paint and lysozyme — Google Scholar
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`more v
`
`Sign in
`
` _ 12007
`
`include citations
`
`
`:‘3.\
`\\\.\
`
`..stripper(Nitromors). Multisystemdisorderafter‘exposureto paint These include:. .Multisystem
`disorder after exposure to paint stripper (Nitromors) Nitromors is a household and industrial
`paint stripper whose active ingredient is methylene chloride (CH2CI2).
`
`
`
`..Thus, we may deduce that, of the eleven carboxyl groups of the lysozyme molecule, one has
`pKint=—35, another one has pAi nt—:6 0, six have the normal pJTint value of 4.3, and the remaining
`three aretitratable only in the presenceofdenaturing agents but not in O.2 M KCI..p.Aint
`
`
`
`“..vvater by mechanically shaking the bac- terial suspension for two hours with pavement marking
`beads,4 type 510 800260, on a paint rejuvenator having...When lysozyme is added to normal
`cells of M. lysodeikticus (figure 1), the first effect seen is the fragmentation of the cell wall
`
`
`
`‘..(.1"5)ILysozyme was assayed spectrophotometrically(16,). catalase6 accor mg to the previously
`
`described method for cells, and lipase (steapsin) ac cording to Willstatter et al. (1 7). .on a paint
`rejuvenator having 620 oscillations min. with an arc of l1. in.
`
`
`
`..vv1th a dotof red fluorescent paint and the model viewed in ultravioletlightanexternal shell of
`red dots is seen to enclose the white bits com- pletely; this makes an exceedingly effective and
`nnfor-gettable demonstration of this general property of pro- teins. Lysozyme Model The..
`
`
`
`.uses as surface-active agents, associative thickeners in oil recovery, latex paint or as supports
`for enzyme immobilization. Hennink and his co--workers reported the synthesis of dextran- based
`hydrogels [7] and their interactions with proteins as. lgG [8 and 9], lysozyme [10] and..
`
`
`[CITATION].. S.tudies: The Effects of Cu20 Antifouling Paint and Coupling to a.
`N
`'1": .
`_
`.
`~
`v
`1. C1111\“ , Iv‘iH':1::L\..‘\‘,
`1.} O‘\ -- SSH ‘-
`
`
`, lipid-coated enzymes. method of producing such enzymes and antifouling paint:
`
`http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=paint+and+lysozyme&h1=en&as_sdt=80000...
`
`4/25/2010
`
`

`

`paint and lysozyme — Google Scholar
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`-\\
`‘
`1 --
`111111.1111.
`1:1.
`:
`1'31
`ESE?» ‘1‘ ~ 1-11111111.. 1--111111.111
`
`.15 TABLE 4 TABLE 6 ComparatIve Example \Fouling (°/o) Protease (.B subtilis) — — 8 — — 8
`Immersion period Comparative Example Lysozyme (chicken egg white) — — — — 4 — Laroflex
`MP-45a B0 B0 80 BO 30 B0(monthsu _BO 12 The antifouling paint-coated steel panels
`
`
`
`2..at 305 mfi of native lysozyme (O) and deacetylated lysozyme prepared fromthe lysozyme
`acetylated with 300-fold molar excess of NAI in the presence of 8 M urea ( ) and in the absence
`of urea (A). Curve 1 rep- resents the interaction of Trp-108 with GIu-35 with pAint = 6.9 and
`
`
`
`.\
`.-
`\1\1
`\\\L\‘\\“
` (UV-‘
`.\.
`‘
`l
`
`
`lysozyme and casein Abstract. The purpose of this research was to find the best experImental
`conditions for glycosylation of lysozyme and casein with dextran, and to investigate the effect
`of glycosylation on the functional properties of these proteins.
`
` r111)”
`
`p.
`5‘",
`
`Result Page:
`
`3 3 :3
`
`,3 3 3 :1: 3 3:3 ‘ Next
`
`paint and lysozyme
`
`1 Search
`
`
`Go to Google Home - About Google - About Google Scholar
`
`©2010 Google
`
`http ://scholar. google.com/scholar?start=0&q=paint+and+1ysozyme&h1=en&as_sdt=80000 . . .
`
`4/25/2010
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket