throbber
In Compliance with 35 § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court Northern District of California
`on the following
`§X_ Patents or
`CL] Trademarks:
`DOCKET NO.
`DATEFILED
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`CV 12-04498 NC
`8/27/12
`450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16" Floor San Francisco, CA 94102
`PLAINTIFF
`DEFENDANT
`
`ASETEK HOLDINGS INC
`COOLIT SYSTEMS INC
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`ecA
`Paw3ex[iP
`
`6,343,267|_«d|
`aa
`
` pO
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above-—entitled case, the following patent(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`] Answer
`
`[4 CrossBill
`
`C) Other Pleading
`
`[] Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`De
`ES(ee
`pe
`ER
`po
`
`
`
`August 28, 2012
`
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Stipulation and Order of Dismissal filed 2/9/2015
`
`Richard W. Wieking
`
`Alfred Amistoso
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Commissioner|Copy 3—Upon terminationof action, mail this copy to Commissioner
`Copy 2—Uponfiling documentadding patent(s), mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`

`

`Case3:12-cv-04498-EMC Document281 Filed02/09/15 Pagel of 3
`
`Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
`robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
`Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
`jeffrey. smyth@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Tel: (650) 849-6600
`Fax: (650) 849-6666
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS,
`INC. and ASETEK A/S
`
`COOLEY LLP
`HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
`(hkeefe@cooley.com)
`DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
`(dknauss@cooley.com)
`Five Palo Alto Square
`3000 El Camino Real
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
`Telephone:
`(650) 843-5000
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-7400
`
`DENNIS McCOOE
`(mccooe@blankrome.com)
`(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`BLANK ROME LLP
`One Logan Square
`130 North 18" Street
`Philadelphia. PA 19103
`Telephone:
`(215) 569-5580
`Facsimile:
`(215) 832-5580
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEKA/S,
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
`Defendants,
`
`Vv.
`
`COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,
`
`Defendant and
`Counterclaim Plaintiff.
`
` CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
`
`STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION
`WITH PREJUDICE;
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Judge: Hon, Edward M. Chen
`
`AFeWONO
`oOCONSDN
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
`
`

`

`Case3:12-cv-04498-EMC Document281 Filed02/09/15 Page2 of 3
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
`
`Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S (“‘Asetek”) and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff CoolIT
`
`Systems Inc., (“CoolIT”) stipulate that this action (i.e., all claims and counterclaims) is dismissed
`
`with prejudicein its entirety. Magistrate Judge Grewal, or in his absence, the Northern District of
`California, will retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the
`
`terms of which are incorporated herein by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees
`
`and costs.
`
`The parties further note for the record that the namedplaintiff “Asetek A/S” is currently
`
`known as Asetek Danmark A/S andthat references to “Asetek A/S”in this stipulation and proposed
`
`orderrefer to the corporate entity currently known as “Asetek Danmark A/S.”
`
`By his signature below, counsel for Asetek attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for
`
`CoollT concursin thefiling of this document.
`
`Dated: February 6, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`By:___/s/Robert F. McCauley
`Robert F. McCauley
`
`-
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
`Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S
`
`Dated: February 6, 2015
`
`COOLEY LLP
`
`By:___/s/Daniel J. Knauss
`Daniel J. Knauss
`Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
`CoolIT SystemsInc.
`
`ooSDWN&WwN
`
`‘oO
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`1]
`
`DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
`
`

`

`Case3:12-cv-04498-EMC Document281 Filed02/09/15 Page3 of 3
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`PURSUANTTO STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:
`
`This action(i.e., all claims and counterclaims) is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with
`
`Magistrate Judge Grewal, or in his absence, the Northern District of California, retaining jurisdiction
`
`to enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the terms of which are incorporated herein
`
`by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`9
`
`Dated: February 2015
`
`oOowsNN
`
`1
`
`DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket