`
`PATENT SPECIFICATION
`(21) Application No. 11319/72
`(22) Filed 10 March 19-72
`(31) Convention Application N0. 141407
`(3 3) United States of America (US)
`(44) Complete Specification published 16 April 1975
`(51) INT CL2 AGlK 31/485
`(52\ Index at acceptance
`
`(32) Filed 7'May 1971 in
`
`(11)
`
`N i
`
`s
`is;
`
`® 3
`
`3
`W3
`M
`
`(54) ORAL NARCOTIC COMPOSITION
`
`(71) We, ENDO‘ LABORATORIES INC,
`a Corporation organised and existing under
`the Laws of the State of Delaware, located
`at 1000 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, New
`York 11530, United States of America, do
`hereby declare the invention for which we
`pray that a patent may be granted to us, and
`the method by which it is to be performed, to
`be particularly described in and by the
`following statement:-——
`This invention relates to an oral narcotic
`
`10
`
`the
`the narcotic, preventing obtainment of
`desired euphoriant effect. Thus, the combina—
`tion removes the incentive for diversion of the
`drugs into other channels and uses.
`The narcotic drug which can be used in the
`compositions of this invention is oxycodone,
`hydrocodone, codeine, propoxyphene or penta—
`zocine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
`thereof. Propoxyphene is not at present under
`narcotic control, but it is definitely recognised
`as a weak narcotic, and has been incriminated
`-
`__ __..‘l -113-
`
`50
`
`55
`
`EA
`
`PATENTS ACT 1949
`
`Patent No 1353815.
`
`THE
`PATENT OFFICE
`10 November 1977
`
`Baa 42365/3
`
`35
`
`4O
`
`45
`
`Capsule or syrup, comprising a narconc Wmcn
`has substantial activity orally as well as by
`injection,
`in combination with a narcotic
`antagonist which is much less effective orally
`than by injection,
`the ratio of antagonist to
`narcotic in the combination being such that
`the antagonist does not block the effect of the
`narcotic when the combination is administered
`orally, but does prevent the obtainment of an
`acute euphoriant effect when the combination
`is administered by injection.
`When administered orally in unit dosage
`form, the composition provides a fully effec-
`tive therapeutic dose of the narcotic, substan—
`tially
`undiminished
`by presence
`of
`the
`antagonist. However, when the combination of
`active ingredients is extracted and injected,
`the antagonist effectively blocks the effect of
`
`vention IS 0116 SUILflDIC 1U]: 01.211. aumuuauauuu
`and comprising (a) a compound having sub-
`stantial narcotic activity both orally and by
`injection,
`the compound being oxycodone,
`hydrocodone,
`codeine,
`propoxyphene
`or
`pentazocine or a pharmaceutically acceptable
`salt
`thereof, and (b) a narcotic antagonist
`which is substantially less active orally than
`by injection,
`the narcotic antagonist being
`(1) naloxone or a pharmaceutically acceptable
`salt thereof, (2) N - cyclopropylmethyl - 7,8-
`dihydro - 14 - hydroxynormorphinone or a
`pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, or (3)
`21 — cyclopropyl — 7.8 - (I - hydroxy — 1—
`methylethyl)
`— 6,14 - endo — ethanotetra—
`hydrooripavine or a pharmaceutically accept-
`able salt thereof,
`the weight ratio of (a) to
`(b), calculated as the free base, being
`
`80
`
`85
`
`90
`
`95
`
`

`

`unilaoorva
`
`
`
`PATENT SPECIFICATION
`(21) Application No. 113 19/72
`(22) Filed 10 March 1972
`(31) Convention Application No. 141407
`(33) United States of America (US)
`(44) Complete Specification published 16 April 1975
`(51) INT CL2 A61K 31/485
`(52) Index at acceptance
`ASB 292 294 295 29‘Y 381 382
`385 386' 387 38Y 392 39X
`401 40Y 4-23 42Y 431
`43Y 466 4'6Y 482 48Y 551
`55Y 576 57Y 586 58Y
`636 63Y r644 64Y 77Y
`
`(32) Filed '7 May 19,71 in
`
`N D b
`
`e Q G
`
`?
`to
`F1
`
`(54) ORAL NARCOTIC COMPOSITION
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`(71) We, ENDO- LABORATORIES INC,
`a Corporation organised and existing under
`the Laws of the State of Delaware,
`located
`at 1000 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, New
`York 11530, United States of America, do
`hereby declare the invention for which we
`pray that a patent may be granted to us, and
`the method by which it is to be performed, to
`be particularly described in and by the
`following statement:—
`This invention relates to an oral narcotic
`composition.
`In general, narcotic addicts do not obtain
`narcotic satisfaction or a “high” from the com-
`paratively slow, difiuse, and attenuated effect
`of narcotics taken orally. Instead they seek the
`rapid, concentrated, and undiminished effect
`of an injected narcotic, preferably intravenous
`or “mainline”,
`to achieve the desired acute
`euphoriant effect of a satisfactory “high”.
`Consequently, addicts sometimes obtain the
`more easily procurable oral narcotics such as
`analgesics and antitussives, and extract
`the
`narcotic substance so that it can be injected.
`Thus, narcotic abuse through diversion of oral
`narcotic therapeutic drugs into channels for
`injection by addicts has become a serious
`problem in medicine and public health.
`This invention provides a narcotic com-
`position for oral administration, e.g. a tablet,
`capsule or syrup, comprising a narcotic which
`has substantial activity orally as well as by
`injection,
`in combination with a narcotic
`antagonist which is much less effective orally
`than by injection, the ratio of antagonist to
`narcotic in the combination being such that
`the antagonist does not block the effect of the
`narcotic when the combination is administered
`orally, but does prevent the obtainment of an
`acute euphoriant eflect when the combination
`is administered by injection.
`When administered orally in unit dosage
`form, the composition provides a fully efiec-
`tive therapeutic dose of the narcotic, substan~
`tially
`undiminished
`by presence
`of
`the
`antagonist. However, when the combination of
`active ingredients is extracted and injected,
`
`the antagonist effectively blocks the effect of
`\
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`the
`the narcotic, preventing obtainment of
`desired euphoriant elfect. Thus, the combina-
`tion removes the incentive for diversion of the
`drugs into other channels and uses.
`_
`The narcotic drug which can be used in the
`compositions of this invention is oxycodone,
`hydrocodone, codeine, propoxyphene or penta-
`zocine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
`thereof. Propoxyphene is not at present under
`narcotic control, but it is definitely recognised
`as a weak narcotic, and has been incriminated
`in some cases of narcotic drug abuse and addic-
`tion. Pentazocine likewise is not at present
`under narcotic control in the U.S.A.; how-
`ever, it is a mixed weak narcotic antagonist
`and borderline narcotic, from which the narco-
`tic component has emerged sufliciently to
`cause a significant'number of cases of drug
`abuse and addiction.
`The narcotic antagonist used in the inven—
`tion has
`substantially greater effectiveness
`when administered by injection than when
`administered orally; the antagonist is naloxone,
`N — cycle
`propylmethyl - 7,8 — dihydro- - 14-
`hydroxynormorphinone or 21 - cyclopropyl-
`7m: - (1 — hydroxy - 1 - methylethyl) - 6,14—
`endo — ethano - tetrahydrooripavine (or di—
`phenorphine) or a pharmaceutically acceptable
`acid addition salt thereof.
`The pharmaceutical composition of the in-
`vention is one suitable for oral administration
`and comprising (a) a compound having sub—
`stantial narcotic activity both orally and by
`injection,
`the compound being oxyeodone,
`hydrocodone,
`codeine,
`propoxyphene
`or
`pentazocine or a pharmaceutically acceptable
`salt
`thereof, and (b) a narcotic antagonist
`which is substantially less active orally than
`by injection,
`the narcotic antagonist being
`(1) naloxone or a pharmaceutically acceptable
`salt thereof, (2) N - cyclopropylmethyl - 7,8-
`dihydro — 14 — hydroxynormorphinone or a
`pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, or (3)
`21 - cyclopropyl — 7,8 - (1 - hydroxy - 1-
`methylethyl)
`- 6,14 - endo - ethanotetra—
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`75
`
`80
`
`‘85
`
`95
`
`:I'EFTQNEE'ga _r_ 72- »,
`L, :45ou slink”. .
`.
`_~,
`
`.
`
`-
`.
`
`.:
`
`'. 32-
`
`' "
`
`‘7
`
`

`

`1,390,772
`
`
`
`2
`
`a
`d
`oxyco age
`hydroco one
`pigggyphene
`pentazocine
`
`Ratio with
`(b) (1)
`5_() 1
`5: 0'03
`30: 0'1
`65 1 0'2
`50: 0‘2
`
`Ratio with
`(b) (2) or (3)
`15.01
`5:0'01
`90: 0‘1
`195; 0‘2
`150: 0.2
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`so that (b) does not block the narcotic effect
`of (a) when the composition is administered
`orally but does prevent an acute euphoriant
`effect by (a) when the composition is injec-
`ted.
`The compositions of the invention are con-
`ventional oral narcotic compositions, except
`for the inclusion of the narcotic antagonist.
`In the case of tablets, they will generally con-
`tain 5—100 mg of the narcotic and 0.001—
`50 mg (usually 0.003—5 mg) of the antagon—
`ist. Liquid preparations will generally con-
`tain 1—20 mg/ml of the narcotic and 0.0002
`—10 mg/ml (usually 0.0006—1 mg/ml) of
`the antagonist. Additional drugs, e.g. anti-
`histamines, non—narcotic analgesics and anti—
`spasmodics may be included, along with con—
`ventional excipients in conventional amounts.
`The following are some specific Examples
`of the compositions of the invention and the
`uses to which they can be put.
`
`Example 1.
`Oxyco-dane with Naloxone — Oxycodone
`is an effective oral narcotic analgesic and is
`generally used in a dose of about 5 mg. of
`oxycodone hydrochloride per tablet, together
`with aspirin, phenacetin and caffeine (similar
`to the well known “AFC with Codeine”). The
`addict would probably have to inject
`the
`narcotic extract from 6—12 tablets to obtain
`a “high,"
`In the compositions of this invention, the
`tablet (or 5 m1 dose of liquid) should contain
`about 5 mg of oxycodone hydrochloride (or
`equivalent as the base or salt) together with
`0.01—0.3 mg. of naloxone hydrochloride (or
`equivalent as base or salts) with or without
`additional drugs such as aspirin, phenacetin
`and caffeine. The preferred tablet dose is
`oxycodone hydrochloride 5 mg. and naloxone
`hydrochloride 0.1 mg., together with aspirin
`224 mg, phenacetin 160 mg., and caffeine 32
`mg.
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`(or equivalent as base or, salt) together with
`0.003—0.1 mg. of naloxone hydrochloride (or
`equivalent as base or, salt) with or without
`additional drugs such as antihistamines (e.g.,
`chlorpheniramine maleate),
`vasoconstrictors
`(e.g.,
`' phenylephrine
`hydrochloride),
`non-
`narcotic analgesrcs (e.g., acetamrnophen), anti-
`spasmodics, and caffeine. The preferred tablet
`dose is hydrocodone hitartrate 5 mg. and
`naloxone hydrochloride 0.03 mg.
`
`Example 3.
`Codeine with Naloxone — Codeine phos-
`phate is an efiective oral analgesic and anti-
`tussive which is generally used in doses of
`75—60 mg.
`tablets as an analgesic and 10
`mg. tablets or liquid dosages as an antitussive
`With or without additional non-narcotic drugs
`like APC (aspirin, phenacetin, and caffeine).
`The addict would probably have to inject the
`narcotic extract from 4——8 tablets of the 60
`mg. strength to obtain a “high”.
`In the compositions of this invention, the
`tablet should contain 75—60 mg. of codeine
`phosphate or (equivalent as base, sulphate or
`other
`salt)
`together with 0.03—l mg. of
`naloxone hydrochloride (or equivalent as base
`or salts), with or without additional drugs such
`as aspirin, phenacetin, and cafieine. The pre-
`ferred tablet dosage is codeine phosphate 30
`mg. and 0.1 mg. of naloxone hydrochloride,
`together with aspirin 224 mg., phenacetin
`160 mg., and cafieine 32 mg.
`
`65
`
`70
`
`75
`
`80
`
`85
`
`Example 4.
`Propoxyphene with Naloxone — Propoxy—
`phene hydrochloride is widely—used as an oral
`analgesic, generally in a 65 mg. dose with
`aspirin, or with aspirin, phenacetin, and cat'-
`feine. The addict would probably have to in-
`ject the narcotic extract from 4—8 tablets to
`obtain a “high”.
`In the compositions of this invention, the
`tablet should contain 30—65 mg. of propoxy-
`phene hydrochloride (or equivalent as base or
`salt) together with 0.03—1 mg. of naloxone
`hydrochloride (or equivalent as base or salt),
`with or Without aspirin or APC (aspirin,
`phenacetin, and caffeine). The preferred tablet
`dosage is propoxyphene hydrochloride 65
`mg. and naloxone hydrochloride 0.2 mg.,
`together with aspirin 224 mg., phenacetin
`160 mg, and cafieine 32 mg.
`
`95
`
`100
`
`105
`
`110
`
`115
`
`120
`
`Example 2.
`Hydrocodone with Naloxone — Hydro-
`codone is an effective oral narcotic antitussive—
`analgesic and is generally used in a dose of
`about 5 mg. of hydrocodone bitartrate per
`tablet or per 5 ml. of syrup. The addict would
`probably have to inject the narcotic extract
`from 18—36 tablets to obtain a “high”.
`the
`In the components of this invention,
`tablet (or 5 ml. dose of liquid) should con-
`tain about 5 mg. of hydrocodone bitartrate
`
`Example 5.
`Pentazocine with Naloxone — Pentazocine
`is an eflective oral analgesic which is generally
`used as a tablet containing pentazocine hydro—
`chloride equivalent to 50 mg of the base. The
`addict would probably have to inject the ex—
`tract from 4—8 tablets to obtain a “high”.
`In the compositions of this invention, the
`tablet should contain 50 mg. of pentazocine
`base in the form of the hydrochloride (or
`equivalent as the base itself or other salts)
`
`

`

`3M
`
`1,390,772
`
`3
`
`together with 0.02—0.6 mg. of naloxone
`hydrochloride (or equivalent as the base or
`salt). The preferred tablet dose is pentazocine
`hydrochloride equal to 50 mg. of the base
`together with 0.2 mg. of naloxone hydro-
`chloride.
`The other antagonists mentioned herein—
`above, except for the mixed narcotic-antagon-
`ist pentazocine, can be substituted for nalox-
`one in the above Examples, at the following
`multiples or fractions of the naloxene dosages
`given: N — cyclopropylmethyl
`- 7,8 - di-
`hydro — 14 - hydroxynormorphinone - 1/3 (of
`naloxone dosage in mg.) and 21 - cyclo-
`propyl - 7.0; - (1 - hydroxy - 1 - methyl-
`ethyl)
`- 6,14 - endo — ethanotetrahydroori—
`pavine - 1/3. N — cyclopropylmethyl - 7,8-
`dihydro — 14 — hydroxynormorphinone and
`21 - cyclopropyl - 7o: — (1 - hydroxy - 1—
`methylethyl) - 6,14 - endo - ethanotetrahydro-
`oripavine are also used in combination with
`pentazocine, each antagonist being at 1/3 the
`naloxone mg. dosage. It is understood that
`pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts
`of the narcotic antagonist bases can also be
`used.
`
`orally than by injection, the narcotic antagon-
`ist being (1) naloxone or a pharmaceutically
`acceptable salt thereof, (2) N - cyclopropyl-
`methyl
`- 7,8 — dihydro - 14 - hydroxy—
`normorphinone or a pharmaceutically accept-
`able salt thereof, or (3) 21 — cyclopropyl - 708-
`(1 — hydroxy - 1 - methylethyl) - 6,14 - enda-
`ethanotetrahydrooripavine or a pharmaceutic-
`ally acceptable salt. thereof, the weight ratio
`of (a) to (b), calculated as the free base, being
`
`a
`oxycodone
`hydrocodone
`codeine
`propoxyphene
`pentazocine
`
`Ratio with
`(b) (1)
`5 : 0.1
`5 : 0.03
`30: 0.1
`65 : 0.2
`50: 0.2
`
`Ratio with
`(b) (2) 0r (3)
`15 : 0.1
`5 : 0.01
`90: 0.1
`195 : 0.2
`150: 0.2
`
`so that (b) does not block the narcotic eifect
`of (a) when the composition is administered
`orally but does prevent an acute euphoriant
`efiect by (a) when the composition is injec-
`ted.
`
`2. A composition according to claim 1
`wherein (b) is (2) or (3).
`3. A composition according to claim 1 sub-
`stantially as described in any one of
`the
`Examples.
`
`WHAT WE CLAIM IS:—
`1. A pharmaceutical composition suitable
`for oral administration comprising (a) a com-
`pound having substantial narcotic activity both
`orally and by injection the compound' being
`J. A. KEMP AND CO.,
`oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, propoxy—
`Chartered Patent Agents,
`phene or pentazocine or a pharmaceutically
`14, South Square,
`acceptable salt
`thereof, and (b)
`a narcotic
`Gray’s Inn,
`London, WC1R 5EU.
`antagonist which is substantially less active
`Printed for Her Majesty’s Stationery Oifice, by the Courier Press, Leamington Spa, 1975
`Published by The Patent Ofiice, 25 Southampton Buildings, London, WCZA lAY, from
`which copies may be obtained.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket