`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
` FILING DATE
`
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`CONFIRMATIONNO.
`
`
`13/269,234
`
`10/07/2011
`
`André Sloth ERIKSEN
`
`10494.0003-01000
`
`1954
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER
`LLP
`901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW
`WASHINGTON,DC 20001-4413
`
`DUKE, EMMANUEL E
`
`3784
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`04/05/2012
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`
`
` ; . ; 13/269,234 ERIKSEN, ANDR LOTH
`
`Applicant-initiated Interview Summary
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`
`
`
`EMMANUEL DUKE
`
`3784
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) EMMANUEL DUKE.
`
`(2) FRANTZ JULES (SPE)
`
`.
`
`Date of Interview: 03/29/2012.
`
`(3)BlJU CHANDRAN,Esq., (Reg. No. 63,684).
`
`(4)
`
`.
`
`Type:
`
`[] Video Conference
`[X] Telephonic
`[-] Personal[copy given to: [J applicant
`
`[X] applicant’s representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`[L] Yes
`
`XX] No.
`
`[J101 [1112 [102 (103 (XoOthers
`Issues Discussed
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 12 and 17.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: Tomioka.
`
`Substanceof Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics may include: identification or clarification of a
`reference or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied referencesetc...)
`
`Applicant’s arguments that the pump chamber and the thermal chamber being separate chamber; and the pump
`chambervertically spaced apart from the thermal chamber was reviewed and found to be persuasive, and considered
`to be distinguished over the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Tomioka ‘432. When the
`Applicant files a proper response to the Office Action mailed 03/13/2012, a decision on patentability will be consider
`upon further consideration and search.
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substance of the interview. (See MPEP
`section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is given a non-extendable period of the longer of one month or
`thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this interview summary form, whichever is later, to file a statement of the substance of the
`interview
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substanceof any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of
`the substanceof an interview should include the itemslisted in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the
`general thrust of each argumentor issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the
`general results or outcomeofthe interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issuesraised.
`
`] Attachment
`/EMMANUEL DUKE/
`Examiner, Art Unit 3784
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`/Frantz F. Jules/
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3784
`
`
`
`PTOL-413 (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20120329
`
`

`

`Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), Section 713.04, Substance of Interview Must be Made of Record
`A complete written statement as to the substance of any face-to-face, video conference, or telephone interview with regard to an application must be madeof record in the
`application whether or not an agreement with the examiner was reachedat the interview.
`
`Summary of Record of Interview Requirements
`
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews
`Paragraph (b)
`
`In every instance where reconsideration is requested in view of an interview with an examiner, a complete written statement of the reasons presented at the interview as
`warranting favorable action must befiled by the applicant. An interview does not removethe necessity for reply to Office action as specified in §§ 1.111, 1.135. (35 U.S.C. 132)
`
`37 CFR §1.2 Businessto be transacted in writing.
`All business with the Patent or Trademark Office should be transacted in writing. The personal attendance of applicants or their attorneys or agents at the Patent and
`Trademark Office is unnecessary. The action of the Patent and Trademark Office will be based exclusively on the written record in the Office. No attention will be paid to
`any alleged oral promise, stipulation, or understanding in relation to which there is disagreement or doubt.
`
`The action of the Patent and Trademark Office cannot be based exclusively on the written record in the Office if that record is itself
`incomplete through the failure to record the substanceof interviews.
`It is the responsibility of the applicant or the attorney or agent to make the substanceof an interview of record in the applicationfile, unless
`the examiner indicates he or she will do so.
`It is the examiner's responsibility to see that such a record is made and to correct material inaccuracies
`which beardirectly on the question of patentability.
`
`Examiners must complete an Interview Summary Form for eachinterview held where a matter of substance has been discussed during the
`interview by checking the appropriate boxes andfilling in the blanks. Discussions regarding only procedural matters, directed solely to restriction
`requirements for which interview recordation is otherwise provided for in Section 812.01 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, or pointing
`out typographical errors or unreadable script in Office actions or the like, are excluded from the interview recordation procedures below. Where the
`substance of an interview is completely recorded in an Examiners Amendment, no separate Interview Summary Record is required.
`
`The Interview Summary Form shall be given an appropriate Paper No., placed in the right hand portionofthe file, and listed on the
`“Contents” section ofthe file wrapper.
`In a personalinterview, a duplicate of the Form is given to the applicant (or attorney or agent) at the
`conclusion of the interview.
`In the case of a telephoneor video-conferenceinterview, the copy is mailed to the applicant’s correspondence address
`either with or prior to the next official communication. If additional correspondencefrom the examineris not likely before an allowanceorif other
`circumstances dictate, the Form should be mailed promptly after the interview rather than with the next official communication.
`
`The Form provides for recordation of the following information:
`— Application Number (Series Code and Serial Number)
`—Name of applicant
`—Name of examiner
`— Date ofinterview
`— Type of interview (telephonic, video-conference, or personal)
`—Name of participant(s) (applicant, attorney or agent, examiner, other PTO personnel, etc.)
`—Anindication whether or not an exhibit was shown or a demonstration conducted
`—Anidentification of the specific prior art discussed
`— An indication whether an agreement was reachedandif so, a description of the general nature of the agreement (may be by
`attachmentof a copy of amendments or claims agreed as being allowable). Note: Agreementas to allowability is tentative and does
`not restrict further action by the examiner to the contrary.
`— The signature of the examiner who conductedthe interview (if Form is not an attachmentto a signed Office action)
`
`It is desirable that the examinerorally remind the applicant of his or her obligation to record the substance of the interview of each case. It
`should be noted, however, that the Interview Summary Form will not normally be considered a complete and proper recordation of the interview
`unlessit includes, or is supplemented by the applicant or the examiner to include, all of the applicable items required below concerning the
`substanceofthe interview.
`A complete and proper recordation of the substance of any interview should include at least the following applicable items:
`1) A brief description of the nature of any exhibit shown or any demonstration conducted,
`2) an identification of the claims discussed,
`8) an identification of the specific prior art discussed,
`4) an identification of the principal proposed amendmentsof a substantive nature discussed, unless these are already described on the
`Interview Summary Form completed by the Examiner,
`5) a brief identification of the general thrust of the principal arguments presented to the examiner,
`(The identification of arguments need not be lengthy or elaborate. A verbatim or highly detailed description of the argumentsis not
`required. The identification of the argumentsis sufficient if the general nature or thrust of the principal arguments made to the
`examiner can be understood in the context of the application file. Of course, the applicant may desire to emphasize and fully
`describe those arguments which he or she feels were or might be persuasive to the examiner.)
`6) a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed, and
`7) if appropriate, the general results or outcomeofthe interview unless already described in the Interview Summary Form completed by
`the examiner.
`Examiners are expected to carefully review the applicant’s record of the substanceofan interview.
`accurate, the examinerwill give the applicant an extendable one month time period to correct the record.
`
`If the record is not complete and
`
`Examiner to Check for Accuracy
`
`If the claims are allowable for other reasons of record, the examiner should send a letter setting forth the examiner’s version of the
`statementattributed to him or her.
`If the record is complete and accurate, the examiner should place the indication, “Interview Record OK” on the
`paper recording the substanceof the interview along with the date and the examiner'sinitials.
`
`