`“x
`‘\\f
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`15/ 121,623
`
`08/25/2016
`
`Cecilia Anna Wilhelmina GEUIJEN
`
`4096.0100002/DAS/PAC/E—H
`
`5717
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.
`WASHINGTON, DC 20005
`
`RAWLINGS, STEPHEN L
`
`ART UNIT
`
`1643
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/16/2018
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`e-office@sternekessler.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`
` . _ _ _ 15/121,623 GEUIJEN ET AL.
`
`
`Applicant-Initiated Interwew Summary
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`
`
`
`
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant’s representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) STEPHEN RA WL/NGS.
`
`(3)Mark Chadwick.
`
`STEPHEN RAWLINGS
`
`1643
`
`(2) Paul Calvo.
`
`(4)_-
`
`Date of Interview: 11 May 2018.
`
`Type:
`
`I:l Video Conference
`IZI Telephonic
`I:I Personal [copy given to:
`|:| applicant
`
`|:| applicant’s representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`I:I Yes
`
`IZI No.
`
`Issues Discussed D101 IXI112 D102 IXI103 I:|Others
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 1-4 6-13 18-22 28 30-33 35 and 58-71.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: Kang etal. (MAbs. 2014 Mar-Apr; 6 (22: 340-532, U.S. PatentAgg/ication
`Publication No. 2014/0141019z and Troise et al. (FEBS J. 201 1; 278 (72: 1156-66).
`
`Substance of Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics may include: identification or clarification of a
`reference or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied references etc...)
`
`The grounds of reiection set forth in the Office action mailed November 27, 2017 were discussed in light of the
`amendment filed Agril 271 2018. No agreement with resgect to the claims was reached.
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1643
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substance of the interview. (See MPEP
`section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is given a non-extendable period of the longer of one month or
`thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this interview summary form, whichever is later, to file a statement of the substance of the
`interview
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of the
`substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the
`general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the
`general results or outcome of the interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`|:| Attachment
`/STEPHEN RAWLINGS/
`
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-413 (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20180511
`
`