`
`(19) World Intellectual Property Organization _'
`International Bureau
`'
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`16 August 2007 (16.08.2007)
`
` (10) International Publication Number
`
`WO 2007/092473 A2
`
`(SI) International Patent Classification:
`
`Not classified
`
`(2I) International Application Number:
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`(22) International Filing Date: 2 February 2007 (02.02.2007)
`
`(25) Filing Language:
`
`(26) Publication Language:
`
`English
`
`English
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`60/764,420
`
`2 February 2006 (02.02.2006)
`
`US
`
`(71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): THE
`BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STAN-
`FORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY [US/US];
`1705 El
`Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306—1106 (US).
`
`(72) Inventors; and
`(75) Inventors/Applicants (for US only): QUAKE, Stephen
`[US/US]; 636 Alvarado Row, Stanford, CA 94305 (US).
`FAN, Hei-Mun, Christina [CN/US]; 121 Campus Drive,
`Apt 1314a, Stanford, CA 94305 (US).
`
`(74) Agents: ASTON, David, J. et al.; Peters Vemy, LLP, 425
`Sherman Avenue, Suite 230, Palo Alto, CA 94306 (US).
`
`(8I) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated. for every
`kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CN,
`CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI,
`GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS,
`JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS,
`LT, LU, LV, LY, MA, MD, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY,
`MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS,
`RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN,
`TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
`
`(84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated for every
`kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM,
`ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM),
`European (AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI,
`FR, GB, GR, IIU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, MC, NL, PL, PT,
`RO, SE, SI, SK, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA,
`GN, GQ, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published:
`
`without international search report and to be republished
`upon receipt of that report
`
`For two-letter codes and other abbreviations, refer to the ”Guid-
`ance Notes on Codes and Abbreviations ” appearing at the begin-
`ning of each regular issue of the PCT Gazette.
`
`(54) Title: NON—INVASIVE FETAL GENETIC SCREENING BY DIGITAL ANALYSIS
`
`14
`
`@@@
`
`O
`
`
`
`7/092473A2|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
`
`A
`
`B
`
`C
`
`D
`
`®@@®
`©®©©
`®©®G
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`21,21
`22,22
`
`21,21
`22,22
`
`21,21
`22,22
`
`21,21,21
`22,22
`
`
`
`
`
`G
`ood containing fetal DNA is diluted to a nom-
`(57) Abstract: The present methods are exemplified by a process in which maternal b
`c inal value of approximately 0.5 genome equivalent of DNA per reaction sample. Digital PCR is then be used to detect aneuploidy,
`N such as the trisomy that causes Down Syndrome. Since aneuploidies do not present a mutational change in sequence, and are merely
`21 change in the number of chromosomes, it has not been possible to detect them in a
`~etus without resorting to invasive techniques
`such as amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling. Digital amplification allows the detection of aneuploidy using massively parallel
`amplification and detection methods, examining, e.g., 10,000 genome equivalents.
`
`W0
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`NON-INVASIVE FETAL GENETIC SCREENING BY DIGITAL ANALYSIS
`
`Inventors: Stephen Quake, Hei-Mun Christina Fan
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
`
`This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/764,420
`
`filed on February 2, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
`
`STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT
`
`This invention was made with U.S. Government support. The U.S. Government may
`
`have certain rights in this invention.
`
`REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING
`
`Applicants assert that the paper copy of the Sequence Listing is identical to the Sequence
`
`Listing in computer readable form found on the accompanying computer disk. Applicants
`
`incorporate the contents of the sequence listing by reference in its entirety.
`
`Field of the Invention
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to the field of fetal genetic screening and to the field of
`
`quantitative nucleic acid analysis.
`
`Related Art
`
`It is now recognized that fetal DNA sheds from the placenta and mixes with the mother’s
`
`blood at fairly high levels — between 3% and 6% of DNA in the mother’s blood is from the fetus.
`
`This observation has been used in conjunction with PCR assays for a variety of fetal genetic
`
`screens — gender, Rh, and thalassemia. However, the technique remains limited for two primary
`
`reasons: first, the PCR assays trade off sensitivity for specificity, making it difficult to identify
`
`particular mutations, and second, the most common genetic disorder, DoWn Syndrome, is a
`
`chromosomal trisomy and therefore cannot be detected by conventional PCR in a mixed sample.
