`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`wwwusptogov
`
`
`
`
`
`15/644,524
`
`07/07/2017
`
`Clayton K. Redmon
`
`REDM—POOOlUS
`
`2303
`
`Grable Martin Fulton PLLC
`2709 Dublin Road
`Plano, TX 75094
`
`NGUYEN, PHUNG HOANG JOSEPH
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2656
`
`PAPER NUIVIBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`06/18/2018
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`docketing @ gchub.com
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`
`
`
`
` _ _ _ _ 15/644,524 REDMON ET AL.
`
`
`Examiner-Initiated Interwew Summary
`_
`_
`Examiner
`Art UnIt
`
`Phung-Hoang J. Nguyen
`
`2656
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant’s representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) Phung-Hoang J. Nguyen.
`
`(2) Wei Wei Jeang.
`
`Date of Interview: 05 June 2018.
`
`Type:
`
`IZI Telephonic D Video Conference
`D Personal [copy given to: D applicant D applicant’s representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: D Yes
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`D No.
`
`Issues Discussed D101 D112 D102 D103 DOthers
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed:
`
`Identification of prior art discussed:
`
`Substance of Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics may include: identification or clarification of a
`reference or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied references etc...)
`
`Examiner proposed to further clarify the claim to place this case into an allowance. Applicant declined.
`
`
`
`Applicant recordation instructions:
`
`It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of the
`substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the
`general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the
`general results or outcome of the interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`D Attachment
`
`/Phung-Hoang J Nguyen/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2656
`
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-41sB (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20180612
`
`