Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary
`
`Application
`No.
`1 5/1 72,023
`
`Applicant(s)
`Wan et al.
`
`Examiner
`ALISON
`SLATER
`
`AIA (First Inventor
`to File) Status
`Yes
`
`All participants (applicant, applicants representative, PTO personnel):
`
`1. ALISON SLATER (Examiner); Telephonic
`
`2. MICHAEL MALEK (Attorney of Record); Telephonic
`
`Date of Interview: 13 February 2019
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`|tem(s) under 35 U.S.C. 102:
`Discussed how the reference Wang reads on the terms "transition point" and "supplemental enhancement
`information" in claim 1. Defined acronym HRD as Hypothetical Reference Decoder. No agreement was reached.
`
`
`
`Attachment(s): Agenda,
`
`/Alison Slater/
`Examiner, Art Unit 2487
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substance of the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview was initiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner has indicated that a written summary will be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Please further see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`37 CFR § 1.2 Business to be transacted in writing
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/413b (Rev. 01/01/2015)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20190213
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substance of the
`interview. (See MPEP section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is given a
`non-extendable period of the longer of one month or thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this
`interview summary form, whichever is later, to file a statement of the substance of the interview
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete
`and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete
`and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general
`indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or outcome of the
`interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`