`
`It has now been found that these problems can be solved by quantitative examination of
`
`large numbers of chromosome samples through the use of highly scalable techniques. This
`
`approach is termed here “digital analysis,” and involves the separation of the extracted genomic
`
`material into discrete units so that the detection of a target sequence (e.g., chromosome 21) may
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/U52007/003209
`
`be simply quantified as binary (O, 1) or simple multiples, 2, 3, etc. The primary example of a
`
`technique that can be used to yield such “digital” results is “digital PCR,” which allows efficient
`
`amplification from single molecules, followed by subsequent quantitative analysis. Digital PCR,
`as the term is used here, refers to a quantitative, limited dilution of a nucleic acid sample, such as
`
`into multiwell plates, then the amplification of a nucleic acid molecule in a well, which due to
`
`the dilution, should be either 0 or 1 molecule. Digital PCR using multiwell plates has been used
`
`previously to detect rare mutations by either serial analysis of single molecule (i.e., clonal)
`
`amplicons (Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999 Aug 3; 96 (16): 9236-
`
`41) or by enhancing the sensitivity of differential amplification
`
`(http://www.fluidigm.com/didIFC.htm). Described below is an invention whereby digital PCR
`
`can be applied to noninvasive fetal diagnostics in order to detect fetal mutations with specificity
`
`and sensitivity beyond what is possible with conventional PCR analysis.
`
`Furthermore, as also described in connection with the invention described below, digital
`
`PCR can be used to detect aneuploidy, such as the trisomy that causes Down Syndrome. Since
`
`aneuploidies do not present a mutational change in sequence, and are merely a change in the
`
`number of chromosomes, it has not been possible to detect them in a fetus without resorting to
`
`invasive techniques such as amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling (Science 309, 2 September
`
`2005 pp. 1476-8).
`
`Another form of digital PCR has been described as emulsion PCR, which has been used
`
`to prepare small beads with clonally amplified DNA — in essence, each bead contains one
`
`amplicon of digital PCR. (Dressman et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJOO, 8817 (Jul 22, 2003)).
`
`Another form of Digital PCR can be carried out using microfluidics. In this embodiment,
`
`described below, DNA is diluted and separated into small, discrete samples for forming reaction
`
`samples by a series of channels and valves.
`
`An example of a suitable method for single molecule analysis that may be adapted to the
`
`present methods is given in Braslavsky et al., “Sequence information can be obtained from single
`
`DNA molecules, Proc. Nat. Acaa’. Sci. 100(7): 39606964 (2003), which uses sequential
`
`incorporation of labeled nucleotides onto an immobilized single stranded DNA template and
`
`monitoring by fluorescent microscopy.
`
`Another aspect of the relevant art involves sample preparation in order to carry out the
`
`present processes. That is, the fetal DNA may be enriched relative to maternal DNA. Chan, et
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`31., “Size Distribution of Maternal and Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma,” Clin. Chem. 50(1): 88—
`
`92 (2004) reports that plasma DNA molecules are mainly short DNA fragments. The DNA
`fragments in the plasma of pregnant women are significantly longer than DNA fragments from
`
`non-pregnant women, and longer than fetal DNA.
`
`Related Publications and Patents
`
`Vogelstein et 211., “Digital Amplification,” US 6,440,705, issued Aug. 27, 2002, discloses
`
`the identification of pre—defined mutations expected to be present in a minor fraction of a cell
`
`population.
`
`Lo, “Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma: Biology and Diagnostic Applications,” Clin. Chem.
`
`10
`
`46: 1903-1906 (2000) discloses the demonstration of fetal DNA in maternal plasma. The authors
`
`found a mean fractional level of 3.4% fetal DNA in maternal DNA in plasma during early
`
`pregnancy. The authors report detection of the RID gene and microsatellite polymorphisms in
`
`the plasma of pregnant women.
`
`Li et 9.1., “Detection of Patemally Inherited Fetal Point Mutations for B-Thalassemia
`
`15
`
`Using Size Fractionated Cell-Free DNA in Maternal Plasma,” J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 293:843-849
`
`2O
`
`25
`
`(Feb. 16, 2005) discloses that the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma has proven
`
`to be remarkably reliable for the assessment of fetal loci absent from the maternal genome, such
`
`as Y-chromosome specific sequences or the RhD gene in pregnant women who are Rh-negative.
`
`The authors report on the extraction and size fractionation of maternal plasma DNA using
`
`agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, peptide—nucleic acids (PNA) were used to bind specifically to
`a maternal allele to suppress PCR amplification of the of the wild type maternal allele, thereby
`
`enriching for the presence of paternally inherited mutant sequences. Four distinct point
`
`mutations in the B-globin gene were examined. It was found that the PNA step was necessary for
`
`the detection of mutant alleles using allele specific PCR.
`
`Lo et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma and Serum:
`
`Implications for Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis,” Am. .1 Hum. Genet. 62:768—775 (1998)
`
`discloses a real-time quantitative PCR assay to measure the concentration of fetal DNA in
`
`maternal plasma and serum. The authors found a mean of 25.4 genome equivalents/ml of fetal
`
`DNA in early pregnancy. This corresponds to about 3.4% of total DNA in early pregnancy.
`
`30
`
`Chan et al., “Size Distribution of Maternal and Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma,” Clin.
`
`Chem. 50:89-92 (Jan. 2004) investigated the size distribution of plasma DNA in non-pregnant
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/U52007/003209
`
`women and pregnant women, using a' panel of quantitative PCR assays with different amplicon
`
`sizes targeting the leptz'n gene. They found that the DNA fragments in the plasma of pregnant
`
`women are significantly longer than those in the plasma of non—pregnant women, and the
`
`maternal—derived DNA molecules are longer than the fetal-derived ones.
`
`Tufan et 111., “Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA from Maternal Plasma and Serum Using a
`
`Conventional Multiplex PCR: Factors Influencing Success," Turk. J. Med. Sci. 35: 85—92 (2005)
`
`compared the success rates of two different DNA extraction techniques, the heat based direct
`
`method and the QIAMP DNA blood mini kit method. The crucial role of PCR optimization was
`
`also reported. The authors used the DYSl4 marker for the Y chromosome and the GAPH gene
`
`10
`
`for a control. The QIAMP mini kit was found to give the best results in sex determination
`
`analysis using multiplex PCR and ethidium bromide staining on gels.
`
`Hromadnikova et 211., “Quantitative analysis of DNA levels in maternal plasma in normal
`
`and Down Syndrome pregnancies,” BJWC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2(4): 1-5 (2002),
`
`investigated total DNA levels in maternal plasma and found no difference in fetal DNA levels
`between the patients carrying Down Syndrome fetuses and the controls. Real time quantitative
`
`15
`
`PCR analysis was performed using primers to the B-globin gene and the SRY locus.
`
`Grundevikk and Rosen, “Molecular Diagnosis of Aneuploidies,” published on line at
`
`http://www.molbiotech.chalmers.se/research/ml</mbtk/Molecular%20diagnostics%20ot%20aneu
`
`ploidies%20-%20rapport.pdf, suggests that non-invasive methods for detection of aneuploidies
`
`(such as Down Syndrome, Edwards Syndrome or extra sex chromosomes) may be carried out on
`
`fetal nucleated cells isolated from maternal blood. In their review, the authors also describe
`
`quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), based on amplification of short
`
`tandem repeats Specific for the chromosome to be tested._ They describe tests where DNA was
`
`amplified from amniotic or chorionic villus samples. The authors suggest that the STR markers
`
`will give PCR products of different size, and these size differences may be studied by analyzing
`
`peak sizes in electrophoresis. It is also proposed that quantitative real time PCR may be used to
`
`diagnose Down Syndrome by comparing the amount of a gene located on chromosome 12 to the
`
`amount of a gene located on another autosomal chromosome. If the ratio of these two genes is
`
`1:1, the fetus is normal, but if the ratio of these genes is 3:2, it indicates Down Syndrome. The
`
`authors propose the use of Down Syndrome marker DSCR3. They also suggest that the
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`housekeeping gene GAPDH on chromosome 12 can be used as a reference.
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`Poon et al., “Differential DNA Methylation between Fetus and Mother as a Strategy for
`
`Detecting Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma,” Clin. Chem. 48(1): 35-41 discloses the detection of
`
`genes or mutations in a fetus where the same mutation or condition is also present in maternal
`
`DNA. That is, the use of fetal DNA in maternal plasma is limited due to the low amount of fetal
`
`DNA compared to maternal DNA. The authors overcame this limitation by detecting the IGF2-
`
`H19 locus, which is maintained in a methylated DNA status in the paternal allele and is
`
`unmethylated in the maternal allele. The authors used a bisulfite modification kit whereby
`
`unmethylated cytosine residues were converted to uracil. The sequence difference between
`
`methylated and unmethylated DNA sequences could be distinguished with different PCR
`
`10
`
`primers. DNA extracted from buffy coat was used.
`
`Science 309:1476 (2 Sept. 2005) News Focus “An Earlier Look at Baby’s Genes”
`
`describes attempts to develop tests for Down Syndrome using maternal blood. Early attempts to
`
`detect Down Syndrome using fetal cells from maternal blood were called “just modestly
`encouraging.” The report also describes work by Dennis L0 to detect the Rh gene in a. fetus
`
`15
`
`where it is absent in the mother. Other mutations passed on from the father have reportedly been
`
`detected as well, such as cystic fibrosis, beta—thalassemia, a type of dwarfism and Huntington’s
`
`disease. However, these results have not always been reproducible.
`
`United States Patent Application 20040137470 to Dhallan, Ravinder S, published July
`
`20
`
`25
`
`15, 2004, entitled “Methods for detection of genetic disorders,“ describes a method for detecting
`
`genetic disorders using PCR of known template DNA and restriction analysis. Also described is
`
`an enrichment procedure for fetal DNA. It also describes a method used to detect mutations, and
`
`chromosomal abnormalities including but not limited to translocation, transversion, monosomy,
`
`trisomy, and other aneuploidies, deletion, addition, amplification, fragment, translocation, and
`
`rearrangement. Numerous abnormalities can be detected simultaneously. The method is said to
`
`provide a non—invasive method to determine the sequence of fetal DNA from a tissue, such as
`
`blood, drawn from a pregnant female, and a method for isolating free nucleic acid from a sample
`
`containing nucleic acid.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The following brief summary is not intended to include all features and aspects of the
`
`30
`
`present invention, nor does it imply that the invention must include all features and aspects
`
`discussed in this summary.
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`Briefly, the present invention is directed to a method of differential detection of target
`
`sequences in a mixture of maternal and fetal genetic material. One obtains maternal tissue
`
`containing both maternal and fetal genetic material. Preferably, the maternal tissue is maternal
`
`peripheral blood or blood plasma. The term “plasma” may include plasma or serum. The genetic
`
`material may be genomic DNA or RNA, preferably mRNA. In the case of mRNA, one may
`
`choose target sequences corresponding to genes that are highly expressed in the placenta for fetal
`
`genetic material. The genetic material (e.g., DNA) in each reaction sample is detected with a
`sequence specific reactant directed teat least one oftwo target sequences in the genetic material
`to obtain a detectible reaction product if the target sequence is present in the reaction sample. For
`
`example, a probe specific to chromosome 21 is bound to the reaction sample, along with a
`
`control probe specific to another chromosome. In most cases, the results will be from maternal
`
`DNA, but a small number of results will be obtained from fetal DNA. In order to distinguish
`
`random variation from fetal results, a large number of reactions are run, and statistical methods
`are‘applied to the results. The labeling and detection in the present method is used to distinguish
`
`the presence or absence of a single target sequence, referred to as “digital analysis,” although it
`
`may be performed with sensitive nucleic acid detection methods which distinguish between one
`
`and more than one target sequence in a discrete sample. Many fluorescent techniques have this
`
`sensitivity. The target sequences are chosen so that a maternal sequence and a fetal sequence are
`
`distinguishable, such as two copies of a maternal sequence versus two copies of a fetal sequence.
