`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/103
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1458
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`:
`
`|
`
`REPORTON THE
`
`FOULING GR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`fn Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 ULS.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
`on the following
`[_] Trademarks or
`ff Patents.
`([} the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.5:
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`CV 14-1645
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`3/5/2014
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`[DEFENDANT
`
`CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
`
`FONTEM VENTURES B.V., a Netherlands company;
`and FONTEM HOLDINGS 1 B.V., a Netherlands
`company,
`
`| NJOY, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1-5,
`[
`inclusive,
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`——
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`i 8,365,742
`
`Fontem Holdings 1 B.V.
`
`ses031|zag Foniem Holdings 1 B.V.
`
`7/23/2013
`
`Fontem Holdings 1 B.V.
`
`eo
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`04/07/2016
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitied case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been incinded:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`Li] Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`Li} Answer
`
`[i] Cross Bill
`
`[| Other Pleading
`
`fn the above-—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`See attached Order dated 04/07/2016.
`
`CLERK
`Kiry K. Gray
`
`[(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`|
`Charles A. Rojas
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1-—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy te Director Cepy 3—-Upon termination of action, mail this copy te Directer
`Copy 2--Upen fling document adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—Case fle copy
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FONTEMVENTURES BVeaTEM
`ethersands company; an
`HOLDINGS1 B.V., a Netherlands
`Plaintiffs
`
`pany,
`
`Case No. CV 14-1645-GW(MRWx)
`and related consolidated cases:
`CV14-1655, CV14-8161, CV14-9273
`ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL
`
`V.
`
`NJOY, INC., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`
`
`Case 2:44-cv-01645-GW-MRW Document 445 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2of3 Page JS-6
`
`SES|eESOoNOFF@&
`
`CowmNDNNBPWONY
`NYNYNYNYNYNYNYNYNHYHFFPeSeeonanDNNMFPWONOKFCOTOANINDNfF
`
`
`
`Mase 2:14-cv-01645-GW-MRW Document445 Filed 04/07/16 Page Sof3 Page ID #24111
`
`In light of the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal by Plaintiffs Fontem Ventures
`
`B.V. and Fontem Holdings 1 B.V. (together, “Fontem”) and Defendant VMR
`
`Products, LLC (““VMR”), the Court hereby ORDERSasfollows:
`
`1.
`
`All claims and counterclaims between Fontem and VMRin Case No.
`
`CV 14-1645 shall be dismissed without prejudice.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Fontem and VMRshall each bear its own fees andcosts.
`
`The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this case for the sole purpose of
`
`enforcing the Settlement Agreement between Fontem and VMR.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED: April 7, 2016
`
`renee
`a feet K,
`of
`foe
`“ZCAme
`Ue
`GEORGEH.WU,U.S. District Judge
`
`CowmNDNNBPWONY
`
`NYNYONYONYNYNYNNNYNOKFKFKFKFFFKFFrOFESeRonHNONBPWONYKFCOOOWnDBFPWONYOKKOC
`
`
`
`