`
`PCT
`
`INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PATENTABILITY
`
`(Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty)
`
`(PCT Rule 44bis)
`
`Applicant’s or agent’s file reference
`3685.042PC02
`
`FOR FURTHER ACTION
`
`See item 4 below
`
`International filing date (day/month/yeGE)
`International application No.
`20 January 2016 (20.01.2016)
`PCT/U82016/014005
`International Patent Classification (8th edition unless older edition indicated)
`See relevant information in Form PCT/ISA/237
`
`Priority date (day/month/yeCIE)
`20 January 2015 (20.01.2015)
`
`Applicant
`ABBVI E INC.
`
`This international preliminary report on patentability (Chapter I) is issued by the International Bureau on behalf of the
`International Searching Authority under Rule 44 bis.1(a).
`
`This REPORT consists of a total of 9 sheets, including this cover sheet.
`
`In the attached sheets, any reference to the written opinion of the International Searching Authority should be read as a
`reference to the international preliminary report on patentability (Chapter I) instead.
`
`This report contains indications relating to the following items:
`
`Box \o. I
`
`Basis of the report
`
`Box \o. II
`
`Box \o.
`
`
`
`Priority
`
`Non—establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial
`applicability
`
`Lack of unity of invention
`
`Reasoned statement under Article 35(2) with regard to novelty, inventive step or
`industrial applicability; citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
`Certain documents cited
`
`Certain defects in the international application
`
`Certain observations on the international application
`
`lhe International Bureau will communicate this report to designated Offices in accordance with Rules 44bis.3(c) and 93bis.1
`but not, except where the applicant makes an express request under Article 23(2), before the expiration of 30 months from
`the priority date (Rule 44bis .2).
`
`The International Bureau of WIPO
`34, chemin des Colombettes
`1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland
`Facsimile NO. +41 22 338 82 70
`Form PCT/IB/373 (January 2004)
`
`Date of issuance of this report
`25 July 2017 (25.07.2017)
`
`AthHZEd officer
`
`.
`.
`.
`Llngfel Bal
`e—mail; pct.[eam2@wip0.int
`
`
`
`
`
`Box \o.
`
`Box \o.
`
`Box \o.
`
`Box \o.
`
`Box \o.
`
`E E E E E E E E '
`
`
`
`PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`From the
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`see form PCT/ISA/220
`
`
`
`PCT
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`(PCT Rule 43bis.1)
`
`
`Date of mailing
`(day/month4/ear)
`
`see form PCT/ISA/210 (second sheet)
`
`
`
`Applicant's or agent‘s file reference
`see form PCT/ISA/220
`
`FOR FURTHER ACTION
`See paragraph 2 below
`
`International application No.
`PCT/US2016/014005
`
`International filing date (day/fnonth/year)
`20.01.2016
`
`Priority date (day/month4/ear)
`20.01.2015
`
`
`
`
`
`International Patent Classification (IPC) or both national classification and IPC
`INV. A61 K9/00 A61K9/10 A61K47/38 A61K31/195 A61K31/198
`
`
`Applicant
`ABBVIE INC.
`
`1.
`
`This opinion contains indications relating to the following items:
`
`Box No. I
`
`Basis of the opinion
`
`Box No. II
`
`Priority
`
`EDKEIE Box No. V
`KEIE Box No. VIII Certain observations on the international application
`
`Box No. III
`
`Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
`
`Box No. IV
`
`Box No. VI
`
`Lack of unity of invention
`Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial
`applicability; citations and explanations supporting such statement
`Certain documents cited
`
`Box No. VII
`
`Certain defects in the international application
`
`2.
`
`FURTHER ACTION
`
`If a demand for international preliminary examination is made, this opinion will usually be considered to be a
`written opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority ("IPEA") except that this does not apply where
`the applicant chooses an Authority other than this one to be the IPEA and the chosen IPEA has notifed the
`International Bureau under Rule 66.1bis(b) that written opinions of this International Searching Authority
`will not be so considered.
`
`If this opinion is, as provided above, considered to be a written opinion of the IPEA, the applicant is invited to
`submit to the IPEA a written reply together, where appropriate, with amendments, before the expiration of 3 months
`from the date of mailing of Form PCT/ISA/22O or before the expiration of 22 months from the priority date,
`whichever expires later.
`
`For further options, see Form PCT/ISA/220.
`
` Name and mailing address of the ISA:
`
`
`
`
`Date of completion of
`this opinion
`see form
`PCT/ISA/210
`
`Authorized Officer
`
`Hede aard, Anette
`g
`Telephone No. +49 89 2399-0
`
`F
`we“ “BMW-ts
`f3 o 6%:
`>
`3
`94’
`3.
`ewmmw
`-
`
`
`
`—
`a) European Patent Office
`, )
`— D-80298 Munich
`Tel- +49 89 2399 ' 0
`Fax: +49 89 2399 - 4465
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Cover Sheet) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`International application No.
`PCT/U82016/014005
`
`Box No. I Basis of the opinion
`
`1. With regard to the language, this opinion has been established on the basis of:
`
`IZI
`
`El
`
`the international application in the language in which it was filed.
`
`a translation of the international application into , which is the language of a translation furnished for the
`purposes of international search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23.1 (b)).
`
`This opinion has been established taking into account the rectification of an obvious mistake authorized
`by or notified to this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43bis.1(a))
`
`With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, this
`opinion has been established on the basis of a sequence listing:
`
`a. El
`
`forming part of the international application as filed:
`
`CI
`
`in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file.
`
`[I on paper or in the form of an image file.
`
`b. El furnished together with the international application under PCT Rule 13ter.1(a) for the purposes of
`international search only in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file.
`
`c. D furnished subsequent to the international filing date for the purposes of international search only:
`
`CI
`
`in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file (Rule 13ter.1(a)).
`
`El on paper or in the form of an image file (Rule 13ter.1(b) and Administrative Instructions, Section
`713).
`
`In addition, in the case that more than one version or copy of a sequence listing has been filed or furnished,
`the required statements that the information in the subsequent or additional copies is identical to that
`forming part of the application as filed or does not go beyond the application as filed, as appropriate, were
`furnished.
`
`5. Additional comments:
`
`Box No. II Priority
`
`1.|Z|
`
`2.|:|
`
`The validity of the priority claim has not been considered because the International Searching Authority
`does not have in its possession a copy of the earlier application whose priority has been claimed or, where
`required, a translation of that earlier application. This opinion has nevertheless been established on the
`assumption that the relevant date (Rules 43bis.1 and 64.1) is the claimed priority date.
`
`This opinion has been established as if no priority had been claimed due to the fact that the priority claim
`has been found invalid (Rules 43bis.1 and 64.1). Thus for the purposes of this opinion, the international
`filing date indicated above is considered to be the relevant date.
`
`3. Additional observations, if necessary:
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (January 2015)
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`International application No.
`PCT/US2016/O14005
`
`Box No. Ill Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial
`applicability
`
`The questions whether the claimed invention appears to be novel, to involve an inventive step (to be non
`obvious), or to be industrially applicable have not been examined in respect of
`
`El
`
`IZI
`
`the entire international application
`
`claims Nos. 26-34
`
`because:
`
`IXI
`
`the said international application, or the said claims Nos. 26-34 relate to the following subject matter which
`does not require an international search (specify):
`
`see separate sheet
`
`the description, claims or drawings (indicate particular elements below) or said claims Nos.
`that no meaningful opinion could be formed (specify):
`
`are so unclear
`
`the claims, or said claims Nos. are so inadequately supported by the description that no meaningful opinion
`could be formed (specify):
`
`no international search report has been established for the whole application or for said claims Nos.
`
`a meaningful opinion could not be formed without the sequence listing; the applicant did not, within the
`prescribed time limit:
`
`III furnish a sequence listing in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file, and such listing was not available
`to the International Searching Authority in the form and manner acceptable to it; or the sequence listing
`furnished did not comply with the standard provided for in Annex C of the Administrative Instructions.
`
`El furnish a sequence listing on paper or in the form of an image file complying with the standard provided
`for in Annex C of the Administrative Instructions, and such listing was not available to the International
`Searching Authority in the form and manner acceptable to it; or the sequence listing furnished did not
`comply with the standard provided for in Annex C of the Administrative Instructions.
`
`El pay the required late furnishing fee for the furnishing of a sequence listing in response to an
`invitation under Rule 13fer.1(a) or (b).
`
`See Supplemental Box for further details
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (January 2015)
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`International application No.
`PCT/U82016/014005
`
`Box No. V Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step or
`industrial applicability; citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
`1. Statement
`
`Novelty (N)
`
`Yes: Claims
`No:
`Claims
`
`16-20
`
`1—15 21—36
`
`Inventive step (IS)
`
`Yes: Claims
`No:
`Claims
`
`1-36
`
`Industrial applicability (IA)
`
`Yes: Claims
`No:
`Claims
`
`1-25I 35I 36
`
`2. Citations and explanations
`
`see separate sheet
`
`Box No. VI Certain documents cited
`
`1. Certain published documents (Rules 43bis.1 and 70.10)
`
`and / or
`
`2. Non-written disclosures (Rules 43bis.1 and 70.9)
`
`see form 210
`
`Box No. VII Certain defects in the international application
`
`The following defects in the form or contents of the international application have been noted:
`
`see separate sheet
`
`Box No. VIII Certain observations on the international application
`
`The following observations on the clarity of the claims, description, and drawings or on the question whether the
`claims are fully supported by the description, are made:
`
`see separate sheet
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (January 2015)
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING
`
`International application No.
`
`AUTHORITY (SEPARATE SHEET)
`
`PCT/U82016/O14005
`
`w N
`
`on-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and
`
`industrial applicability
`
`1
`
`Claims 26-34 relate to subject-matter considered by this Authority to be
`
`covered by the provisions of Rule 39.1 (iv)/67.1 (iv) PCT.
`
`w R
`
`easoned statement under Rule 66.2(a)(ii) with regard to novelty, inventive step
`
`or industrial applicability; citations and explanations supporting such
`statement
`
`1
`
`Reference is made to the following documents:
`
`D1
`
`D2
`
`D3
`
`WO 2007/138086 A1
`
`WO 94/12153 A1
`
`WO 2012/066538 A1
`
`D1 (see claim 13) discloses compositions comprising levodopa and carbidopa
`
`in form of particles suspended in an aqueous carrier having a viscosity of at
`
`least 300 mPas at a moderate shear rate. Paragraph [0037] of D1 discloses a
`
`gel (Duodopa®) comprising levodopa, carbidopa, carmellose sodium and
`
`water. Paragraph [0024] of D1 discloses the combination with a portable
`
`pump for intestinal administration. The use for treating Parkinson's disease is
`disclosed in claim 1 of D1.
`
`D2 (see Example 1) discloses a suspension of levodopa and carbidopa in a
`
`viscous water solution of methyl cellulose.
`
`D3 (see paragraphs [0067] and [00103]) discloses the improved stability of
`
`levodopa under N2 atmosphere.
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Separate Sheet) (Sheet 1) (EPO-April 2005)
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING
`
`International application No.
`
`AUTHORITY (SEPARATE SHEET)
`
`PCT/US2016/014005
`
`2
`
`The subject-matter of independent claims 1 and 26 is not novel (Art. 33(2)
`
`PCT) since all the essential features have already been disclosed in D1 and
`
`D2 (see above under item 1).
`
`In the absence of proof to the contrary it is considered that the compositions
`
`according to D1 and D2 meet the functional requirements defined in present
`
`Claims 1 and 26 (see also below in Section VIII).
`
`3
`
`Having regard to the disclosures of D1 -D3, claims 2-25 and 27-36 do not
`
`appear to contain new and/or inventive features per se and are only allowable
`
`when related to an independent claim which fulfils the requirements of the
`PCT.
`
`It is here pointed out that it is known from D1 and D2 to improve physical
`
`stability of suspensions comprising levodopa and carbidopa by controlling
`
`viscosity (see eg. D2, page 2, lines 20—25). Furthermore, D2 and D3 disclose
`
`exclusion of air (and use of N2) for improving chemical stability (see D2, page
`
`6, lines 21-23 and D3, par. [0103]).
`
`Hence, the subject-matter of the present claims is not considered to involve
`
`an inventive step (Art. 33(3) PCT).
`
`4
`
`Claims 26-34 relate to subject-matter considered by this Authority to be
`
`covered by the provisions of Rule 39.1 (iv)/67.1 (iv) PCT.
`
`The patentability can be dependent upon the formulation of the claims. The
`
`EPO, for example, does not recognize as patentable claims to the use of a
`
`compound in medical treatment, but may allow claims to a product, in
`
`particular substances or compositions for use in a first or further medical
`treatment.
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Separate Sheet) (Sheet 2) (EPO-April 2005)
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING
`
`International application No.
`
`AUTHORITY (SEPARATE SHEET)
`
`PCT/US2016/O14005
`
`w C
`
`9”3i n._SI.9.EH.[EEl].t.:‘i_E.I339'.._____________________.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Application No
`
`5, Publication
`date
`
`Filing date
`
`Priority date
`
`
`
`WO2015/069773 A1
`
`14.05.2015 ‘ 05.11.2014
`
`05.11.2013
`
`Although WO2015/069773 A1 does not constitute prior art within the meaning
`
`of Rule 64.1 (b) PCT, it could become of relevance in the regional phase (see
`
`Examples 14-15 and 32-34 of said WO application).
`
`Re Section VII
`
`Certain defects in the international application
`
`1
`
`Contrary to the requirements of Rule 5.1 (a)(ii) PCT, the closest prior art (see
`
`D1 and D2) is not mentioned in the description, nor are these documents
`identified therein.
`
`w C
`
`ertain observations on the international application
`
`1
`
`Claims 1 and 26 do not meet the requirements of Article 6 PCT because the
`
`matter for which protection is sought is not clearly defined. The claim attempts
`
`to define the subject-matter in terms of the result to be achieved (a certain
`
`viscosity profile), which merely amounts to a statement of the underlying
`
`problem, without providing the technical features necessary for achieving this
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Separate Sheet) (Sheet 3) (EPO-April 2005)
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING
`
`International application No.
`
`AUTHORITY (SEPARATE SHEET)
`
`PCT/US2016/O14005
`
`result.
`
`2
`
`3
`
`The word "about", particularly when applied to a range, detracts from the
`
`general clarity and should be deleted in the claims (Art. 6 PCT).
`
`The terms "room temperature" and "refrigerated conditions" used in claims 1
`
`and 26 are vague and unclear and leave the reader in doubt as to the
`
`meaning of the technical features to which they refer, thereby rendering the
`
`definition of the subject—matter of said claims unclear, Article 6 PCT.
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Separate Sheet) (Sheet 4) (EPO-April 2005)
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site