throbber
- Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 38
`Entered: August 3, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`NVIDIA CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICSCO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Cases!
`IPR2015-01062 (Patent 7,056,776 B2)
`IPR2015-01065 (Patent 6,147,385)
`IPR2015-01068 (Patent 7,804,734 B2)
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, BEVERLY M. BUNTING,and
`JON B. TORNQUIST,Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BUNTING,Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of Proceedings
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`' This Judgment addressesissues that are identical in each case. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Judgmentto befiled in each case. The
`parties are not authorizedto use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01062 (7,056,776 B2)
`IPR2015-01065 (6,147,385)
`IPR2015-01068 (7,804,734 B2)
`
`On July 14, 2016, NVIDIA Corporation and SamsungElectronics
`
`Co., Ltd. (collectively referred to as “the parties”) filed a joint motion to
`
`terminate each ofthese proceedings pursuant to a settlement agreement.
`Paper 30.* Theparties alsofiled true copies oftheir written Memorandum
`
`of Understanding Regarding Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1027) and
`
`Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1028), both made in connection with the
`
`termination of these proceedings, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and
`
`37 C.E.R. § 42.72. Additionally, the parties submitted a joint request to
`
`have both their Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Settlement
`
`Agreement, and Settlement Agreement, treated as confidential business
`information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).3- Paper 30.
`Theparties submit that termination is appropriate because the parties
`havesettled their dispute and have reached agreement to terminate these
`inter partes reviews. Paper 30, 1. The parties representthat this settlement
`agreement endsall disputes as to these patents betweenthe parties, including
`pending lawsuits and ITC investigations, which were either dismissed with
`
`prejudice or terminated. Jd.
`
`The Boardis not a party to the settlement, and may identify
`
`independently any question of patentability. 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(a).
`Generally, however, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after
`
`the filing of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`2 Paper and exhibit numbersrefer to IPR2015-01062.
`3 Wenote that certain documents contain confidential information. Pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56,the parties may file a motion to expungethis
`information. Such motion will be due within 10 business daysofthis
`Judgment, otherwise the documents will be made public in due course.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01062 (7,056,776 B2)
`IPR2015-01065 (6,147,385)
`IPR2015-01068 (7,804,734 B2)
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). Indeed, the parties
`
`jointly waived oral argumentand agreed notto file any further papers
`pertaining to the remaining due dates noted in the Scheduling Order. Paper
`
`28.
`
`Underthe circumstances, based on the record before us, we determine
`that it is appropriate to terminate each of these proceedings with respect to
`
`the parties, at this juncture, to promote efficiency and minimize unnecessary
`
`costs. Based onthe facts, it is appropriate to enter judgment terminating
`
`these proceedings without rendering a final written decision andtreat the
`Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Settlement Agreement (Ex.
`1027) and Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1028) as business confidential
`information. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C_F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74(c).
`
`ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing,it is
`ORDEREDthattheparties’ joint request that the Memorandum of
`Understanding Regarding Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1027) and Settlement
`Agreement (Ex. 1028) be treated as business confidential information under
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) and kept separate from the
`
`patent file, is GRANTED;
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe joint motions to terminate IPR20 15-
`
`01062, IPR2015-01065, and IPR2015-01068 are GRANTED;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat the parties are authorized to file a motion
`
`to expunge confidential information from the record within 10 daysofthis
`
`Judgment; and
`
`

`


`
`IPR2015-01062 (7,056,776 B2)
`IPR2015-01065 (6,147,385)
`IPR2015-01068 (7,804,734 B2)
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthese proceedings are TERMINATED.
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01062 (7,056,776 B2)
`IPR2015-01065 (6,147,385)
`IPR2015-01068 (7,804,734 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert Steinberg
`Julie Holloway
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`bob.steinberg@lw.com
`Julie.Holloway@lw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert A. Appleby
`Gregory S. Arovas
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`robert.appleby@kirkland.com
`greg. arovas@kirkland.com
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket