`
`From the INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`To: Wei Wei Jeang
`Grable Martin Fulton PLLC
`2709 Dublin Road
`piano, Texas 75094
`United States of America
`
`
`
`PCT
`
`NOTIFICATION OF TRANSMITTAL OF
`THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT AND
`THE WRITTEN OPINION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
`SEARCHING AUTHORITY, OR THE DECLARATION
`
`(PCT Rule 44.l)
`
`32:55.5333225 0 8 N CV 2017
`
`Applicant’s or agent’s file reference
`
`REDM-POOO1WO
`
`International application No.
`PCT/U81 7/42838
`Applicant
`
`REDMON JEANG LLC
`
`FOR FURTHER ACTION See ara ra hs l and4 below
`p
`g p
`
`lntemational filing date
`d /
`h/
`( ay ”'0"! year)
`
`_
`19 July 2017 (19.07.2017)
`
`. F
`
`1. m The applicant is hereby notified that the international search report and the written opinion ofthe International Searching
`Authority have been established and are transmitted herewith.
`Filing ol‘amendments and statement under Article 19:
`The applicant is entitled, if he so wishes, to amend the claims of the international application (see Rule 46):
`When? The time limit for filing such amendments is normally'two months from the date oftransmittal ofthe international
`search report.
`Directly to the lntemational Bureau of WIPO preferably through ePCT or on paper to, 34 chemin des Colombettes
`1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, Facsimile No.1 +41 22 338 82 70
`For more detailed instructions, see PCTApp/I‘cant ’s Guide, lntemational Phase, paragraphs 9.004 — 9.01 l.
`
`How?
`
`2. D The applicant is hereby notified that no international search report will be established and that the declaration under
`Article l7(2)(a) to that effect and the written opinion of the lntemational Searching Authority are transmitted herewith.
`
`3. C] With regard to any protest against payment of(an) additional fee(s) under Rule 40.2, the applicant is notified that:
`the protest together with the decision thereon has been transmitted to the International Bureau together with any
`request to forward the texts of both the protest and the decision thereon to the designated Offices.
`D no decision has been made yet on the protest;
`the applicant will be notified as soon as a decision is made.
`4. Reminders
`
`The applicant may submit comments on an informal basis on the written opinion ofthe International Searching Authority
`to the lntemational Bureau. These comments will be made available to the public after international publication. The
`lntemational Bureau will send a copy of such comments to all designated Offices unless an international preliminary
`examination report has been or is to be established.
`Shortly after the expiration of 18 months from the priority date, the international application will be published by the
`lntemational Bureau.
`If the applicant wishes to avoid or postpone publication, a notice of withdrawal of the international
`application, or ofthe priority claim, must reach the International Bureau before the completion ofthe technical preparations for
`international publication (Rules 90bis.l and 90bis.3).
`Within 19 months from the priority date, but only in respect ofsome designated Offices, a demand for intemational preliminary
`examination must be filed ifthe applicant wishes to postpone the entry into the national phase until 30 months fiom the priority
`date (in some Offices even later); otherwise, the applicant must, within 20 months from the priority date, perform the
`prescribed acts for entry into the national phase before those designated Offices. In respect of other designated Offices, the
`time limit of30 months (or later) will apply even ifno demand is filed within 19 months. For details about the applicable time
`limits, Office by Office, see www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/time_limits.html and the PCT Applicant ’5 Guide, National Chapters.
`Within 22 months from the priority date, the applicant may request that a supplementary international search be carried
`out by a different lntemational Searching Authority that offers this service (Rule 45bis.1). The procedure for requesting
`supplementary international search is described in the PCT Applicant ’s Guide, lntemational Phase, paragraphs 8.006—8.032.
`
`Name and mailing address of the ISA/US
`Mail Stop PCT, Attn: ISA/US
`Commissioner for Patents
`PO. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`.
`.
`Facsrmile No. 571-273-3300
`orm PCT/ISA/ZZO (July 2017)
`
`Authorized officer
`
`Shane Thomas
`
`PCT Helpdesk: 571-272-4300
`Telephone No. .
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO17IO42838 08. 1 1 .2017
`
`PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`PCT
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`(PCT Article 18 and Rules 43 and 44)
`
`Applicam’s 0' “gen“ 5‘6 reference
`REDM-P0001WO
`
`FOR FURTHER
`ACTION
`
`see Form PCT/ISA/220
`as well as, where applicable, item 5 below.
`
`lntemational application No.
`PCT/US17/42838
`
`Applicant
`REDMON JEANG LLC
`
`lntemational filing date (day/monIh/year)
`19 July 2017 (19.07.2017)
`
`(Earliest) Priority Date (day/month/year)
`19 July 2016 (19.07.2016)
`
`This intemational search report has been prepared by this lntemational Searching Authority and is transmitted to the applicant
`according to Article 18. A copy is being transmitted to the International Bureau.
`
`This international search report consists ofa total of
`sheets.
`[:1 It is also accompanied by a copy ofeach prior art document cited in this report.
`
`1. Basis of the report
`a. With regard to the language, the international search was carried out on the basis of:
`
`the international application in the language in which it was filed.
`[Z]
`which is the language of
`E] a translation ofthe international application into
`a translation fumished for the purposes ofintemational search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23. l(b)).
`
`This international search report has been established taking into account the rectification of an obvious mistake
`authorized by or notified to this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43.6bis(a)).
`
`With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, see Box No. 1.
`
`Certain claims were found unsearchable (see Box No. 1]).
`
`Unity of invention is lacking (see Box No. 111).
`
`4. With regard to the title,
`E the text is approved as submitted by the applicant.
`[1 the text has been established by this Authority to read as follows:
`
`b. '3 none ofthe figures is to be published with the abstract.
`
`5. With regard to the abstract,
`
`the text is approved as submitted by the applicant.
`
`D the text has been established, according to Rule 38.2, by this Authority as it appears in Box No. IV. The applicant may,
`within one month from the date of mailing ofthis international search report, submit comments to this Authority.
`
`6. With regard to the drawings,
`
`a.
`
`the figure ofthe drawings to be published with the abstract is Figure No.
`
`1
`
`[:1 as suggested by the applicant.
`as selected by this Authority, because the‘applicant failed to suggest a figure.
`
`'3 as selected by this Authority, because this figure better characterizes the invention.
`
`Form PCT/ISA/Z 10 (first sheet) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO1 7I042838 08.11 .2017
`
`1. E] ClaimsNos.:
`because they relate to subject matter not required to be searched by this Authority, namely:
`
`because they relate to parts of the international application that do not comply with the prescribed requirements to such an
`extent that no meaningful international search can be carried out, specifically:
`
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`mtemafional application No.
`
`PCT/US17/42838
`
`
`
`
`Box No. II
`Observations where certain claims were found unsearchable (Continuation ofitem 2 of first sheet)
` This international search report has not been established in respect ofcertain claims under Article l7(2)(a) for the following reasons:
`
`
`
` 2. D Claims N05,:
`
`
`3. D Claims Nos.:
`because they are dependent claims and are not drafted in accordance with the second and third sentences of Rule 6.4(a).
`
`
`Box No. [l] Observations where unity ofinvention is lacking (Continuation ofitem 3 of first sheet)
` This International Searching Authority found multiple inventions in this international application, as follows:
`
`
`See extra sheet.
`
`
`
`As all required additional search fees were timely paid by the applicant, this intemational search report covers all searchable
`claims.
`
`
`
`only those claims for which fees were paid, specifically claims Nos:
`
`additional fees.
`
`
` As all searcliable claims could be searched without effortjustifying additional fees, this Authority did not invite payment of
` As only some of the required additional search fees were timely paid by the applicant, this international search report covers
`
` 4.
`No required additional search fees were timely paid by the applicant. Consequently, this international search report is
`restricted to the invention first mentioned in the claims;
`it is covered by claims Nos:
`1-8
`
`Remark on Protest
`
`
`DEE] No protest accompanied the payment of additional search fees.
`
`The additional search fees were accompanied by the applicant’s protest but the applicable protest
`
`fee was not paid within the time limit specified in the invitation.
`
`
`The additional search fees were accompanied by the applicant’s protest and, where applicable, the
`
`payment of a protest fee.
`
`
`
`
`
`Form PCT/lSA/Z lO (continuation of first sheet (2)) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO17I042838 08.1 1 .2017
`
`B.
`
`See Search History document
`
`See Search History document
`
`See Search History document
`
`
`
`search (name of data base and, where practicable, search terms used)
`
`lntcmational application No.
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`
` PCT/US‘lZ/42838
`
`
`
`AI
`CLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT MATTER
`
`
`IPC - G06F 17/30; G060 50/18; H04N 7/14 (2017.01)
`CPC -
`
`GOGF 17/30017; GOBQ 50/18; H04N 7/141
`
`
` According to International Patent Classification (IPC) or to both national classification and IPCFIELDS SEARCHED
`
` Minimum documentation searched (classification system followed by classification symbols)
`
`Documentation searched other than minimum documentation to the extent that such documents are included in the fields searched
`
` Electronic data base consulted during the intemational
`
`
`
`C. DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO BE RELEVANT
`
`Relevant to claim No.
`
` us 2015/0371456 A1 (HERTZ SYSTEM, l
`
`NC.) 24 December 2015; figures 1, 2; paragraphs
`
`[0013140017], [0021], [0022]
`
`
`US 7,061,521 82 (BULRISS, M et al.) 13 June 2006; abstract; figures 1A, 2A; column 6, lines
`20-29; column 7, lines 35-42; column 9, line 17 to column 10, line 10; column 10. lines 45-64;
`
`column 11, lines 14-25; column 12, lines 40-63
`
`
`
` CN 205071154 U (LONGSE ELECTRONICS LTD.) 02 March 2016; see machine translation.
`
`abstract; paragraph [0005]; claim 1
`
`
`US 2016/0173742 A1 (HASSAN ZUREIKAT SABINE) 16 June 2016; abstract; paragraph [0012] 3
`US 9,288,446 32 (MOKASHI, 8 el al.) 15 March 2016: claim1
`
`
`
`
`US 2016/0140179 A1 (HUAWEI INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD.) 19 May 2016; abstract: figure 1:
`
`paragraph [0032]
`
`
`
`claim 1
`WO 2015/052896 A1 (NEC CORPORATION) 16 April 2015; English translation, pages 1, 2;
`
`
`US 2014/0214702 A1 (BECKER, G) 31 July 2014; figure 2A;'paragraph [0012]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D Further documents are listed in the continuation of Box C.
`[:1 See patent family annex.
`Speual categories 0fc'led documents:
`“T”
`laterdocument publishedafter the international filing date ordpriority
`
`“A” document defining the general state ofthe art which is not considered
`‘ date and not in conflict With the application _but cited to un erstand
`to be of particular relevance
`the prinCiple or theory underlying t e invention
`
`
`“X” document of particular relevance; the claimed invention cannot be
`earlier application 0" patent bl" PUbllShed on 0" after the international
`“E”
`considered novel or cannot be considered to involve an inventive
`filing date
`
`
`“L”
`document which may throw doubts on priority claim(s) or which is
`step when the document ‘5 taken alone
`
`Cited tlo establish the pfub‘ljication date of another Citation or other “Y" document of particular relevance; the claimed invention cannot be
`specia reason (as spem “3 )
`considered to involve an inventive step when the document
`is
`
`“0" document referring t0 an 0'31 diSCIOSUTC, use, exhibition or other
`combined with one or more other such documents, such combination
`
`
`
`
`means
`being obvious to a person skilled in the art
`
`
`“P”
`document published‘prior to the intemational filing date but laterthan u&» document member ofthe same patent family
`the priority date claimed
`
`
`Date of the actual completion of the international search
`
`
`Date of mailing of the international search report
`10 October 2017 (10.10.2017)
`08 NOV 20l7
`
`
`
`
`Name and mailing address ofthe ISA/
`Authorized officer
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PCT, Attn: ISA/US, Commissioner for Patents
`Shane Thomas
`
`
`PO. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`PCT Helpdesk: 571-272-4300
`
`
`
`Facsimile No. 571—273-8300
`PCT OSP: 571-272-7774
`
`
`
`Form PCT/lSA/ZIO (second sheet) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO17IO42838 08.1 1 .2017
`
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`lntemational application No.
`PCT/US17/42838
`
`-Continued from Box No. lll Observations where unity of invention is lacking-"’-
`
`The inventions listed as Groups l-ll do not relate to a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1 because, under PCT Rule
`13.2, they lack the same or corresponding special technical features for the following reasons:
`
`screen; upon command from a user.
`of the remote attorney; and the at lea
`for viewing by the remote attorney,
`
`The common technical features shared by Groups l-ll are a mobile devicef a remote server; at least one video camera configured to
`capture video images; live-streaming video for storage in a database; and notifying an attorney located remotely.
`However, these common features are previously disclosed by US 2016/0173950 A1 to Virtual Health Systems Corporation (hereinafter
`"VHSC"). VHSC discloses a mobile device (smart phones and other mobile devices; paragraph [0024]); a remote sewer (remote servers;
`paragraph [0025]); at least one video camera configured to capture video images (two-way interactive real-time video conference using
`-streaming video in a database (all video recordings can be
`
`
`
`Form PCT/ISA/ZIO (extra sheet) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`
`
`PCT/U8201 7/042838 08.11.2017
`
`From the
`
`PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`
` PCT
`TO: Wei Wei Jeang
`Grable Martin Fulton PLLC
`
`2709 Dublin Road
`
`
`
`
`Plano, Texas 75094
`United States of America
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`(PCT Rule 43 bis. l)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date ofmailing
`
`O 8 N O V 2017
`(day/monIh/year)
`
`
`Applicant’s or agent’s file reference
`
`
`FOR FURTHER ACTION
`
`REDM-P0001WO
`
`
`
`See paragraph 2 below
`International application No.
`
`International filing date (day/month/year)
`
`
`
`Priority date (day/monIh/year)
`
`PCT/US17/42838
`
`
`19 July 2017 (19.07.2017)
`19 July 2016 (19.07.2016)
`
`
`
`International Patent Classification (IPC) or both national classification and IPC
`
`
`IF’C
`- GOGF 17/30; (3060 50/18; H04N 7/14 (2017.01)
`
`
`CPC -
`
`G06F 17/30017; G060 50/18; H04N 7/141
`
`I
`E Box No.
`[:1 Box No. II
`
`Basis of the opinion
`Priority
`
`
`
`
` Applicant REDMON JEANG LLC
`
` 1. This opinion contains indications relating to the following items:
`
`
`
`Box No. III
`Box No. IV
`
`Non-establishment ofopinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
`Lack ofunity ofinvention
`
`Box No. V
`
`EDDKEG
`
`
`
`
`
`Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis. l(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability;
`citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
`
`
`Box No. Vl
`Certain documents cited
`
`
`Box No. VII Certain defects in the intemational application
`
`
`
`Box No. VIII Certain observations on the international application
` 2. FURTHER ACTION
`
`Ifa demand for international preliminary examination is made, this opinion will be considered to be a written opinion of the
`International Preliminary Examining Authority (“IPEA") except that this does not apply where the applicant chooses an Authority
`
`
`other than this one to be the [PEA and the chosen IPEA has notified the International Bureau under Rule 66.1bi‘s(b) that written
`
`
`opinions ofthis International Searching Authority will not be so considered.
`
`
`
`
`Ifthis opinion is, as provided above, considered to be a written opinion ofthe IPEA, the applicant is invited to submit to the IPEA
`
`a written reply together, where appropriate, with amendments, before the expiration of3 months fi-om the date ofmailing ofForm
`
`PCT/ISA/220 or before the expiration of 22 months from the priority date, whichever expires later.
`
`
`For further options, see Form PCT/ISA/ZZO.
`
`
`Name and mailing address ofthe ISA/US Date ofcompletion ofthis opinion
`Authorized officer
`
`Mail Stop PCT, Attn: lSA/US
`Commissioner for Patents
`Shane Thomas
`
`
`
`PO. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`10 October 2017 (10.10.2017)
`PCT Helpdesk: 571-272-4300
`
`
`
`Facsimile No. 571-273-8300
`
`PCT OSP: 571-272-7774
`
`
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (cover sheet) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO17I042838 08.1 1 .2017
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`
`lntemational application N0.
`pcwummzwe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition, in the case that more than one version or copy ofa sequence listing has been filed or furnished, the required
`
`statements that the information in the subsequent or additional copies is identical to that forming part ofthe application as
`
`filed or does not go beyond the application as filed, as appropriate, were fumished.
`
`
`
`5. Additional comments:
`
`
`Box No.1
`
`Basis of this opinion
`
`1. With regard to the language, this opinion has been established on the basis of:
`LXI
`
`the international application in the language in which it was filed.
`a translation ofthe international application into
`furnished for the purposes ofintemational search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23.1(b)).
