throbber
TRADEMARK
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advisedthat a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`on the following
`X Patents or
`C} Trademarks:
`
`DOCKET NO.
`CV 12-04498 NC
`PLAINTIFF
`ASETEK HOLDINGS INC
`
`DATE FILED
`8/27/12
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16" Floor San Francisco, CA 94102
`DEFENDANT
`COOLIT SYSTEMS INC
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`[-] Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`CJ Answer
`
`LC Cross Bill
`
`(.) Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK Richard W. Wieking
`
`ESO
`eo
`eo
`eo
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Commissioner
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Alfred Amistoso
`
`August 28, 2012
`
`

`

`
`
`a
`
`ace
`
`LUNA ADT ATAIT CAD DATCATT IFATOCDIAIMlCALACAIT
`
`Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
`robert.mccauley @finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Tel: (650) 849-6600
`Fax: (650) 849-6666
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC.
`and ASETEK A/S
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`Cc
`
`NORTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`A2o.49 8
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`ASETEK HOLDINGS,INC. and ASETEK Se
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`COOLIT SYSTEMSINC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`AANLZ SEIT 1 Mmmm
`
`ao
`
`OAaHDNN
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`COMES NOWPlaintiffs Asetek A/S (“Asetek”) and Asetek Holdings, Inc., by and through
`
`their attorneys, and for their Complaint against CoolIT SystemsInc. (““CoolIT”or “Defendant’),
`
`state as follows:
`
`Nature of the Action
`
`1. This Complaint seeks judgment that CoolIT has infringed and continuesto infringe Asetek’s
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362 (“the ’362 patent”) and 8,245,764 (“the ’764 patent”) (collectively, “the
`
`Patents-in-Suit”). The Patents-in-Suit relate to a cooling system and cooling method for a computer
`
`system. A true and accurate copy of the ’362 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A true and
`
`accurate copy of the ’764 patentis attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`The Parties
`
`2. Plaintiff Asetek Holdings, Inc. is organized and exists under the laws of Delaware. Asetek
`
`Holdings, Inc.’s principal place of business is 5285 Hellyer Avenue, Suite 110, San Jose, California
`
`OoCO4DRWA£F
`
`10
`
`il
`
`12
`
`13
`
`95138.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`3. Plaintiff Asetek is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Denmark, and has
`
`its principal place of business at Saltumvej 27, DK-9700 Broenderslev, Denmark. Asetek is the
`
`ownerof the Patents-in-Suit, and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Asetek Holdings, Inc.
`
`4, Upon information and belief, Defendant CoolIT is a corporation operating and existing under
`
`the laws of Canada with its principal place of business at 3920 29th Street NE, Calgary, Alberta,
`
`Canada T1LY 6B6.
`
`Jurisdiction
`
`5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
`
`and 1338(a), and underthe patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq.
`
`6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over CoolIT because CoolIT infringes the Patents-in-
`
`Suit in the United States, in California, and in this judicial district. CoolIT maintains a website via
`
`which it promotes andoffersto sell its infringing products to customers, including customers in the
`
`United States, in California, and in this judicial district. Among other things, upon information and
`
`belief, CoolIT offers to sell and sells its infringing products to Corsair Components,Inc. and Corsair
`
`Memory,Inc.(collectively “Corsair’) for importation, promotion,sales, and distribution to end users
`
`2905517 1 HWOCYK
`
`1
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`

`

`throughout the United States, including in California and in this judicial district. Corsair’s principal
`
`place of business is in Fremont, California, in this judicial district. CoolIT’s website identifies
`
`Corsair as a “proud retailer of CoolIT’s liquid cooling solutions.” CoolIT further identifies Corsair
`
`as a “retail partner” on its website, and furtherstates that “[d]ue to our partnership with Corsair for
`
`the retail market, please visit the Corsair website for any direct retail sales inquiries.” Upon
`
`information and belief, Coollt has entered into one or more contracts with Corsair for this
`
`“partnership” and the promotion, importation,offers for sale, sale, and distribution of CoolIT
`
`products, including products that infringe the Patent-in-Suit, to end users in the United States
`
`(including California and this judicial district). Upon information and belief, CoolIT derives
`
`substantial revenue from its sales of infringing products to Corsair in California and this judicial
`
`district, and CoolIT purposefully availsitself of the privilege of conducting activities in California,
`
`thus invoking the benefits and protections of the laws of California.
`
`Facts
`
`7. Asetek is the world leading provider of CPU and GPUliquid cooling systems for thermal and
`
`acoustic management. Asetek’s solutions are used by leading OEMsservicing the gaming,
`
`workstation and performance PC markets. In 2006, the company madea strategic decision to shift
`
`its focus to providing water-based cooling solutions for the OEM market and introducedthefirst
`
`fully assembled, factory sealed liquid cooling system.
`
`In addition to being designed for
`
`manufacturing and providing up to 50,000 hours of maintenance-free operation, Asetek shattered
`
`liquid cooling’s price barriers. Asetek is now the vendorof choice for CPU cooling in factory
`
`overclocked gaming systems, serving Dell Alienware, Acer and multiple leading gaming system
`
`providers.
`
`8. Asetek is also active in the workstation market, supplying liquid cooling for HP’s Z400 and
`
`Z800 workstations and several tier 2 workstation suppliers. “Quiet computing”andreliability are
`
`the principle drivers for superior thermal managementwithin the workstation market. Liquid
`
`cooling delivers both by moving heatto a location where it can be exhausted directly from the
`
`chassis using modestair flow velocities, reducing internal chassis temperatures and lowering system
`
`oO©SFDBNH&
`
`10
`
`{1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`noise.
`
`3908517 1NaoCcCKX
`
`ty
`
`COMPT AINT ROR PATENT INERINGEMENT
`
`

`

`9. Asetek is addressing the server market with its new low profile integrated pump and cold
`
`plate CPU cooler. The low profile pumpis sized perfectly to fit in 1U rack servers. The company’s
`
`heat exchanger technologyfor servers is derived from solutions the company has developedforall-
`
`in-one and notebook PCs. Within the server market the key benefits of water-based cooling are
`
`enabling increased thermal density and energy savings.
`
`10. CoolIT identifies itself a “leading supplier of reliable and customizable liquid cooling
`
`solutions for computers.” CoolIT touts its liquid cooling solutions for computers by stating onits
`
`website (www.coolitsystems.com), amongotherthings, that:
`
`If you are integrating liquid cooling into your systemstoday or are looking to do so soon,
`CoolIT offers customizable solutions that fit your specific requirements.
`
`The Future ofEnterprise Cooling
`
`Liquid cooling has recently become a requirement of high-end desktop processors with the
`launch of the Intel® Core™17-3900series. ...
`
`. offers a compelling alternative with the ECO II series self-contained
`.
`CoolIT Systems .
`liquid coolers. ECO II was designed from the ground up to be the highest performanceliquid
`
`solution available with a design featuring thoughtful touches to make integration easier and
`
`11. Upon information and belief, CoolIT is an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and
`
`manufacturesat least the H60, H80, and H100 liquid cooling products that infringe the Patents-in-
`
`Suit. Upon information and belief, CoolIT offers to sell and sells at least the H60, H80, and H100
`
`productsto, at least, Corsair in the United States, and Corsair then offers to sell and sells them to end
`
`users in the United States, in California, and in this judicial district. Upon information andbelief,
`
`CoollT’s claimed “partner” Corsair has demonstrated these CoolIT products at trade shows within
`
`the United States, and has sent out product samples to potential customers within the United States.
`
`Upon information and belief, CoolIT is also offering to sell andis selling cooling products that
`
`infringe the Patents-in-Suit to additional resellers in the United States, who thenoffer to sell andsell
`
`them to end in the United States.
`
`—_=oCfeSNDBDOeF&FWDWL
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2905517 1NOCYK
`
`q
`
`COMPT AINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`

`

`COUNT I
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`
`12. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs | through
`
`11 of this Complaint as if fully set forth and restated herein.
`
`13. The ’362 patent entitled “Cooling System for a Computer System” was duly andlegally
`
`issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) on August 14, 2012. Asetek is the
`
`sole and exclusive ownerofthe ’362 patent. CoolIT, without authority or consent of Asetek, has
`
`been and continuesto offer to sell and sell in the United States products that infringe the ’362 patent,
`
`including but not limited to the H60, H80, and H100 cooling products. Coollt has directly infringed
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`and continuesto directly infringe the ’362 patent.
`
`14. At least as of the date of this complaint, CoolIT has knowledge of the 362 patent and, upon
`
`information andbelief, has induced and continues to induce direct infringementof the ’362 patent by
`
`aiding and abetting infringement by customers in the United States, including butnot limited to
`
`customers of the H60, H80, and H100 cooling products. CoolIT has intentionally taken action that
`
`has actually induced and continues to induce direct infringement by customers in the United States,
`
`and has knownthatthe acts it has been and is causing infringe the ’362 patent. These acts include,
`
`but are not limited to, CoolIT’s promotion on its website and its partnership with Corsair for the
`
`promotion, offers to sell, and sales of H60, H80, and H100 cooling products in the United States.
`
`15. At least as of the date of this complaint, CoolIT has knowledgeof the °362 patent and has
`
`contributed and continues to contribute to direct infringementof the ’362 patent by supplying an
`
`important (material) componentof the infringing products and method to customersin the United
`
`States, including but not limited to the H60, H80, and H100 cooling products, which are not a
`
`common components suitable for non-infringing use. CoolIT supplies the components with
`
`knowledgeof the *362 patent and knowledge that the components were especially made or adapted
`
`for use in an infringing manner, and that customers and end users directly infringe the °362 patent in
`
`26
`
`the United States.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`16. CoollIT’s infringement of the ’362 patent has caused and continues to cause damages and
`
`irreparable harm to Plaintiffs.
`
`3905517 1pDOCX
`
`A
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`

`

`WwNHNRe
`
`OoCONNDBWnFS
`
`COUNT II
`
`Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8.245.764
`
`17. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs | through
`
`16 of its Complaintas if fully set forth and restated herein.
`
`18. The ’764 patent entitled “Cooling System for a Computer System” was duly and legally
`
`issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) on August 21, 2012. Asetek is the
`
`sole and exclusive ownerof the ’764 patent. CoolIT, without authority or consent of Asetek, has
`
`been and continuesto offer to sell and sell in the United States products that infringe the ’764 patent,
`
`including but not limited to the H60, H80, and H100 cooling products. Coollt has directly infringed
`
`and continuesto directly infringe the ’764 patent.
`
`19. At least as of the date of this complaint, CoolIT has knowledge of the ’764 patent and, upon
`
`information and belief, has induced and continues to induce direct infringement of the ’764 patent by
`
`aiding and abetting infringement by customers in the United States, including butnot limited to
`
`customers of the H60, H80, and H100 cooling products. CoolIT has intentionally taken action that
`
`has actually induced and continuesto induce direct infringement by customers and endusers in the
`
`United States, and has knownthatthe acts it has been causing would infringe the ’764 patent. These
`
`acts include, but are not limited to, CoolIT’s promotion on its website and its partnership with
`
`Corsair for the promotion,offers to sell, and sales of H60, H80, and H100 cooling products to
`
`customers and end users in the United States.
`
`20. At least as of the date of this complaint, CoolIT has knowledge of the ’764 patent and has
`
`contributed and continues to contribute to direct infringementof the ’764 patent by supplying an
`
`important (material) componentof the infringing products and method to customers and end users in
`
`the United States, including but not limited to the H60, H80, and H100 cooling products, which are
`
`not a common componentssuitable for non-infringing use. CoolIT supplies the components with
`
`knowledge of the ’764 patent and knowledge that the components were especially made or adapted
`
`for use in an infringing manner, and that customers and endusers directly infringe the ’764 patent in
`
`the United States.
`
`3905517 1DOCK
`
`&
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`

`

`21. CoolIT’s infringement of the ’764 patent has caused and continues to cause damages and
`
`irreparable harm to Plaintiffs.
`
`PRAYER
`
`WHEREFORE,Plaintiffs respectfully pray that the Court enter judgmentin their favor and
`
`award the followingrelief against CoolIT:
`
`A.
`
`A judgmentin favorof Plaintiffs that CoolIT has infringed,directly, contributorily,
`
`and by inducement, the Patents-in-Suit;
`
`B.
`
`Preliminarily and permanently enjoin CoolIT andits officers, directors, employees,
`
`agents, licensees, representatives, affiliates, related companies, servants, successors and assigns, and
`
`any and all persons acting in privity or in concert with any of them, from further infringing upon the
`
`Patents-in-Suit;
`
`C.
`
`AwardPlaintiffs actual damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, in an amountto be
`
`determinedattrial, as a result of CoolIT’s infringement of the Patents-in-Suit;
`
`D.
`
`Find this to be an exceptional case and award Plaintiffs their costs and attorney’s fees
`
`under 28 U.S.C. § 285; and
`
`E.
`
`Award andgrant Plaintiffs such other and furtherrelief as the Court deems just and
`
`proper underthe circumstances.
`
`Plaintiffs demanda jurytrial on all matters triable to a jury.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Dated: August 27, 2012
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`py (bd 17
`
`Robert F. McCauley
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc.
`
`AANKEIFT 1THOCyv
`
`L
`
`CHOVIAADT AINIT EAD DATENIT INIEGRINCECACNT
`
`oOoSNTONH
`
`‘oO
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket