`
`Claims 1-35, 37-64, 72-82, 92-106 were pending. With this response, claims 34, 37, and
`
`95 are amended, claims 92-94, 96-98, 105, and 106 are cancelled, and claims 107 and 108 are
`
`added. Claims 1-33, 38-64, and 72-82 are withdrawn. Accordingly, claims 34, 35, 37, 95, 99-
`
`104, 107, and 108 are presently under examination. No new matter is introduced by the claim
`
`amendments or new claims.
`
`Illustrative support for the new claims may be found, for example, in paragraph [0019] of
`
`the specification as filed.
`
`RESPONSE TO ELECTION OF SPECIES RE UIREMENT
`
`The Examiner has required 5 different species elections.
`
`For species election 1, the Examiner has required an election of a species of sample as in
`
`claims 95 and 99. The Examiner has required election of:
`
`(i) as to whether the sample is suitable for storage in a pipette tip or not; and
`
`(ii) as to whether the sample is biological in nature.
`
`Regarding (i), Applicants elect that the sample i_s suitable for storage in a pipette tip.
`
`Regarding (ii), Applicants elect that the sample i_s biological in nature. Claims 34, 35, 37, 95,
`
`99-104, 107, and 108 encompass the elected species.
`
`For species election 2, the Examiner has required an election of species of analyte detection as
`
`in claim 92.
`
`With this response, Applicants have canceled claim 92 and dependent claims thereof (claims
`
`93, 94, 96-98, 105, and 106), rendering this species election requirement moot. Applicants
`
`respectfully request withdrawal of this species election requirement. Pending claims 34, 35, 37,
`
`95, 99-104, 107, and 108 are generic.
`
`Response to Species Election Requirement
`Application No: 13/355,458
`
`_ 11 _
`
`