throbber
FIN0008-DIV 1
`
`PATENT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re Application of
`
`David GRUZMAN,etal.
`
`Group Art Unit:
`
`2435
`
`Serial No.:
`
`—-12/814,584
`
`Filed:
`
`June 14, 2010
`
`Patent No.:
`
`8,141,154
`
`Examiner:
`
`Ponnoreay Pich
`
`Issued: March 20, 2012
`
`For:
`
`SYSTEM AND METHODFOR INSPECTING DYNAMICALLY GENERATED
`
`EXECUTABLE CODE
`
`PETITION TO ACCEPT UNINTENTIONALLY DELAYED CLAIM OF
`
`PRIORITY UNDER35 U.S.C. §120 FOR THE BENEFIT OF A
`PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION FILED UNDER37 C.F.R.§1.78(a)(3)
`
`Mail Stop OFFICE OF PETITIONS
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`DearSir:
`
`Assignee respectfully submits this Petition for acceptance of an unintentionally delayed
`
`claim ofpriority under 35 U.S.C. §120 for the benefit of a prior-filed application in the above-
`
`referenced patent. In conjunction with this Petition, Assignee submits an Amendmentto the
`
`Specification, and provides for paymentof the required fees under 37 C.F.R. §1.17(t) ($1,420).
`
`The Assigneeis also submitting a Request for Reconsideration of Certificate of Correction,
`
`whichwasoriginally filed on September 19, 2013, requesting correction of the priority
`
`information on the front of the patent and also the correction of the specification to include the
`
`priority information, and provides for paymentof the required fee under 37 C.F.R. §1.20(a)
`
`($100). The application as originally filed included the priority information on the Utility Patent
`
`Application Transmittal letter filed with the application on June 14, 2010. Further, the priority
`
`information is accurately reflected in the filing receipt mailed June 24, 2010.
`
`

`

`Serial No. 12/814,584
`
`Docket No. FIN0008-DIV1
`
`Assignee understandsthat a petition for acceptance of a claim for late priority under 37
`
`C.F.R. §1.78(a)(3) is only applicable to those applications filed on or after November 29, 2000
`
`and after the expiration of the period specified in 37 C.F.R. §1.78(a)(2)(ii). Assignee
`
`understandsthat the petition under 37 C.F.R. §1.78(a)(3) must be accompaniedby:
`
`(1)
`
`the reference required by 35 U.S.C. §120 and 37 C.F.R. §1.78(a)(2)() of the
`
`prior-filed application, unless previously submitted;
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`the surcharge set forth in 37 C.F.R. §1.17(t); and
`
`a statement that the entire delay between the date the claim was due under 37
`
`C.F.R. §1.78(a)(2)(i1) and the date the claim wasfiled was unintentional.
`
`The correction of the priority claim of the present patent is made to complete the priority
`
`claim to include a specific reference to benefit of U.S. Application Serial No. 11/298,475, filed
`
`December 12, 2005, now U.S. Patent No. 7,757,289, issued July 13, 2010, which claim wascited
`
`in the transmittal letter and filing receipt of this application/patent. This request is made after the
`
`expiration of the period specific in 37 C.F.R. §1.78(a)(2)(ii).
`
`In accordance with 35 U.S.C. §120 and 37 C.F.R. §1.78(a)(2)(i), the following
`
`amendmentto the specification of the present application which addsa referenceto the benefit of
`
`priority to U.S. Application Serial No. 11/298,475, filed December 12, 2005, now U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,757,289, is submitted in conjunction with this Petition in a separate amendmentfiled
`
`herewith:
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
`
`This application is a divisional of and claimspriority to U.S. Patent Application
`
`Serial No. 11/298.475, filed December 12, 2005, entitled “System and Method
`
`For Inspecting Dynamically Generated Executable Code,” now U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,757,289.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. §1.78(a)(2)(i), the amendmentidentifies the prior filed application
`
`by application numberandindicates the relationship of the application.
`
`It is submitted that the entire delay between the date the priority claim was due and the
`
`date that this petition with priority claim addedto the specification is filed was unintentional.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Serial No. 12/814,584
`
`Docket No. FIN0008-DIV1
`
`Paymentof $1,420 fee as required under 37 C.F.R. §1.17(t) and fee of $100 as required
`
`under 37 C.F.R. §1.20(a) is provided electronically via EFS-Web with this Petition. The
`
`Commissioneris authorized to charge any additional fees due to Deposit Account No. 50-6099.
`
`Assignee submits that this request, the amendmentto the specification, and the Request
`
`for Reconsideration of Certificate of Correction are diligently made to correct the record of the
`
`present application and accurately reflect the priority information on the face of United States
`
`Patent No. 8,141,154. Granting of this Petition is respectfully requested.
`
`Date: October 16, 2013
`
`By:
`
`/Dawn-Marie Bey — 44,442/
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Bey & Cotropia PLLC
`213 Bayly Court
`Richmond, VA 23229
`(804) 441-8530
`
`Dawn-Marie Bey (Reg. No. 44,442)
`Attorney for Assignee
`Finjan, Inc.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket