PATENT
`Attorney Docket No.: AKBM-14409/US-9/CON
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 1-20 are pending and under examination following entry of the Responseto the
`
`Final Office Action filed on April 16, 2015.
`
`Applicant respectfully requests that the Examiner additionally consider the disclosure of
`
`Tanakaet al., Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 59(8):1389-93 (1995) which demonstrates that the
`
`deleterious PAF-like analogs described in Maranteet al. (1999) 274(10):28395-28404 are readily
`
`formed from ether phospholipids found in krill. In fact, as described in the Tanakaabstract:
`
`
`The activity of oxidized krill PC, which was equivalent of 89.8 + 8.8 pmol 16:0
`
`PAF/umolofstarting PC, was about five times those of oxidized PCs from salmon roe
`
`and sea urchin eggs and about 50 times that of oxidized hen yolk PC.
`
`Based on this information, and the knownplatelet aggregation and inflammatory activity of PAF,
`
`one of skill in the art would not be motivated to increase the ether phospholipid content of prior
`
`art krill oil and would in fact have been motivated to avoid increasing the ether phospholipid
`
`content of krill oil. Certainly, one of skill in the art would not have expected that increasing the
`
`ether phospholipid contentof krill oil would lead to increased health benefits.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`If a telephone interview wouldaid in the prosecution of this application, the Examineris
`
`encouragedto call the undersigned collect at (608) 662-1277.
`
`Dated:
`
`April 23, 2015
`
`/J. Mitchell Jones/
`John Mitchell Jones
`Registration No. 44,174
`Casimir Jones, S.C.
`2275 Deming Way,Suite 310
`Middleton, WI, 53562
`(608) 662-1277
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket