`571.272.7822
`
`Paper 15
`Entered: October 28, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and
`SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH,
`Petitioner,
`
`Vv.
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALSLPand
`AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Cases IPR2016-00353 (Patent 7,691,963 B2),
`IPR2016-00354 (Patent 8,445,647 B2), and
`IPR2016-00355 (Patent 8,951,962 B2)
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, ZHENYU YANG,and
`TINA E. HULSE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SNEDDEN,Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding and
`Granting Request to Treat Agreement as Business Confidential Information
`37 CFR. §§ 42.72 & 42.74
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00353 (Patent 7,691,963 B2),
`IPR2016-00354 (Patent 8,445,647 B2), and
`IPR2016-00355 (Patent 8,951,962 B2)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH
`
`(collectively, “Petitioner”) and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Amylin
`
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC (collectively, “Patent Owner”) filed a Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate in each of the proceedingsidentified in the caption of this
`
`Judgment. IPR2016-00353, Paper 12; IPR2016-00354, Paper 12; IPR2016-
`
`00355, Paper 12. In each proceeding, along with the Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate, the parties filed a copy oftheir settlement agreement(“the
`
`Agreement”), made in connection with the termination of these proceedings
`
`and therelated district court proceedings, in accordance with 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 2.74(b). IPR2016-00353, Paper 13; IPR2016-
`
`00354, Paper 13; IPR2016-00355, Paper 13.
`In each proceeding, the parties also submitted a Joint Motion
`requesting that the Agreementbe treated as business confidential
`
`information and be kept separate from the files of the patents at issue under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). IPR2016-00353, Paper 14;
`
`IPR2016-00354, Paper 14; IPR2016-00355, Paper 14.
`
`In each Joint Motion to Terminate, the parties indicate that the
`
`Agreementresolvesall disputes between the parties and theiraffiliates
`
`involving the patents-at-issue in these proceedings. See, e.g., IPR2016-
`
`00353, Paper 12, 3-5. Upon consideration of the facts before us,it is
`
`appropriate to terminate these proceedings without rendering final written
`
`decisions. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. Accordingly, we grant the Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate in each proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00353 (Patent 7,691,963 B2),
`IPR2016-00354 (Patent 8,445,647 B2), and
`IPR2016-00355 (Patent 8,951,962 B2)
`
`Wealso grant the Joint Motion to File Agreement as Business
`
`Confidential Information in each proceeding.
`
`For the foregoing reasons,itis:
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDEREDthat the Joint Motion to File Agreement as Business
`
`Confidential Information Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 (IPR2016-00353,
`
`Paper14) is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`Proceedings (IPR2016-00353, Paper 12) is granted, and IPR2016-00353 is
`
`terminated with respect to both Petitioner and Patent Owner;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Joint Motion to File Agreement as
`
`Business Confidential Information Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 (PR2016-
`
`00354, Paper 14).is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`Proceedings (IPR2016-00354, Paper 12) is granted, and IPR2016-00354 is
`
`terminated with respect to both Petitioner and Patent Owner;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Joint Motion to File Agreement as
`
`Business Confidential Information Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 (PR2016-
`
`00355, Paper 14) is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`Proceedings (IPR2016-00355, Paper 12) is granted, and IPR2016-00355 is
`
`terminated with respect to both Petitioner and Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00353 (Patent 7,691,963 B2),
`IPR2016-00354 (Patent 8,445,647 B2), and
`IPR2016-00355 (Patent 8,951,962 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Paul Berghoff
`berghoff@mbhb.com
`Joshua Rich
`rich@mbhb.com
`Andrew Williams
`williams@mbhb.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`David Berl
`dberl@wc.com
`Dov Grossman
`dgrossman@wce.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
