`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/808,632
`
`11/09/2017
`
`Gregory D. Jay
`
`LUB-030
`
`8457
`
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`
`PATENT ADMINISTRATOR
`100 Northern Avenue
`BOSTON MA 02210
`
`KOMATSU U N
`
`ART UNIT
`1658
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`02/12/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`GLENN.WILLIAMS @ GOODWINPROCTERCOM
`PATENTBOS @ GOODWINPROCTERCOM
`PSOUSA-ATWOOD @GOODWINPROCTER.COM
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`15/808,632
`
`Examiner
`
`Jay et al.
`
`Art Unit
`
`AIA Status
`
`LI N KOMATSU
`
`1658
`
`Yes
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant’s representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) LI N. KOMATSU.
`
`(3) Crystal A. Komm.
`
`(2) _.
`
`(4) _.
`
`Date of Interview: 06 February 2019.
`
`Type:
`
`C] Video Conference
`Telephonic
`D Personal [copy given to: [:1 applicant [:1 applicant's representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: C] Yes
`
`No.
`
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`Others
`CI 102 D 103
`Issues Discussed D 101 D 112
`(For each of the checked b0x(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed:
`
`Identification of prior art discussed:
`
`Substance of Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics may include: identification or clarification of a reference
`or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied references etc...)
`
`See Continuation Sheet.
`
`
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of the
`substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the general
`thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or
`outcome of the interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`CI Attachment
`
`/LI N KOMATSU/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 1658
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-413B (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper NO- 20190205
`
`
`
`Continuation Sheet (PTOL-413B)
`
`Application No. 15/808,632
`
`Continuation of Substance of Interview including description of the general nature of what was agreed
`to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments: The Examiner telephoned Applicant's
`representative, Crystal A. Komm, for clarification of species election in the response filed on 1/17/
`2019. In the response filed on 1/17/2019, the elected route of administering the PRG4 or a biologically
`active fragment thereof from claims 6-10 is a genus, not a species. This species election was
`discussed. Applicant's representative elected on the phone that intra-articular injection into a toe joint
`as species of route of administering the PRG4 or a biologically active fragment thereof on 2/7/2019.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