`
`The genetic material thus obtained is distributed into discrete samples, where each
`
`sample will contain, on average not more than about one target sequence per sample. The
`
`average of one target sequence means that, for practical reasons, the sample will contain,
`
`preferably 0.1 to 0.8 genome equivalents per discrete sample, ideally 0.5 genome equivalent per
`
`sample. The method may be performed with dilutions whereby more target sequences are
`
`detected in samples containing a trisomic or increased copy number of target sequence. That is,
`
`if one is analyzing chromosome 21, the mixture may be diluted such that, on average, one may
`
`detect two chromosomes present in a maternal DNA, and three chromosomes in a Down
`
`Syndrome fetal DNA. Alternatively, the method may be performed with dilutions whereby more
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`reaction samples are positive in this situation. The presence or absence of different target
`
`30
`
`sequences in the discrete samples is detected; and the results are analyzed whereby the number
`
`of results from the discrete samples will provide data sufficient to obtain results distinguishing
`
`different target sequences. In one aspect, the method involves an analysis of a trisomy. In this
`
`method, one of the different target sequences (e.g. chromosome 21) is diploid in maternal
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`genetic material and aneuploid in fetal genetic material and another of the different target
`
`sequences (e.g. chromosome 12) is diploid in both maternal and fetal genetic material.
`
`The discrete samples are in reaction samples where the target sequences can be analyzed.
`
`The reaction samples may be, for example, wells in a microtiter plate, aqueous phases in an
`
`emulsion, areas in an array surface, or reaction chambers in a microfluidic device. The reaction
`
`samples may be used for PCR analysis of the discrete samples. The discrete samples are
`
`contacted with a plurality of PCR primers, including at least one (or one forward and one
`
`reverse) primer directed specifically to a maternal control sequence, expected to be the same in
`
`both mother and fetus. PCR primers are also directed specifically to a fetal sequence, i.e. one
`
`which may be present in both mother and fetus, but is amplified or altered in the fetus. PCR
`
`amplification will allow detection of these two different sequences, and, according to the present
`
`method, there will be a differential in the case of an abnormal fetal target sequence. The PCR ~
`
`method may be (but is not necessarily) quantitative. Quantitative real time PCR, which includes
`
`hybridizing target sequences with a nucleic acid having a fluorescent label, may be used. A
`
`fluorescent probe hybridizing to the target sequence may also be used. A number of “digital
`
`PCR” protocols are known for this purpose, as well as bead—based or emulsion PCR. While
`
`florescent probes are readily available and may be used to provide sensitive results, e.g., in
`
`FRET combinations, other labeling techniques may be used.
`
`The number of discrete samples is chosen according to the results desired. In one aspect,
`
`it is preferred that a high degree of statistical significance is obtained, and the number of samples
`
`is at least about 10,000. In order to improve statistical confidence, it is preferable to employ
`
`large numbers of reactions, preferably between 500 and 100,000, more preferably between
`
`10,000 and 100,000 or more reactions, depending on the percentage of fetal DNA present in the
`
`mixture. The results to be obtained should be statistically significant for purposes of the analysis
`
`conducted, e.g. initial screening, primary diagnosis, etc. A commonly used measure of statistical
`
`significance when a highly significant result is desired is p< 0.01, Le, a 99% confidence interval
`
`based on a chi-square or t—test.
`
`However, as shown below, results can be obtained with less, e.g. on the order of about
`
`500 samples, placed in separate reaction samples. Fewer discrete samples may be analyzed
`
`where the genetic material is present in a higher concentration in the mixture. The mixture may
`
`be enriched for fetal genetic material. One method to enrich plasma DNA for fetal DNA is size
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`separation, whereby a preparation comprising only DNA fragments less than about 300 bp are
`
`used for measuring target sequences.
`
`A variety of genetic abnormalities may be detected according to the present method,
`
`including known alterations in one or more of the genes: CFTR, Factor VIII (F8 gene), beta
`
`globin, hemachromatosis, G6PD, neurofibromatosis, GAPDH, beta amyloid, and pyruvate
`
`kinase. The sequences and common mutations of these genes are known. Other genetic
`
`abnormalities may be detected, such as those involving a sequence which is deleted in a human
`
`chromosome, is moved in a translocation or inversion, or is duplicated in a chromosome
`
`duplication, wherein said sequence is characterized in a known genetic disorder in the fetal
`
`genetic material not present in the maternal genetic material. For example chromosome trisomies
`
`may include partial, mosaic, ring, l8, 14, I3, 8, 6, 4 etc. A listing of known abnormalities may
`be found in the OMIM Morbid map, http;//www.ncbi.nimningov/Omim/getmorbid.cgi.
`
`In general, the term “aneuploidy” is used to refer to the occurrence of one or more extra
`
`or missing chromosomes.
