`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 081009—406855
`Filed Via EFS-Web
`
`Remarks
`
`Reconsideration of this application is respectfully requested. Upon entry of the
`
`foregoing reply, claims 6—35 and 41—132 are pending in the application, with claims 6, 41, 79,
`
`and 93 being the independent claims. Support for the above amendments to independent
`
`claims 6, 41, 79, and 93 can be found, for example, at paragraphs [0074], [0088] and [0120]
`
`of the specification as originally filed.
`
`Rejections under 35 U.S. C. § 103
`
`
`Claims 6 17-19 22 24-27 41 52-55 59-62 79-88 93-102 107-116 122-124 and
`
`
`129-132.
`
`The Examiner rejected claims 6, 17—19, 22, 24—27, 41, 52—55, 59-62, 79—88, 93—102,
`
`107—116, 122—124, and 129—132 under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,389,467 (Eyal) in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,987,621 (Duso et al.) and U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,938,021 (Shear et al.). Applicant respectfully traverses the Examiner’s rejection
`
`as follows.
`
`As indicated above, Applicant has amended claim 6 to recite, “limiting an amount of
`
`time for the requested media content to be completely viewed at the communication device
`
`and preventing the streaming of one or more of the media content segments to the
`
`communication device after the amount of time has passed.” Independent claims 41, 79, and
`
`93 have been similarly amended. Support for these amendments may be found throughout the
`
`application as originally filed, including paragraphs [0088] and [0120].
`
`Applicant submits that none of Eyal, Duso et al., or Shear et al., taken alone or in
`
`together, teaches or suggests the combinations recited in claims 6, 41, 79, and 93 as amended.
`
`For at least this reason, Applicant requests that the rejection of claims 6, 17—19, 22, 24—27, 41,
`
`52—55, 59—62, 79—88, 93—102, 107-116, 122-124, and 129-132 be withdrawn.
`
`
`Claims 7-14 16 42-49 51 118-121 and 125-128.
`
`The Examiner rejected claims 7—14, 16, 42—49, 51, 118—121, and 125—128 under pre—
`
`AlA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eyal in view of Duso et al. and Shear et al.
`
`717165652
`
`22
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 081009—406855
`Filed Via EFS-Web
`
`in further view of US. Patent No. 5,758,257 (Herz et al.). Applicant submits that Herz et al.
`
`fails to cure the deficiencies of Eyal, Duso et al., and Shear et al. as set forth above in regards
`
`to claims 6, 41, 79, and 93. Accordingly, Applicant requests that the rejection of claims 7—14,
`
`16,42-49, 51, 118-121, and 125-128 be Withdrawn.
`
`Claims 15 and 50.
`
`The Examiner rejected claims 15 and 50 under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Eyal in view of Duso et al. and Shear et al. in further view of US. Patent
`
`No. 5,933,811 (Angles et al.). Applicant submits that Angles et al. fails to cure the
`
`deficiencies of Eyal, Duso et al., and Shear et al. as set forth above in regards to claims 6, 41,
`
`79, and 93. Accordingly, Applicant requests that the rejection of claims 15 and 50 be
`
`Withdrawn.
`
`
`Claims 20 21 55 and 56.
`
`The Examiner rejected claims 20, 21, 55, and 56 under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as
`
`being unpatentable over Eyal in view of Duso et al. and Shear et al. in further view of US.
`
`Patent No. 6,654,807 (Farber et al.). Applicant submits that Farber et al. fails to cure the
`
`deficiencies of Eyal, Duso et al., and Shear et al. as set forth above in regards to claims 6, 41,
`
`79, and 93. Accordingly, Applicant requests that the rejection of claims 20, 21, 55, and 56 be
`
`Withdrawn.
`
`
`Claims 23 28—35 58 63—78 89—92 and 103—106.
`
`The Examiner rejected claims 23, 28—35, 58, 63—78, 89—92, and 103—106 under pre—
`
`AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eyal in view of Duso et al. and Shear et al.
`
`in further view of US. Patent No. 6,385,596 (Wiser et al.). Applicant submits that Wiser et
`
`al. fails to cure the deficiencies of Eyal, Duso et al., and Shear et al. as set forth above in
`
`regards to claims 6, 41, 79, and 93. Accordingly, Applicant requests that the rejection of
`
`claims 23, 28-35, 58, 63-78, 89-92, and 103-106 be Withdrawn.
`
`717165652
`
`23
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 081009—406855
`Filed Via EFS-Web
`
`Conclusion
`
`All reasons for patentability of the independent and dependent claims have not
`
`necessarily been discussed herein. No implication or construction should be made therefore.
`
`This is intended to be a complete response to the Office action dated June 20, 2019.
`
`Applicant has no further remarks with regard to any references cited by the Examiner
`
`and made of record, whether or not acted upon by the Examiner in the action’s rejections,
`
`even if specifically identified in the action or any other paper or written or verbal
`
`communication. No implication or construction should be drawn about any review of the
`
`same by Applicant or Applicant’s attorney.
`
`Applicant’s attorney welcomes the opportunity to discuss the case with the Examiner
`
`in the event that there are any questions or comments regarding the response or the
`
`application.
`
`The Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge any fees that may be required or
`
`credit any overpayment to Deposit Account 50—1662, referencing the docket number above.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`POLSINELLI PC
`
`/James M. Sti ek/
`
`James M. Stipek, Reg. No. 39,388
`900 w. 48‘h Place, Suite 900
`Kansas City, MO 64112
`Tel: (816) 360-4191
`
`Fax: (816) 753-1536
`
`Attorney for Applicant(s)
`
`717165652
`
`24
`
`
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site