throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 15
`Entered: July 26, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`ALEX IS THE BEST, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2017-02059
`Patent 8,581,991 Bl
`
`Before DANIEL N. FISHMAN, MINN CHUNG,and
`JESSICA C. KAISER,Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FISHMAN,Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Granting Request for Adverse Judgment After Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(4); 37 CFR. § 42.73(b)
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02059
`Patent 8,581,991 B1
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Google LLC (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition requesting inter partes
`
`review of claims 22, 23, 25, 27-29, 32, 33, and 35-38 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,581,991 B1 (“the 991 patent,” Ex. 1001). Paper 1. Alex Is The Best,
`
`LLC (“Patent Owner”) filed a Preliminary Responseto the Petition. Paper
`
`7. On March 9, 2018, weinstituted an inter partes review ofall challenged
`
`claims (22, 23, 25, 27-29, 32, 33, and 35-38) of the ’991 patent. Paper 8,
`
`46. On June 7, 2018, Patent Ownerfiled a Request for Adverse Judgment
`
`requesting adverse judgment pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(2) with
`respect to all claims that are the subject of this proceeding. Paper 14,1.
`
`Specifically, Patent Ownerasserts “Patent Ownerhas decided to cancel
`claims 22, 23, 25, 27-29, 32, 33, and 35-38 of U.S. Patent No. 8,581,991
`(‘the °991 patent’), on which IPR2017-02059 wasinstituted.” Jd.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`A party may request entry of adverse judgmentagainstitself at any
`lime during a proceeding. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b). Petitioner has notfiled
`an opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion for Adverse Judgment.
`
`Under these circumstances, we determine that the grant of the request
`
`for entry of adverse judgmentis appropriate. Furthermore, becauseall
`claims challenged in this proceeding are cancelled, a Certificate shall issue
`
`in due course cancelling the challenged claims under 35 U.S.C. § 318(b).
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02059
`Patent 8,581,991 Bl
`
`It is ORDEREDthat Patent Owner’s Request for Adverse Judgment
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b) with respect to claims 22, 23, 25, 27-29, 32, 33,
`
`and 35-38 of U.S. Patent No. 8,581,991 B1 is granted; and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat claims 22, 23, 25, 27-29, 32, 33, and 35—
`
`38 of U.S. Patent No. 8,581,991 B1 shall be cancelled under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 318(b).
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Joshua Larsen
`Steven Shipe
`Jeffrey C. Morgan
`Jeffrey M. Barron
`Barnes & Thornburg LLP
`joshua. larsen@btlaw.com
`steven.shipe@btlaw.com
`jeff.morgan@btlaw.com
`jeff.barron@btlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`C. Andrew IM
`IM IP LAW PLLC
`docket@imiplaw.com
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket