`
`REMARKS
`
`This paper is submitted in response to the final Office action mailed on December 4,
`
`2018. This paper amends claims 45 and 51. Accordingly, after entry of this Amendment
`
`and Response, claims 37-56 will be pending.
`
`l. Claim Amendments
`
`Claims 45 and 51 were amended to correct a typographical omission.
`
`In the step of
`
`forcing/pressing the word “feature” should be “features”. The words morphology and
`
`topology were also changed for “features” to provide appropriate antecedent basis.
`
`ll. Claim Re'ections Under 35 U. S. C.
`
`103
`
`The Examiner rejected claims 45-56 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over
`
`Horton, Jr. et al. (US. Patent Publication No. 2002/0162605; hereinafter “Horton”) in view of
`
`Scruggs et al. (US. Patent No. 5,711,363; hereinafter “Scruggs”) and Otani et al. (US.
`
`Patent No. 5,049,074; hereinafter “Otani”). For at least the following reasons, Assignee
`
`respectfully disagrees with this rejection.
`
`Independent claims 45 and 51 include the step of:
`
`pressing/forcing the heated body against a mold to form a plurality of surface
`
`features on the outer surface (emphasis added).
`
`None of the references taken alone or together teach this step. The surface features
`
`and pores are important for surface morphology (Assignee’s published application
`
`2012/0158151 paragraph 0036). The claimed method uses casting and surface
`
`microstructuring process to form the surface morphology (Assignee’s published application
`
`paragraphs 0038-0040 and 0043-0044).
`
`Horton teaches BMG implants but does not mention surface features much less a
`
`way to form them.
`
`In fact, Scruggs teaches away from forming surface features. Scruggs
`
`teaches die casting with am mold to form am outer surface (Scruggs col. 4 lines
`
`13-19; col.8 lines 36-41).
`
`Otani teaches a dental implant with a core material and a porous layer on the core
`
`material. Otani teaches the core material may be roughened by blasting with abrasive sand
`
`(Otani col. 3 lines 58—66) rather than by molding as claimed herein. The porous surface
`
`layer in Otani is formed by a fibrous material (col. 3 lines 2—5; col. 4 lines 8-15) which is not a
`
`BMG material.
`
`Improved bonding of the implant to surrounding area is done by flame
`
`spraying (Otani col. 4 line 65- col. 5 line 2). Thus Otani does not teach the method claimed
`
`in claims 45 and 51.
`
`190688221
`
`5
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. P10162USD1
`
`In short, none of the cited references taken alone or together teach pressing/forcing
`
`the heated body against a mold to form a plurality of surface features on the outer surface of
`
`the implant.
`
`Independent claims 45 and 51 are allowable over the cited references.
`
`Claims 40, 46-50 and 52-56 are allowable as being dependent from an allowable
`
`base claim. Assignee makes this statement without reference to, or waiving, the
`
`independent bases for patentability in any dependent claim. The Assignee reserves the right
`
`to separately argue the patentability of dependent claims 40, 46-50 and 52-56 in a
`
`subsequently filed response if necessary.
`
`III. Double Parenting
`
`Claims 37-56 are rejected on the grounds of non-statutory obviousness type double
`
`patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,560,001. Assignee
`
`includes a Terminal Disclaimer herewith.
`
`IV. Conclusion
`
`The Assignee thanks the Examiner for the thorough review of the application. The
`
`Assignee respectfully submits the present application, as amended, is in condition for
`
`allowance and respectfully requests the issuance of a Notice of Allowability as soon as
`
`practicable.
`
`This Amendment is filed with a Certification and Request for Consideration Under the
`
`After Final Consideration Pilot Program, and a petition for a one-month extension of time.
`
`Payment by credit card for the requisite fee is being made with this filing. The Assignee
`
`believes no additional fees or petitions are due with this filing. However, if any such petitions
`
`or fees are necessary, please consider this a request therefor and authorization to charge
`
`Deposit Account No. 504621 accordingly.
`
`190688221
`
`6
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. P10162USD1
`
`If the Examiner should require any additional information or amendment, please
`
`contact the undersigned attorney.
`
`Dated: April 2, 2019.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Timothy R. Schulte/
`Timothy R. Schulte, Registration No. 29,013
`Attorney for Assignee
`USPTO Customer No. 130551
`
`Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
`410 Seventeenth Street
`Suite 2200
`
`Denver, Colorado 80202
`Phone: (303) 223-1100
`Fax: (303) 223-111129,013
`
`190688221
`
`7
`
`