC voltage input. Therefore, McDonoughdoesnotdisclose a disconnect switch in the
`
`electrical boxfor disconnecting an AC outputfrom an AC voltage input.
`
`Applicant submits, therefore, that McDonoughdoes notteach the claimed disconnect
`
`switch, and for at least this reason does notanticipate claim 1.
`
`Also, applicant points out that while McDonough ON/OFFswitch 220 (e.g, FIG. 8; col.
`
`9, In. 18) is part of interface 182 (e.g, col. 8, In. 62-63), whichis part of fixed controller 106 (e.g,
`
`FIG. 6), switch 220, like all of the McDonoughfixed controller switches, communicates by RF
`
`to the McDonoughfan. See, e.g., McDonough FIG.8 (showing fixed controller buttons 211-
`
`221, all of which feed information to control 230 and encoder 184 for transmission by transmitter
`
`186 to the McDonoughfan). None of the McDonoughswitchesis a switch that disconnects the
`
`fan from an AC voltage output in the box.
`
`The foregoingis true forall of the McDonoughfeatures that the Examinerrelied upon,
`
`including the "four position DIP switch [244]" that the Examinerstated is in the McDonough
`
`"fixed (electrical box) controller." Office action at 3. DIP switch 244is part of the RF
`
`communication between a McDonoughcontroller and the McDonoughfan. See, e.g.,
`
`McDonough,FIG.9; col. 10, In. 12-24). And, in any event, McDonough DIP switch 244is
`
`located at the fan in control unit 123. See, e.g., McDonough,col. 9, In. 66-67.
`
`For these reasons, too, McDonough doesnot teach the claimed disconnect switch, and
`
`does not anticipate claim 1.
`
`Forat least the foregoing reasons, applicant respectfully submits that independent
`
`claim 1, and the claims that depend therefrom, including new claims 12-15, are patentable over
`
`
`
`McDonough. Applicant respectfully requests that the rejections of claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 102 be withdrawn.
`
`Absence ofa reply to a specific rejection, issue or comment does not signify applicant’s
`
`agreement. Absence of an argumentdoes not signify waiver of the argument. Further,
`
`amendmentof any claim is not a concession of unpatentability of the claim prior to the
`
`amendment.
`
`IV.
`
`Amendments
`
`Applicant has amended claim 1 to recite an AC voltage outputthatis:
`
`in the electrical box; and
`
`configured to be in electrical communication with a fan.
`
`Applicant has amended claim 1 to recite an RF signal transmitter configured to be paired
`
`with the fan.
`
`Applicant has made a conforming amendmentof claim 7.
`
`Applicantasserts that the amendmentsare notrelated to patentability.
`
`V.
`
`New Claims
`
`Applicant has added new claims 12-15, which are directed to inventive subject matter.
`
`VI.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant respectfully awaits a prompt and favorable response to this Reply. The
`
`
`
`Director is hereby authorized to charge any additional fees that may be due in connection with
`
`this paper, or to refund any overpayments, to Deposit Account No. 50-4650.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Edward M. Arons/
`Edward M. Arons
`Reg. No. 44,511
`Attorney for Applicant
`WEISS & ARONS LLP
`Customer No. 72,822
`63 South Main Street
`Spring Valley, New York 10977
`Tel.: (845) 362-6100
`
`Date: January 27, 2022
`
`