`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313- 1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
` F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`11/680,452
`
`02/28/2007
`
`Chuck Jennings
`
`406855
`
`5285
`
`07/07/2010
`7590
`27148
`POLSINELLI SHUGHART PC
`700 W. 47TH STREET
`SUITE 1000
`KANSAS CITY, MO 64112-1802
`
`EXAMINER
`
`BLAIR, DOUGLAS B
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2442
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`07/07/2010
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`11/680,452
`
`JENNINGS ET AL.
`
`Examiner
`
`DOUGLAS B. BLAIR
`
`Art Unit
`
`2442 -
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`In no event however may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)IXI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 04 June 2010.
`
`2a)I:I This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)IZI This action is non-final.
`
`3)I:I Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under EX parte Quayle, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`4)IZI Claim(s) 1-70 is/are pending in the application.
`
`4a) Of the above claim(s) 1-5 and 36-40 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`
`5)I:I Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`6)IXI Claim(s) 6-35 and 41-70 is/are rejected.
`
`7)I:I Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`8)I:I Claim(s) _ are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`Application Papers
`
`9)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`
`10)I:I The drawing(s) filed on
`
`is/are: a)I:I accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`11)I:I The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152.
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)I:I Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)—(d) or (f).
`
`a)I:I All
`
`b)I:I Some * c)I:I None of:
`
`1.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`
`
`3.I:I Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`4) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date. _
`2) D Notice of Draftsperson‘s Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948)
`5) I:I Notice of Informal Patent Application
`3) IZI Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date 4/5/07 and 2/14/08. 6) D Other:
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 08-06)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20100630
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 11/680,452
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2442
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Election/Restrictions
`
`Applicant's election with traverse of claims 6-35 and 41-70 in the reply filed on 6/4/2010
`
`is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no burden on the examiner. This
`
`is not found persuasive because the applicant's traversal fails to address the substance of the
`
`claims themselves. Subclass searches are only one of many factors in a complete search and
`
`examination and the number of claims is totally irrelevant as it only takes one claim to define an
`
`entirely different invention.
`
`The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL.
`
`Claims 1-5 and 36-40 are withdrawn from filrther consideration pursuant to 37 CFR
`
`l.l42(b), as being drawn to a nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking
`
`claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on
`
`6/4/2010.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 1 01
`
`35 USC. 101 reads as follows:
`
`Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or
`any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and
`requirements of this title.
`
`Claims 6-21, 24-35, and 41-70 are rejected under 35 USC. 101 because the claimed
`
`invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter.
`
`Claims 6-2l and 24-35 are rejected under 35 USC. 101 as not falling within one of the
`
`four statutory categories of invention. While the claims recite a series of steps or acts to be
`
`performed, a statutory “process” under 35 USC. 101 must (1) be tied to particular machine, or
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 11/680,452
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2442
`
`(2) transform underlying subject matter (such as an article or material) to a different state or
`
`thing. See page 10 of In Re Bilski 88 USPQ2d 1385. The instant claims are neither positively
`
`tied to a particular machine that accomplishes the claimed method steps nor transform
`
`underlying subject matter, and therefore do not qualify as a statutory process. The claimed
`
`method including steps of generating, determining, assigning is broad enough that the claim
`
`could be completely performed mentally, verbally or without a machine nor is any
`
`transformation apparent. For example, a person could perform all of these steps without any
`
`machine by a person at a video store manually checking if DVD's are physically available and
`
`able to be reserved. Claims 22 and 23 were not included because a transmission would require
`
`some sort of machine in order to be carried out.
`
`Claims 41-62 are directed towards a system comprising a presentation creator and a
`
`reservation generator. Claims 63-69 further comprise a service order system. Claim 70 fithher
`
`comprises a financial screener. None of these elements which comprise the claimed system are
`
`explicitly disclosed as being hardware elements. Therefore claims 41-70 are broad enough to
`
`cover software per se. Software per se does not fit into any of the statutory categories of
`
`invention.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 1 02
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 USC. 102 that form the
`
`basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless ,
`
`(e) the invention was described in (1) an application for patent, published under section 122(b), by another filed
`in the United States before the invention by the applicant for patent or (2) a patent granted on an application for
`patent by another filed in the United States before the invention by the applicant for patent, except that an
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 11/680,452
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2442
`
`international application filed under the treaty defined in section 351(a) shall have the effects for purposes of this
`subsection of an application filed in the United States only if the international application designated the United
`States and was published under Article 21(2) of such treaty in the English language.
`
`Claims 6, 17-23, 35, 41, 52-58, and 70 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being
`
`anticipated by US. Patent Number 6,385,596 to Wiser et a1.
`
`As to claim 6, Wiser teaches a method for reserving media for a request from a viewer
`
`(col. 16, lines 31-43) comprising: generating a presentation for at least one media based on a
`
`program identifying the at least one media, the program comprising at least one media reference
`
`identifying the at least one media and an order having at least one order component, the at least
`
`one media corresponding to at least a portion of the request (col. 17, lines 36-52); determining if
`
`a system resource is available to stream the presentation and, if so, creating a reservation for the
`
`presentation (col. 16, line 61-001. 17, line 21); and assigning a reservation identification to the
`
`reservation (col. 17, lines 22-35).
`
`As to claim 17, Wiser teaches tracking the reservation identification for the reservation
`
`(col. 17, lines 36-52).
`
`As to claim 18, Wiser teaches processing the presentation and the request to determine if
`
`the system resource is available (col. 16, line 61-col. 17, line 21).
`
`As to claim 19, the delivery server reads on the claimed system resource.
`
`As to claims 20 and 21, see col. 14, line 61-001. 15, line 23.
`
`As to claim 22, the content manager reads on the routing processor.
`
`As to claim 23, See col. 16, line 67-001. 17, line 35.
`
`As to claim 35 See col. 16, lines 44-60.
`
`As to claims 41, 52-58 and 70, they are rejected for the same reasoning as claims 6, 17-23
`
`and 35.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 11/680,452
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2442
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 1 03
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 USC. 103(a) which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in
`section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are
`such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person
`having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the
`manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 7-16, 24-34, 42-51, and 59-69 are rejected under 35 USC. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over US. Patent Number 6,385,596 to Wiser et al. in view of US. Patent
`
`Application Publication Number 2002/0078444 by Krewin et al.
`
`As to claim 7, Wiser teaches the method of claim 6; however Wiser does not explicitly
`
`teach the use of a viewer profile used to select other media as claimed in claim 7.
`
`Krewin shows that the concept of using a viewer profile to dynamically select another
`
`media for presentation to viewers is an obvious concept (paragraphs 27-32).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the Computer networking art at the
`
`time of the invention to combine the teachings of Wiser regarding reserving media with the
`
`teachings of Krewin regarding using a viewer profile because such a system would not require
`
`any changed in how Wiser operates to be implemented with Wiser and would provide viewers
`
`with potentially useful supplemental information.
`
`As to claims 8-14, see paragraphs 27-73 of Krewin.
`
`As to claims 15 and 16, see paragraphs 27-73 of Krewin.
`
`In claims 15, 16, 24, and 28 Wiser and Krewin are combined for the same reasoning as
`
`explained in the rejection of claim 7.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 11/680,452
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2442
`
`As to claims 24-36 and 28-34, see paragraphs 27-73 of Krewin.
`
`As to claim 27, see col. 14, lines 40-47 of Wiser.
`
`As to claims 42-51 and 59-69, they are rejected for the same reasoning as claims 7-16
`
`and 24-34.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS B. BLAIR Whose telephone number is (571)272-
`
`3893. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00am-5:30pm.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Philip Lee can be reached on (571) 272-3967. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR
`
`system, see http://pair-direct.uspto. gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR
`
`system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would
`
`like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated
`
`information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/Douglas B Blair/
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 11/680,452
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 2442
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2442
`
`
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site