`
`which is the language ofa translation
`
`2D
`
`3-D
`
`This opinion has been established taking into account the rectification ofan obvious mistake authorized by or notified to
`this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43bis. 1(a)).
`'
`
`With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, this opinion has
`been established on the basis ofa sequence listing:
`a. D forming part ofthe international application as filed:
`[3 in the form ofan Annex C/ST.25 text file.
`D on paper or in the form of an image file.
`b. D fumished together with the international application under PCT Rule l3ter.l(a) for the purposes ofintemational
`search only in the form ofan Annex C/ST.25 text file.
`c: D furnished subsequent to the international filing date for the purposes ofintemational search only:
`D in the form ofan Annex C/ST.25 text file (Rule 13mm».
`'3 on paper or in the form ofan image file (Rule lBter.l(b) and Administrative Instructions, Section 713).
`
`4.]:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Form PCT/lSA/237 (Box No. I) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO17I042838 08.1 1 .2017
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`
`lntcmational application No.
`
`
`
`E] complied with.
`
`not complied with for the following reasons:
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY PCT/US17/42838
` Box No. IV
`
`Lack of unity ofinvention
` 1. K In response to the invitation (Form PCT/lSA/206) to pay additional fees the applicant has, within the applicable time limit:
`
`
`D paid additional fees.
`D paid additional fees under protest and, where applicable, the protest fee.
`
`
`El
`paid additional fees under protest but the applicable protest fee was not paid.
`
`
`[Z]
`not paid additional fees.
`
`
`
` pay additional fees.
` 3. This Authority considers that the requirement ofunity ofinvention in accordance with Rule 13.1, 13.2 and 13.3 is
`
`
`
`
`
` screen; upon command from a user,
`
` The common technical features shared by Groups H! are a mobile device; a remote server; at least one video camera configured to
`
`The inventions listed as Groups I-Il do not relate to a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1 because. under PCT Rule
`13.2. they lack the same or corresponding special technical features for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`remotely.
`Group II: Claims 9-33 are directed towards using a mobile device to initiate a live video stream with an attorney.
`
`
`
`
`the remote attorney; and the at least
`viewing by the remote attorney,
`
`capture video images; live-streaming video for storage in a database; and notifying an attorney located remotely.
`
`
`
`
` However, these common features are previously disclosed by US 2016/0173950 A1 to Virtual Health Systems Corporation (hereinafter
`“VHSC"). VHSC discloses a mobile device (smart phones and other mobile devices; paragraph [0024]); a remote server (remote servers;
`
`
`
`
`paragraph [0025]); at least one video camera configured to capture video images (two-way interactive real-time video conference using
`
`wearable video cameras; figures 1—7; paragraphs [0020], [0024]); storing live-streaming video in a database (all video recordings can be
`
`
`
`
`
`Since the common technical features are previously disclosed by the VHSC reference. these common features are not special and so
`Groups l-ll lack unity.
`
`
`
`4.
`Consequently, this opinion has been established in respect ofthe following parts ofthe international application:
`[:1 all parts.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`.
`-
`the parts relating to claims Nos.
`
`1-8
`K
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. lV) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`PCTIUSZO1 7/042838 08.11.2017
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
` International application No.
`
`
`PCT/US17/42838
`
`
` Box No. V Reasoncd statement under Rule 43bis.l(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability;
`
`
`
`citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
` Statement
` Novelty (N) Claims 1'8 YES
`
`
`
`
`Claims
`
`
`
` Inventive step (IS) Claims NONE YES
`
`
`
`
`Claims
`
`
`
` Industrial applicability (IA) Claims 1'8 YESX
`
`
`
`
`Claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 2.
`Citations and explanations:
`
`
`Claims 1 8. 7 lack an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over US 2015/0371456 A1 to Hertz System. Inc.
`
`
`(hereinafter “Hertz") and further in view of US 7,061,521 82 to Bulriss et al. (hereinafter "Bulriss").
`
`
`
`
` ;
`igure 1; paragraphs [0013], [0016]); and a mobile device executing a mobile application and in wireless
`communication with the video camera and display screen, configured, upon command from a user. to communicate with the remote
`
`
`server (the portable device can be a customer's personal electronic device such as a mobile smartphone having its own camera and
`
`
`display screen; the device 10 includes an application configured to communicate with server 14; figures 1. 2; paragraphs [0017], [0021],
`[0022]). Hertz does not disclose notifying an attorney located remotely; the display screen configured to live-stream a video image of the
`remote attorney; and the at least one video camera is configured to li
`
` connecting the first and second conference stations that carries the audio and video signals between the first and second conference
`stations; abstract; column 6. lines 20-29); and the at least one video camera is configured to live-stream video captured by the at least
`
`one video camera for viewing by the remote attorney and for storage in the database (the recording device 58 (database) records both
`
`
`audio and video signals received over the communications link: the recording device 58 can be a video cassette recorder ("VCR"), a
`
`
`
`
`the remote attorney: and the at least one video camera is configured to liveLStream video captured by the at least one video camera for
`
`viewing by the remote attorney and for storage in the database, as taught by Bulriss, in order to provide the Hertz system with the ability
`
`
`to connect vehicle occupants with a remotely located attorney in real—time over video.
`
`
`
`
`
` , which is also configured to capture video
`
`
`images of the remote attorney and transmit them to the remote server (conferencing system 10 where a first input-output device 20 is
`configured to capture audio-visual information from a defense attorney in a courtroom; a second input-output device 28 captures
`
`
`
`audio—visual information from an inmate in a jail; audio-visual information is routed to and stored in a digital recording device 56 (can be a
`server); figures 1A. 2A; column 10, lines 45-64; column 11, lines 14-25; column 12. lines 40-63). It would have been obvious to a person
`
`
`
`of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the invention, to modify the Hertz invention to provide wherein the remote attorney is able to
`
`
`
`
`-""-Continued Within the Next Supplemental Box-“‘-
`
`
`
`
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. V) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO17I042838 08. 1 1 .2017
`
`Claim 2 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Hertz in view of Bulriss, and further in view of CN
`205071154 U to LONGSE ELECTRONICS LTD (hereinafter “Longse").
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`
`lntemational application No.
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`PCT/US17/42838
`
`
`
`Supplemental Box
`
`
` In case the space in any of the preceding boxes is not sufficient.
`Continuation of:
`
`
`
`
`-""-Continued from Box V: Citations and Explanations-“'-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As per claim 2, Hertz, in view of Bulriss, discloses the mobile lawyer system of claim 1. Hertz does not further disclose wherein the at
`least one video camera comprises a 360-degree high definition video camera configured to capture video images in a plurality of
`
`directions. Longse discloses wherein the at least one video camera comprises a 360-degree high definition video camera configured to
`
`
`
`capture video images in a plurality of directions (360-degree high-definition night vision video camera; English translation, abstract;
`
`
`paragraph [0005]; claim 1).
`it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the invention. to modify the
`
`
`Hertz invention to provide wherein the at least one video camera comprises a 360-degree high definition video camera configured to
`
`
`capture video images in a plurality of directions. as taught by Longse. in order to provide a more comprehensive and thorough view of
`the occupants of a vehicle during video conferencing.
`
`
`
` Claim 3 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Hertz in view of Bulriss, and further in view of US
`
`2016/0173742 A1 to HASSAN ZUREIKAT (hereinafter "Hassan").
`
`
`
`
` Claim 4 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Hertz in view of Bulriss, and further in view of US
`
`
`
`
`
`9,288,446 82 to Mokashi et al. (hereinafter “Mokashi").
`
`conferencing.
`
`
` Claim 6 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Hertz in view of Bulriss, and further in View of US
`
`
`2016/0140179 A1 to HUAWEl INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD. (hereinafter "Huawei”).
`
` -"'-Continued Within the Next Supplemental Box-“"-
`
`
`
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Supplemental Box) (January 2015)
`
`
`
`PCT/USZO17IO42838 08. 1 1 .2017
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`Supplemental Box
`
`International application No.
`PCT/US17/42833
`
`In case the space in any of the preceding boxes is not sufficient.
`Continuation of:
`an:
`
`~Continued from Previous Supplemental Box-"'-
`
`Claims 1-8 have industrial applicability as defined by PCT Article 33(4) because the subject matter can be made or used in industry.
`
`Claim 8 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Hertz in view of Bulriss, and further in view of WO
`2015/052896 A1 to NEC Corporation (hereinafter "NEC").
`
`Form PCT/lSA/237 (Supplemental Box) (January 2015)
`
`
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site