`
`In one aspect, the present method of differential detection of target sequences may
`
`involve direct sequencing of target sequences the genetic material. Single molecule sequencing,
`
`as is known, is further described below. The method may also comprise sequencing of amplified
`
`derivatives of the target sequences clones or amplicons of the genetic material. That is, a target
`
`sequence in a discrete sample is amplified by PCR, i.e. as an amplicon, or cloned into a vector
`
`that is grown up and thereby amplified by obtaining multiple copies of the vector insert.
`
`In another aspect,‘the present invention comprises materials selected and combined for
`
`carrying out the present methods. Thus is provided a kit for differential detection of target
`
`sequences in maternal and fetal DNA in a mixed DNA sample, comprising primers specific for a
`
`genetically abnormal sequence and a control sequence, such as two chromosomes, one of which
`
`is possibly aneuploid and one of which is presumed diploid; a PCR reaction buffer for forming a
`
`PCR reaction sample with the primers in a device having separate reaction samples; and a size
`
`separation medium for separating the DNA sample into a fraction having less than about 1000
`
`bp. The size separation medium may be gel or centrifugation material for recovering smaller
`
`DNA fragments and thus enriching fetal DNA. The kit may further comprise a pair of primers
`
`specific to chromosome 21. The kit may filrther comprise the device having separate reaction
`
`samples for discrete samples. The device may be a microfluidic device or a microtiter plate
`
`having at least 1,000 discrete reaction samples.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of the present analytical method, showing distribution
`
`of genetic material into compartments (1 A), chromosome peaks of different height (1 B), and
`
`statistical analysis of chromosomes (IC);
`
`Figure 2 is a photograph of a microfluidic chip having 12 panels (numbered 1~12)
`
`containing DNA with chromosome 21 labeled;
`
`Figure 3 is a photograph of a microfluidic chip having 12 panels (numbered 1~12)
`
`containing DNA with chromosome 12 labeled; and
`
`Figure 4 is a graph showing results from experiments done using digital analysis of
`
`10
`
`mixed normal and trisomic (Down Syndrome, trisomy 21) DNA.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
`
`Outline
`
`I. Overview
`
`II. Description of Steps
`
`15
`
`A. Tissue Preparation
`
`B. Distribution of DNA molecules
`
`C. Detection and Quantification
`
`1. Digital PCR Methods
`
`2. Bead emulsion PCR
`
`20
`
`3. Microfluidic Dilution with PCR
`
`4. Single molecule detection and/or sequencing
`
`D. Quantitative evaluation
`
`III. Specific applications
`
`A. Preparation for tn'somy with frequency analysis.
`
`25
`
`B Sample Protocol
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`IV. Examples
`
`1. Overview
`
`The methods and materials described below apply techniques for analyzing numerous
`
`nucleic acids contained in a tissue sample (preferably serum or, more preferably, plasma)
`
`containing a mixture of DNA from both the mother and the fetus, and allowing detection of
`
`small but statistically significant differences.
`
`The present invention involves the analysis of maternal blood for a genetic condition,
`
`wherein the mixed fetal and maternal DNA in the maternal blood is analyzed to distinguish a
`
`fetal mutation or genetic abnormality from the background of the maternal DNA. It has been
`
`found that, using a combination of steps, a DNA sample containing DNA from both the mother
`
`and the fetus can be analyzed to distinguish a genetic condition present in a minor fraction of the
`
`DNA, which represents the fetal DNA. The method employs “digital analysis,” in which the
`
`DNA in the sample is isolated to a nominal single target molecule in a small reaction volume.
`
`Each sample mixture has a possibility of having distributed in it less than 1 target (i.e., 0 target)
`
`or more than one target. Next, the target molecules are detected in each reaction well, preferably
`
`as target sequences which are amplified, which may include a quantization of starting copy
`
`number of the target sequence, that is, 0, l, 2, 3, etc. A control sequence is used to distinguish an
`
`abnormal increase in the target sequence, e.g., a trisonomy. Thus there is a differential detection
`
`of target sequences, one of which is chosen to represent a normal genotype present in both
`
`mother and offspring, and one of which is chosen for detection of an abnormal genotype in the
`
`offspring, where the target sequence in the offspring will be different from that of the mother,
`
`e.g. in trisomy.
`
`Fig. 1A illustrates an embodiment where quantitative detection, e.g. quantitative real time
`
`PCR, is used. Blood 10 is processed to obtain plasma DNA 12, which is diluted and distributed
`
`into aliquots 14. These are added to reactions wells 1A through 5D. Shown in the wells are
`
`targets representing chromosomes 21 and 22. In well 2A, no target DNA is found; some wells
`
`(not shown) may have excess DNA. In well BB, fetal DNA having trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome)
`
`is found. The remainder of the wells contains maternal DNA. The DNA is amplified and/or
`
`labeled and a quantitative readout is obtained, as shown at 16. Peak 18 representing well 3B will
`
`be 50% higher than the peaks from the other well, or the peaks from a reference sequence on
`
`chromosome 22. Well A2, lacking either 21 or 22, will have no peak. The peaks are shown at 20.
`
`A single run will have numerous random variations, such as wells that have no target sequence,
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2O
`
`25
`
`30
`
`10
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`or have duplication through sample variability. Also, samples with no target will clearly result in
`
`no peak at all; wells with two or more targets, will give peaks significantly higher than peak 18,
`
`i.e., 2X or 2.5 X controls. These results are distinguished by running a multitude of reactions,
`
`folIOWed by statistical analysis that can discriminate random variations from true results.
`
`Fig. IC illustrates an embodiment where the DNA is distributed in a more dilute fashion
`
`(less than 1, or about one half genome equivalents per well). In this case chromosome 21 labels
`
`(primers) will generate more positives than chromosome 22 (a diploid chromosome) specific
`
`labels (e.g., primers) due simply to the slightly greater abundance of chromosome 21 in a
`
`trisomy-containing sample. As shown, some wells will contain positives 20 for both
`
`chromosomes, some will contain negatives 22 for both chromosomes, but some will contain
`
`blanks 24 for the diploid chromosome and peaks for the trisomic chromosome, due to its greater
`
`abundance. The data from a higher peak 18 is not used in this mode. As explained below, this
`
`slight difference can be made statistically significant by examining a large number of wells, and
`
`by the sensitivity of the present method to a single molecule.
`
`Thus, the present method comprises generally the following steps:
`
`1. Obtaining a tissue containing DNA from a pregnant subject, which DNA is known to have
`
`about 3% fetal DNA. This material is preferably drawn blood, and the circulating DNA is found
`
`in the blood plasma, rather than in cells. The blood or plasma may optionally be enriched for
`
`fetal DNA by known methods, such as size fractionation to select for DNA fragments less than
`
`about 300 bp. Alternatively, maternal DNA, which tends to be larger than about 500 bp may be
`
`excluded. Another enrichment step may be to treat the blood sample with formaldehyde, as
`
`described in Dhallan et a1. “Methods to Increase the Percentage of Free Fetal DNA Recovered
`
`From the Maternal Circulation,” J.Arn. Med. Soc. 291(9): 1114-] 119 (March 2004).
`
`2. Distributing single DNA molecules fiom this sample to a number of discrete reaction samples,
`
`where the number of reaction samples is selected to give a statistically significant result for the
`
`number of copies of a target in the DNA molecules. Further, the reaction sample is confined to a
`
`small volume to bring the reaction molecules into close approximation. The amount of DNA
`
`molecule per reaction sample is preferably on the order of one copy of the chromosome of
`
`interest equivalent per reaction sample.
`
`3. Detecting the presence of the target in the DNA in a large number of reaction samples,
`
`preferably with a sequence specific technique such as highly multiplexed short read sequencing
`
`10
`
`‘15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`ll
`
`
`
`WO 2007/092473
`
`PCT/US2007/003209
`
`or a PCR reaction wherein the PCR product is labeled to give a convenient quantitative read out.
`
`The detection step is referred to here as “digital PCR” and may be carried out by a variety of
`
`methods, such as (a) by PCR on samples diluted into individual wells of a microtiter plate; (b)
`
`PCR on samples diluted into emulsions containing primers immobilized to beads; or (0) PCR on
`
`samples trapped in a microfluidic chamber; and
`
`4. Quantitative analysis of the detection of the maternal and fetal target seguences. In some cases
`
`this may include targets to different regions, such as probes to a target on a chromosome
`
`suspected of being present in an abnormal copy number (tn'sonomy) compared to a normal
`
`diploid

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site