`
`Document:116
`
`Page:1
`
`Filed: 10/14/2022
`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`GAnited States Court of Appeals
`for the Pederal Circuit
`
`CELLSPIN SOFT, INC.,
`Appellant
`
`Vv.
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC
`CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, GOPRO,
`INC., GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN
`USA, INC.,
`Appellees
`
`KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF
`COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARKOFFICE,
`Intervenor
`
`
`2020-1948
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-
`00131.
`
`JUDGMENT
`
`RANDALL T. GARTEISER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Tyler,
`TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL
`SCOTT FULLER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA; KIRK ANDERSON,
`Budo Law PC, Arvada, CO; PETER JOSEPH CORCORAN,III,
`
`
`
`Case: 20-1948
`
`Document:116
`
`Page:2
`
`Filed: 10/14/2022
`
`Corcoran IP Law PLLC, Texarkana, TX.
`
`MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees
`Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North
`America also represented by T. VANN PEARCE, JR.
`
`KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, KXT Law, LLP, Redwood
`City, CA, for appellee GoPro,Inc.
`
`JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS,
`for appellees Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA,Inc.
`Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ.
`
`JOSHUA K. HANDELL, Appellate Staff, Civil Division,
`United States Departmentof Justice, Washington, DC, ar-
`gued for
`intervenor.
`Also represented by BRIAN M.
`BOYNTON, MELISSA N. PATTERSON; SARAH E. CRAVEN,
`THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA
`YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States
`Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
`
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered,it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
`PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and STARK, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`October 14, 2022
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`Case: 20-1948
`
`Document:118
`
`Page:1
`
`Filed: 12/05/2022
`
`GAnited States Court of Appeals
`for the Pederal Circuit
`
`CELLSPEIN SOPP, INC.,
`Appellant
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC
`CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, GOPRO,
`INC., GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, ENC., GARMIN
`USA, ENC.,
`Appellees
`
`RATHERINE BR. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARYOF
`COMMERCE POR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNTPED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARE OFFICE,
`infervener
`
`2020-1948
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-
`00131.
`
`MANDATE
`
`In accordance with the judgmentof this Court, entered
`October 14, 2022, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal
`
`
`
`Case: 20-1948
`
`Document:118
`
`Page:2
`
`Filed: 12/05/2022
`
`Rules of Appellate Procedure,
`hereby issued.
`
`the formal mandate is
`
`Costs are awarded to appellee Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, GoPro,
`Inc.,
`Garmin International,
`Inc., Garmin USA,
`Inc.
`in the
`amount of $85.44 and taxed against the appellant.
`
`
`December 5, 2022
`Date
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`